Breaking Down the Chiefs and Broncos Tape - O-Line
The Kansas City Chiefs dropped a second egg against the Denver Broncos. It was hard as a fan to watch a game like that, let alone two in a row, and come away with positives.
If you are a fan looking for a positive, any positive, from last weeks game...you might be reading the right post. The Denver game was the best our offensive lineman have performed since I started grading them. Especially when it came to pass protection.
So what was the problem against Denver? This post is not going to venture into that topic. It will, however, let you know how the offensive line performed against the Broncos on every play for every lineman in the first three quarters. The film never lies.
Observations after reviewing the film:
- The offensive lineman had their best game since I have been grading them. This is the time I am glad I grade these guys to show that despite the impression many fans walked away with on Sunday...the line really did do a good job.
- The backs missed at least 3 blitz pickups.
- When the Chiefs cut block they are not very affective. Most are seen on backside and on quick throws play-side. The backside cuts are the worst...they have little affect because the o-lineman does not get enough of the defender.
- Charles is just the type of runner this line needs. Hope he can hold up to the pounding.
- Center and Right Guard are still concerns.
- O'Callaghan was almost perfect going into the 3rd quarter except for 2nd level blocks (which are difficult). Then he fell apart. Missed 4 of 5 run blocks and 2 of 4 pass blocks at one point.
- Even though I did not grade the WR. I can say with some confidence that the WR group may be the worst area, now, when it comes to blocking.
- I changed the RB Double column to a Reach Block column. So now I am showing how many times the o-lineman was successful at reach blocking the defender next to him.
- Cottom was in on more run plays but was rarely at he point of attack. Pope received that honor.
Here are the grades from first three quarters against the Denver Broncos :
DENVER BRONCOS
|
| PLAYER | RB SOLO | Reach Block | SECOND LEVEL | PB SOLO | PB DOUBLE | Driven |
| Albert | 90% | -- | 3 of 4 | 93% | 100% | 1 |
| Waters | 90% | 85% | 5 of 6 | 98% | 100% | 2 |
| Niswanger | 78% | 85% | 2 of 3 | 95% | 100% | 5 |
| Smith | 78% | 70% | 2 of 2 | 86% | 100% | 6 |
| O'Callaghan | 78% | -- | 0 of 3 | 89% | 100% | 1 |
| Pope | 75% | -- | -- | 80% | -- | 2 |
| Cottam | 100% | -- | -- | -- | 100% | -- |
Great job offensive line. Both Albert and Waters topped the ninety percent mark in both run blocking and pass blocking.
| TOP GRADE AWARD |
TOP GRADE AWARD |
|
![]() |
![]() |
I am starting a new, fun, award for this post. It is called the "Driven by Miss Daisy Award". It will be the top lineman who has the most 'Driven' tallies for that game. This week the winner is...
| MISS DAISY | DRIVEN BY MISS DAISY AWARD | |
![]() |
![]() |
Previous grades for Chargers 2nd game, Steelers game, Raiders game, Jaguars game, Chargers 1st game for those of you that would like to track progress.
| PAST SIX GAMES |
|||
| GP | Player | Top Grade Award |
# of Drivens |
| 5 | Albert | 1 |
3 |
| 6 | Waters |
4 |
4 |
| 6 | Niswanger | 0 |
12 |
| 3 | Smith | 0 |
7 |
| 6 | O'Callaghan | 2 |
7 |
| 3 | Pope | 1 |
2 |
| 2 | Cottom | 0 |
3 |
| 2 | Alleman | 0 |
4 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's how the grading works:
- Each offensive lineman was given a "+" for doing their job or a "-" for failing to do their job on each play.
- These pluses and minuses were grouped into the type of block they were asked to do, e.g., a run block solo (RB Solo), a run block double team (RB Double), or a pass block solo (PB Solo), etc.
- A "D", for "driven", was assigned every time a player was manhandled during a pass or run play.
- The quality of the lineman's play is represented as a percentage above. The higher the percentage the better the lineman did.
- I tried to be very strict...I think Haley would want it that way.
- One important note, some plays were unclear as to who exactly did not do their job, e.g., a defensive tackle going unblocked at the line of scrimmage. Was it the centers fault? The guards fault? In these cases it was clear that a mistake was made and the player that looked to be most at fault was assigned the blame.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
14 recs |
38 comments
|
Comments
Much appreciated, as usual, Bewsaf
Rec’d
Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"
by KCporkchop on Dec 8, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Thanks Porkchop
Where is my weekly glass of cool aid? Or did that dry up?
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
love the “driven by miss daisy” award
by reedeasy on Dec 8, 2009 10:04 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Awesome job, been waiting for this since 3:00pm on Sunday
looks like the left side of the line has settled in nicely.
OCall still showing to be avg NFL player, more than serviceable enough to go forward with.
This draft/offseason is screaming for a C and RG.
Does your analysis help put to rest that we don’t need to replace Albert at LT; it appears to me that he has been improving all season, (I live our of state and never see any of the games), is this backed up with your numbers?
by Your_Moms_Boyfriend on Dec 8, 2009 10:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Albert played better this game
Give me four more games to watch him and I will let you know.
O’Callaghan is good enough to focus on center and right guard this off season.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say C and RT
Colin Brown B. Rich. and Ndukwe can fight for the RG position if we brought in Fox to back up O’Callaghan, until he gets down the zone blocking scheme.
by mcclanahanman on Dec 8, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Brown will be contesting for RG/RT. I expect him to end up swing T/G.
But I agree that if a talented RT falls to KC, they probably make more hay that way.
"Ow! You knocked my tooth out!!"
"Yeah? Well, Colt makes a heavy firearm. That's a fact."
by hmills110 on Dec 8, 2009 7:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting
I do see progress on the OL…
and it’s no coincidence that it starts w/Albert and Waters
I do think there’s a good chance that both guys stay in their current positions next year.
Draft a Center, at least!
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
by stagdsp on Dec 8, 2009 10:19 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
It is looking like that could be a choice
I really like how the line did this game. Like I said in the last post. A natural pocket is forming. That means Cassel should start to be more comfortable in the pocket. And when there is pressure then he should be able to move in a more normal escape route to buy more time to get the ball down field.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Rudy has issues
But I will say that he might be more valuable now as a backup since he has played center for 2 years. (He was a guard)
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Not sure what level he performed at as a gaurd, but I wonder how the line looks with him at RG and a brand new C……..might be a much better performing O-line then.
by Hail2DaChiefs on Dec 8, 2009 3:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I still think Ndukwe or Alleman would be better at RG
Rudy as a backup, along with Wade
Unless Colin Brown is ready to go next year!
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
by stagdsp on Dec 8, 2009 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think what we could agree on...
is the Chiefs could have some quality depth when a couple of starters are brought in. That would be pretty good to go from bad to a team that is deep at o-line in two years.
Have to pull the correct stings this next off season though.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 5:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, and for all the hoopla for Pioli and wide bodies, I've not cared much for what NE has done on O-Line.
"Ow! You knocked my tooth out!!"
"Yeah? Well, Colt makes a heavy firearm. That's a fact."
by hmills110 on Dec 8, 2009 7:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Question.
Is it possible that the improved production of our line comes from Denver’s defensive plans rather than actual improvement?
After all, Cassel couldn’t find an open receiver pretty much all game.
Is it possible that, rather than blitzing, Denver decided to simply cover the receivers and make Cassel beat them with his throws (which, clearly seems like a decent game plan as he was noticably uncomfortable throwing to covered receivers)?
by JacinB on Dec 8, 2009 10:46 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Denver
did have some plays when they rushed only 3 down lineman. In those cases Cassel had a lot of time. I will say that in past games the line would have trouble with only 3 rushers.
Denver’s down 3 are also fast. The knock on them is they are not as physical as a team would like.
The good part is that when Denver did send 4 the Chiefs picked it up.
I noticed a couple of things that do not show up in the stats…
1. A natural pocket is starting to form.
2. When the line does their different protections…all 5 guys seem to be on the same page. They look like they are moving as one.
3. More guys have their head on a swivel when no one rushes into their area.
4. More guys attempt to help block with one defender and at the same time pick up a looping d-lineman or blitz delay.
Of course if they fall apart the next two games we can say it was just the Denver scheme. But at this point…I like what I see.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I'm thinking along JacinB's lines.
Doing well against Bewsaf is pretty important. Indicative of better quickness at the new weight. Haven’t seen much of Buffalo this year, since early on, but they gave New England’s leaky o-line lots of problems. I think they’ll match up better on stout than Denver (and I think Denver’s lack of stout will either keep them outta the playoffs or lead to an early exit, depending on the matchup).
"Ow! You knocked my tooth out!!"
"Yeah? Well, Colt makes a heavy firearm. That's a fact."
by hmills110 on Dec 8, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what grade...
…would you give Casey Wiegman after taking Ron Edwards to the wood shed?
by J ray on Dec 9, 2009 4:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I love these posts, Bewsaf, and appreciate the effort you put into them - they always get a rec from me!
I do have one question – why do you only cover the first three quarters in your grades? Is it just a time thing, or something else?
-"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married." - H.L. Mencken
by Big Chief on Dec 8, 2009 11:54 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
his dvr cut off the 4th quarter on his first post
so, he’s staying consistant, for apples-to-apples comparison
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers
by stagdsp on Dec 8, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That dang DVR
although…it might have saved me some agony.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 12:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Another question
Was Albert on Dumervil for the bulk of the game or did Elvis move around? If Albert was taking him for most of the game it makes his performance even more impressive.
-"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married." - H.L. Mencken
by Big Chief on Dec 8, 2009 11:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure how many times Dumervil lined up in other spots
Since the line did well all the way around against the pass rush…it didn’t seem to matter.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 1:03 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And we only gave up 2 sacks...
Which with our line (and the 37 we had given up leading up to the Denver game) is an improvement. On average we had been giving up 3.4 sacks/game.
by Eastcoastransplant on Dec 8, 2009 12:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
They had little to fear from Cassel in the pocket.
"Ow! You knocked my tooth out!!"
"Yeah? Well, Colt makes a heavy firearm. That's a fact."
by hmills110 on Dec 8, 2009 7:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll rec this...
If for no other reason those that keep blaming the o-line for Cassel’s play should take note. They played good enough to win. JC was right. Someone else needs to step up.
by 12t on Dec 8, 2009 12:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think it should take a couple of games
for Cassel to get used to the extra time he has. When that comfort level kicks in then it is all on him and the WRs.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 12:58 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I surely hope so.
Imagine that, needing to get used to having time to throw the football – now all we need is for some receivers to get open and when they do… Dont Drop The Freaking BALL!
BTW I just watched Murderball, which is freaking insane. I think we need that dude, Mark Zupan, to come on up to KC and give some serious GET MAD and get passionate speech. I mean that dude is nuts (in a fully inspirational way).
by Eastcoastransplant on Dec 8, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Excellent
I count this rating work you’re doing as, consistently,one of the top three most relevant posts each week. Anyone who understands football understands what a significant question you’re answering by taking time to do this each week. I don’t have access to Chiefs film. Thanks.
by crackpipe on Dec 8, 2009 2:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nice to see Albert FINALLY grade high
Looking at the grades all year it confirms our weaknesses are at C and RG.
When does Ndukwe get his shot?
by Nick Britt on Dec 8, 2009 2:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good question
I know a couple of APers wanting to see what Ndukwe could do at guard. Previously, I wanted to see Smith at guard due to his pass blocking success at center. But we have had two games to see that, even though he might be holding on, we still need to get an upgrade at RG next year.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 2:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Question on the driven....
Because a guy is driven into the backfield doesn’t mean he was beat. If he stays engaged they could push him all over without getting to the QB, or back. Are you saying these “drivens” are all negative plays?
by 12t on Dec 8, 2009 5:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good point
No…There were times when I marked ‘job done’ and at the same time marked ‘driven’. This is, of course, a subjective thing because the simple fact that the defender “bubbles” an area messes with the play. In the run it can make a running back cut up or have to bounce the play outside. Most NFL teams love to see you bounce it outside…because they have the speed to run you down.
On the pass it can distract a QB, at the least, and at times flush him from the pocket even though the defender may not be in any real threat to sack him. It also does not allow the QB to step into his throw if the pressure is coming from the middle…which occurs for the Chiefs most often…as you can see that Niswanger and Smith have the most drivens.
I also think that in general it might say something about the player. Basically, if you have a high number of drivens you may be outgunned in some physical way, e.g., people say Niswanger is to tall to be a center. Therefore, bull type DT might be able to get under his pads more and get a good push on him.
I might also point out to everyone that DTs tend to be bull types. Guards and centers are more likely to be driven because they face the DTs more. While DE might have a combination of speed and power and face the OT more.
Bewsaf
by Bewsaf on Dec 8, 2009 5:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent stuff and Rec
I love the Driven stat and the term itself. Now I want to see D-players driven by our O-line like Roaf, Shields, Waters and Weigman used to do.
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Dec 8, 2009 6:48 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs

by 
























