Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Budweiser Shootout Entry List Released

Your Week 15 Glass of Kool Aid

From the FanPosts. Kind of a tradition. - Woodman

Koolaidpresconference_medium

Well my friends, after three straight weeks of games that are pretty hard to swallow the Kool Aid is getting a little watered down.  By that I mean it's getting harder to find new things to write about.  There are still things to be positive about but most of them are the same things to be positive about in weeks 13, 14, etc.  I did try to dig up some new stats to lift your spirits.  So here you go, your glass of Kool Aid for week 15.

Star-divide

 

  • In his 5 games as the Chiefs starting RB Jamaal Charles has totaled 570 combined yards rushing and receiving.  That is fourth in the league over that span behind Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, and Steven Jackson.  If you average that over an entire season he would have over 1,800 all purpose yards and 16 TDs.  Against the Bills last week he racked up the most rushing yards by a Chiefs RB since week 4 of last season (24 games).
  • Flowers and Carr are starting to put up some numbers that compare with the top corner teams in the league.  They have a combined 33 passes defended which ranks sixth in the league behind Cincy's Hall and Joseph (48), NYJ's Revis and Sheppard (40, of which 33 are Revis!), Philly's Samuel and Brown (38), GB's Woodson and Williams (37), and Dallas' Newman and Jenkins (35).
  • In case you haven't heard we get D-Bowe back this week.  That in and of itself is good news.  However, the better news is that for the third time this season Matt Cassel will have both Bowe and Chambers in the starting line up.  In the 2 previous games where he had them both in the line up he completed 57.5% of his passes for 239 yards/game, 6.4 yards/attempt, and 2 TDs to 1 INT.  In the other 10 starts he has completed 54% of his passes for 173 yards/game, 5.4 yards/attempt, and 11 TDs to 12 INTs.  So in the limited sample we have it appears that having Bowe and Chambers in the line up does open up our passing attack.
  • This one is my favorite.  We are UNDEFEATED in games where Charles, Bowe, and Chambers are all in the starting line up.  Okay, so we're just 1-0, but no one can say they have beat us when all three of our top offensive weapons are in the line up.
  • With a roster short on talent we really need to get some big time players in the upcoming draft.  As we stand today we would pick 5th overall, 37th overall, and the Falcon's second rounder we got for Tony G would also land us a top 50 pick.  Three picks in the top 50 should give us a much needed infusion of talent to go along with whatever FAs Pioli brings in.

So there you go AP, another weekly glass of Kool Aid.  Sorry if some of the "flavors" are similar to previous weeks but I tried to give you some new statistical data to help you battle the "haters" out there.  So stay positive AP, at least it will be over soon and the official "mock mania" can commence.

 

PORKCHOP OUT

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

Comment 61 comments  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Lol I like that you said we are undefeated when all 3 in the lineup.

Lets get 2-0 this Sunday!!! :)!!!

When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.

by NJChieffan16 on Dec 14, 2009 10:54 PM CST reply actions  

Its looking better for sure with Bowe back.

Now if we can trade in one of the droppsey twins (wade and bradley) for Savage to return kicks, we will be in business.

Go Todd Haley!

by Idahochief on Dec 14, 2009 11:00 PM CST reply actions  

Carr is improving

which is a good sign. He was pretty darn bad the 1st half of the year. O’Callaghan had another nice game. Cottam didn’t look like a total stiff…for the first time…ever.

This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.

by KCSatchmo on Dec 14, 2009 11:02 PM CST reply actions  

It would be nice to see some more of Studdebaker

to see what he is all about. I’m encouraged by his play so far.

Go Todd Haley!

by Idahochief on Dec 14, 2009 11:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice job as usual, Porkchop.

Personally, i would’ve included Corey Mays’ Shaq-esque stuff of the lame duck Fitzpatrick pass. That made me smile in an otherwise bad performance.

"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris

by KaloPhoenix on Dec 14, 2009 11:07 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks Kalo

you know when Mays made that play I did make a mental note of it, but to be honest I forgot about it. It was a great play. I still have hopes that he can improve his pass coverage enough to be a part of this team in the future.

Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"

by KCporkchop on Dec 14, 2009 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

He was better.

However, I don’t know how much of that was the Bills’ poor pass attack and how much was our guys.

"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris

by KaloPhoenix on Dec 14, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions  

True,

I actually had another point about how we held the Bills WRs and TEs to a total of 6 receptions for 53 yards. I just didn’t feel right about putting it in when in my heart I knew it wasn’t because of our D, but because their QB is terrible and their run game was getting the job done.

Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"

by KCporkchop on Dec 14, 2009 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Exactly.

The holes were there, they just weren’t able to capitalize. And yeah, why pass when they’re scooping up yardage like that?

"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris

by KaloPhoenix on Dec 14, 2009 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Great minds think alike, Kalo - and so do yours and mine.

I thought that the Mayes defense of the pass was indicative of what you start seeing from your LBs when you get good push up the middle from the front 4 or 5. There was a wall of defenders standing tall in front of Fitzpatrick, who was forced to dump it off, but the dump-off was obstructed, as well.

The Bills game was a matchup against an inferior O-Line. With all due respect to Ron Edwards, for all the work he put in to switch to NT, I still noticed him being single-blocked quite a bit. But T-Jack’s numbers were indicative of the mismatch elsewhere on the line.

Carr looked pretty good, making some nice breaks on the ball (a pick would’ve been nice), but I think the Bills are similar to the Chiefs in the still-searching-for-WRs sense.

Next spring, we’ll have to remember that the corners having a field day in 7-on-7s and 11-on-11s doesn’t necessarily mean they’re great, but, unless there are significant changes at BOTH corner/safety and WR, such reports merely mean that the WRs still aren’t very good.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

IF WE LOSE THIS WEEKEND, I'M GONNA PUNCH SOMEONE IN THE NECK

CLEVELAND BROWNS ARE THE WORST TEAM IN SPORTS AND A LOSS TO THEM MAKES THIS YEAR A COLLOSAL FAILURE REGARDLESS OF THE EVENTUAL WIN-LOSS RECORD.

Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.

by craig in calgary on Dec 14, 2009 11:09 PM CST reply actions  

eh I sorta agree with him though.

Losing to the Browns at home would mean we drop to 0-3 during our homestand and there wont be a lot of Kool-aid to fix that…but thats if we lose.

When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.

by NJChieffan16 on Dec 14, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree that a loss will suck, there's no Kool Aid to make that taste good.

Let’s hope we don’t have to worry about it. All though the thought of Craig walking up to some unsuspecting Canadian and punching them in their throat is kind of amusing.

Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"

by KCporkchop on Dec 14, 2009 11:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Canadians are very kind

After I punch him, he will probably apologize, give me a hug and wish me a Merry Christmas.

Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.

by craig in calgary on Dec 15, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions  

ALL CAPS!!!

Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...

by woodman212 on Dec 14, 2009 11:16 PM CST up reply actions  

for the record, tampa bay is worse than cleveland

The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells

Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells

by kcguy on Dec 15, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I want to win too

but at this point we are better off losing. Any additional wins will feel great now, but when the season is over all they give us is a worse draft position.

Predictions:

Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010

by jmcgoblue on Dec 15, 2009 9:44 AM CST up reply actions  

i hate this mentallity. we should try like hell to win the rest of our games. i don't care what it does to draft position

The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells

Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells

by kcguy on Dec 15, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah I know

I’m not saying I want them to purposely lose any games, but at draft time I’ll be happier with higher picks. Then again, a couple more wins would help with the offseason optimism…and if Pioli can draft well a few slots in the draft shouldn’t matter much.

Predictions:

Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010

by jmcgoblue on Dec 15, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions  

I like the idea of higher 2nd-round pick(s),

but you’re kind of in no-man’s land in the 1st round in the top 5. Still, you have a better probability of getting an immediate impact player up there in the stratosphere.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 11:09 AM CST up reply actions  

yeah, I know what you mean

If Berry and/or Okung are really as good as advertised then I’d be happy with the top-5 pick…otherwise I hope someone will trade up with us for a QB. I agree that it’s even more important in the later rounds.

It’s too bad Suh wasn’t in the draft last year instead, he’ll probably end up being much better than Jackson as a pro.

Predictions:

Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010

by jmcgoblue on Dec 15, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions  

With Haley / Pioli, though ...

… it doesn’t really matter.

I mean, from what we’ve seen so far, whether we’re in the #5 spot or the #15 spot, we’ll still take the guy we could’ve gotten at #15. The higher we are, the more we wind up over-paying our ‘talent.’

by JacinB on Dec 15, 2009 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Browns have been competitive in a number of games I've watched parts of.

They have their share of problems, but not at all sure the Chiefs can capitalize.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 9:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for a nicely detailed ray of sunshine, PC

Season’s winding down again, not a lot to smile about in that locker room, just survive to the end.

With luck, a lot of great junior talent will come out this year and KC will get some better players. Less painful to watch would be good.

Watching the Bengals here in Cincy, the thing that mostly elevated them from last year’s dismal performance was maturation of the defense and a big improvement in the running game. Both could happen for KC next year, depending on how they draft. Another good RB to complement Charles, a new receiver with better speed and separation, and continued improvement in the O-line are all do-able in the next twelve months. I’m not sure what to do about the play of their safeties, though— even a gifted rookie will take awhile to learn the league.

by Wheatboy74 on Dec 14, 2009 11:28 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

Keep a weather eye on Lawrence.

He has talent, and Haley/Pioli actually upgraded WR position in garbage time, with guys like Chambers, Long and Wade. Nobody’s thrilled with the final product, but this is far different from what we saw from the Peterson regime for decades. I hope Lawrence has what it takes to round out his game, and I believe in the current coach’s ability to bring along diamonds in the rough at that one position.

I think KC has a fairly solid foundation that understands the job at hand. And after watching AZ’s defense struggle last night, maybe the fans (and mgmt) see Clancy in a more positive light and we can keep some continuity in men and message, and start plugging in talent (read “speed”) across the DB and LB corps, with surrounding (and competing) players who understand the system and how to prepare for it.

This has been an especially rough year on LB, RB and QB, with shortcomings at the other position groups being the near-invisible source of many of their struggles. As I’ve said before, without a NT and great coverage backs, Derrick Johnson’s job, in particular, was NOT as clear-cut as he (and we) was (were) expecting. No holes for RBs. No protection for the QB(s).

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

A couple of other positives from this past game...

we cut down on penalties (with 5 I believe) and our 3rd down completion percentage is creeping upwards…which can only be a good thing.

"Gonna gallop all over the Chiefs. Cleat prints on the chests. Mud in the face masks." - 2.7* *Yes I know it was changed to 2.9 but f*ck the statisticians.

by Kristospherein on Dec 15, 2009 1:42 AM CST reply actions  

And all the pre-snap shifts were executed pretty cleanly, with little confusion.

As the pace of incoming newbies slackens (one hopes), the 2nd-year-under-Haley guys will make it a LOT easier to plug-and-play, without the amount of confusion we saw most of this season. A new C would be a big upgrade for the offense. Not sure I’m interested in bringing up a rookie behind Rudy, though. The best rookie availabe plus Kevin Mawae (for instance) on a short-term deal would make me feel a whole lot better short- and long-term. Try Rudy at G, maybe, but starting him next season at C would be a slap in the face of fans. Rudy is plenty smart, and his insight from playing C could make him a standout G, and raise the level of competition in that position group. But on a team that’s well-stocked in the interior, Rudy’s fighting for a back-up spot, imo.

But your point is well-taken. I think that the threat of Jamaal Charles’ speed and Haley’s penchant for running the draw on 3rd-and-long opened things up for Cassel off the play-fake and his receivers in the middle of the field.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh no!....

Ohh Yeahh! -Stop saying that! Everytime you say that we have to fix the wall!

Virtus In Arduo

by carthagechief on Dec 15, 2009 5:59 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Keep the Kool Aid comming

Let’s just hope that your next week flavor comes with a little more sugar, sweetened by a W over the Browns. I like it that the players are starting to play better together. I realize that they still don’t play that well together, but the seeds are there for the starters to really know each other. Next year’s starters, plus a great FA, and a great Draft = a solid rock of a foundation to build on for the future.

by TXChiefan on Dec 15, 2009 6:32 AM CST reply actions  

Thanks PorkChop!

Love these posts! I like to be optimistic, so this really helps!

by Chief_Elmo on Dec 15, 2009 7:30 AM CST reply actions  

Good morning Porkchop!

You know what it is really that gets to me I think? It’s the fact that I was so high on Pioli coming here. I was literally stunned. Nothing that good ever happens to us. I think that was an amazing move. I don’t care about the bashing he takes for his secretive measures. That’s to be expected because it’s different for us here in KC. And change is sometimes hard.

But what gets to me is the fact that I don’t think this team as bad as it is should have been placed in the hands of a rookie HC. Nothing against Haley. I think if he takes over the Cardinals this year and Whisenhunt were to get fired for example, then he does great. He does outstanding. Because he is a rookie HC and he is taking over an established talented team. Which is best case scenario for a rookie HC>

I just don’t believe it was in our best ineterest to go replace Herm with a rookie. Unless Haley is just a puppet figure for one year and then their going to replace him with Bill Cowher or someone on the lines of Bill Cowher.

The only reason I can find for why no HC has ever won a SB with two different teams is because they don’t stick around long enough on their second tour of duty to make it happen again. Jimmy Johnson didn’t hang around Miami very long for example. So who knows. Dick Vermeil left way too soon. He might have done it if he would have stuck around for a few more years. But we’ll never know. And I don’t really care as that’s history now.

But what I am saying is I think it would have made much more sense to bring in a seasoned SB winning veteran coach to get this team headed in the right direction. Someone who has dealt with adversity and up’s and down’s and has already learned how to cope with those scenario’s successfully.

Let’s look at one scenario. You hire Cowher for example. I’m only using him as an example. It could be Jimmy Johnson too either way. But a coach who has taken horrible loser teams and turned them into winners. You bring a guy like that in here first. Maybe you don’t keep the guy past 3 years or 4 years. It doesn’t really matter.

Maybe you don’t really expect him to come here and win a SB with a second team since no HC has EVER done that. I’m ok with that. We have to rebuild anyway. Either way. So who do you want rebuilding your team? A rookie who has never even HC’d before? Or a veteran SB winning experienced HC to start out with. Like I said, maybe you don’t keep the guy very long. Maybe 3 or 4 years. But in that time a proven SB winning HC who has experience turning losers into winners could really get us moving in the right direction.

Case in point; the Buccaneers. Under Dungy they became winners. Then we brought in Gruden to finish the job. Why not use that formula here in KC? Bring a Dungy here. Let him fix it up. Let him right the ship. Then if he can’t finish the job by winning a SB, you bring in some fresh young blood like a Haley.

I mean if you really stop to think about it is that so far fetched? I think a rookie HC is in over his head with a team that is this destroyed.

by krayfish on Dec 15, 2009 8:00 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

I here you. It is a tall order for a rookie head coach. But what were the choices?

The last ten coaches to win the SB:
Mike Tomlin
Tom Coughlin
Tony Dungy
Bill Cowher
Jon Gruden
Bill Belichick
Brian Billick
Dick Vermeil
Mike Shanahan
Mike Holmgren

Out of these Tomlin, Coughlin, and Belichick were going no where.
Vermeil finally retired, Dungy was freshly retired, Shanahan freshly fired.
Can’t remember Holgren’s status, and Cowher seemed untouchable.
That would have left Jon Gruden and Brian Billick. Are those good choices?

Again I think you are on to something with this rookie HC thing. But it may be more of a rookie HC trying to be all aspects of the operation. Look at the list of those coaches again and find who that coach had as assistants, coordinators, scouts, etc. To me that is where SB head coaches seperate from the pack. Whisenhunt’s success may be more a reflection of the assistants he had/has than anything else.

by BCRavenJHawkfan on Dec 15, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions  

Jon Gruden

Seriously, who would not like Jon Gruden as your coach? I love that guy. But, he has successfully gotten me to watch MNF again so I almost don’t want him to leave the booth. He is AWESOME at commentating.

But, if Haley cannot get it done, I love Gruden. But, it would never happen.

If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.

-Steve Nash

by Red Shadow on Dec 15, 2009 9:43 AM CST up reply actions  

good point bcraven...I think you may be on to something there too

perhaps if Haley had come in here and ONLY been the HC he would have had a little more success. I feel bad for Haley too. He sounds different in his recent interviews to me. He has lost that swagger and he sounds a bit like Herm sometimes. Trying to find the right excuses. I just want us to win.

by krayfish on Dec 15, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions  

Great points here

Kray…week 15 is here and we suck. I am starting to see your point of view on alot of things. I was going crazy after the PIT upset (is it an upset really? Well…actually now that I am thinking about it, it still is an upset.). But 3 weeks later, it feels like the coaching staff hit their goal of winning that game, and now are throwing the rest of the season away…that is what it seems like. Everyone knew Haley wanted to beat PIT cause it was a personal measuring stick for him. I don’t know what to think anymore. It sucks that we got that HUGE win and now everyone is coasting instead of pedaling it to the metal gearing up for a run NEXT SEASON. With the proper approach to the final six games, we would have been ready for an immediate run (my opinion). Now we are fluttering because the coach had a different goal than the team (my opinion).

For the record, I am not anti-Haley just yet…I still think he can do it. It will just take longer because he hit his personal goal (my opinion) against PIT and has been complacent ever since. So moving forward, to steer this onto the right track, Haley needs to feel heat for his job. Then, I am hoping he gets his stuff back.

If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.

-Steve Nash

by Red Shadow on Dec 15, 2009 9:41 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't believe that he's complacent.

When you look at the obvious team speed issues, and missing pieces in the trenches, he needed some lucky breaks and perfect execution to beat ANYbody. What’s surprising about the PIT game is how poorly THEY matched up against the Chiefs, and how much they were depending on the one guy (Polamalu) to be the glue at crunch time.

PIT’s kind of like KC in the O-Line, WR and secondary issues. The secondary would go unnoticed if Polamalu were on the field. But make no mistake. Haley’s knowledge of that team and a few lucky breaks were what gave the Chiefs the win in a game that was otherwise dominated by the Steelers.

But it’s possible that there was an extra bit of fire in Haley that raised the level of play in his players for that one week. Personally, I just think that it was largely a lack of stout on O-Line and speed/size on the perimeter (PIT doesn’t have a whole lot of fast AND big on the edge on either side of the ball, imo. And I don’t think they had an answer to Jamaal Charles’s speed, either.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

My emotions talking

Thank you for a rational post. Mine was more ranting and emotional than based on fact. But, I see your points and they are good.

If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.

-Steve Nash

by Red Shadow on Dec 15, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I might be mistaken, but I think Pittsburgh's been dealing with injuries along their defensive front, too.

Specifically, they’ve been missing one of their starting ends, who was pretty good at taking up blockers. Their linebackers are outstanding (boy, would I love to see Lamarr Woodley as a Patriot or Chief) but without Polamalu and one of their starting ends, there aren’t the complementary pieces. I can also see where they might have to drop one of their faster linebackers (Woodley or Timmons) into coverage this year more regularly without Polamalu and last year’s #2 corner (McFadden) in the lineup.

by DanielUM on Dec 15, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Pioli brought in a rookie HC with all the earmarks of a guy capable of taking the next step.

For all his youth, Haley’s been pointing towards this virtually his whole life. He has a rare combination of work ethic, originality, and, beyond believing in victory every week (crucial for HC to kid himself on this one thing), he believes more in what his eyes see than in what he wants to believe. I really think he’s the real deal, and will preside over a perennial contender for many years, after these growing pains are over.

I remember the days of Martyball, when Marty continually misinterpreted the reasons for his success and his failures. Cunningham the same way. The only exception to this in recent memory was Dick Vermeil, and it’s become clear in hindsight that he was just brought in for a charge at the playoffs on a team that was structured to de-construct immediately after, further handicapped by a GM who was not on the same page with personnel.

I haven’t been following Haley’s press conferences, lately, because all the pertinent questions have been asked and answered, and all that remains is soap opera from hacks looking for something to write/talk about. Just look at the dearth of new content there is here on AP that’s truly football-related, and project that to what’s happening in “Coach’s Comments.” If I were he, and I weren’t obliged to put a good face on things week in and week out, I’d offer up a 10-second “It is what it is,” and exit the damn podium, myself.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

very well said mills, I agree 100%

Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"

by KCporkchop on Dec 15, 2009 5:02 PM CST up reply actions  

thank you.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 16, 2009 9:38 PM CST up reply actions  

thank you.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 16, 2009 9:39 PM CST up reply actions  

My thoughts...

Gonzo must of taught him something….That was an awesome catch

by tomahawk44 on Dec 15, 2009 8:47 AM CST up reply actions  

When #87 caught it on the run AND kept his feet, it was something that I wanted to see more of from TG, to be honest.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 11:07 AM CST up reply actions  

waiter! waiter, this Kool Aid tastes like ... BUFFALO MEAT

sometimes I wonder if we’re “whistling past the devil” with our optimism grinning

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!

by upamtn on Dec 15, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

No. Shitlock's the two fat guys in the foreground.

Something to do with mass transfer to the afterlife.

Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by hmills110 on Dec 16, 2009 9:40 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs
Stag_20silhouette_small
Weekly Official AP Mock-tastic Thread 1/31-2/6 Post-Senior-Bowl-edition

Recent FanPosts

Calabaloo_small
Reviewing AP's Predictions For The Chiefs 2011 Season
Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players
Okoye_small
Setting the Trenches: Offensive Line
Small
The Three Most WTF Moments of the Chiefs Season
Chiefs_logo_small
Need some help, KC trip
9aaaa629560faa267f0a91faca7f420d-getty-135962716_small
Ben Grubbs.
Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI