Five Things the Chiefs Need to Fix to Beat the Broncos
Back on December 6th, the Denver Broncos whooped the Chiefs by a score of 44 to 13. It was a depressing day for a number of reasons. It was a blowout loss to a division rival; the Chiefs retired Derrick Thomas' number and the Chiefs' D did squat to honor that; and Matt Cassel was replaced in game for the first time this season (without being injured).
In Week 17, the Broncos are teetering on the edge of the playoffs, essentially needing a win in Denver against the Chiefs to make it in.
How can the Chiefs help derail the Broncos' playoff chances? Well, they're going to have to fix a number of things that went wrong in the first meeting between these two teams.
After the jump, we're taking a look at the Chiefs/Broncos first meeting of the season and seeing what the Chiefs need to fix to come out of Denver with a win.
Matt Cassel can't play like he did
Let's face it: One of the many reasons the Chiefs lost so terribly against the Broncos was Matt Cassel's poor play. Cassel was 10/29 for 84 and two picks. It was his worst day as an NFL quarterback.
The bottom line is, unless you put up 351 yards rushing, you need your quarterback to make more than 10 completions and pass for more than 100 yards. I think Cassell will accomplish that this weekend.
Offensive line needs to take it up a notch
Even though the o-line did a decent job of opening up running lanes in the first half (63 yards rushing before the game went entirely passing for the Chiefs), they gave up two sacks and seven tackles for losses for the game.
Yes, Broncos DE Elvis Dumervil is a stud and the Chiefs did a good job of keeping him in check. But it's going to take a complete effort by the offensive line to beat the Broncos - protecting Matt Cassel, not letting the Broncos' D behind the line of scrimmage and creating running lanes for Jamaal Charles.
Turnovers: Capitalize and minimize
Yep, it's a cliche: Win the turnover battle. But here's how this is different leading up to this game.
The Chiefs and Broncos both had three turnovers the last time they played. Kyle Orton threw a pick on the Broncos first drive and the Chiefs went three and out on the next drive. The Broncos took the subsequent Colquitt punt and used the next eight plays to score a TD. It's almost as if Mike Brown's interception didn't happen.
At the half, this was a close game at 14 to 6. Halfway through the third quarter, Matt Cassel had thrown two picks which directly led to 10 Bronco points. The game was 24 to 6 at that point and essentially over for the Chiefs' impotent offense.
Do I even need to mention that a couple of minutes later the Chiefs fumbled and the Broncos recovered in the end zone? The Broncos capitalized on the Chiefs' three turnovers. The Chiefs only managed to capitalize on one Bronco turnover - the Tamba Hali strip near the goal line. That was a gimme.
The run defense, again
The Chiefs gave up 245 yards rushing to the likes of Correll Buckhalter, Peyton Hillis and Knowshon Moreno. The Chiefs did better last week against the Bengals defending the run. If the Chiefs can keep the Broncos to under 150 yards rushing, that increases our chances of a win exponentially.
Finish drives
The Chiefs' second drive against the Broncos was perhaps the best drive of the season - had the Chiefs scored a TD.
With the Broncos leading 3-0, the Chiefs got the ball on their own 2-yard line. 20 plays and nearly 8 minutes later, the Chiefs were looking at first and goal from the Broncos' 1-yard line.
What happened? Jamaal Charles lost three yards rushing on first down; Cassel's pass to Lance Long was incomplete on second down; and another Cassel pass was incomplete to Jamaal Charles on third down.
The Chiefs took three points after not being able to get 1 yard on three plays. The game would have been tied at seven if the Chiefs had scored a TD.
Personally, I think a touchdown there changes the game entirely. How confident could the Chiefs be if they couldn't score a TD on first and goal from the 1-yard line?
***
Will the Chiefs be able to fix all of these problems? I think Cassel will play better and the Chiefs won't give up as many rushing yards to the Broncos as they did in the first meeting.
Aside from that, I can't say with confidence I think the Chiefs will finish drives, capitalize on turnovers or turn in a good performance from the o-line.
What do you guys think? Can the Chiefs fix these problems and come out of Denver with a win?
48 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
We will win this game
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 9:40 AM CST up reply actions
"Matt Cassel can't play like did"?
Hitting the sauce early today Chris?
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 9:40 AM CST reply actions
Ha...
I can speak for Chris when I say that writing at 5:00 AM causes lots of typos :)
by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions
I love the irony
of me pointing out a typo.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't say they did "squat" to honor DT
At least Tamba had a DT style performance
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
I think McDaniels still has Cassel's number...
He helped create him and he will now break him…again… :P
I hope Cassel overcomes this though!
Biggest problem I see is...
With Cincy, we pretty much knew they were going to run, run, and run some more so it was easier to plan the defense. Our guys have a hard time planning and playing against both the run and the short pass right behind the LB’s where Orton is best suited to throw it. If we can bring the heat and still not give up the shallows then we will be alright.
Things of importance to me:
1)God
2)Family
3)Chiefs
4)Marine Corps
6. Score more points than they do
If the Chiefs do this, I can guarantee a win
Check out my blog on software development:
http://www.turnleafdesign.com/
by Scaryclouds on Dec 31, 2009 10:28 AM CST via mobile reply actions
John Madden?
Is that you?
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
problem I've seen, or think I've seen, over the course of the year is ...
we get one thing “fixed” and something else breaks down … more like 2 or 3 something elses (if that wasn’t a word before, it is now)
rather like a cartoon of a plumber trying to fix a leaky faucet, he plugs it up here and two more leaks spring up elsewhere … more patches, more leaks … more pipe, more leaks, more patches, more pipe, more leaks … you get the idea
OLine, taclking, run defense, fumbles, drops, play calling, special teams, passing, pass defense … if it isn’t one thing, it’s another …
I have no doubt we’ll play better in SOME of the areas we failed in the first time vs Denver, but I’m just as sure we’ll find someplace ELSE to screw it up (though even if we play a decently solid game, I think Denver has a better overall team, and playing at home, in Denver, is always tough for KC or anyone else)
hi, Mo!
5 minutes!!!
Yep, one week we score 30 something points and give up 300 rush yards...
The next week we contain the run but can’t get the offense going. I know what you mean, it’s like they focus on the previous weeks problems all week, fix them, but then forget how to manage other aspects of the game.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions
Take a freaking LEAD
This team is good at getting a tie. But it’s just that. Take a lead at the half… even at the end of the first quarter. That’ll give em confidence.
We are building a fighting force of extwaordinary magnitude.
+1
Matt Cassel – Play like the guy that Josh McD wanted for his team
Jamaal Charles – Hold onto the ball like your life depends on it
Defense and O-line – Many of you will not be on this team next year, play like you want a job next year.
Receivers – Put some freakin glue on your hands.
Go Chiefs! Knockin’ the Donkeys out of the playoffs is how we should end our season, and theirs.
by Spiderwomn69 on Dec 31, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions
I am with this
Got my tickets so will be there. Pretty good seats too considering the price paid.
Predictions for 2009:
The Chiefs will regret cutting LJ
Bowe's numbers regress due to lack of decent QB play.
The D gets better in the second half but still is plagued by big plays
Cassel looks more like the guy Pioli almost cut in the '08 preseason instead of the franchise QB he hoped he would be when he traded him for
Chiefs 3-13
by bonesjackson on Dec 31, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions
No Kidding!
How many times have we held a lead this season? 3 maybe 4 times all year. We are ALWAYS playing from behind or with a tie.
Not sure where to put this
Just found out the Chiefs let go a few long time members of the office staff including a gal who has been the secretary for every HC the Chiefs have ever had and Bob Gretz’ wife.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:00 AM CST reply actions
It pretty obvious...
Mrs. Gretz has been holding this team back for YEARS.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 11:03 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Bob
Is going to go on a rant over on his site now. When he was relieved from his duties with the Chiefs website his writing over on his site got a real negative vibe to it.
Things of importance to me:
1)God
2)Family
3)Chiefs
4)Marine Corps
H was never an employee of the Chiefs
He was employed by KCFX. KCFX let him go without informing teh Chiefs. I’m told CP was furious.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions
Gretz was pretty comical as a sideline reported
Mitch: Let’s go down to Bob Gretz on the sideline….Bob.
Gretz: Yeah Mitch, the Chiefs are all looking around…no one knows what going on, it’s mass confusion down here…back to you Mitch.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions
lol!
They should have done that sooner!
On a side note, Is it just me or is anybody else surprised that no assistants have been fired yet? I don’t know why but, I honestly expected Clancy to be gone before the season was over just so they could start the DC search early. Maybe I’m in the wrong about that.
Assistnat will be let go very shortly after the season
assuming changes will be made…
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
And please don't make fun of these firings
These are good, hard working people who no longer have jobs.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
Black Monday...
Clancy’s last day as an NFL coordinator.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions
I almost hope Krumrie gets the job
just to watch people’s heads explode around here ;)
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
Good lord...
That would be something.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 11:17 AM CST up reply actions
ROFLMAO
oh man i can’t stop laughing at that. it’s so sadistically cruel.
UCrawford will eventually calm down and realize that Haley isn't a bad coach.
Will embrace the Fire Haley Bandwagon if we lose to the raiders by more then a TD...
..But we aren't going to lose.
LJ will not land in Pittsburgh
The Chiefs will not be the number one pick in this years draft
The Chiefs first pick of the draft will NOT be a OL
Thinks UCrawford just needs a hug... offer is there when you are ready UC :p
Think they will keep Clancy on with a smaller position with less responsibility?
If we go into next season with him as our DC, I swear I will give up on Halioli. He’s not a very good DC…at all!
And, you are right about the firings.
I have no special insight on coaching changes
but my gut tells me he stays as DB coach.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions
It's possible
Afterall he wasn’t hired to be out coordinator, but took the position after we couldn’t find anyone.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
exactly
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 31, 2009 11:16 AM CST up reply actions
So...what are the chances of us getting him now?
With all the big name coaches out there this year, I doubt he will get a HC position anywhere. Wouldn’t it make perfect sense for him to come here? especially with his history with Pioli?
by Chiefsfan1970 on Dec 31, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions
I'm still not sure Clancy is the problem
I think the entire middle of our D is soft, and we don’t have a lot of options to deal with it. I hope at this time next year we have a new starting NT, Inside LBs, and at least one new starting Safety. I don’t know that Buddy Ryan or Dom Capers or Jim Johnson or [name your favorite DC] could accomplish much with what we have. I’d rather have some consistency in the coaching staff than to make a knee-jerk change when you have known problems. None of the guys we have now rate better than backups and are playing as starters. I can’t see dumping a DC with those holes.
If Haley decides to get a new DC, I won’t be upset (as long as he’s a 3-4 guy – I couldn’t imagine him doing otherwise), but I’m not going to be upset if Clancy comes back.
-"A man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is married." - H.L. Mencken
I am confident we have a new DC by the start of the 2010 season
Pendergast will probably be demoted to either LBs or DBs.
Al Groh and Romeo Crennel are both very real possibilities at DC.
Weis at OC. I would say maybe Mangini, but there may be a rift there between him and Pioli.
I want Russ Grimm
and I am going to pout now:( :)
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
by Steve_Chiefs on Dec 31, 2009 5:12 PM CST up reply actions
That's what I'm hoping as well.
I think he’s fine as an assistant, just NOT as the DC.
I agree with most on this one
I would love to keep Pendergast on as an assistant, but I would like to bring in Crennel…and Leach or Weis as the OC. With a QB coach as well.
Haley knows they need more coaches, he wasnt shy about how late it was to put a staff together..
Hmm
I have not gone with Kc in many games this year….but I believe we can win in Denver. I see Charles with 26-146 with 2 TD’s and 60 recieving yards off a big screen(yes we actually block out a screen!)
I think the D is lucky to be facing a struggling run attack from denver…I also think if the weather is good enough in terms of wind etc, Succop and Prater could make this difference with a few long range field goal attempts.
Field position wins this one….Cassel leads KC from behind down 10 and the Chiefs close out the season with 47 yarder from Succop…who drills it…sending denver fans home in a loud echo of “boooooooooo”
KC 27 Denver 24
win
Because I do not want to pick 3rd again. No one will ever trade with us.
by Alaskan Chief on Dec 31, 2009 12:42 PM CST via mobile reply actions
Chris Thorman
You forgot the most important variable. If you watched the last game the single worst performance on the field besides Cassel was Ron Edwards. Huge holes were made by Casey Wiegman that created the easy cut back lanes. Remeber Wiegman the guy that was to old and under sized to play center for the Chiefs any longer. Wiegman took Edwards to the wood shed so unless this improves it doesn’t matter the Chiefs will be destroyed.

by 























