No Ruling Yet in Larry Johnson's Grievance Hearing with the Chiefs
by Chris Thorman on Apr 2, 2009 7:46 AM CDT
in 2009 Kansas City Chiefs Offseason
Email
Print
We've been waiting just over a week for yesterday's salary grievance hearing between Larry Johnson and the Kansas City Chiefs. Yesterday's hearing came and went quietly. Adam Teicher of the Kansas City Star has the scoop:
The case between the Chiefs and running back Larry Johnson was heard Wednesday by a special master, but he made no ruling. Neither side was certain when a ruling would be given.
At issue is $3.75 million of guaranteed money Johnson is due from the Chiefs in the contract extension he signed in August 2007. The contract calls for $3.5 million of Johnson’s 2009 salary and $250,000 of his 2010 salary to be guaranteed regardless of whether he plays for them or not.
Teicher goes on to say for a second time what his sources are telling him about Larry's future in KC:
A source familiar with the situation has said the Chiefs would probably release Johnson if they prevail, suggesting the team wouldn’t be going through the trouble if it didn’t intend to free him from his contract.
Again, we wait to hear what Larry Johnson's fate is.
*You're probably wondering what a special master is too. It's a "a representative of the court appointed to hear a case involving difficult or specialized issues."
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
So much for a clean slate ;)
But in all seriousness, I think they’re going to tell him this is what happens when you screw up. You can get over it, straighten up, run hard, and finish what you started, or we’re going to dump you where you stand.
My crystal ball says Jay Cutler cries himself to sleep every night.
I'm guessing the Chiefs haven't found any trade suitors
or else Teicher’s source wouldn’t be telling him that the Chiefs will likely release LJ.
by Chris Thorman on Apr 2, 2009 7:34 AM CDT up reply actions
Double Agree
they haven’t found trade suitors and because of that they are clearing the guaranteed money so they can cut him.
Beat the Donkeys!!
We can't even trade him for some Krispy Kremes and some click clacks?
"But what do I know, I'm AP's new assclown and I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
But haven't looked at RBs in the draft
….that we know of anyway. No reports of players Chiefs have talked to, gone to Pro Days or had private workouts for. Or we just don’t know about it. Of course that could all change here in a week or so.
I think the Chiefs brass are open to keeping him and giving him a clean slate, if he accepts that. I think its in LJ’s court. His decision. LJ your actions will show us if you want to be here and play. Do your job and we will use you, run you and build our power running game around you. If you want that, you’ve got it. Do your job and produce. Stay out of trouble. Be all about football. Isn’t that what you really want?
Actually rumored that Chiefs were at Iowa Pro Day
Could Chiefs be looking at Shonn Greene if LJ is cut or traded? Makes sense. Greene would seem perfect for the Chiefs featured RB if no LJ.
The full title is actually
Special Master Debater, in order to be a Master Debater you have to be able to see and respond to both sides of the argument, and find a conclusion that is both fitting, and justified. Also, you have to look really kick ass in a black robe.
My crystal ball says Jay Cutler cries himself to sleep every night.
Is a Special Master Debater
different than a Special Master Bater? Just curious if the qualifications were the same or whether they were two different things.
Huge difference
This is the prime example of a Special Master Bater:
This is a Special Master Debater:
My crystal ball says Jay Cutler cries himself to sleep every night.
You mention Shonn Greene, take a look at his highlight reel, very impresive and would fill in very nicely in LJ’s departure, but where do we draft him, No. 1(nah) or No. 3(won’t be around), unless we trade down & possibly pick up a 2nd, even then I’m not sure this guy will be there!
At issue is $3.75 million of guaranteed money Johnson is due from the Chiefs in the contract extension he signed in August 2007.
regardless of whether he plays for them or not.
Well it pretty much says it all. If it’s guaranteed per the contract he’s going to get the money.
Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."
"My job is not to collect talent, but to build a team. Individuals make the Pro Bowl. Teams win championships. That is our goal."—Chiefs GM Scott Pioli.
But if there's a conduct clause
the wording in that clause will be very dependent on if they’ll have to pay him the money or not.
My crystal ball says Jay Cutler cries himself to sleep every night.
and that's just it
it’s about the wording. The “regardless if he plays for them or not” could be the mitigating factor and trump the clause of conduct if the clause isn’t solid.
Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."
"My job is not to collect talent, but to build a team. Individuals make the Pro Bowl. Teams win championships. That is our goal."—Chiefs GM Scott Pioli.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Arrowhead Pride
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
