The Case For A Draft Surprise
I know, I know. Defense is the need.
All season long, the evidence was clear enough that we needed major help along our front seven. The pitiful league record in sacks is enough to declare the lack of a legitimate pass rush as not only major need, but our sole priority for some. And the defense only continues to keep us all up in arms.
3-4 vs. 4-3. Who still fits? Who doesn't? How will Dorsey handle the transition? How was Dorsey mishandled? The failures of Gunther vs. the arrivals of defensive coaches we don't particularly care for either. Hopefully Crennel can help some here.
Hell, how often does a group of fans argue over the status of a DL coach (Krumrie, anyone?).
But let me say this: KC needs a wide receiver more than anything else.
The thought of Aaron Curry in Chiefs colors for life is certainly a fantastic thought and one that I would not be frustrated with should that come true. But what I'm realizing is that some particular football-oriented planets are aligning in such a way that we could take a different direction and still come out okay.
Some things to consider:
1. Tony Gonzalez might be gone. Increasingly, the chatter continues from this future HoFer whereas at one point in time, we never heard any negativity from him. A locker room spoiler, we cannot tolerate and Piolo knows it (see Deion Branch, Asante Samuel). But we cannot throw Thigpen (or anyone else) to the wolves by not offensively preparing for the loss of our number one target and most reliable receiver.
2. Allow us to hide Bowe. I don't want to slam Bowe. I think he's phenomenal and will only get better. But there are facets to his game that certainly need work and having Gonzalez around allow us to keep defenses honest in that way. Grabbing another complementary receiver preps for Gonzalez's departure either immediately or in the near future (next couple years).
3. Special Teams. This is most important. Possessing a game changer on special teams can absolutely alter everything in a game, where momentum is king. We knew it when we had Dante Hall in his prime. When Devin Hester touched the ball over the last couple years, Bears fans still had hope. Few men can give a team that hope, but when you can, you appreciate it for all its worth.
Jeremy Maclin seems to be that man. He's absolutely electric, can still contribute in major ways on offense and use him in end-arounds and specialized offensive plays suitable for him. And yet we also still have the offensive playmakers so we don't have to call him "savior" and place that pressure upon him.
KC hasn't enjoyed a return for a TD of any kind since October, 2006 when Hall took one 60 yards. That's two and a half seasons since our special teams could alter the face of a game for us.Of course, special teams is not the end all we once thought it was three or four seasons ago (when pundits were saying how the best teams got it done on special teams). But an electric player like Maclin changes everything.
Even if we end up with Curry or a DL (Raji?) in the first round, there are six WRs available that scouts insist deserve first round consideration - Percy Harvin, Jeremy Maclin, Michael Crabtree, Hakeem Nicks, Darrius Heyward-Bey and Kenny Britt. Of course, many of those will get taken, but the NFL is won in the trenches and teams know that. So I can't imagine all six get taken with a team's first round pick.
This means someone like Nicks ends up sliding to the top of the second round. And it means we add a Boldin-styled receiver who might not fly past defenders with his top-end speed but who can run crisp routes and catch anything with the best of them. Paired with Bowe and possibly Gonzalez and you ensure the continued development of our young offensive players as well as the ability to stay competitive within games as our defense develops (remember, it will take several games - preseason and regular - to understand the game plan, make adjustments and get comfortable).
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
I'm a huge Hakeem Nicks fan.
I know alot of people want Mack/Unger in the 2nd, but I like the way Nicks plays. Luigs and Caldwell will be available in the 3rd, and while I agree they are a step down from the top 2, they aren’t scrubs either.
by JasonM on Feb 21, 2009 11:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nicks is a play maker for sure
Everytime you see him, he is making a “Fitzgerald” type catch. I would like to see this guy in KC.
AFC West Champs in 2009? Mayyybee.
by cmpotter on Feb 21, 2009 7:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we addressed OLB, ILB, and some kind of O-line in FA I wouldn’t mind taking a reciever in the 2nd.
by JrGrayson on Feb 21, 2009 11:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Stinchcomb!!
yeah, agreed, that’s why we go for Stinchcomb, he brings in experience, and can give us 4+ years of quality.
by Red and Gold on Feb 21, 2009 1:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
very
nice post. I agree we need another receiver.
by whodachefs? on Feb 21, 2009 12:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ramses Barden
I’ll take him in the 3rd over Nicks in the 2nd
by GracieKal on Feb 21, 2009 1:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
The WR demand is too high
I think they’ll get plucked. Plus with Dwayne Bowe and Mark Bradley on our team WR is the least of our concerns. We need help in both trenches and the linebacking core…
Gamechanger huh… so he would be changing the game from losing by a lot to losing by a little? That’s how it will be without the trenches! The Giants and Steelers showed us how important the trenches are in the last two superbowls
Time is a great teacher... unfortunately it kills all it's pupils.
by 808NaNz808 on Feb 21, 2009 3:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yahtzee...I couldn't have put it any better
I love me some Maclin. I think he is more valuable than Crabtree is, but WR is something that the Chiefs will have to make due with what we got until other positions are in order. Build from inside out.
I understand you want to sneak a WR in at a mid round pick, but taking a LB, DE, or OL will go a lot further in helping the Chiefs become a winner faster than taking a player that touches the ball maybe 5 times a game tops.
by JZChiefsfan on Feb 21, 2009 4:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My only disagreement with your statement is that Maclin would
touch 3-4 kickoffs, 5-6 punts, 2-3 passes, and 3-4 runs in spread type offense. Thats 15 touches.
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 5:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hmmm
you think our defense is going to give up 3-4 scores and force 5-6 punts in the same game? that’s a bit of an oxymoron
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
by kcguy on Feb 21, 2009 5:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
When we have OUR 3-DC defense in place
I imagine
1 – kickoff to start game
multiple punts to return over game
2-3 enemy field goals
A few reverses
A few screens
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
2-3 passes?
more like 8-10, if we drafted J-Mac he would have a minimum of 20 touches a game.
by JasonM on Feb 21, 2009 6:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maclin...
Ok first of all….I was talking about OTHER WR’s taken with our 2nd round pick. MACLIN will be lllllllloooooooooonnnnnnngggggg gone by then. So you guys talking about how many touches Maclin will have is a moot point. Yes Maclin will have more touches than Nicks, Britt, etc, but we won’t be in a position to draft him unless we take him at #3 which we prob won’t do.
by JZChiefsfan on Feb 21, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No S#!t
He will be drafted in the top 15 of the draft, so no need to show how much more you know about the draft than me. I was hypothetically saying that if we drafted Maclin, he would have atleast 20 touches a game.
by JasonM on Feb 21, 2009 6:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well Jason
my reply was really towards Steve. I think my statement was misunderstood. No offense intended to either one of you guys if any was taken if I came off as being rude. My comment about touches a game was geared more towards Nicks and other WR’s, not Maclin. Personally, I love Maclin.
But…just considering Maclin (hypothetically) as a Chief. 20 touches a game seems to be extreme? You have to consider that he would be a rookie coming in. Also DBowe is our current #1 WR and you have to consider T-Gonz. Plus Thigpen already has a repor with both Bowe and Gonzo. So even with punts/KO’s/rec/runs I don’t think he would come in as a rookie and touch it that many times.
by JZChiefsfan on Feb 21, 2009 6:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Touch it, maybe not but threaten to touch it OHHHH yea.
No offense taken :)
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 6:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I posted about the KC love of defense. But
if Crabtree is hurt? And we want Butts in the seats?
And we want excitement with the 3rd pick.
And we want impact this year with the 3rd pick.
And at least some miniscule amount of Chiefs fans are MU fans.
And he is from MO
And he is moving closer to a top-5 pick
Just thinking.
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 6:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Maclin reminds me of Steve Smith a bit
He can take it to the house anytime he gets the rock.
AFC West Champs in 2009? Mayyybee.
by cmpotter on Feb 21, 2009 8:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
1. Stafford
2. Crabtree
3. Maclin
hm. 33 to 1
current Chiefs roster + 1 premiere LB FA + Crabtree + defensive draft = CONTENDAHS
"at least we don't need a punter"
by nayjevin on Feb 21, 2009 7:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Is that your top three draft order?
Or odds in Vegas
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 7:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm Sorry
MU didn’t need a punter.
Or we didn’t have one.
by Steve_Chiefs on Feb 21, 2009 9:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 




















