Your Week 15 Glass of Kool Aid
From the FanPosts. Kind of a tradition. - Woodman
Well my friends, after three straight weeks of games that are pretty hard to swallow the Kool Aid is getting a little watered down. By that I mean it's getting harder to find new things to write about. There are still things to be positive about but most of them are the same things to be positive about in weeks 13, 14, etc. I did try to dig up some new stats to lift your spirits. So here you go, your glass of Kool Aid for week 15.
- In his 5 games as the Chiefs starting RB Jamaal Charles has totaled 570 combined yards rushing and receiving. That is fourth in the league over that span behind Chris Johnson, Ray Rice, and Steven Jackson. If you average that over an entire season he would have over 1,800 all purpose yards and 16 TDs. Against the Bills last week he racked up the most rushing yards by a Chiefs RB since week 4 of last season (24 games).
- Flowers and Carr are starting to put up some numbers that compare with the top corner teams in the league. They have a combined 33 passes defended which ranks sixth in the league behind Cincy's Hall and Joseph (48), NYJ's Revis and Sheppard (40, of which 33 are Revis!), Philly's Samuel and Brown (38), GB's Woodson and Williams (37), and Dallas' Newman and Jenkins (35).
- In case you haven't heard we get D-Bowe back this week. That in and of itself is good news. However, the better news is that for the third time this season Matt Cassel will have both Bowe and Chambers in the starting line up. In the 2 previous games where he had them both in the line up he completed 57.5% of his passes for 239 yards/game, 6.4 yards/attempt, and 2 TDs to 1 INT. In the other 10 starts he has completed 54% of his passes for 173 yards/game, 5.4 yards/attempt, and 11 TDs to 12 INTs. So in the limited sample we have it appears that having Bowe and Chambers in the line up does open up our passing attack.
- This one is my favorite. We are UNDEFEATED in games where Charles, Bowe, and Chambers are all in the starting line up. Okay, so we're just 1-0, but no one can say they have beat us when all three of our top offensive weapons are in the line up.
- With a roster short on talent we really need to get some big time players in the upcoming draft. As we stand today we would pick 5th overall, 37th overall, and the Falcon's second rounder we got for Tony G would also land us a top 50 pick. Three picks in the top 50 should give us a much needed infusion of talent to go along with whatever FAs Pioli brings in.
So there you go AP, another weekly glass of Kool Aid. Sorry if some of the "flavors" are similar to previous weeks but I tried to give you some new statistical data to help you battle the "haters" out there. So stay positive AP, at least it will be over soon and the official "mock mania" can commence.
PORKCHOP OUT
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
61 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lol I like that you said we are undefeated when all 3 in the lineup.
Lets get 2-0 this Sunday!!! :)!!!
When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.
Its looking better for sure with Bowe back.
Now if we can trade in one of the droppsey twins (wade and bradley) for Savage to return kicks, we will be in business.
Go Todd Haley!
Carr is improving
which is a good sign. He was pretty darn bad the 1st half of the year. O’Callaghan had another nice game. Cottam didn’t look like a total stiff…for the first time…ever.
This is my signature line. It is full of awesome and win.
by KCSatchmo on Dec 14, 2009 11:02 PM CST reply actions
It would be nice to see some more of Studdebaker
to see what he is all about. I’m encouraged by his play so far.
Go Todd Haley!
Nice job as usual, Porkchop.
Personally, i would’ve included Corey Mays’ Shaq-esque stuff of the lame duck Fitzpatrick pass. That made me smile in an otherwise bad performance.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
Thanks Kalo
you know when Mays made that play I did make a mental note of it, but to be honest I forgot about it. It was a great play. I still have hopes that he can improve his pass coverage enough to be a part of this team in the future.
Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"
He was better.
However, I don’t know how much of that was the Bills’ poor pass attack and how much was our guys.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Dec 14, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions
True,
I actually had another point about how we held the Bills WRs and TEs to a total of 6 receptions for 53 yards. I just didn’t feel right about putting it in when in my heart I knew it wasn’t because of our D, but because their QB is terrible and their run game was getting the job done.
Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"
Exactly.
The holes were there, they just weren’t able to capitalize. And yeah, why pass when they’re scooping up yardage like that?
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Dec 14, 2009 11:23 PM CST up reply actions
Great minds think alike, Kalo - and so do yours and mine.
I thought that the Mayes defense of the pass was indicative of what you start seeing from your LBs when you get good push up the middle from the front 4 or 5. There was a wall of defenders standing tall in front of Fitzpatrick, who was forced to dump it off, but the dump-off was obstructed, as well.
The Bills game was a matchup against an inferior O-Line. With all due respect to Ron Edwards, for all the work he put in to switch to NT, I still noticed him being single-blocked quite a bit. But T-Jack’s numbers were indicative of the mismatch elsewhere on the line.
Carr looked pretty good, making some nice breaks on the ball (a pick would’ve been nice), but I think the Bills are similar to the Chiefs in the still-searching-for-WRs sense.
Next spring, we’ll have to remember that the corners having a field day in 7-on-7s and 11-on-11s doesn’t necessarily mean they’re great, but, unless there are significant changes at BOTH corner/safety and WR, such reports merely mean that the WRs still aren’t very good.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
IF WE LOSE THIS WEEKEND, I'M GONNA PUNCH SOMEONE IN THE NECK
CLEVELAND BROWNS ARE THE WORST TEAM IN SPORTS AND A LOSS TO THEM MAKES THIS YEAR A COLLOSAL FAILURE REGARDLESS OF THE EVENTUAL WIN-LOSS RECORD.
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 14, 2009 11:09 PM CST reply actions
Waitress, we need another round of Kool Aid at Craig's table, and make it a double!
Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"
eh I sorta agree with him though.
Losing to the Browns at home would mean we drop to 0-3 during our homestand and there wont be a lot of Kool-aid to fix that…but thats if we lose.
When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.
by NJChieffan16 on Dec 14, 2009 11:17 PM CST up reply actions
I agree that a loss will suck, there's no Kool Aid to make that taste good.
Let’s hope we don’t have to worry about it. All though the thought of Craig walking up to some unsuspecting Canadian and punching them in their throat is kind of amusing.
Feeling "The Love" and "Drinking the Kool AId"
Canadians are very kind
After I punch him, he will probably apologize, give me a hug and wish me a Merry Christmas.
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 15, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
I'm not sure what happened with that blockquote at the end
But I kinda like it
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 14, 2009 11:18 PM CST up reply actions
for the record, tampa bay is worse than cleveland
The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells
Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells
I want to win too
but at this point we are better off losing. Any additional wins will feel great now, but when the season is over all they give us is a worse draft position.
Predictions:
Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010
i hate this mentallity. we should try like hell to win the rest of our games. i don't care what it does to draft position
The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells
Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells
Yeah I know
I’m not saying I want them to purposely lose any games, but at draft time I’ll be happier with higher picks. Then again, a couple more wins would help with the offseason optimism…and if Pioli can draft well a few slots in the draft shouldn’t matter much.
Predictions:
Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010
I like the idea of higher 2nd-round pick(s),
but you’re kind of in no-man’s land in the 1st round in the top 5. Still, you have a better probability of getting an immediate impact player up there in the stratosphere.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
yeah, I know what you mean
If Berry and/or Okung are really as good as advertised then I’d be happy with the top-5 pick…otherwise I hope someone will trade up with us for a QB. I agree that it’s even more important in the later rounds.
It’s too bad Suh wasn’t in the draft last year instead, he’ll probably end up being much better than Jackson as a pro.
Predictions:
Kansas City will not win more than four games in 2009
Kansas City will have a new OC and DC in 2010
Kansas City will win at least seven games in 2010
With Haley / Pioli, though ...
… it doesn’t really matter.
I mean, from what we’ve seen so far, whether we’re in the #5 spot or the #15 spot, we’ll still take the guy we could’ve gotten at #15. The higher we are, the more we wind up over-paying our ‘talent.’
Browns have been competitive in a number of games I've watched parts of.
They have their share of problems, but not at all sure the Chiefs can capitalize.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Thanks for a nicely detailed ray of sunshine, PC
Season’s winding down again, not a lot to smile about in that locker room, just survive to the end.
With luck, a lot of great junior talent will come out this year and KC will get some better players. Less painful to watch would be good.
Watching the Bengals here in Cincy, the thing that mostly elevated them from last year’s dismal performance was maturation of the defense and a big improvement in the running game. Both could happen for KC next year, depending on how they draft. Another good RB to complement Charles, a new receiver with better speed and separation, and continued improvement in the O-line are all do-able in the next twelve months. I’m not sure what to do about the play of their safeties, though— even a gifted rookie will take awhile to learn the league.
by Wheatboy74 on Dec 14, 2009 11:28 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Keep a weather eye on Lawrence.
He has talent, and Haley/Pioli actually upgraded WR position in garbage time, with guys like Chambers, Long and Wade. Nobody’s thrilled with the final product, but this is far different from what we saw from the Peterson regime for decades. I hope Lawrence has what it takes to round out his game, and I believe in the current coach’s ability to bring along diamonds in the rough at that one position.
I think KC has a fairly solid foundation that understands the job at hand. And after watching AZ’s defense struggle last night, maybe the fans (and mgmt) see Clancy in a more positive light and we can keep some continuity in men and message, and start plugging in talent (read “speed”) across the DB and LB corps, with surrounding (and competing) players who understand the system and how to prepare for it.
This has been an especially rough year on LB, RB and QB, with shortcomings at the other position groups being the near-invisible source of many of their struggles. As I’ve said before, without a NT and great coverage backs, Derrick Johnson’s job, in particular, was NOT as clear-cut as he (and we) was (were) expecting. No holes for RBs. No protection for the QB(s).
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
A couple of other positives from this past game...
we cut down on penalties (with 5 I believe) and our 3rd down completion percentage is creeping upwards…which can only be a good thing.
"Gonna gallop all over the Chiefs. Cleat prints on the chests. Mud in the face masks." - 2.7* *Yes I know it was changed to 2.9 but f*ck the statisticians.
And all the pre-snap shifts were executed pretty cleanly, with little confusion.
As the pace of incoming newbies slackens (one hopes), the 2nd-year-under-Haley guys will make it a LOT easier to plug-and-play, without the amount of confusion we saw most of this season. A new C would be a big upgrade for the offense. Not sure I’m interested in bringing up a rookie behind Rudy, though. The best rookie availabe plus Kevin Mawae (for instance) on a short-term deal would make me feel a whole lot better short- and long-term. Try Rudy at G, maybe, but starting him next season at C would be a slap in the face of fans. Rudy is plenty smart, and his insight from playing C could make him a standout G, and raise the level of competition in that position group. But on a team that’s well-stocked in the interior, Rudy’s fighting for a back-up spot, imo.
But your point is well-taken. I think that the threat of Jamaal Charles’ speed and Haley’s penchant for running the draw on 3rd-and-long opened things up for Cassel off the play-fake and his receivers in the middle of the field.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Oh no!....
Ohh Yeahh! -Stop saying that! Everytime you say that we have to fix the wall!
Virtus In Arduo
by carthagechief on Dec 15, 2009 5:59 AM CST via mobile reply actions
Keep the Kool Aid comming
Let’s just hope that your next week flavor comes with a little more sugar, sweetened by a W over the Browns. I like it that the players are starting to play better together. I realize that they still don’t play that well together, but the seeds are there for the starters to really know each other. Next year’s starters, plus a great FA, and a great Draft = a solid rock of a foundation to build on for the future.
Good morning Porkchop!
You know what it is really that gets to me I think? It’s the fact that I was so high on Pioli coming here. I was literally stunned. Nothing that good ever happens to us. I think that was an amazing move. I don’t care about the bashing he takes for his secretive measures. That’s to be expected because it’s different for us here in KC. And change is sometimes hard.
But what gets to me is the fact that I don’t think this team as bad as it is should have been placed in the hands of a rookie HC. Nothing against Haley. I think if he takes over the Cardinals this year and Whisenhunt were to get fired for example, then he does great. He does outstanding. Because he is a rookie HC and he is taking over an established talented team. Which is best case scenario for a rookie HC>
I just don’t believe it was in our best ineterest to go replace Herm with a rookie. Unless Haley is just a puppet figure for one year and then their going to replace him with Bill Cowher or someone on the lines of Bill Cowher.
The only reason I can find for why no HC has ever won a SB with two different teams is because they don’t stick around long enough on their second tour of duty to make it happen again. Jimmy Johnson didn’t hang around Miami very long for example. So who knows. Dick Vermeil left way too soon. He might have done it if he would have stuck around for a few more years. But we’ll never know. And I don’t really care as that’s history now.
But what I am saying is I think it would have made much more sense to bring in a seasoned SB winning veteran coach to get this team headed in the right direction. Someone who has dealt with adversity and up’s and down’s and has already learned how to cope with those scenario’s successfully.
Let’s look at one scenario. You hire Cowher for example. I’m only using him as an example. It could be Jimmy Johnson too either way. But a coach who has taken horrible loser teams and turned them into winners. You bring a guy like that in here first. Maybe you don’t keep the guy past 3 years or 4 years. It doesn’t really matter.
Maybe you don’t really expect him to come here and win a SB with a second team since no HC has EVER done that. I’m ok with that. We have to rebuild anyway. Either way. So who do you want rebuilding your team? A rookie who has never even HC’d before? Or a veteran SB winning experienced HC to start out with. Like I said, maybe you don’t keep the guy very long. Maybe 3 or 4 years. But in that time a proven SB winning HC who has experience turning losers into winners could really get us moving in the right direction.
Case in point; the Buccaneers. Under Dungy they became winners. Then we brought in Gruden to finish the job. Why not use that formula here in KC? Bring a Dungy here. Let him fix it up. Let him right the ship. Then if he can’t finish the job by winning a SB, you bring in some fresh young blood like a Haley.
I mean if you really stop to think about it is that so far fetched? I think a rookie HC is in over his head with a team that is this destroyed.
by krayfish on Dec 15, 2009 8:00 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I here you. It is a tall order for a rookie head coach. But what were the choices?
The last ten coaches to win the SB:
Mike Tomlin
Tom Coughlin
Tony Dungy
Bill Cowher
Jon Gruden
Bill Belichick
Brian Billick
Dick Vermeil
Mike Shanahan
Mike Holmgren
Out of these Tomlin, Coughlin, and Belichick were going no where.
Vermeil finally retired, Dungy was freshly retired, Shanahan freshly fired.
Can’t remember Holgren’s status, and Cowher seemed untouchable.
That would have left Jon Gruden and Brian Billick. Are those good choices?
Again I think you are on to something with this rookie HC thing. But it may be more of a rookie HC trying to be all aspects of the operation. Look at the list of those coaches again and find who that coach had as assistants, coordinators, scouts, etc. To me that is where SB head coaches seperate from the pack. Whisenhunt’s success may be more a reflection of the assistants he had/has than anything else.
by BCRavenJHawkfan on Dec 15, 2009 8:55 AM CST up reply actions
Jon Gruden
Seriously, who would not like Jon Gruden as your coach? I love that guy. But, he has successfully gotten me to watch MNF again so I almost don’t want him to leave the booth. He is AWESOME at commentating.
But, if Haley cannot get it done, I love Gruden. But, it would never happen.
If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.
-Steve Nash
good point bcraven...I think you may be on to something there too
perhaps if Haley had come in here and ONLY been the HC he would have had a little more success. I feel bad for Haley too. He sounds different in his recent interviews to me. He has lost that swagger and he sounds a bit like Herm sometimes. Trying to find the right excuses. I just want us to win.
Great points here
Kray…week 15 is here and we suck. I am starting to see your point of view on alot of things. I was going crazy after the PIT upset (is it an upset really? Well…actually now that I am thinking about it, it still is an upset.). But 3 weeks later, it feels like the coaching staff hit their goal of winning that game, and now are throwing the rest of the season away…that is what it seems like. Everyone knew Haley wanted to beat PIT cause it was a personal measuring stick for him. I don’t know what to think anymore. It sucks that we got that HUGE win and now everyone is coasting instead of pedaling it to the metal gearing up for a run NEXT SEASON. With the proper approach to the final six games, we would have been ready for an immediate run (my opinion). Now we are fluttering because the coach had a different goal than the team (my opinion).
For the record, I am not anti-Haley just yet…I still think he can do it. It will just take longer because he hit his personal goal (my opinion) against PIT and has been complacent ever since. So moving forward, to steer this onto the right track, Haley needs to feel heat for his job. Then, I am hoping he gets his stuff back.
If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.
-Steve Nash
good point red...it's all very frustrating right now isn't it? I feel bad for haley too.
this can’t be easy for him either.
I don't believe that he's complacent.
When you look at the obvious team speed issues, and missing pieces in the trenches, he needed some lucky breaks and perfect execution to beat ANYbody. What’s surprising about the PIT game is how poorly THEY matched up against the Chiefs, and how much they were depending on the one guy (Polamalu) to be the glue at crunch time.
PIT’s kind of like KC in the O-Line, WR and secondary issues. The secondary would go unnoticed if Polamalu were on the field. But make no mistake. Haley’s knowledge of that team and a few lucky breaks were what gave the Chiefs the win in a game that was otherwise dominated by the Steelers.
But it’s possible that there was an extra bit of fire in Haley that raised the level of play in his players for that one week. Personally, I just think that it was largely a lack of stout on O-Line and speed/size on the perimeter (PIT doesn’t have a whole lot of fast AND big on the edge on either side of the ball, imo. And I don’t think they had an answer to Jamaal Charles’s speed, either.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
My emotions talking
Thank you for a rational post. Mine was more ranting and emotional than based on fact. But, I see your points and they are good.
If everyone worked as hard as me, I would be out of a job.
-Steve Nash
I might be mistaken, but I think Pittsburgh's been dealing with injuries along their defensive front, too.
Specifically, they’ve been missing one of their starting ends, who was pretty good at taking up blockers. Their linebackers are outstanding (boy, would I love to see Lamarr Woodley as a Patriot or Chief) but without Polamalu and one of their starting ends, there aren’t the complementary pieces. I can also see where they might have to drop one of their faster linebackers (Woodley or Timmons) into coverage this year more regularly without Polamalu and last year’s #2 corner (McFadden) in the lineup.
Pioli brought in a rookie HC with all the earmarks of a guy capable of taking the next step.
For all his youth, Haley’s been pointing towards this virtually his whole life. He has a rare combination of work ethic, originality, and, beyond believing in victory every week (crucial for HC to kid himself on this one thing), he believes more in what his eyes see than in what he wants to believe. I really think he’s the real deal, and will preside over a perennial contender for many years, after these growing pains are over.
I remember the days of Martyball, when Marty continually misinterpreted the reasons for his success and his failures. Cunningham the same way. The only exception to this in recent memory was Dick Vermeil, and it’s become clear in hindsight that he was just brought in for a charge at the playoffs on a team that was structured to de-construct immediately after, further handicapped by a GM who was not on the same page with personnel.
I haven’t been following Haley’s press conferences, lately, because all the pertinent questions have been asked and answered, and all that remains is soap opera from hacks looking for something to write/talk about. Just look at the dearth of new content there is here on AP that’s truly football-related, and project that to what’s happening in “Coach’s Comments.” If I were he, and I weren’t obliged to put a good face on things week in and week out, I’d offer up a 10-second “It is what it is,” and exit the damn podium, myself.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Furthermore,
Haley and Pioli are on the same page with regard to personnel and mgmt style. They’re both new enough to the game to build a working relationship free of most of the baggage and preconceptions that store up real conflict and dysfunction. A big-name HC would likely have questioned much of what Pioli wanted to do, with all kinds of power struggles and politics behind the scenes. With multi-year commitments from both towards both, they’re in a unique position to be patient, and take the long view, which is the one thing this organization has lacked, again, for decades.
If they continue in this way, success should follow.
If there’s one thing, though, that Haley was brought in for, it was his ability and openness to self-reflection and lifelong learning. He takes the truth more seriously than himself, and this is HUGE. That’s why AP oughta love the guy, because that’s the one core constant HERE. Might not LIKE the truth, but rarely do you see people here getting away with reasoning backwards from a preconceived notion, and pretending they’re reasoning forward to a rational conclusion.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
by hmills110 on Dec 15, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions 5 recs
thank you.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
thank you.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
When #87 caught it on the run AND kept his feet, it was something that I wanted to see more of from TG, to be honest.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
waiter! waiter, this Kool Aid tastes like ... BUFFALO MEAT
sometimes I wonder if we’re “whistling past the devil” with our optimism grinning

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
by upamtn on Dec 15, 2009 10:00 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
No. Shitlock's the two fat guys in the foreground.
Something to do with mass transfer to the afterlife.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.

by 
























