More Experts like the Chiefs Drafting a Tackle
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"It's time to get back to that style of play. Jason Smith should be the favorite and he can be a dominant left tackle," former Tampa Bay Buccaneers coach Jon Gruden told me in a conference call with the NFL Network today.
I've been advocating drafting left tackle for the Kansas City Chiefs for a little while now. Moving Brandon Albert to right tackle, selecting Smith with the third overall pick and establishing book end tackles will go a long way to improving the Chiefs' longevity on offense.
Gruden cited the Chiefs' new offensive line coach, Bill Muir, as a reason why Smith would be a good choice.
Gruden and Muir worked together for the head coach's entire tenure in Tampa Bay. Muir is the longest tenured offensive line coach in football and Gruden's familiarity and endorsement of him helps state his case for Smith.
Similarly, Steve Mariucci talked tackle and calls Eugene Monroe the best pass protecting tackle on the board.
Gruden noted Smith's athleticism as a reason why you hear him "thumping people even though there's no sound coming."
Mariucci compared the run on tackles he expects to see in the 2009 draft similar to last year (there were eight taken in the first round in 2008). The debate over the top tackles worthy of the Chiefs third overall pick has been around Eugene Monroe and Jason Smith, but Mariucci said "if it weren't for the whole Combine thing, you would be putting Andre Smith up there, too."
The Alabama tackle of course disappeared from the NFL Combine early which caused a lot of negative reports to come out questioning his character.
As far as moving players on the offensive line, namely Albert to right tackle, Mariucci says the Chiefs should do whatever it takes to get the offensive line back intact. He doesn't see the Chiefs worrying about whose playing what position and where they were drafted on the offensive line.
There you have it - two more former NFL coaches weighing in on the Chiefs and the third overall pick. Click over to see a few notes from the call.
*Gruden said he worked out JaMarcus Russell and while he has the ability, the Raiders have to get him a weapon like Michael Crabtree or Jeremy Maclin. Last year, the Raiders leading receiver had 22 catches (compared to the Dolphins' three players over 50 catches). He also says the Raiders need to look at offensive tackle.
*Mariucci said there will be plenty of pressure on Russell this season, especially since head coach Tom Cable will run the west coast offense, which vereran backup Jeff Garcia is very familiar with.
*Gruden said he was "disgusted" with the allegations against B.J. Raji and it's "disappointing" that they came out. He hopes they're not true but still expects Raji to be a top ten pick, unlikely to get past Green Bay at #9.
*Gruden also talked about teams copying the Steelers blueprint with the 3-4 defense this upcoming season.
*Mariucci called B.J. Raji the best defensive tackle in the draft.
*Kinda funny - regarding a question on what the Bucs should do in the draft, Gruden said, "I'm gonna let Steve handle that question because they offered him the job before me." Nice one, coach.
*Gruden said the Bucs should address the defensive line. He says maybe they should take a close look at Georgia Tech's defensive end Michael Johnson, or even one of the defensive tackles if they call.
*Gruden said the Bucs are one of seven teams with back to back winning seasons but they struggled at the end of the stretch last year. Ultimately, he placed the blame on the head coach (himself).
*Regarding college defensive ends making the switch to outside linebacker in a 3-4, Gruden said it takes a year or two for those going from playing with their hand on the ground to playing standing up. When talking about Aaron Maybin, he cites Vernon Gholston last year as a Big Ten player who will take some time to make the transition.
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ya seems like everyone is seeing the light right now Its just is the best
pick for us unless we are going to be blitzing him all night which i dont see happening we would just have more production all around with a tackle then we would a line backer.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
Agreed
Another offensive lineman. It would help protect Matt Cassel and ideally help the run game get going which would again help Matt Cassel.
by Joel Thorman on Apr 21, 2009 2:28 PM CDT up reply actions
we got a night game this year?
"But what do I know, I'm AP's new assclown and I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
Come on
Guys maybe we should just draft o-line guy’s! I can already see it again, good offense and shitty d-fense, but i guess that’s what you guy’s want!?
especially for all thee LJ faithful
To want LJ and be against picking a Tackle is crazy talk. IT just makes sense im not a fan of keeping LJ . But if we had protection and blocking for him im pretty sure he will hopefully make the best of it.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
I think Chucky's and Mooch's talent scouting prowess
is a big part of why they’re “experts” now and not head coaches in the NFL.
Mike Mayock probably has the best track
record of anyone with regard to the NFL draft. Mayock is thinking the Chiefs should draft an offensive tackle to make the offensive line a viable force for years to come.
dude if that guy was my dad he would be thrown off the air cuz his son works for a porn company hahah
and goes by the name sexassassin hahahahha.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
mike mayock when he talks he aint just talking football he is talking woman
the way he rates his players is the way we should all be rating our woman.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
if we are not brothers it wouldent be shocking if you were my cousin
im mexican and i have a thousand cousins. And speaking of sexassassin they all have like 50 kids so you could be my cousin.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
Bad draft for OT's, comparatively speaking
Branden Albert is a better athlete than the OT’s on the board this year and there are at least a few GM’s, scouts, and coaches that feel the same way. If Pioli and Co. agree with that there’s no way we’ll draft an OT at #3.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/43260222.html
Bask in the glory that is Kwame Harris. Poor Alex...
That's one's opinion
That I haven’t heard very often. That doesn’t necessarily make it true (while I guess it also doesn’t make it false).
by Joel Thorman on Apr 21, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions
Assuming that statement is correct
Branden Albert is a better athlete than the OT’s on the board this year
Then it should not be a problem for him to move to any other position on the line and be successful.
"But what do I know, I'm AP's new assclown and I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
That is an opinion from a scout of the team picking immediately after us...
…in other words…don’t believe jack…
Would either of these two
be a good fit at RT? Alot of the OTs taken last year were projected as LT, but switched over to RT once the season started. I think Albert earned himself another year to start on the Left Side.
I think I read what JHWK is referring to this morning
But, you have to admit, Monroe kept Albert at guard for two years…that has to say something…
Inifinite Diversity In Infinite Combinations
I coached a Mens softball team a few years ago and had a similar problem
Two guys could play 1st base really well. I placed the guy who could “only” play 1st base well at that position and played the other guy who could play all positions well in Left field.
"But what do I know, I'm AP's new assclown and I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
The draft experts said Albert has a better rating then all of this years LT
I don’t necessarily disagree with drafting a LT but if Alberts is better why move him to RT just bc the new guys makes more money. If they have one of the tackles rated higher then Curry or who ever draft him and in mini-camp find out who should be moved, probably the new guy.
I would personally take Curry.
I definitely agree
We shouldn’t be forced to move Albert based solely on the fact that if we took a tackle with the 3rd pick that he needs to start on the left side.
by Chief Seattle on Apr 21, 2009 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm almost to the point I don't care who we draft...as long as it makes sense
Inifinite Diversity In Infinite Combinations
The reason that many want to draft a tackle at #3 and play him at left tackle....
….is to justify the pick and the cost.
We don’t need a left tackle, we might need a right tackle if we don’t have anyone else that can fill that position, therefore we should draft a right tackle if we need to.
This talk about drafting a LT, paying the high cost of a third round pick for him, and then switching our, already good LT to RT, just does not make sense.
Thank you
That’s my point, we’ve already got a LT on our roster that’s proven himself for a year in the NFL and is at least comparable to the top 5 OTs on this year’s board, if not better. Sliding him to RT is at best an upgrade at RT and status quo at LT and could potentially be an actual downgrade on the blind side of our line if we were to draft someone that happens to bust.
Go defense with #3 unless we can trade down. If we can’t get picks in the 2nd or 3rd then the only Rd1 OL I’d be happy to see us take over a defender is someone like Mack, Unger, or Luigs at Center. If we truly don’t have any talent on our roster right now that can fill the RT void of McSackintosh then draft one on day 2.
Bask in the glory that is Kwame Harris. Poor Alex...
I agree.......
We have a LT now, who is not getting Tackle $$$! Why in the world would we sign another and pay him top dollar, it make’s no sense! Monroe has a questionable knee, and the other top guy walked out on the combine, so that leave’s Smith who will be gone! How is it a smart move to sign a guy with knee problem’s? Can anyone tell me hmmmmmm?
There is no way in hell i sign a guy to top $$$ if he has had a knee issue!! Everyone is worried we have to protect of QB, well we have already improved our o-line, and we can pick-up someone later on that will do fine(remember J.Alt) he was drafted in the 7th rd!
Bone’s would be fine with what we have now, maybe he should start! Since everyone think’s Cassel is not good enough to move around in the pocket or even scramble!! Since everyone want’s to draft position’s that are already filled maybe we should draft a QB, that would be a good move to you guy’s too i guess!
Mariucci's understatement
If it wasn’t for the Combine debacle, Andre Smith would be THE top offensive tackle in this draft. This guy was was the battering ram for a high octane offense in the toughest conference in college football.
But the combine dabacle DID happen
and was followed by what was called a weak pro day. A Smith just doesn’t seem to have the mentality to cut it in the NFL. If he can’t even get pumped for the combine or pro day what makes you think he will still motivated during his career? Give him a massive check and he may very well eat himself into obscurity.
Definately agree. Many of us might have problems with our weight or maintaining
….. a good workout schedule; but, we’re not motivated by a huge pile of money and the talent to play in the NFL. HE should be.
Andre Smith would be a huge mistake. Eugene Monroe
is a natural left tackle. His main strength is his outstanding footwork. Coach this guy up and he would be a great left tackle. Branden Albert,however, is a naturally gifted versatile offensive lineman. He could play any position on the o-line, no sweat. How about a great left tackle and a great right tackle. Jason Smith is stronger than Monroe, and will be a great left tackle. His footwork is good, but not as good as Monroe. Coach Jason Smith up and he may be every bit as good as Eugene Monroe only stronger. Either would be a good choice.
By the way, even if Andre Smith weren't an accident
waiting to happen, Eugene Monroe is still a superior pass protecting left tackle. Since the running game is probably not going to be showcased in a Haley system, Monroe would be the better choice, even if the combine debacle had not happened.
You're splitting hairs
Andre Smith only allowed 2.5 sacks in 2007 and 2008 in the toughest conference in football. Monroe is an awesome pass protector, but he can’t protect if he’s hurt (which he has a history of). And although it’s not his fault, but I’m always a little leery when a top prospect plays on a team with an anemic offense. If Monroe’s so great, why couldn’t they score?
Totally Agree on LT (left tackle).
Andre Smith was a beast at Alabama blocking in the SEC. I think he might be the best tackle in the draft! He will have so many behavior clauses in the contract it will set him straight. Plus, if we still have waters (big if)! He can mentor the young fella and he could dominate.
Stop the "great line for years to come" nonsense
Anyone who is throwing that line out, how taking an OT and moving Albert will give the Chiefs a great offensive line “for years”, is fooling themselves.
Branden Albert has shown he can play left tackle in the league. Let’s be generous and assume that if Albert does indeed get moved to RT, he’ll play out the rest of his contract, as opposed to holding out or demanding a trade after a few years.
The moment he’s a free agent, he’s gone. Why? Because another team will want him to play left tackle. And they will pay him left tackle money.
The Chiefs will already be paying left tackle money to the OT they took with the 3rd pick in the draft. They won’t do the same with Albert, unless they want a huge chunk of their cap tied up in both tackles. Which they won’t, which also eliminates the chance of using the franchise tag or any such thing.
Does anyone seriously think a player would stick around, play the cheaper position, and make less money when they have other options elsewhere? Of course they wouldn’t.
Drafting an OT and moving Albert GUARANTEES that Albert leaves KC in a few years.
The only way.....
I’m for drafting a o-line guy in the first round is if we trade B.Water’s,that’s it period!
Gruden & Mooch?!
I am so freaking jealous.
That is absolutely awesome that AP was included. Creds soon? :)
Follow PARADE's twitter feed here
I don't have religion. I have Baduizm...and Billie Holiday...and Janet. Actually, just Janet.
Gotta go with a Tackle
The Chiefs need to get the most value at this pick. If a tackle is drafted and he does not have the mobility desired at LT move him to RT or G. The Chiefs line is so poor you have to upgrade it and protect the millions invested in QBs and RBs. Cassel will make the throws if he is upright. You just can’t pass up the chance to solidify the OL for 5-7-10 years with Tackles like Albert and Monroe/ Smith.
Draft OT with the 3, Defense with the rest of the draft.

by 



























