KC Offense good on paper

by kc571 on Dec 21, 2009 2:49 PM CST

I'm sure most folks will disagree, but on the surface, I like the way our team has been built offensively. If we keep Chambers, I like him and Bowe. I like Long and Wade as the 4 and 5. I'm not completely sold on Bradley though. He's been good, and really bad with some of his drops. We might be able to pick up a free agent WR, as well as re-sign Chambers.

In Charles, we finally have a game changing player. I'm not so sure about his durability. If he adds size, he may take away some of his speed. In Cottam, I love the 6'7 target. And, I like the way Haley has been using him and Pope. Our line is coming around. Cassel has had some time to throw. And, he's making some plays too. Some of his passes are short, long, and behind the receivers. I think with a full year under his belt, with the same players, he'll be better.

In closing, with a good draft, some free agents, and possibly a coordinator, I think we'll be ok, or at least average at best.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Tweet Comment 22 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

I say we replace the grass at Arrowhead

with paper.

This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.

by KCSatchmo on Dec 21, 2009 2:58 PM CST reply actions 1 recs

LOL

that was a good one. I always want the offense to look good.

by Helmets on Dec 21, 2009 3:00 PM CST up reply actions

Up until today

I though a vibrating metal field was the way to go

This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.

by KCSatchmo on Dec 21, 2009 3:03 PM CST up reply actions

so THAT's why the recievers drop so many balls!

by reedeasy on Dec 21, 2009 3:05 PM CST up reply actions

I think this has to be the funniest comment of the month on AP...we should have a category for that on here.

by krayfish on Dec 22, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions

they shouldn't ... your only supposed to catch ONE ball at a time.

by krayfish on Dec 21, 2009 3:10 PM CST reply actions

someone tell Haley

krayfish for WRs coach!

by reedeasy on Dec 21, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions

We need a legit slot receiver in a big way

Bowe, Chambers, and a really good slot guy would be a nice receiving corps. Cottam seems to be coming on and Charles might have the best pass catching skills on the team.

If Cassel can be more consistent/accurate and we can improve the O-line some this offseason, it could be a pretty effective offense. Even against good defenses.

by Chiefsfan1970 on Dec 21, 2009 3:32 PM CST reply actions

shipley from Texas ?

with one of our 2nds, we do need a PR/KR and he could be that slot guy….if hes even available

Great players dont win championships.....Great TEAMS win championships

by DT58forever on Dec 21, 2009 3:37 PM CST up reply actions

yeah, it's hard to tell where he goes

but, he’d be solid, i think

the eternal optimist in me is holding out hope that Lance Long figures out how to be that guy… but yes, I realize that he hasn’t shown much since his first game

I’m guessing there were times early in Welker’s career where people said he didn’t have what it takes :)

* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
* Stats are for losers

by stagdsp on Dec 21, 2009 3:56 PM CST up reply actions

I liked Austin Collie out of this years draft

Indy got him.

I like Shpley though…Golden Tate would be preferred.

by Nick Britt on Dec 21, 2009 4:55 PM CST up reply actions

i'm still holding out hope

for Golden Tate with our first 2nd round pick…slot WR and KR

by KCCheeze on Dec 21, 2009 3:59 PM CST up reply actions

he would be a GREAT pick for KC in the 2nd

not sure that he’s a slot guy as much as he is a true outside WR…

but, I’d take him either way

by stagdsp on Dec 21, 2009 4:04 PM CST up reply actions

His height is the only thing limiting his chance as a #1 WR

I like him in the slot with Bowe and Chambers split ,with Tate having the potential to be #1 eventually. Actually, I don’t care where he is at as long as we draft him.

I think slot WR is more of a need than a true #1 even though I think Bowe and Chambers are better off as a #2. Look how valuable Wes Welker has been to Tom Brady in NE in a similar offense.

by Nick Britt on Dec 21, 2009 5:00 PM CST up reply actions