Report: Lions Complete Contract with Curry; Waiting to Do the Same with Stafford

With Pioli’s history with linebackers, I simply don’t think theres any way he takes Curry. I think he’s much more likely to take whichever Tackle the Rams don’t take than Curry.

That being the case, it would be much more beneficial to the Chiefs if the Lions took Stafford to leave the smidgeon of a possibility, as slim as it might be, teams would trade up to get Sanchez ahead of the Seahawks.

Because then it’s Sanchez or nothing for a lot of clubs, thereby increasing desperation for a trade up. If Stafford and Sanchez are available, our pick may be less valuable.

this on their front page, quoting Curry as saying he will sign for less than Long did with the Dolphins last year. Saving that kind of cheeze and having guy like Curry that is pretty much bust proof might be enough for the Lions.

They got to be pretty fed up with all the first round failures they have had in recent history.

There are very good points being made for both sides already here. Good job, guys.

If Curry becomes a Lion our trade down possibilities diminish. Teams will be more likely to trade with Cincinnati and Cleveland than us now because the Seahawks will take Sanchez before they take Stafford because Sanchez was groomed in the West Coast system that Seattle runs.

If this deal is finalized, were looking at Monroe, Jackson, or Smith as the #3 pick in the draft

draft.

daamn we would be looking sick ill give you that.

Knowing how terrible our defense was last season and take an Offensive Lineman. He upgraded the OL with Goff and got us our Franchise QB…now lets get some young Defensive impact player on our team. I would love Curry but would be even happy with Maulaluga or Laurinaitis

 with all this wheeling and dealing,…..atleast we dont have Carl and Germ calling the shots on this one….

Curry goes #1 & Monroe goes #2 so just so all Chiefs mock drafts get turned on their head

Mentioned taking Stafford at # 3
The way the draft has been scripted was Stafford was gone.
The Chiefs haven’t looked at him I think.
NOT to start a controversy, well maybe, what if Pioli likes Stafford

Tyson Jackson and 2 LBs for Vrabel and Thomas to groom.

KC LOVES defense

I think you get more reaction out of the crowd with a 4th down D-Stuff or a critical down QB Sack than you might get with the 4 TD of a pending blowout. We were known for D in 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s. The fans were brought up that way. SEE Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas. WE ARE Big-12 country. Offense is johnny come lately here. We know D wins Championships because we DID.

If they take Curry and he has indeed signed for less that Long signed last year that has set the bar for contracts a lot lower than most GMs might have thought. Does this mean we won’t mind hanging on to the #3 pick or alternatively other GMs might htink it not so bad to trade up to a #3 contract.

really seems to think it is Stafford. Slam dunk.

they don’t need him, and nobody has Sanchez significantly ranked above Stafford for real, I think it’s a bunch of talk. If they are both available at #3 its a bidding war to avoid getting stuck with the next Ryan Leaf, Chiefs get a money ass trade down.

the photographer/captioner cleared up which one was Curry in the photo. If you didn’t catch it he’s the one on the right.

Curry in the first
Kruger in the third
it’s a lock

Seattle will take Stafford. Seattle might even consider moving into the 2nd pick to grab Stafford preventing any other team interested in Matt to move ahead of them.

Stafford is a better prospect of the two QB’s available. It doesn’t matter about what systemt the young QB’s ran in college, it always falls on the experience and talent of the QB prospect.

Seattle would have taken Sanchez at 5 only because Stafford should have been off the board when the Seahawks would make their choice. If Matt is still there after Detriot makes their pick, Seattle will be jockeying for position.