Look at it as helping ourself. If we could turn a prospect like Curry into prospects like Rey Rey and Andre Smith (or insert any other top 20 stud) you do it in a heartbeat. Stafford is an unknown. I’m high on Sanchez but he’s an even bigger unknown. It could be a high priced downgrade from Orton.
If I’m Pioli I’m pitching this to Denver.

If Denver is willing to give up what it takes, I hope Pioli jumps all over it.

is locating a qualified neckbeard stylist in the metro area.

I don’t believe Pioli would be to entrenched with the “Denver our Rival” mindset as he would be “Put MY team in better position” train of thought. As has been said on many occasions here. This is a business and shouldn’t be based on emotion.

Pioli is a master at wheeling and dealing for the betterment of his team. If this even smells of making the Chiefs better he’ll do it.

Don’t wanna help Denver, and I’d love to see neckbeard taking the snaps.

However, this QB class is classified as “weak”, and Sanchez in Denver, while not as crappy as Orton, doesn’t scare me.

Now look at the flipside: We could end up with Everette Brown and Rey Maualuga with those two picks. HUGE defensive upgrade to nullify Sanchez for years to come.

That said, give me Curry and screw the Donkeys. Have fun with Orton. Our DB’s are gonna have a field day with all those INTs.

I don’t see any trades happening between now and April 25.

His forte is to trade down for value and accumulate more good players b/c he IS building a TEAM. I think he would be willing to trade with anyone as long as the Chiefs end up ahead in the deal.

I guess you can look at it this way….If we trade with Denver, they get Sanchez or Stafford and we get a couple more quality players this year like Rey Maualuga at #12 and Michael Oher/Eben Britton or Tyson Jackson/Robert Ayers/Michael Johnson at #18. But if we stay and take Curry/Monroe at #3….then Denver most likely will still get their guy by trading with Seattle, Cleveland, or Cincinnati at #4, 5, and 6. As all of those teams have QB’s that can play and are trying to fill many needs. So a trade down for these teams could seem likely.

So…I guess what I’m saying is, if Denver is gonna (most likely) get their guy (Sanchez) right behind us in the # 4-6 range and we just get one player (Curry/Monroe, even though I love them both and would be thrilled to have either), wouldn’t it make sense to trade down and accumulate more good players rather than let Denver get their guy and give their picks to Seattle, Cleveland, or Cincinnati. Shouldn’t the Chiefs be taking that deal before those teams since we are in a position for those teams in need of a QB (Denver, Jets, 49ers, Bucs) to move ahead of other teams who could also move up to acquire Stafford/Sanchez/Freeman.

Apparently, it cannot be stopped. I may present a motion for mercy deletions. :)

the Broncos can only trade with the Chiefs for the QB left after Detroit selects. Not true. The Chiefs won’t draft a QB because of the money invested in Cassell. That automatically drops a QB to at least pick #4.

WIth so many others competing for Sanchez we can trade with them…Which I am sure has already been said…

“I don’t like the Broncos, so I’m not going to trade with them.”

What? That means that you would potentially give up an opportunity to improve your team just because you hate Denver?

Sure, I hate Denver as much as the next guy. But you trade with whoever, if it improves your team.

Maybe, you have a preference to trade outside of the division. Fine. But if Denver is offering you the best deal, you take that deal.

I don’t really think the question is if we should help the broncos or not. The question is, if the trade is offered, would it hurt the broncos more to accept the trade than to not take it?

If we take the trade we get 2 top class players and negate the cassel trade. The broncos get a qb from this weak ass class and since they will have so much money wrapped up in them they won’t take from the stronger class next year.

Granted we are assuming the bears will have a good first rounder next year.

But I ask you. Is it better to let the broncos get a top notch qb next year, and us ignore a trade down? Or we double down and stick the broncos with a weaker QB.