Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Africa Cup Of Nations Final

The Other Side of the Chiefs Trade for Matt Cassel

539_playoffs__1228236386_7524_medium

via cache.boston.com

The Chiefs trade for Matt Cassel is getting national praise for GM Scott PioliArrowhead Pride responded with a 91% approval of the trade and the general tone in the comments was positive. In this case, the potential reward far outweighs the risk.

But there's another side to the Cassel trade.  Some are calling him the next Scott Mitchell while others are reminding folks that Bill Belichick knows what he's doing and wouldn't take a below market deal.

The Next Scott Mitchell

Ron Borges of the Boston Herald penned a piece that took the next Scott Mitchell angle. His league sources said they're not impressed with Cassel, especially considering the talent he had around him in New England.

"I look at Cassel and I think Scott Mitchell," one longtime NFC personnel man said yesterday. "That’s who I see."

I'm not a professional judge of talent so my argument against Cassel being the next Scott Mitchell isn't complete. There's always a chance that the team has fallen in love with Cassel and are grading him optimistically. 

The argument against this of course is that Pioli has been around Cassel for the last four years and knows him as well as anyone else.

Bill Belichick Doesn't Do Any Favors

"Bill Belichick wouldn’t do his mother a favor," one NFL insider scoffed yesterday. "Anybody who looks at this deal and thinks he did doesn’t know him. Or the guys he just traded."

To me it doesn't necessarily bode well from the Chiefs perspective if Belichick dealt him for what has been perceived as a below market deal.

Pioli said he and Belichick agreed on a player 95% of the time. I wonder if Cassel is one of the 5%.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. You know how we've been saying 'In Pioli We Trust' around here? In New England the mantra is 'In Bill We Trust'.

The Deal Wasn't Below Market

Mike Reiss of the Boston Globe opines that the deal isn't as lopsided as some say.  He argues that the market was never there for Cassel in the first place and it's not a "fleece job." The Patriots never had the leverage to swing a deal better than the one they got.*

I gotta disagree on this one. I'm not privy to the talks between Detroit and New England but if the Lions were involved, couldn't they offer a higher second round pick (33rd to the Chiefs 34th)? And why would the Pats trade him to an AFC team over a NFC team is the offers were equal (which the Lions 2nd round pick would have been)?

Dan Shaughnessy of the Boston Globe says that the fans should learn by now that the Patriots operate without emotions and Belichick got the best deal that was out there.

Most fans have come to accept the abject bloodlessness of Patriot Place. There are no gold watches or thank you notes passed out in Foxborough. Sentiment is wasted energy. When the Patriots are done with you, they say, "We wish [insert popular player's name] the best," then they move on to the next guy. Thanks for the Super Bowl rings you delivered, now turn in your playbook and clean out your desk. We'll walk you to your car.

Merlin from Arrowhead Addict disagrees with the trade:

What QB has come off the bench, had a good year then moved to another team and became a top QB? Scott Mitchell? Matt Schaub? Billy Volek? What QB has moved away from throwing to Randy Moss and done as well elsewhere? Daunte Culpepper?

Jason Whitlock took the pessimistic approach to the situation. There's some discussion in the FanShots about his piece.

***

My natural position on the Chiefs is optimism right now. So when I heard about the trade I immediately made up my mind that it was a good move. I agreed with the trade based partly on Cassel's play and partly on my trust in the Chiefs new management team.

The detractors of the trade listed above make good points but I keep coming back to the fact that Pioli and Belichick worked together and they both drafted Cassel and our guy, Pioli, chose him. I pretty much trust all his moves at this point.  With his track record in New England he hasn't given us any reason to think otherwise.

The Cassel to the Chiefs trade could end up defining the Pioli/Belichick split. If it works out in the Chiefs favor, then Pioli has fully stepped out of the shadow. If Cassel flops, then Belichick stroked his magic wand once again.

Comment 42 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yeah there are two

sides to every story. while there is a chance that cassel could be a scott mitchell type, the reward far outweighs the risk in my opinion. Basically when it comes down to it you are drafting a franchise quarterback with half a second round pick. Now the last qb we drafted with a similar pick turned out to be made of glass, but cassel at least has some track record in the NFL. Basically its hard to make a compelling counter argument that against this trade in my opinion.

by wjp1982 on Mar 1, 2009 10:07 AM CST reply actions  

Yep

Put it this way….Is Cassel better than Stafford or Sanchez? Yes. And he cost less than both of those guys (and probably less than Josh Freeman if he goes in the first round).

Management apparently decided Thigpen wasn’t the guy so they went out and got the best player available. It’s a solid move.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:08 AM CST up reply actions  

+ 1

Cassel doesnt have to play in the Arrowspread to be a good QB either.

by Jay 23 on Mar 1, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep,at least with pieces around him

we know Cassel can play, a rookie QB is a shot in the dark.

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Completely agree.....

…..and we still have Thigpen who does seem to have some good potential. The quarterback situation is fixed for now and they can proceed with FA and the draft having already strengthened two week spots.

by jcox31mc on Mar 1, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

"Slash" Thigpen

We’ll see how imaginative Haley and Gailey are.

If they use Thigpen periodically in the same backfield with Cassel what does the other team’s defense have to worry about?

mkaynan

by mkaynan on Mar 1, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Ron Borges' comments don't really hold much water

in my opinion considering the following:

“The Boston Globe today suspended without pay for two months a veteran sports reporter, Ron Borges, after allegations that he had plagiarized a portion of a football column from another sportswriter.”

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/city_region/breaking_news/2007/03/globe_suspends.html

by NJ_Chief on Mar 1, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I remember hearing that

I can see how the New England writers would be more biased with Belichick and his success though.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Wonder if Chan was in on this discussion?

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:13 AM CST reply actions  

I'm sure he was

It only makes sense because he was the offensive coordinator.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:13 AM CST up reply actions  

Man I would like to

be able to hide in a corner at Arrowhead, and just watch , and listen. I would be sworn to secrecy!

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

Chiefs got a steal...

2 starters for one 2nd rounder. Any rookie qb we could have drafted would have to do his time on the bench. Cassells done it already, as is now set to come in and BALL!

by ArrowDread on Mar 1, 2009 10:16 AM CST reply actions  

Agreed

I keep looking at it as Cassel vs. Stafford/Sanchez and considering the compensation for each this is a good deal.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:19 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah

Imagine we were talking about using the #3 overall on Cassel? Which, even if this deal was for the #3 pick, it wouldn’t be the worst trade in the world. The fact that it was just a second makes this very pleasing to me.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions  

besides if cassell doesnt pan out

he is not contracted. he is playing for the chiefs on a fanchise tender.

by chiefs8288 on Mar 1, 2009 10:21 AM CST reply actions  

He'll sign a long-term deal this offseason

There’s no way he enters the season without a long-term deal.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

They are working on a long term deal correct?

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

No reports indicating that

But the deal was likely made with the assumption that he’ll be signed to a long-term deal.

We wouldn’t give up a 2nd for him then risk him getting a massive offer in free agency. My guess is the parameters of the deal will be discussed soon, if they haven’t already.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

What about Cassell + Thigpen

running the Wildcat? We know Thiggys got wheels and can catch. That would be tight!

by ArrowDread on Mar 1, 2009 10:23 AM CST reply actions  

Why not?

I think the front office knows Thigpen has some value to the Chiefs and will use him wherever they can.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:25 AM CST up reply actions  

OK, now lets work on protecting this QB!

We need o-line help in the worst way now, it appears we now have our franchise QB.

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep

Signing Cassel now means there’s a bigger emphasis on protecting him. I’m just trying to forget how awful our offensive line was in a traditional style offense and without a mobile QB.

by Joel Thorman on Mar 1, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Want me some pancakes!

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions  

now you're talkin

the performance enhancing drugs argument begins with lassic eye surgery

by nayjevin on Mar 1, 2009 4:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Sour grapes

When someone gets a new car that you don’t like I bet you say it a piece of junk. That is what NE people are doing.

by Aejfan on Mar 1, 2009 10:32 AM CST reply actions  

Build the offfense first,

then work on the defense? After all without points, you cannot do shit.

Now hopefully this team is fun to watch again! Thanks Scott, Clark!!

by Eric Allen on Mar 1, 2009 10:32 AM CST reply actions  

Hey, I'd bet it was just the timing..............

A three way trade would have been much more complicated and I’m sure that the Patriot’s have other deals that they wanted to get to work on. They need the cap room right away.

by jcox31mc on Mar 1, 2009 10:45 AM CST reply actions  

What QB has come off the bench, had a good year then moved to another team and became a top QB?

Jon Kitna? Kurt Warner? Trent Green? Not exactly the same situation, but I’m just sayin. Elvis Grbac wasn’t bad, he just had a two cent head. He did make a Pro Bowl as a Chief though.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Mar 1, 2009 10:50 AM CST reply actions  

Absolutely.

That AA quote made my blood boil. They’re just pissed that now that Vick/Cowher to KC ain’t gonna happen.

-cw

"If there’s a god he’s laughing at us and our football team." - Ben Folds

by webby37 on Mar 1, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't forget Gannon

We let him go to our arch-nemesis and he played like a star.

by Chiefs4Life on Mar 1, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Re: the Cutler, Tampa Bay, 1st and 3rd round to NE deal.

Some you here are speculating wildly about “Belichick sticking it to McDaniels” or that “NE turned the offer down”. These things simply aren’t true.

The KC/NE deal was essentially finalized before Tampa Bay called NE to make the offer. NE wanted to take the deal, but there was nothing that could be done about it. The paper work was already in the league office. This has been confirmed by WEEI (radio in Boston) and was initially reported by Mortenson.

The Patriots even called around to the teams who had expressed interest before they finalized the deal with KC and no one responded. KC had the best offer and there were no signs that anyone else was interested. So, the deal went through. That’s the story, as confirmed by Mike Felger on WEEI (he used to work the Patriots’ beat for years at the Boston Herald).

by a tommy point on Mar 1, 2009 10:54 AM CST reply actions  

When I say that NE wanted to take the deal, I mean that they wanted to take the Tampa Bay deal when they offered it, but it was too late. The paper work with KC was already done.

by a tommy point on Mar 1, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Mortenson, pfft.

You think it's coincidence that I bleed red?

by Mully on Mar 1, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Not fond of him either, but he had this one right.

Schefter is owns ESPN when it comes to scoops.

by a tommy point on Mar 1, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions  

It's Not A Matter Of Being Fond Of Mort

It’s a matter of being suspicious that he actually fabricates sources and stories.

Predictions for 2009

1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.

by UCrawford on Mar 1, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions  

Which is why I’m not fond of him.

by a tommy point on Mar 1, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

lol will see

that was behind the patriots o-line !!!!!!!! Now lets see what he does behind the chiefs o-line,im not sold on this yet.We now have a 14 million dollar qb who is going to get killed because we have made not one move to sign anyone,damn brown would have been nice,our o-line is crap!!!!!!!I also think tyler thigpen could have won 11 games with the patriots!!!!!

by CPT.Caveman on Mar 1, 2009 3:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Cassel Trade

Only time will tell who is the personnel genius – Belichek or Pioli.

mkaynan

by mkaynan on Mar 1, 2009 11:17 AM CST reply actions  

Is it possible they both are?

Looks like a good deal for both sides. Maybe Pioli got hooked up for his years of loyal service, like a nice parting gift?

by ArrowDread on Mar 1, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL... Borges

Easily one of the worst writers out there. Don’t read anything he puts out regarding Belichick, as he is no better than your average troll.

by NESilver on Mar 1, 2009 11:37 AM CST reply actions  

Anyone else think...

…this is was the media will use as the be-all-end-all reference point to decide who was the brains behind the New England Dynasty? It will be a completely UNFAIR implication, mind you, but that is how the media works. If Cassel busts: “Belichick was obviously the brains behind NE.” If Cassel turns out to be great: “Clearly Scott Pioli was the genius working in the NE dynasty.”

Again, completely naive and unfair to ascertain either, but I can just about guarantee you that is was will happen before the end of next year.

Going on to these reports that Cassel is the next Scott Mitchell, all of those assumptions COMPLETELY ignore one key factor that I think is more than worth noting: TWO of the teams that apparently wanted Cassel (Denver & KC) both had initiators of the trade who WORKED IN THE PATRIOTS ORGANIZATION no more than THREE MONTHS AGO. One was the V.P. of Player Personnel and one was Cassel’s personal coach. Those don’t sound like people who aren’t WELL AWARE of what they were to be given.

by jbj8609 on Mar 1, 2009 12:04 PM CST reply actions  

Exactly right.......

Those that know Cassel knew that he is the real thing.

by jcox31mc on Mar 1, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Patriots fans are used to this...

What do you think happened when Tom Brady went down? The media couldn’t wait to see who was responsible for New England’s success. The question became, “Is Belichick really a genius, or was it just Tom Brady all those years?”

Belichick answered with an 11-5 season.

by NESilver on Mar 1, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Not a two-value question

Maybe Bill was the guiding hand, but everyone contributes to winning, just like everyone “helps” failure to come about.

Which isn’t to say that you’re entirely wrong there, “KCGold”. ;-)

Cassel vs. Thigpen in Camp should improve the play of both.
Next on the need list: linebacker, and both lines

by Bleedingredandgold on Mar 1, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree with you

And you guys are killin’ me with that nickname…

by NESilver on Mar 1, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Heh, you just gotta feel the love here!

Besides, there are worse nicks. “NESilver&Black” springs to mind…

{Grins Evilly}

Cassel vs. Thigpen in Camp should improve the play of both.
Next on the need list: linebacker, and both lines

by Bleedingredandgold on Mar 1, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Even if he does flop

which i don’t think he will, It’ll only be for a second round pick. Its not like its gonna set our franchise back for years. We got Vrabel in the deal as well

by SayHeyWerd on Mar 1, 2009 12:10 PM CST reply actions  

yeah

for the trade to be a bust, both Cassel & Vrabel gotta suck. Either one excels, and it’s FTW for us.

Cassel vs. Thigpen in Camp should improve the play of both.
Next on the need list: linebacker, and both lines

by Bleedingredandgold on Mar 1, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions  

We received two starters for one draft pick

That’s all that matters. We gave up a high second rounder for someone else’s backup QB and an old LB, but the QB has shown he can play at a high level (higher than Thiggy) and the LB has maybe a few years left in the tank. Two starters for one pick sounds like a good deal to me. Wish we would have signed Brown to replace the loss of drafting Mack/Unger with that high second though.

by Chiefs4Life on Mar 1, 2009 2:59 PM CST reply actions  

lol come on

How can anyone compare the 2 qb’s ,yes cassel looked good but who wouldnt in that offense!!!!!Let me see tyler thigpen in that offense for 16 games then ill tell you who’s better!!! signing cassell not only cost us the 34th pick but more hole’s to fill!!!! At least tyler did a good job with the o-line we had,the d-fense was the problem we lost 6 or 7 games by 7 points or less because of the d-fense!!!!!!Now we have the chance to draft aaron curry but we wont,cause they will now trade down for more picks to make up for the loss of the 34th pick watch and see

by CPT.Caveman on Mar 1, 2009 4:00 PM CST up reply actions  

They won't be able to trade down

Few teams want to trade into the top 5. The only hope we really have is someone being desperate for Crabtree, and I doubt that will happen since he hasn’t been able to work out this offseason. I still see us taking Curry at #3, but if we can trade sown I’d be fine with taking Cushing at OLB and finding an O lineman with the additional pick we’d get. That would improve our D and get some protection for our new QB. Which brings us to comparing the QBs. I’m not knocking Thiggy, and it’s true most QBs could play well with the talent pool in NE, but Cassel had very completion % and TD:INT ratio. Thiggy made some poor decisions that I don’t think Cassel would have made. The point is Cassel can play and Thigs can play, now they actually get to compete for the spot, which makes the team better. We still picked up two starting quality players for one draft pick.

by Chiefs4Life on Mar 1, 2009 5:17 PM CST up reply actions  

great points
The Deal Wasn’t Below Market

Mike Reiss of the Boston Globe opines that the deal isn’t as lopsided as some say. He argues that the market was never there for Cassel in the first place and it’s not a “fleece job.” The Patriots never had the leverage to swing a deal better than the one they got.*

I gotta disagree on this one. I’m not privy to the talks between Detroit and New England but if the Lions were involved, couldn’t they offer a higher second round pick (33rd to the Chiefs 34th)? And why would the Pats trade him to an AFC team over a NFC team is the offers were equal (which the Lions 2nd round pick would have been)?

the performance enhancing drugs argument begins with lassic eye surgery

by nayjevin on Mar 1, 2009 4:51 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs
Stag_20silhouette_small
Weekly Official AP Mock-tastic Thread 1/31-2/6 Post-Senior-Bowl-edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Images_small
Flowers vs Carr: 1 vs 2??
Eric-berry_small
My Chiefs Offseason based off of scenarios
Small
I guess I did get knocked off, and I understand why
Supernova1007_small
Building the Perfect Defensive Beast
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
Playing DabollBall, and a look back at past head coaches
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
10452014-small_small
My Favorite Chiefs- Offense (1980's-Present Edition)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI