A Few Notes on Matt Cassel's Contract with the Chiefs
Michael Lombardi of the NFL Network and of the National Football Post reported on April 25th that Matt Cassel and the Kansas City Chiefs had agreed to a long-term contract, in principle, that would pay the quarterback $36 million in guaranteed money over six years. The timing was curious as it broke about an hour and a half before the start of the NFL draft.
Later that day the report was refuted by multiple sources including Peter King of Sports Illustrated, Matt Cassel (via Tom Curran of NBC Sports), GM Scott Pioli, and Adam Teicher of the Kansas City Star. The denials were quick and without much comment other than "The deal's not done."
That's not to say a deal still hasn't been reached in principle. Lombardi first broke the news that the Atlanta Falcons were "seriously considering" making a run at Tony Gonalez and he was the first (as far as I can tell) to report that the Chiefs were "in love" with Tyson Jackson.
We all know how those reports ended up. So, the report of Cassel's contract was especially intriguing to me considering Lombardi's recent track record with Chiefs' news. Lombardi was nice enough to answer a few questions I had for him regarding the Cassel contract and the Gonzalez trade.
When do you expect the Chiefs to finalize and announce the Cassel contract?
My source told me that they had agreed and had to work out some details. In the spirit of their denial it might take a few more weeks to announce the deal. But unless my very good source is wrong then I suspect it gets announced in June.
I asked him a few more questions that are after the jump.
Yes, they had talks and in spite of their denials, they were talking to all the teams. But the Falcons seemed to be the team willing to pay a second rounder and as I reported, once a second rounder came on the table, regardless of year, it sealed the deal. When they denied the talks, it made no sense but that is what they do. Secrecy is at an all time high in KC right now.
I've heard an interesting rumor on the Jackson pick at #3 and where he was projected as the draft process went on. The rumor goes that the New England Patriots were enamored with him after the season and into January and wanted to take him at #23 (where he was projected early in the draft process). Then Josh McDaniels went to the Denver Broncos at which point people started pegging him at #12. Then Pioli, obviously a former Patriots guy, began to consider him at #3.
I am not sure of the Patriots level of interest in Jackson at any time in the process.
The value of the defensive line far outweighed the value of the a non pass rushing linebacker position-hence the reason for the pick. Had Curry been a rusher on 3rd down and excelled in that area, then he would have been the pick, but absent the rushing skills, he was not as valuable.
I really believe that had Jason Smith been there, they would have picked him.
However, when picking in the top ten of the draft, you have to draft a position that is never available in the free agent market. I know they tried to trade down, but they had no takers and the only reason the Browns could pull it off was the Jets had players the Browns wanted.
Lombardi's assertion that talks did indeed occur between the Chiefs and Falcons prior to Pioli's denial is interesting. He's not breaking any news here by saying secrecy is at an all time high in Kansas City, but it's interesting to note that Pioli flat-out denied that an agreement was in place. But enough about the Gonzalez trade. We've covered it ad naeseum around here.
1 recs |
20 comments
|
Comments
Why didn't we just grab Sanchez and trade him?
It it is obvious that teams want and need a player like Sanchez, why didn’t we just draft him and then trade him to the Jets? Just a thought. But no one ever does this so I am sure that there is some kind of reasoning as to why teams don’t do this.
by jono of saintkarla on May 4, 2009 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
because
you dont want to be stuck with a player if the other team decides nevermind and then u still have to give up what you would have with the moving up or even more sometimes so its not worth it
by PSUkegreen on May 4, 2009 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once we draft Sanchez
His value plummets because everyone knows the Chiefs don’t want/need him.
by Joel Thorman on May 4, 2009 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's only "obvious" because of hindsight.
I wouldn’t have predicted the Jets making that big of a move quickly.
You think it's coincidence that I bleed red?
by Mully on May 4, 2009 1:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts...
Pioli wanted to trade down, but didn’t want to trade below the 10 spot…Tyson Jackson was the player that he wanted, and he didn’t want to drop out of getting him. Trading with the Jets would not of allowed us to have our cake and eat it too.
(I agree with everything everyone else has said too, but this was another aspect of not trading with the Jets)
by ravenhawk on May 4, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree,
I think when it came down to it the deal got done because of Mangini’s willingness to take some his old players as part of the compensation. The Jets didn’t want to give up their whole draft for Sanchez, only Mangini would take players inlew of more draft picks.
I do not snort the coke I only smoke...sensimilla.
by HIV 2 Elway on May 4, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To much uncertainty after you have Sanchez
Initially I liked the idea of drafting Sanchez and hoping to score big in a trade BUT….If we had drafted Sanchez the problem would have been very similar to the problem New England faced with Cassel. Recall the NE fan base and bloggers were giddy with all the hope of getting multiple high round draft pics for Cassel. The problem is timing and competition. Unless were willing to hold out and take next year pics the trade would have had to get done in a 20 to 40 minute time frame. Teams know they can wait you out and force you to consider going into the season with 2 high dollar quarterbacks (Cassel and Sanchez). Not a very pleasent prospect.
by BigRedCadillac on May 4, 2009 2:08 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
PT nice work!
I feel like I should FanShot this primary information …
by Keyser Sose on May 4, 2009 1:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Cassel
He is the best tackler I have seen since Joe Montanyah!
....I'm drinkin hot tee b!tch, feel me.
by Undaunted_Fish on May 4, 2009 1:27 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
"Joe Montana was a quarterback you idiot"
Love that movie.
by Vince D on May 4, 2009 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe its just the slowness of the offseason..
But I’m getting really tired of all this secrecy. I can understand keeping it private when we are interested in a free agent, or not broadcasting who we want to pick in the draft, but Pioli’s “Don’t say anything about anyone and everything” is getting really annoying.
I’d like some more news please.
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on May 4, 2009 1:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Personally....I don't mind
Its almost exciting to me……big plot if Pioli & Haley along with Clark have some substance behind the secrecy. Personally I would much rather know absolutely nothing about what is going on and have a decent/good team than know everything thats going on and have to suffer through another season like last year.
by Zimmy on May 4, 2009 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah.
I don’t really want to know anything. It just seems like they are being secretive just for the sake of being secretive.
When it is in the best interests of the chiefs to not say anything fine, but don’t do it just to torture us (and the media)
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on May 4, 2009 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm all for it
there is no upside to sharing information (except making the AP bloggers life easier). Hunt has landed hopefully one of the best GM’s in the game, so lets sit back, let him to do his job, and reap the benifits come Sept.
by BeijingKCfan on May 4, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why is it that so many reporters get the news on the Chiefs wrong?
I guess Pioli knows a little bit about keeping his cards close to his vest.
But Dude, theres so much misinformation thats just creating mass confusion.
People are just looking for sensational headlines without the facts to back up their claims, and are losing credibility with every false claim.
Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.
by aPacificChief on May 4, 2009 2:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
But don't you think...
Why announce the Cassel deal 1.5 hours prior to draft. It’s part of hiding the cards. Keep other team’s guessing. Was it likely that we’d draft Sanchez? No….but for sure NO with the signing.
by KC Chiefs Fan in MN on May 4, 2009 2:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think we'd be fooling anyone.
You don’t trade for a franschised QB only to draft one at #3 that will demand even more money. I think every other team would have called that bluff.
I do not snort the coke I only smoke...sensimilla.
by HIV 2 Elway on May 4, 2009 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















