Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

The Chiefs Selection of DE Tyson Jackson was the First of Many Day One Surprises

45043_nfl_draft_football

More photos » by Jason DeCrow - AP

Wake Forest's Aaron Curry, who was selected as the fourth overall pick by the Seattle Seahawks during the first round of the NFL Draft, holds up a jersey with NFL commissioner Roger Godell, at Radio City Music Hall, on Saturday, April 25, 2009, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)

So did this draft blow up mock drafts forever or what? People will be saying for a long time in the mock draft universe, "Remember 2009?"

While the first two picks of the draft went as expected, with Detroit taking QB Matthew Stafford and the Rams taking OT Jason Smith, the Kansas City Chiefs put the first of many spins on this draft when they selected LSU DE Tyson Jackson.

Rumors of the Chiefs' preference for Jackson had spiked late before the draft but I don't know how many peopel took them that seriously. I know I didn't. Jackson was a mid to late round prospect by most people's draft boards.

40% of you approved of the Chiefs' selection of Jackson. 36% didn't approve and 22% weren't sure. I suspect, judging from recent comments on here, that the approval rating would shoot up a bit if we re-cast those votes.

The selection of Jackson, while a "reach" by most accounts, had Scott Pioli written all over it. This draft is very weak on defensive ends and Jackson was Pioli's #1 guy, mock drafts and experts be damned.If we trust Pioli, or we at least want to to give him a chance, we need to see if Tyson Jackson develops into a special player.

As far as what we can expect from Jackson in Kansas City, Scott Pioli drew comparisons from another player, Cowboys' defensive tackle Russell Maryland. He was selected #1 overall by the Cowboys in a rare trade up from #4 in the 1991 NFL draft. Pioli had this to say today about Maryland and his defensive role:

I remember Coach Johnson a long time ago in conversations Bill and I had had with him and in separate conversations about Russell Maryland. That year they were due to pick the fourth spot overall and they traded up from four to one to get Russell Maryland, a player who played in the league for 10 years, had only 24 and a half sacks over the course of his career and only went to one Pro Bowl. But Coach Johnson talked about the importance of Russell Maryland – again, different positions – how he allowed him to play the defense they wanted to play and what an important component he was even though he didn’t rack up sacks or only went to one Pro Bowl. What he was as a player in a very key position allowed the defense to be what the defense was.

I think we'll have to be patient with Tyson Jackson and not expect a huge impact from him, at least initially. Remember Chiefs fans...The Right 53.

Here's what Mocking the Draft had to say about Jackson:

6’4, 295 pounds | Defensive end | Louisiana State

Strengths: Jackson is a big, powerful defensive end who specializes in stopping the run. Could easily play as a three-technique tackle in a 4-3 or a five-technique end in a 3-4. Has played both at LSU, so he has some versatility. Has the strength to shed blocks quickly and get into the backfield. Better as a pass rusher on the inside. Does a really nice job getting his hands up to bat down passes. Knows how to play off the cut block nicely.

Weaknesses: Doesn’t have great athleticism or speed. A little slow off the line of scrimmage. Doesn’t close very quickly. Needs to be coached up in his pass rush moves. Really only uses his strength to get to a quarterback. Comes out of his stance too high, which allows blockers to control his frame. Not asked to stunt a lot, which is puzzling.

Final word: A versatile player who could help a team looking for a run-stopping end, especially one that runs a 3-4 defense. Very similar to Chris Canty of the Cowboys. Jackson improved his play as a senior, improving across the board statistically. But that still leaves a disappointing junior season in question, particularly since he lined up next to Glen Dorsey. A second-team all-conference player as a senior.

We'll have more on Jackson tomorrow morning, after we sober rest up. The draft is just now ending at 9 PM, which means for those that starting boozing at pick #1, Al Davis is probably making sense to you by now.

Speaking of Al Davis, I just want to link to DJ's FanPost about the ridiculousness that is the Oakland Raider's franchise. This is honestly the first time I've felt bad for Raiders fans. I mean, I always felt bad for them in a rivalry sort of way but man, Darrius Heyward-Bey at #7 overall? How do you reconcile that with your fandom? Then picking a safety that ESPN doesn't even have film on? I know one thing. I don't feel depressed about Tyson Jackson. In fact, I'm quite excited.

Thoughts on a bizarro world first day of the 2009 NFL Draft? We'll be posting more tonight I'm sure and we'll be back early tomorrow morning with more draft coverage.

Remember, rounds 3-7 start tomorrow at 9 AM central time. The full results of the first two rounds are after the jump.

Star-divide

Round 1

Round 2

Player Pos. Team Player Pos. Team
1 Matthew Stafford QB Lions 1 Louis Delmas S Lions
2 Jason Smith OT Rams 2 Patrick Chung S Patriots
3 Tyson Jackson DE Chiefs 3 James Laurinaitis ILB Rams
4 Aaron Curry OLB Seahawks 4 Brian Robiskie WR Browns
5 Mark Sanchez QB Jets 5 Alphonso Smith DB Broncos
6 Andre Smith OT Bengals 6 Rey Maualuga ILB Bengals
7 Darrius Heyward-Bey WR Raiders 7 Eben Britton OT Jaguars
8 Eugene Monroe OT Jaguars 8 Ron Brace DT Patriots
9 B.J. Raji DT Packers 9 Darius Butler DB Patriots
10 Michael Crabtree WR 49ers 10 Jairus Byrd DB Bills
11 Aaron Maybin DE Bills 11 Everette Brown DE Panthers
12 Knowshon Moreno RB Broncos 12 Pat White WR Dolphins
13 Brian Orakpo DE Redskins 13 Clint Sintim OLB Giants
14 Malcolm Jenkins DB Saints 14 Connor Barwin DE Texans
15 Brian Cushing OLB Texans 15 Michael Mitchell DB Raiders
16 Larry English DE Chargers 16 Darcel McBath S Broncos
17 Josh Freeman QB Buccaneers 17 Max Unger C Seahawks
18 Robert Ayers DE Broncos 18 Mohamed Massaquoi WR Browns
19 Jeremy Maclin WR Eagles 19 Andrew Levitre OG Bills
20 Brandon Pettigrew TE Lions 20 David Veikune DE Browns
21 Alex Mack C Browns 21 LeSean McCoy RB Eagles
22 Percy Harvin WR Vikings 22 Phil Loadholt OT Vikings
23 Michael Oher OT Ravens 23 William Moore S Falcons
24 Peria Jerry DT Falcons 24 Fili Moala DT Colts
25 Vontae Davis DB Dolphins 25 Paul Kruger OLB Ravens
26 Clay Matthews OLB Packers 26 Sebastian Vollmer OT Patriots
27 Donald Brown RB Colts 27 Sherrod Martin DB Panthers
28 Eric Wood C Bills 28 William Beatty OT Giants
29 Hakeem Nicks WR Giants 29 Sean Smith DB Dolphins
30 Kenny Britt WR Titans 30 Sen'Derrick Marks DT Titans
31 Chris Wells RB Cardinals 31 Cody Brown OLB Cardinals
32 Evander Hood DT Steelers 32 Richard Quinn TE Broncos

0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

So ...

Who’re we taking at #35 tomorrow … ?

by JacinB on Apr 25, 2009 9:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Er ...

#67, I mean. Been a long day.

by JacinB on Apr 25, 2009 9:34 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't know but we've got plenty of great options.

I just researched them all and my eyes are going funny.

by WesternChief on Apr 25, 2009 10:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I haven't done my research this year.

Who’s left on Offensive Right Tackle? We need someone to take over for Sackintosh.

And someone who can come in and start as a 2nd Wide Receiver wouldn’t hurt either.

by JacinB on Apr 25, 2009 10:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jackson

It was interesting to look back at some Glenn Dorsey highlight tape and see how much Jackson actually allowed him to do what he did at LSU. Many of the sacks Jackson was right there and a TON of the tackles for loss Jackson was moving laterally along the line as a “safety” type play allowing Dorsey to push through and try for the all out penetration and Jackson would sit back and tackle if Dorsey over pursued. I think they along with Tyler are gonna surprise alot of people with their effectiveness. Was it a “sexy” pick? No. But neither was Seymour who is the main reason those linebackers at NE have the great stats that they do. I bet Vrabel was cheering the pick.

by fixitquick79 on Apr 25, 2009 9:51 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

right on

im gonna go back and look at Dorseys highlights with Jackson

by SayHeyWerd on Apr 25, 2009 9:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Something else to consider.

Tank is going to be bulking up for the NT position. I looked back at his measurables and the guy is a freaking monster. He really has the potential to wow us next year.

Also when you look at the highlight tape remember that it was his junior year. In the scouting report it mentions that his stats significantly improved his senior year. If he is progress from what I’ve seen in those tapes I’m very pleased.

Also everyone that was upset about not grabbing curry. The linebackers group isn’t the biggest need on the defense right now. You build a defense from the line up and we were all worried about our defensive line with the 4-3 under/3-4 scheme. We also have some veterans who will be great stop gap players and allow us to develop one of our 3/4 LB pick ups. Linebacker is a very blue collar position. Like I mentioned earlier today, look at James Harrison. He was defensive player of the year and he wasn’t even drafted.

I think we are in a great position to have a solid defense next year, and if they could get a another offensive line pickup tomorrow and maybe a big Jerome bettis power back, we will be on the right track.

"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"

by Jux on Apr 25, 2009 10:50 PM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

Exellent comment Jux

just keep matriculating the ball down the field !

by SoCalChief on Apr 26, 2009 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, great point Jux.

Nice to hear from someone with something positive to say…. I completely agree with you on Tank. I think he’ll surprise.

by Keyser Sose on Apr 26, 2009 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will be watching him a lot next year.

He really has the frame to support Casey Hampton size. Let his big ass take up 3 blocks while Jackson and Dorsey shred the tackles.

"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"

by Jux on Apr 26, 2009 1:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did anyone catch ont he NFL Network when Curry said

when asked how he feels abotu going to Seattle, he said he would ahve been just as excited to go to KC? i found that slightly comical

by SayHeyWerd on Apr 25, 2009 9:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

They are gonna pick me

I am the sackmaster!:)

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Apr 25, 2009 9:52 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Dorsey trade coming tomorrow?

I was wondering if we might get a pick tomorrow, and a pick or two in next years draft? Many believe Dorsey will not work in the 3-4, why not get multiple picks for him?

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Apr 25, 2009 9:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

highly doubt it

Why would you trade him for a 3rd rounder or less + picks? He was a top 5 player and still has the talent.

by Nelly on Apr 25, 2009 9:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you

pick up early round picks next year, why not? We really do not have much trade ammo for this year. If he will not fit this scheme, let him go where he can be used.

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Apr 25, 2009 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are correct.

Check out Haley’s ESPN interview and it sounds like they plan on keeping Dorsey.

by WesternChief on Apr 25, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

We really want dorsey and Jackson together.

They will tear it up.

"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"

by Jux on Apr 25, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

the Dorsey trade would have definitely happened on the first day. No way he is traded for anything less than a first rounder.

by KCMizzou on Apr 26, 2009 8:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

trading Dorsey would be "not bright"

Dorsey and Jackson with Tank will be an awesome frontline
Now where do we find a Jack Backer?

you don't have to win and you don't need to fight. Supertramp

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 25, 2009 10:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He has an uncurable sickness, may not be too effective.

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Apr 25, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Keep Dorsey

I could see a bright future for those three. Dorsey and Jackson back together might turn out well. Tyson was a good pick, 3-4 linebackers cant play without those three so I approve of the pick. Go Chiefs

by tdbowe on Apr 25, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why did Peppers not sign the tender if he couldn't be traded without signing?

Or will he survey the landscape after draft and see who was plaing liars poker.
Sign the tender and specify a few teams and get traded for a 2nd rd pick :)
to a team with some CAP room and needing a Jack Backer.

you don't have to win and you don't need to fight. Supertramp

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 25, 2009 10:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

Lol

Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!

by Buck'O on Apr 25, 2009 10:52 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jack Backer

I say we have one in DJ. That is what he did best in college, that is play on the offensive backfield with sacks and TFLs. Our last DC just didn’t use him right. For some legit reasons though. He was the only reliable LB we had so we had to use him to try and hold the others together and a Predator/Jack is more the lone wolf type guy who lets the defensive line open a lane and he shoots it to the runner/QB. I think this may be DJ’s best year.

by fixitquick79 on Apr 25, 2009 10:11 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

So we need a Will starter

and Mike and Sam backups
in a strong LB draft. actually the coachable backups might be 7th’s or UDFA’s
Grab a RT and Guard candidate and someone Haley can coach up at WR besides Webb.

you don't have to win and you don't need to fight. Supertramp

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 25, 2009 10:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hopefully the 3 years of training will allow for a quick move to Jack :)

you don't have to win and you don't need to fight. Supertramp

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 25, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

all i have to say man is hooooly fuuuucking moses

Oh my god tyson jackson . I can honestly say I have had piolis back this entire time telling others to relax but i swear the wind went out of my sails when they annouced tyson jackson i could see if we had nabbed igor or some 3-4 guys in free agency . But tyson jackson ? oh man I almost was about to take a flight. All i could say is dorsey is out of a job hali is really out of a job mcbride may still have a chance but jees we went from a bad D to the worst D with they tyson jackson announcement . We have no players to pull this off im scared guys really scared.

FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.

by sexassassin on Apr 25, 2009 10:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

It is what it is. If no one wanted to trade up to #3,

which seems more obvious in hindsight, then we made the only move that made sense to build this team the way Pioli wants it. Tyson Jackson definitely seems like a stretch to me, and in most draft classes would have gone mid to late first. But we had absolutely no true 3-4 (and questionable 4-3 ends) on the roster, so this was by far the greatest need, and Pioli realized there wouldn’t be starter material at the position sitting there when we pick in the 3rd.

But I have to say, what a let down emotionally. I felt like Scott would somehow pull a magic trick trade that just wasn’t possible. After the surprising Cassel/Vrabel trade I would have thought he could pull off anything. I am sure it wasn’t for a lack of trying, he was probably just playing the hand he was dealt. Herm had already jettisoned most of the valuable cargo this ship had, and our #3 pick had no trade value to anyone. What are the chances of that? We would have been better off picking #12 this year if we wanted to trade down. I was really looking forward to seeing all of the moves that we were going to make, and it just didn’t happen.

But I am very optimistic about what is going to happen tomorrow. Here is where Pioli will earn his paycheck, and hopefully he will find some gems. There is still some talented players out there, including quite a few in the tight end group. I like Shawn Nelson if we go that route. Shonn Greene is very talented and could replace LJ if we let him go. There is still some wide receivers like Brandon Tate. But I suspect we would look at Michael Johnson or Jasper Brinkley to build our D. Both could find a starter’s position on our team.

Sorry to ramble. I missed all of the draft posts and I had to unload on you guys! Tomorrow will be interesting if nothing else!

by TheQ on Apr 25, 2009 10:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't really agree with your picks

I see the disappointment of you and Sex but you can’t trade if if you don’t have a partner.
Apparently the Chiefs tried to trade #3 and a 4th for Detroits # 20 and 2nd rndr.
The value chart indicated a +800 value to Detroit and they declined.
We had to pick someone and Jackson teamed with Dorsey was fearsome at LSU.
As Far as Sunday I think that the Chiefs would be serverd best with grabbing
A. Duke Robinson OG
B. Herman Johnson OG or possibly at 385 lbs RT
C. Darry Beckwith MLB
and before someone blows me up no I’m not and LSU Tiger but a MU one.
Round 4
A. Tupou RT
B. Joseph MLB
These are all rated 4 star players by Scouts

you don't have to win and you don't need to fight. Supertramp

by Steve_Chiefs on Apr 25, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was kinda what I was saying about trading, it just wasn't an option

Not sure if they would consider taking a TE, but with 3 interesting options (Nelson, Cook, and Rice) still sitting out there, it is intriquing. Perhaps they like Cottam, but I mentioned it because Tony is gone, and in most years, there isn’t the quality of TEs sitting there still. I do agree with you that we should look to improve the O line, and sometimes I feel like I am the only one who likes Duke Robinson. I am surprised he is still out there, while I am unsure on Herman Johnson. He could be great, or his huge size might keep him from moving his feet adequately at the pro level. Not sure. Beckwith would be a nice p/u perhaps even in the 4th round, and I really like Tupou. I forgot about him as well. He could play multiple O line positions for us. Another guy I forgot about is T.J. Lane. He would be a nice pick up, but I don’t think he will last past the 3rd round.

by TheQ on Apr 25, 2009 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What happen to dealing that 2010 2nd rounder?

Kept waiting for a move with all of the talent setting there. I guess Bill was the big man on campus in New England. I hope Sunday is a better day, because I’m not impressed with the last couple.

by Helmets on Apr 25, 2009 11:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

And this is supposed to make me happy?
a player who played in the league for 10 years, had only 24 and a half sacks over the course of his career and only went to one Pro Bowl

If that is the kind of production we are hoping to get out of Jackson then we seriously missed. I know, I know he will make the others play better blah blah. Before the draft most people were saying ‘you only select impact players in the top 5 so we can’t select a 3 down LB that can do everything.’ So where is the outcry for a guy who we hope gives us 2.4 sacks a year? I just can’t get behind this pick, I am sorry but there were many better choices at that point in the draft. Even at 3 we could have taken Monroe, Crabtree, Curry, Raji or a handful of other players that will have a bigger impact than Jackson.

by tevans96 on Apr 25, 2009 11:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wow.

Way to miss the entire point of the article. I could take one line out of context in any article and make it look bad. Impact player does not necessarily mean he has high stats. What it means is he impacts your TEAM. Richard Seymour is an impact player for the Pats but he does not have high personal stats. Think of it like a great left tackle. He will not show up in stat sheets like a WR or RB but he will impact the play of your entire offense. A ton of people are down on this pick but would not be angry if you got a LT because “he helps our offense” It is exactly the same with a D lineman not sexy but he helps your entire D move up a few spots in the ranking.

by fixitquick79 on Apr 26, 2009 2:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll say it again:

In the end, a good draft is about getting the best value available. BPA’s got weaknesses, and so does filling a need. The one can get you a player you can’t use to good effect, the other can make you look silly by overpaying for the talent you drafted. Both can blind you defects if you get your mind locked into a mindset – look at Al and his “Gimme the fastest WR on the board in the first” (or whatever the hell he’s allegedly thinking) groove.

Pioli might be wrong – as can anyone – but from what’s coming to light, Jackson’s been drafted as a good fit, and a step in the new direction that Pioli & Co. want to take the team. That shows that SP’s not just a stats & scouts guy. He’s thining about the bigger picture. I find that datum comforting, even if Jackson busts, or takes time to develop, or the D takes time to jell.

It looks to me like SP’s not working a system, which is good. You know what casinos say to people with systems? “Welcome! We hope you’ll stay here for a long time!” I don’t know Jackson from Adam, but: He wasn’t hyped, he wasn’t foreshadowed by the Chiefs, he’s got a history with a player on the roster, and he appears to be a good fit for the 3-4 system they want to implement.

Like I said, he may have made a mistake, but don’t despair fellow Chiefs fans. Pioli’s draft of this guy shows that he’s doing more than tweaking spreadsheets – he’s /thinking/ about who he wants, why he wants him, and how he’ll use him. things could be worse.

Cassel vs. Thigpen in Camp should improve the play of both.
Next on the need list: linebacker, and both lines

by Bleedingredandgold on Apr 25, 2009 11:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If we get a good pass rusher

I am not sure at this point what OLB pass rushers are still available but if we find someone who can really take advantage of Jackson being in front of him I might be willing to change my mind about Jackson. But we better have over 35 sacks next year as a team or this is a fail. Since Jackson is not a pass rusher anyway and he is supposed to make the entire D better then we better see a lot more sacks.

by tevans96 on Apr 25, 2009 11:44 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

That's an incredibly unfair point of view

Tyson Jackson is, in my humble opinion, the best individual 1st round pick we’ve made in the last 10 years. I’ve been projecting this pick (also had Bey going to Oakland since the Combine, irrelevant but it’s been a long day of sports and I’m elated with how my picks matched up with the real world picks) for the last few weeks and it makes a lot of sense for us. We would have arguably gotten just as little/much sack production from Curry as TJ except that TJ fills a position of immediate need and one that is harder to acquire than 3-4 ILB (of which we have at least 3 on the roster already, if not 5-6).

Jackson was drafted with the expectation that he will be able to dominate the left end of the OL allowing his future, and former, teammate Dorsey to play over the LG and wreak havoc in the backfield, something he’s infinitely better suited for than soaking double teams. That also allows Pendergast to create some entertaining mismatches by lining guys like Pollard up at ILB or Hali at ROLB that would be given a great line into the backfield. Look for Dorsey, Hali, and Pollard to boost their sack numbers noticeably this season as a direct result of taking Ty and the mismatches he’ll be forcing across the DL.

Obviously there’s no guarantee that any player drafted will pan out but if TJ lives up to expectations (and I’m betting he will) he could be the Richard Seymour of our defense (forcing teams to pass against what I think is one of the more talented, if still slightly raw, ball-hawking secondaries in the AFC) and the cornerstone for the new Pioli/Haley Regime in KC.

Bask in the glory that is Kwame Harris. Poor Alex...

by JHWK on Apr 26, 2009 4:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Way too much

overreacting going on here. People need to sit back and realize, with our first 2 picks of the draft, we picked up the top rated 3-4 DE on the board. Probably our biggest need with switching to a 3-4. Then with our 2nd round pick, we got Matt Cassel, the off seasons most sought after quarterback, and presumed the bets to hit free agency in years (before the jay cutler fiasco), and Mike Vrabel, an experienced linebacker to help our young guys the next couple years. Thats a hell of a 2nd round pick.

As for trading down from #3, obviously teams had good information that they didnt need to go that far to get Sanchez, because they didnt. There wasnt any other giant need for anyone to trade down that far for, pretty much our only hope was someone trying to get Sanchez, it didnt work out.

Overall, I rate day 1 as a good day for the Chiefs, im happy with getting the best player at the position we needed most.

by cawksrawks on Apr 26, 2009 12:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Hey guys

In Pioli We Trust

by whodachefs? on Apr 26, 2009 12:33 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Michael Mitchell-NEWS ...

Michael Mitchell-NEWS …
What the fuck is he doing?
Here:Michael Mitchell

by grag on Apr 26, 2009 4:23 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Slow off the line?

Seriously? Jackson shoots off the line quick as hell in everything I’ve seen. The problem seemed to me that he hadn’t difficulty making moves off that jump and sometimes got to deep. I think the guy is pretty damn quick for a big guy.

by KCMizzou on Apr 26, 2009 8:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Also looking over...

the fact that Jackson will be using all those 4-3 moves he used in college vs much less athletic guard in a 3-4 scheme rather than the tackle. Most likely Dorsey gets moved to right DE where he’ll be playing the gap. He’ll be way more comfortable there than last year lining up over the guard. Then you have Tank Tyler rounding out the middle.

The pick itself is not the most exciting one, but it makes me a lot more excited about our overall defense.

by GSpaulding on Apr 26, 2009 9:00 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Plainview_small
Talk Steelers with BTSC
Chiefs_pic_small
A little love for the Kool Aid drinkers (-!
Kool_aid_man_small
The Kool Aid Drinker’s Manifesto on the Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

Images2_small
Danario Alexander, 5th round Pick?
Pollard_small
Chiefs Scout Oregon at Arizona
041_small
5 ways the Chiefs get a win this Sunday
Small
Time To Go To The War Room
Turtle_article_small
AP Power Rankings Week 11; You Could Make It At Receiver For The Chiefs Edition
Us_on_thanksgiving_08_small
Beyond this season...
Fama150_small
TGIF Prediction Poll - Kansas City vs Pittsburgh Steelers
Small
Arrowhead Pride's name sealed in ..... brass?
Kool_aid_man_small
Log Jam at the Bottom
Itsgood2_small
Thursday Night Football Open Thread

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Managers

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris Thorman

Tg_small Joel Thorman

Editors

N505381175_257425_5488_small Matt Conner

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Small Jon Yoon