KC to trade first round pick?
by camucr on Mar 28, 2009 1:51 PM CDT
106 comments
Charlie Casserly on the NFL Network just stated the Chiefs are the most likely to trade down on draft day assuming Curry's on the board when KC's third pick comes up. He suggests Seattle (#4) may be the likely trade partner....and that KC could regain it's second round pick this way.
Based off conventional wisdom, that would mean that the Chiefs would pick up Eugene Monroe (OT) with the 4th pick and then have the 37th pick overall (we traded away the 34th pick overall for Cassel).
I think trading down one position in the first round to pick up a second rounder would be a phenomenal trade. It seems lop-sided, however, so I wouldn't be surprised to see something like Larry Johnson being thrown in as compensation (minimal value ot chiefs, fairly valuable to the Seahawks).
Regardless - if Aaron Curry is on the board with the 3rd pick, I'm starting to think more and more that other teams will be knocking on our door to trade up. He's widely considered to be the best player (overall) in the draft, so he garners a lot of attention.
So - let's hear from you:
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
0 recs |
106 comments
Email
Print
Comments
trade down
I’d love to see the Chiefs trade down… either w/ Cleveland or Seattle for a 2nd round pick, OR Philly for 2 first round picks… Though, I’m not sure exactly what the compensation would need to be to make those even…
Either way, there is a good amount of talent in the late 1st round, and a ton of good fits for the Chiefs in the 2nd…
Curry is the man, but 2 starters are better than one for this team!
by stagdsp on Mar 28, 2009 1:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
if philly traded with us
they’d have to give up a whole bunch of stuff. I think I said this before (if not then I researched it then went out and got drunk and didn’t post lol) but they’d have to give us the 2 1st rounders, their 2nd, 3rd and a few players to compensate. If someone has the chart handy please double check me
by scharny on Mar 28, 2009 7:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thanks
but, does a team HAVE to go by the chart?
Wouldn’t Pioli make the best deal for the team, even if the “points” didn’t add up?
I would think that 2 #1s would be enough to pull the trigger… Or maybe they throw in a later round pick, or a 2010 pick…
either way, I’d do it, if it were possible
by stagdsp on Mar 28, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
I say if we get both 1st rounders, their 2nd and one of their 5th round picks i’d pull the trigger
by scharny on Mar 28, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
absolutely
I’d take both 1st rounders and a 5th.
by stagdsp on Mar 28, 2009 7:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be nice
But I think Casserly is in major speculation zone. A lot has to happen for someone to trade up that high.
by Joel Thorman on Mar 28, 2009 1:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
a second round pick to trade up one spot?
thats insane
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 2:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Seems like Casserly didn’t think that through very well. There are a lot of potential trading partners for this pick that make way more sense than this IMO.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
by Buck'O on Mar 30, 2009 1:51 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Casserly's wig is eating his brain!
How would he know who is most likely to trade down? Why would we not take the best defensive player in the draft when we had the worst defense? Come on Casserly!!!!
Go Chiefs!!
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 28, 2009 2:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
What a deal?
I know this is probably a bunch of bullshit, but if something like this really happened (thank you God), that would be a tremendous advantage for us to move forward. We need as many draft picks that we can get, and I think it would allow us the ability to get some quality young guys to continue this rejuvenation. My biggest questions are surrounding TG, LJ and BW. Without veterans to coach these young guys, I am not sure this whole ordeal would be that smart.
Shake 'n' Bake
by Husker'n'Chief on Mar 28, 2009 2:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah i think he would pass on Curry but
i dont know any team who really wants him enough to trade up. Matt Stafford strikes me as the only guy who teams would be willing to trade up for
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 2:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why would he pass on him?
Go Chiefs!!
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 28, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
because Curry's really not that hot at the 3rd pick
i could definantly see Pioli picking Monroe over him if his still around
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 2:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thats nuts!
Monroe over Curry! haha! Never in a million years. We NEED Curry we dont need Monroe! Our offense was decent last year but our defense was terrible. We need Curry badly!
Go Chiefs!!
by Matt_Grbac on Mar 28, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
we dont
NEED linebacker who is not a Game Changer… i agree curry will be very very good but at the point our team needs more than what he brings to the table
by rich04 on Mar 28, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who says Curry is not a game changer
He’s a multi talented guy with a lot of football smarts.
In a 43 defense THE HARDEST LB spot to fill is the MLB. Especially in a cover 2 type system. You have to have a player that is big enough (255lbs in Curry’s case) and strong enough (400lb power lifts) to take on the run at the point of attack. You also have to have a guy that is fast enough (4.5-4.6 in the 40) and had great transition and hip fluidity to cover a HUGE area in the middle of the field. In addition, the MLB has to be the smartest guy (football smarts) on the defense. He’s got to be able to read pre snap, key post snap, and call the defense that fits the situation.
If you had that guy (Curry) on your team would you use him as a MLB (where he is a coaches dream) or slide him outside to be a one-dimensional player that rushed the passer and nothing else; while settling for an inferior player at you most important defensive position (MLB) ?
Curry was not used as a pass rusher in college. He was used in a much more valuable position for a guy of his talent level. However, he HAS the size, speed, hand skills, transition movement skills, and smarts to play OLB as a pure rusher if that is where he’s best suited for the Chiefs. He CAN be a “game changer” by your definition.
He IS a “game changer” by my definition: A complete player that has the ability to call the defense and put the right scheme in the right place to give the team the best chance to succeed.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Mar 28, 2009 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i totally agree with your points and i do think hes got good potentail but
i can see are defense striving without him. weve already invested 3 first rond picks, 3 second picks, and third rounder on defense so i do think we have the personal without him, they just need to be used better. plus how many times did people say the patriots were gonna draft a LB in the first and they didnt. i think we definantly need to get younger at OG and Monroe would allow us to move Bradon back to guard well having a chance of having a elite LT which Bradon probly will never be. bottom line is we need to improve are line and he is the best option out there
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 3:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Albert is being paid like a left tackle
and moving him to guard would be dumb. We can get younger at guard later in the draft and still get a guy who can help our defense. (i.e. Curry)
by scharny on Mar 28, 2009 7:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
explain...
the guys on here tend to make claims and have real reasons supporting there arguement
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cuurry is more of an anchor
which is to say the he is more of a game factor and less of a game changer. Placing him at OLB would be a tremendous waste of his talents, considering that he could potentially lock down the center of the field. Besides rushing off the end is not the only way or even best way to keep your defense dominant.
Your statements are true concerning a 43, but a 34 transition seems to be in place. Curry would fit in well in either scheme, but lets assume he would be playing in a 34 here. With that said, as a MLB in a 34 one of the most important abilities the player can have is to rush either the A or B gap. This is crucial to the philosophy of a 34, being able to constantly change the zone/blitz scheme throughout a game, keeping the OL confused on blocking assignments and the QB unsure about where seams will develop. Curry has not shown that he can do this.
If he can convince the Trinity that he has this ability, then he might be worth a shot at this position. I love Curry, but I think we can fill his possible role with much less of a financial investment.
I've been rapping for about seveteen years okay? I don't write my stuff anymore I just kick it from my head you know what I'm sayin? I can do that. No disrespect but that's how I am.
by soybon on Mar 28, 2009 3:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
explain...
you say its nuts but your not giving any reason of why. my arguement is that paying 30 million dollars to a MLB at the 3rd pick is nuts. Currys abiltiys are very limited even i do agree that he fits a need. Eugene Monroe is a all pro calibar talent ( just ask bradon Albert) and he could give be are LT for the next 10 years and give Albert a chance to play a position he is better suited for
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 2:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
From what I have noticed about Pioli
he is simply too pragmatic to place such draft potential and cash into a MLB who has shown no real ability to pressure the QB. Curry is amazing and I would love to have him, but for that kind of money he better be able to stuff the run, do a decent job in pass coverage, and have the elusiveness to get to the QB. Stated another way, there will be half a dozen guys (vets and rookies) in the next two years who may become available that have (at least close to) Curry’s abilities but will cost a fraction of what Curry would at this point in the draft.
Trading down seems like a viable option from the value chart and throwing Johnson into the mix may be a good way to leverage some of his value considering we might be releasing him outright (yikes). Monroe is an option at this point, but I still have concerns about about his left knee.
I've been rapping for about seveteen years okay? I don't write my stuff anymore I just kick it from my head you know what I'm sayin? I can do that. No disrespect but that's how I am.
by soybon on Mar 28, 2009 2:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree.
I think the Chief’s take Curry…….unless offered a REALLY sweet deal. A point that I would like to make is that I think the Chief’s have a heck of a lot of young talented players, probably more so than most teams. When Herm said he was going for youth, he really did and it’s just going to take good coaching, leadership and the right game plans to make these guys very successful.
by jcox31mc on Mar 28, 2009 2:25 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't see how Curry is the obvious choice in this scenario....
He’s got a couple things working against him in this case:
1 – I think the Pioli might be willing to see how our defense shakes out with the free agency trades/pickups (let the debate begin!)
2 – Curry’s gonna be expensive, and we all know how Pioli likes a bargain
3 – our offensive line is not feared anymore…most of us can agree on that
4 – Two for the price of one! Seriously – there’s great talent in the 2nd round…we can probably pick up another linebacker that can be a steady presence for years to come.
by camucr on Mar 28, 2009 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we can trade back into the second
I think were looking for a center so we can spend the rest of our picks on defense
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 2:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
actually
or would be Clint Sintim or Larry English on top of round 2 then a center in round 3… Either way if it happens it will be Sintim/ English and Caldwell, or Mack and Brinkley
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're getting my hopes a little too high
If we got a first round pick, Mack in the second, and Brinkley in the third Pioli would have to get a restraining order against me because I would be dead set on driving up to arrowhead and kissing him right on the mouth. I’d even bring my wife and kids along with me so he’d know it wasn’t a sexual thing.
Ten sacks in a season! For crying out loud that's what I used to average per game using DT in Tecmo Bowl!
by KCporkchop on Mar 29, 2009 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha
same here man.. If we had a second I wouldn’t be as high on Eugene Monroe as I am, all the good talents at RT run out during Mid second round.
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 29, 2009 3:50 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd pee my pants if that happened
Eugene Monroe is priority #1 in my mock. Getting him and a second would be a dream come true
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 2:38 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
explain to me why seattle would trade a 2nd round pick to move up one spot
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah...
so dont you think they could get a pretty good linebacker with that 2nd round pick? it is one of the deepest LB drafts in recent memory… not to mention a elite LT to go with him
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why would you "+1" something that makes zero sense?
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 5:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You see...
…“+1” is a sign of support for an idea…
This “+1” is specifically in support of the comment:
Eugene Monroe is priority #1 in my mock. Getting him and a second would be a dream come true
It makes sense…because that is the value on the draft board…it is just a matter of whether a team wants to pull the trigger…
by woodman212 on Mar 28, 2009 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't see it happening, but it would be damn near the best case scenario if it did.
Monroe or Raji + Max Unger > Curry
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 2:53 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
OK
are we wishing away a problem with our defense. Our defense has sucked every year since DT passed away. Draft some defensive help. I got a fever and it says more Curry.
.
by Major Tom on Mar 28, 2009 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curry isn't the only draft pick that plays d.
If we can slide down one spot and take a guy like Raji and then get an all world center in the second round, we do it in a heartbeat. People fall in love with an individual and then do stupid things like trade a second rounder to move up one spot.
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 3:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Raji is overated
and wouldn’t even be as high as he is without all the propaganda that Mike Mayock from NFL Network has put out about him. Is Mayock getting a cut of money for all the jock sniffing he is doing on Raji. Why wouldn’t you want Curry, you think our LBs from last year were sufficient. The LBs sucked in the 4-3 what makes you think they will be any better in the 3-4. Lets keep Boiman and let him start again.
.
by Major Tom on Mar 28, 2009 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Mayock also but
he has something for Raji. If Raji turns out to be monster then i will put a picture of Mayock and a bunch of candles around it and worship it as if he is a football god.
.
by Major Tom on Mar 28, 2009 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its not that I don't want Curry..
its that I would rather trade down, which is what this post was about, and pick up a second rounder.
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
hell no on Rajii
he’s so overrated it’s not even funny
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
And there are more people that say he is no good at NT than the other way around now…for whatever reason
by woodman212 on Mar 28, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its not that he wouldn't be good at NT, its various scouts
think he can play a 3 technique in a 4-3 package. so they being the scouts, think his talent would be maximized at 3 tech rather than NT.
by Lvl.99 on Mar 29, 2009 2:42 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
That is a better way to put it…where he fits best…
by woodman212 on Mar 29, 2009 1:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want a tackle
I’m just appeasing to those demanding a defender. Rey Rey is the linebacker we should be targeting, just not at #3 or 4.
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
3 first round picks, 3 second round picks, and a third round pick on this defense now
im not sure if another first rounder will have any more of a effect than maybe a couple of good veteran starters
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 3:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 3:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If any other teams are interested
And we were to trade down, we could also consider Brian Orakpo…You never know, he could be the next Demarcus Ware… There are a lot of other good picks that we could get if we traded down, either later in the first, or even some possibilities in the second round. Maybin, Raji, Cushing, Ron Brace… to name a few…
by jcw1987ml on Mar 28, 2009 3:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh snap...
+1
(I actually would put him as a hybrid…Tamba’s physique with Vernon Gholston’s desire…)
by woodman212 on Mar 28, 2009 3:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And Gholston has looked great thus far...
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes...
Looked great for a first round waterboy…
by woodman212 on Mar 28, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It would be the other way around my friend
Orapko has Gholston’s physique and Tamba’s motor. He was the team leader on the Texas D, a vocal leader in the game and the locker room. Appears to have the ability to play DE in the 4-3 or OLB in the 3-4, ala Suggs from Baltimore. Orakpo would be an excellent addition to the Chiefs D.
If the Chiefs were staying at 4-3, I’d be for Curry @ SLB, but since we are moving to the 3-4, I value Orapko’s pass rushing ability higher. Come draft day for the Chiefs, Orapko has more value for what we are trying to accomplish than Curry as he adds a dynamic to the pass rush from the OLB position and has the versatility to play on the line if we are going hybrid.
The fact we could trade down with the possiblity of picking up Orapko and a 2nd round pick….holy shit, call the cops, Scott Pioli jut commited grand larceny
by Lvl.99 on Mar 29, 2009 2:54 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That would make a player who dominates all game every game...
…and that is definitely not what you have with him…
That is the knock on him…that he disappears (as Gholston does.)
by woodman212 on Mar 29, 2009 1:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
best case
the best case scenario is that both Stafford and Curry are available at #3…
Seattle would be tempted to take either one, so other teams may want to jump ahead of them to get their guy.
by stagdsp on Mar 28, 2009 4:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
bidding wars
the team in pole position always wins
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Mar 28, 2009 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
All I know is
I trust Pioli more than I trust any of you guys… or myself…
by jcw1987ml on Mar 28, 2009 4:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Why, do we not look lovable enough?
Or do you like short bald men? :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i think the best case scenario is...
if Curry goes number 1 to Detriot and Monroe and Staford fall to us. This way we have a good chance to trade down with Staford still there or you pick up a guy who can play at LT for us for the next 10 years at a pro bowl level
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 4:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think teams are just as likely to reach for curry or stafford at #3 if it goes smith and monroe
by cassel4prez on Mar 28, 2009 6:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really don't think
we’re gonna draft Monroe or any LT for that matter. I understand if we did we could move Brandon Albert to RT or G but we are paying him LT money i believe. Yes we did drop a whole bunch of 1st day draft choices on our defense, but let’s face it we need a MLB and Curry can play that position. Yes I know we are planing to switch to a 3-4, Curry can still play MLB since by that time he will have learned how to rush the passer effectively and while we are running a 4-3 hybrid he can lock down the middle of the field.
by scharny on Mar 28, 2009 7:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
They will probably draft Curry, and not get a trade done.
And, I think we’ll all be happy with having him on the team.
But… there are huge possibilities if Pioli can work some trade magic!
If Curry isn’t there, and the Chiefs still can’t trade down… I wouldn’t rule out a “reach” for a DE like Brown.
I think there is workable talent already in KC on the OL, and Pioli knows he’ll get some good prospects in the mid/late rounds of the draft. NO need to get one of the “top 3” guys
by stagdsp on Mar 28, 2009 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Pioli would reach
Play the cards dealt and take best OT
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
all i know is...
the patriots were peged almost every year to draft a LB and outside of last year they didnt. i still think there are some good vetern OLB on the market that have potential in the hybrid defense (marcus washington) which are more appeling than curry all things considered. outside of oralando pace there are no decent RT on the FA market.
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 8:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way
why do you so much about Albert being paid well? i believe right now we still have a ton of cap space, and if im not mistaken we are paying 3 first round guys on defense right now. plus just imagine how much its gonna cost to re sign DJ. Also how many MLB do you know who are being paid +30 million?
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 8:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just so you don't have to answer yourself
I don’t have any problem with the Chiefs paying the entire O line LT money.
Unlike the rest of us the Hunt’s have it. I would sign Pace for LT money and put his ASS at RT and say learn to love it. But, I have a problem with appearing to stay with Draft vibes and drafting an ILB at # 3 and claiming that we did a great job by passing up legitimate Tackles for the sake of BPA.
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whittle, Naoli, Newberry
Cupboard is lookin barren
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:26 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
vs Harris, Fox, Colvin, and Colvin
Cupboard is equally barren.
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:29 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I sorta like the Chiefs FA LB's more
I Hope we can get some of them
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
were you trying to prove a point?
its much easier to find a sleeper LB on the market than it is OT. like i metion marcus washington could fit, and worse case scenrio we move DJ to MLB like we did last season
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 8:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
In case you want an example of both
James Harrison LB, Pittsburgh Steelers, UDFA, went to camp, bounced around on the practice squad for a couple years, last seasons defensive player of the year for the NFL.
Brian Waters, OG, Kansas City Chiefs, cut by Dallas Cowboys, spent some time in NFL Europe for a few seasons, goes on to be four time prowbowl selection.
So you can find lumps of coal that turn into diamonds at both positions, however I do agree with you that there are alot more LB’s available that OL.
by Lvl.99 on Mar 29, 2009 3:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
My team just got beat by UConn
I was trolling bait out there.
But you know what, I responded earlier that I like what your’e bringing.
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 8:58 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
good to know
i really wouldnt mind if we drafted Curry, i just think that we need to make are Oline younger. plus think of all the nick names we could think of for our 2 virgina tackles
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 9:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't think you meant Cav's either
I think the “D” would have a hard time penetrating our front line :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup
and when your set to give Cassel a +50 million dolar contract, you might as well protect him. pioli doesnt wanna have another brady situation on his hands
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 9:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I would think that Pioli would have spent a little more on "D" in FA
If he was going to go “O” Line in Rd’s 1 and 3 because I still think Woods, Luigs, or Caldwell is destined for KC Center spot.
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 9:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
we dont need a center in the 3rd round
i think the personnel is there on the defensive side of the ball outside of antother line backer and a experienced end like vonnie holliday. we might also have a big gap at the RB spot in a couple of days so we might be better off trading down for a chris wells
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 9:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thats the mentality I hate to see...
dump LJ and take an RB in the 1st round? What what what!?! No sense in creating yet another need by cutting LJ.
by HIV 2 Elway on Mar 28, 2009 9:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kolby Smith and Jamal Charles
hell Jackie Battle can fill in for LJ.
No need to select a RB round #1, but there is alot of reason to cut, release, trade LJ and the L stands for little.
by Lvl.99 on Mar 29, 2009 3:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Caldwell in 4th or Shipley
I don’t want another year of Niswanger. LB yes, Holliday no, RB maybe would trump C
Beanie no. NoShow no. One of the less heralded more hungry guys later.
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 9:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
3rd rounder RB sounds good to me
im not sure why you think a 3rd round rookie center will be able to step in and be better than rudy, but thats your thing. by the way theres nothing wrong with vonnie holliday…
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 9:56 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Except he was here before
Fool me once, fool me twice….
Niswanger is probably built more for G or T.
I hope KC can find a place for him on O-line:)
by Steve_Chiefs on Mar 28, 2009 10:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How bout we slide Rudy to RG
and put Goff at Center. Then our Oline is a RT away from being pretty solid.
Come draft day, We trade back a few spots and pick up a Pass rushing OLB/DE and lookf for our RT in round 2.
Don't blame me, I voted for content of character.
by paratrooper on Mar 30, 2009 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
havent ever heard of a second chance?
god knows LJs had plenty of them
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 10:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
i gotta get out of here
ive been writing incoherently all day and in the last hour ive been making less sense than i usally do so im gone
by squarebender on Mar 28, 2009 10:12 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
We are 1 more LB away from the D-Fence 3-4 Hybrid Success to be a reality
Vrabel, DJ, Beisel, Curry……… Starters for 2010…………….
NOW here is the part we Mr. 2 for 1 (Poili) does his thing…..
Seatle at #4…….. Swap spot we Seatle, Give them LJ…. We get there 2nd rounder.
Who is to say that this won’t happen………Seatle needs a RB, We will still have other needs. Which at number 4 can be addressed…but If we do that……Curry is Gone…
by Jclawd on Mar 29, 2009 4:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the seatle trade rumor needs to die now
seatle would much rather have monroe than they would curry, and trading up one spot doesnt warrent a 2nd round pick. larry johnson will be cut so any trade scenrios are pointless
by squarebender on Mar 29, 2009 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boldin wants out? hmmm.. and i thought Pioli and Haley were done with there old teams
If this comes about………We need to JUMP ON IT…………Nuff said
by Jclawd on Mar 29, 2009 4:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
the chiefs is the last team boldin wants to be on
hes one of the veterns who was talking shit on haley at the pro bowl
by squarebender on Mar 29, 2009 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
