VIDEO: Todd Haley on Chiefs Mini-camp
Full transcript is here. It was another busy, busy day at the real job. Thanks for your patience. H/T JayKC.
0 recs |
25 comments
|
Comments
I like that he was more focused on the defense. I hope this means he won’t put all his attention on his specialty (offense)
Also, he seems to have gotten the flop sweat under control.
Tyler Thigpen will be a Kansas City Chief in 2009.
by ktr17x on Apr 17, 2009 5:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He said they were running a 4-3 under
by Joel Thorman on Apr 17, 2009 5:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They were running an under in practice, he said
by Joel Thorman on Apr 17, 2009 5:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm so confused about our defense.
Are we running a 3-4 or not?
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on Apr 17, 2009 7:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My guess is we'll do a mix
of the 4-3 under and the 3-4. Switch it up to confuse the offense.
by Vince D on Apr 17, 2009 8:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He said they were lining up in an "Under" all day...
And then later he when asked about positions he said they were in “base defense” all practice.
2+2=4, and We’re running the Pendergast 43 Under as our base defense in 2009.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Apr 17, 2009 9:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And hopefully beyond...
I think it is definitely the best use of Tank and Dorsey…
by woodman212 on Apr 17, 2009 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He looked lighter...
Like…funner…
That was interesting that he spent the whole afternoon with the defense and wouldnt say anything about personnel there….
Under front in a base defense is all he said…that is gay haha
by woodman212 on Apr 17, 2009 5:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He talks like this guy...

FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Apr 17, 2009 5:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
he just always has like that hesitation in his voice hahah like
he is scared to talk . either that or he is just stoned
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Apr 17, 2009 6:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Although you're observation yesterday
about coming down from a weeklong cocaine bender might also be in play
by Sudden on Apr 17, 2009 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he can win games stoned,
I vote we start Chiefs Special Brownie Sunday.
"...Said he couldn't go on the American way"
by Jux on Apr 17, 2009 7:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or we can just make every 2009 home game “Chiefs Special Brownie Sunday”
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on Apr 18, 2009 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he just despises the media/interview aspect of being the HC. I'm fine with that.
I've been rapping for about seveteen years okay? I don't write my stuff anymore I just kick it from my head you know what I'm sayin? I can do that. No disrespect but that's how I am.
by soybon on Apr 18, 2009 1:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hahahah ya i mean i dont know if i can take that guy serious
and i know if i cant then the players im sure cant either.
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Apr 17, 2009 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
god im listening to pioli interview from yesterday
To me its like he is talking woman its so awsome the way he talks football is the way we should all be talking about chicks hahah
FOUR F'S FIND UM FEEL UM FUGUM FORGET UM.
by sexassassin on Apr 17, 2009 6:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I've noticed...
…considering how he usually acts, both times he’s been interviewed after mini-camps he seems to be in lighter more cheerful spirits. It comes off to me that he is very satisfied at the attendance of these voluntary camps, and, for the most part – a few black sheep players nonewithstanding – seems to like what he is seeing.
by jbj8609 on Apr 17, 2009 7:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
what defense are we running?
Haley is talking like that I would guess to keep from saying the wrong thing.
they want to wait as long as possible to tell any one anything about the offense or defense. would not be surprised if we did not know til they lined up for the first play of the preseason
by Battle AXE on Apr 17, 2009 7:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
He said they will see the alignments tomorrow...
So I assume the media will have some access and we may see some photos tomorrow hopefully…
by woodman212 on Apr 17, 2009 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
a game
i still think we or going to run a 3-4 4-3 i mean it’s kind of good we dont let it been out there what we gone run this year cuz if we do that it give teams more time to work on a way to stop it i say keep this going on all the way to week one we have a chance of beating the Ravens but they got time to work on a O that is best for a 3-4 D so keep it loc key even tho it’s going to come out soon
~I AM HAVE A CLEAR VIEW OF MY LIFE AS A FOOTBALL STAR IT'S LIKE I MY EYES IS HD~
by Da Chiefs Guy on Apr 17, 2009 8:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm much more comfortable running the 4-3 under with Pendergast
If we had Crennel, then yeah, lets do the 3-4. But we shouldn’t force it if it’s not there yet.
by Vince D on Apr 17, 2009 9:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the personnel is more relevant than the Pendergast factor, and I think it would be the exact same it Crennel was here
The coaches on defense right now have been around long enough that they can adapt any defense to the players they have. I think that’s the reason Haley brought these guys in. Like New England, the D will be very situational.
by RedNose on Apr 18, 2009 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent point
If Crennel had come here, we’d still be running a defense similar to the 4-3 under, because that best fits the personnel we currently have, and good coaches actually recognize that
Marley will be walking soon...she could probably play Linebacker better than some of the guys we had.
by PVChiefsfan on Apr 18, 2009 11:55 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















