Cassel Doesn't Have It.
Well the academic semester is over so I can get back to the important things, like blogging about the Chiefs.
I have been, for quite sometime, a Matt Cassel proponent. I have now concluded that continuing to sing his praises would make me a Matt Cassel apologist.
My initial impression of Cassel was that he was an accurate, mobile passer. He doesn't have arm strength the NFL likes but that's easy to overcome if you're a good decision maker. Jamarcus Russel has a mega arm, but he's an awful QB. Rich Gannon had sub-par arm strength but found his way to a superbowl. That criticism aside, I've observed traits in him that cause me to doubt that he can be a legit NFL QB.
First, his decision making is not what it should be. This is very evident by his amount of sacks taken, and also his low INT rate. A low INT rate sound like an odd indicator for bad decision making, but I will explain. Cassel is less of a bad decision maker than he is a NON decision maker. He hold on to the ball to long and ends up getting sacked or runing a lot because he throws very safe passes. He's not willing to put the ball in a tight spot which every QB has to do sometimes. When the obvious completion is not there, he gets sacked. It it is there, he throws the pass for a completion or a drop. Cassel doesn't throw few INTs because he's accurate, it's because he only thows the obvious completions. His high completion % in NE was due to conservatism, not great accuracy.
Second, his fundamentals are just bad. Watch him throw and you will see a guy who is lunging his whole upper body forward as he releases. This is due to two things, I think. His arm strength is not that high, so he has to generate extra thrust on the ball by putting his weight into deep passes and fast passes. The other aspect is that Cassel is a pitcher. His throwing motion is completely that of a baseball pitcher. He lunges and releases low. Nearly all of his passes are line drives, which is bad for anything but a laser down the middle. Cassel is good a throwing straight down the middle, and that is why. His line drive passing gives the ball an awkward angle for downfield passes which contributed, IMO, to Bobby Wade's epic drop. I don't recall seeing him drop a pass into "the bucket" as most passers do. Good QBs have upright posture and high release. Watch how Manning and Brady stand when they are throwing, and that is what you will see. Brodie Croyle actually has very good passer posture as well, but he's obviosly no Manning.
Speaking of Croyle, that brings me to what to do if Cassel is indeed not the answer. I remember reading after we drafted him that Croyle had 1st round talent but dropped the the 3rd due to durability questions. We have watched Croyle fall flat(literally and figuratively) in games, but if the first half of that assesment of his talent is accurate, maybe he has developed some of that potential. I'm not saying Croyle > Cassle, i'm honesltly not sure who is better, but I'd guess the difference is not much either way. Do I think you could have put Croyle into the Pats offense and won 11 games? I do. I would not outright bench Cassel for Croyle, but if games get out of hand, I put him in and tell him that he has a chance to make Cassel's job less safe. Since I doubt Croyle would convince anyone he's the guy, you then bring in a guy in the offseason and lunch a battle for the starting nod. Go get a guy that isn't big on the radar, comes cheap, but has the tools to succeed. It had to toss a name out there that fits that bill, its Brian Brohm. He a smart player with good mechanics and a big arm. You may not know who he is, but he's alot like Matt Ryan.
There it it, I've done an about face on Cassel. I know he's got a bad line and WR's who drop like rain. That aside, i still think he would not be able to play consistantly at the pro level. I really, deperately hope I'm wrong. I would Love for the Chiefs to have a long term solution at QB on their hands, but I fear that they have again errored.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
66 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
brian brohm
is too slow indivcense overrated who u need is a guy like k orton utill u can get a qb
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
Really... Orton!?!
Pass… Orton is so crappy he barely was able to inch his way ahead of Grossman.
The Original member of the Ndamukong Suh bandwagon
by averagegatsby on Dec 11, 2009 7:53 PM CST up reply actions
No
Orton is benefiting from a great Oline, good running game and a top 10 defense.
The funny thing is he’s going to spin this season into a Casselesque sized contract if not more.
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 11, 2009 8:20 PM CST up reply actions
yeah
but he wins
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
So did Trent Dilfer
Orton’s success has more to do with the talent around him than his actual talent.
Jman, do you think he’s going to get a big payday this offseason?
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 11, 2009 8:50 PM CST up reply actions
Trent Dilfer is very quickly becoming the best analyist there is...
That guy is GREAT when he goes on the Cowherd show, or anything he does on NFL Live. If that guy had any more physical gifts he would have been a really good QB.
The Original member of the Ndamukong Suh bandwagon
by averagegatsby on Dec 11, 2009 8:54 PM CST up reply actions
You track his career, and there aren't a whole lot of great WRs.
And when he had the total package at wideout to go with everything else, he made a lot of great stick throws and won a championship. Very underrated as a QB. And yes, I remember those days, when he was a laughingstock. I also remember how well he played in TB, and how they were one WR away from going to the big dance when his #1 WR went down against GB.
QBs always get either too much or too little credit. He’s one with a reputation for being a mere caretaker, but if you look closely at TB during their playoff years, and forget for a second that it’s Dilfer, you start thinking the QB is a money player, which he was.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
When you think about it...
His career path is very similar to Jaws. Good QB, not Great QB, once they had some weapons they made serious runs (of course Dilfer had one of the greatest D’s in the history of the game and got a SB). And now they are both at ESPN, and they really are 2 of the best at breaking down film. Any time that guy is on I stop what Im doing and listen to what he says.
The Original member of the Ndamukong Suh bandwagon
by averagegatsby on Dec 11, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions
yeah
sadly i do i think denver needs a upgrade at the qb pos to win it all in the future i wouild draft a qb 1 or 2 round if i was coach/gm of denver now i think orton is a 10-6 11-5 type of player but i douct he can win the big one i hope i am wrong about that and i agree with u boy candas are real smart
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
What would you say is Denver's biggest problem?
Their run D isn’t great, but assuming you guys will be drafting in the 20’s Jake Locker could be available, who could be the best QB in college football. Gerald McCoy is probably gone, but Cody will probably be available. This is probably the deepest D-Line draft since the 2002 draft that had Peppers, Haynesworth, and Freeny that all went in the first round (among many other D-Lineman who weren’t as good).
The Original member of the Ndamukong Suh bandwagon
by averagegatsby on Dec 11, 2009 10:26 PM CST up reply actions
we
have the chi bears pick prob between 9-14 denver has a lot of needs still i say in no order long term qb g long term c bigger de 1 ilb 1 olb 1 cb 1 long term s punter
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
i think that 0-11 (or is it 0-12) record shows he can't
The only players I hurt with my words are the ones who have an inflated opinion of their ability. I can't worry about that.
Bill Parcells
Knowledge is confidence. And confidence lets you play fast.
Bill Parcells
completely different team
than the one he last started on. That team was even worse than this one. Not saying he is the answer, but I agree that Cassel is not. Would like to see what Croyle has learned in his time away from starting while we look for our real franchise QB though.
by KCCheeze on Dec 11, 2009 6:35 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
he has had one
like kcguy said 0-11 0-12
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
Maybe Pike from Cincinnatti to bring in.
I am completely comfortable with Cassel/Croyle as Starter/backup but Croyle will be FA this year I think. It’s in Croyles hands on that. Cassel and Croyle are a combined 53 in age. I am getting close to that number all by myself. Let the QB’s grow into the position.
With a better team around both of them :)
We Will kick at least 4 Teams Asses in 09. Almost there :)
And Succop will be the Key in two of them. Skins & Raiders! Pittsburgh Sweet!
" Think and talk positive football off the field." Hank Stram
Just like you guys refuse to blame Cassel for his Poor games...
Maybe you should let Brodie off the hook for his. He was playing in an offense that was much worse than what we have now. The 2007 O-line was WAAAY worse than the current line and Herm Edwards knows NOTHING about an NFL offense.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Dec 11, 2009 6:36 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Be patient...
Remember TrINT Green when he first came to KC? Everyone wanted to throw him under the bus. Ok, on to my next point. I like Croyle and I think he is a good QB. How many chances has he had to be our QB? A lot of chances. It isn’t his fault he got injured but it is his fault that he didn’t step up when it counted against Thigpen and Huard. He did start in week one which we were pretty much the same team and he played well but couldn’t get the win. Cassel has a lot of problems he needs to work on. He holds onto the ball too long, he can overthrow and underthrow, and makes bad decisions in the pocket. I want to give Cassel another season because he has shown he has the tools. It takes QB’s a while to mold with a team. Peyton Manning had I think over 20 picks his first year as a QB. I bet a lot of people wanted to throw him under the bus. What I’m saying is be patient and good things are most likely to come. We don’t have much to lose. We are rebuilding and have to be patient anyways. If Cassel doesn’t pan out then that is fine. Give Croyle a season to show that he can stay healthy and we’ll see what he has. We brought in Cassel for a reason.
Hali, Johnson, Vrable, Mays, Williams, Studebaker, Belcher
-Come Get Some-
I swear its as if the Croyle family has taken over Arrowhead Pride.
It is completely ignorant to think Croyle > Cassel. History and stats would say otherwise. 3 NFL teams weren’t creaming their pants to get their hands on Croyle last offseason. To this day analysts, writers, and common football fans have noticed what a crappy hand he was dealt coming into this season.
Many people here are jealous because Matt Cassel is young, handsome, charismatic, competitive, and makes money that none of us could ever dream of having (albeit average by NFL standards). I see posts that reference the fact that Croyle is from the south — that he is somehow being held down because he’s just a good ole country boy who had a few chances but dag-gummit he somehow had bone/muscle replacement surgery in the offseason and he’ll never get hurt ever again.
It’s absolutely insane.
I honestly can’t believe how much people are in denial about Matt Cassel. Everything you’ve seen this week has been speculative, hypothetical, or downright false as people use their subjective judgment that Cassel doesn’t have “it” — then go on to act as if Croyle does?! Are you all smoking crack, or what? There’s having opinions and then shoving them down the throats of people who ABSOLUTELY KNOW BETTER. (Not to mention our entire team is swiss cheese and we’re focusing on one guy).
Two bad games and people want to throw him out. Give it time.

Our defense gave up 87 points in two weeks and the only thing people want to talk about is Matt Cassel. Classic.
by jk86 on Dec 11, 2009 7:47 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Cute picture
I find it ironic that you say “don’t feed the troll” after you wrote a small essay in rebuttal (That I admittedly have not read)
Nothing he said was trollish. Just because you don’t like his opinion it doesn’t make him a troll.
Johnnie Morton: The Man. The Myth. The Legend.
by craig in calgary on Dec 11, 2009 8:19 PM CST up reply actions
Well, I'd recommend you read the statement.
Might learn something.
Just sayin’…
Our defense gave up 87 points in two weeks and the only thing people want to talk about is Matt Cassel. Classic.
I rec'd this because you make sense. People act as if Croyle has never had a chance to be the better QB.
When you fail to prepare, you prepare to fail.
by NJChieffan16 on Dec 11, 2009 8:31 PM CST up reply actions
His opportunities have been limited, as have Cassel's.
Not at all certain Croyle wouldn’t win in training camp, but even/especially if he is the better QB, now is not his time. Not a good situation for ANY QB, and KC’s going with the toughest sonofabitch at the position on the roster, which is what they need, right now. And let’s keep in mind how instrumental Cassel is in terms of culture-building. I don’t think Thigpen had ANY idea how hard a QB can (and should) work in this league. Cassel surpassed Thigpen and Croyle by MILES when it came to preparation and training.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
by hmills110 on Dec 11, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
this pic? AGAIN? come on, jk ... surely you can do better than post the same picture over and over again ...
right?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
So....
You think we are jealous because Cassel is young, good looking and rich? That’s your argument? Seriously, we are all coming in with logical arguments and that’s the best you can do? I will say this, that’s the last comment I will read of yours. That has got to be one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever heard on here.
I think you may want to try a little harder next time JK.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Dec 12, 2009 10:49 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
WOW
Am i coming off as a Troll? Please tell me it isn’t so. I’m not in here to troll guys if i start crossing that line, would someone set me straight. The first game i ever went to was the Denver game of this year in K.C, with son who is 17. That ass whoopin was hard to take as a supporter and a fan of this team. 20 year’s ago some Denver fan’s would have gotten the cavey club beat down, but i had to be a good boy for my son’s sake. I’m 43 now and i’ve seen alot of so called QB’s come thru here now, most of whom just couldn’t get the job done. Imo Cassel is going to be another one of those guy’s who is good but just can’t get it done late in the season or the playoff’s. I just don’t understand why this team went to the trouble of getting a so called franchise QB before they fixed our o-line problem’s. Cassel is a game manager style QB and IMO is not even as good as K.Orton. We aready had a QB here that played that way and his name was D.Huard, and both QB’s don’t have a good deep ball arm.
caveman
right on point
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
My belief is that you're overestimating the importance of a deep ball arm.
Jay Cutler has one – his career won-loss record is worse than Matt Cassel’s – Cassel at least is at .500.
Much more important than the deep ball (which you might throw a handful of times a game) is the ability to hit midrange throws accurately with some velocity. Cassel and Orton are quite good at this, in my opinion.
I’ll say this, though – I have no idea how Cassel will do late in the season or the playoffs, but considering he keyed New England’s offense in the second half of the season as they destroyed the Dolphins (a play-off team), the Cardinals (the NFC Champion) and soundly defeated every team but the Steelers (and Randy Moss managed to drop a couple of touchdowns in that game), I think he has a shot at getting it done. Like anyone, he’ll need help around him.
I wonder if part of the reasoning behind picking up Cassel was to keep Denver from getting him – McDaniels clearly would have liked having him, and in my opinion Cassel is actually quite a bit more talented than Orton – with Denver’s receivers, line, and McDaniels as a coach, he could be having a Pro Bowl year. Who knows?
Maybe we can just agree to hope that I’m right about Cassel and he turns out to be a franchise QB?
All good point's
Cassel might have tore it up in Denver, too bad we are 2 or 3 years away from having that good of a o-line, which IMO should have been fixed first before we looked for a Franchise QB.
Agree with the cart-before-the-horse observation.
Cassel looks like a Steve Bono, to me. With the right supporting cast, he could be very very good, and the true test would only come against the top-tier teams, at which point we might reasonably conclude that he lacks that extra something to take a team to the championship level.
If the team-building continues apace, KC will face more playoff teams more often, and to win the big games, it will take something special at QB, as well. I hope Cassel can get it done, but I’m seeing signs that maybe he can’t. But I’m definitely not advocating yet another big move @ QB until the team is built.
Cassel brought a LOT of intangibles that this ship really needed to set a new course (toward success). Preparation, expectations, leadership – all the things that he learned as a developmental player in New England from the best, but that were essentially lacking in KC QBs. This set a standard for off-the-field that KC sorely lacked. This is a big key to developing future QBs, however they are acquired – something KC has been unable to do since forever.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
this guy comes in trying telling us not to shove things down other throat...
while doing the exact same to everyone who read his little rant. lol.
by MountainManMike on Dec 12, 2009 3:29 PM CST up reply actions
Cassel does kind of remind me of Steve Bono.
Tall, mobile, not great peripheral vision, slow release.
Bono was successful in SFO. So was Grbac, for that matter. But not quite top-shelf, either, and you needed something more with the poor tackle play of the Chiefs since John Alt retired (OK, brief period with Roaf and Tait that made TrINT into something to talk about).
I think Cassel is probably better than Bono, but not good enough to prosper with this team, at present. Can the team be built around him? Sure, it can. Until it’s built, we’ve made PLENTY of QB moves for the near term. If the offense continues to struggle after the line and WRs are sorted out, then we’ll know for sure Cassel’s a waste. That point in time will come right around the time his guaranteed money runs out, so the Chiefs have a rugged QB, who has the inside track for when the team matures, and they can walk away from him if things don’t gel.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Currently Cassel's not being COACHED to take risks.
He’s being coached very conservatively, because the Chiefs do not have the talent to be resilient in case things go south on ’em. At least that seems to be the thinking.
I’m more of a risk-taker myself (and have the scars to prove it). So I don’t care a whole lot for the conservative philosophy, but I also have seen enough times how much this team struggles when they DO open it up. Unwilling to take the heat when this doesn’t pay immediate dividends, there are certain aspects of the offense that simply CAN’T manifest, right now.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Here's my take
As far as Brodie Croyle goes, I don’t think he could be a worse NFL QB. He’s had his shot and he flat out sucked. He’s a gunslinger with a strong arm who makes poor decisions, can’t scramble for shit and has severe durability problems. I’m not a fan and no matter who else is in there and is playing like crap, I’d hate to see Croyle take go back in to take his place.
Now Cassel, he’s not playing well and he seems to be regressing. I’ve been saying for about a month now that we’re turning him into a head-case. By no means do I think the line is playing well enough to earn a pass, but they are showing improvement while Cassel seems to be getting worse. I’m willing to let it slide this year. He’s on a shit team in a shit system without a QB coach to lean on. He has a direct line to a HC who is overextended and often acts like a lunatic during games.
I’m willing to see it through to next year with him with the expectation that he and his team (including the GM and Coach) have an incredible amount to prove. This team is not complete. Next year, it had better be and as such, Cassel better play much better.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
To be honest.
I know this has been beaten like a dead horse…BUT…
Tyler Thigpen was the best option for this season. He has the legs to get away from the blitz and make plays that Cassel nor Croyle can.
I was watching him in the Texans preseason game and he made that TD throw to Cottam. It was very impressive….he was scrambling away from defenders buying time and then fakes like he is running and throws a no look pass in the end zone to a wide open Cottam.
Thigpen could have been taking the hits this season buying time until we get the oline fixed and get a solid WR corp. But now Cassel is getting banged up badly and having horrible games as a result….also probably losing some confidence.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
I've seen Cassel make throws on the run (for New England) that Thigpen would regularly miss.
But I’m 100% behind you in MY opinion that QB move was premature, and I’d’ve gone with Thigpen and used the 2nd-rounder to shore up the trenches or add a starting-caliber DB/WR. Spending a 2nd on QB after ’08 was low on my priority list. But Cassel DID really help to bring a culture shift.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Thigpen? Really????
Wow. Thats all I can say.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Dec 12, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
That's because you're missing the fact that the LAST thing you want to do with a BETTER QB is throw him to the wolves
before the O-Line and WR groups are fixed.
Matt isn’t saying Thiggie was great. He’s saying that there were other position groups that needed addressing before you throw a franchise talent/investment into the flames.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
I dont think Tom Brady himself could have done much better than Cassel has for the Chiefs.
Just picture Brady, for a moment, as our QB; does that translate into a winning season? No.
Joe
Raiders Suck!!!
Brady will have to win all of the remaining 4 games in order to match Cassel's 11-5.
Food for thought, eh? I was the only one saying these kinds of things last spring, btw.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
not really
the pats r a very different team this year than last…i dont make much out of that stat.
by MountainManMike on Dec 12, 2009 3:51 PM CST up reply actions
They're actually about the same except for a few keys, and better in the defensive secondary.
Clearly losing Seymour was a blow, and so was losing Vrabel. Bruschi was done as a player – Gary Guyton is an upgrade. Of course, Vrabel was aging, but he had something left. Overall, I’d argue that their defense is about the same as it was last year – passable, better in the secondary, worse up front. It’s translated into about the same statistics on defense.
As a Pats fan, if I had to pick the two biggest losses from that team, it’d be Jabar Gaffney – dude was money on 3rd down, and consistently won his matchups on the outside opposite of Moss – and Josh McDaniels.
They’re not the same team, but they’re not really that different, and this is with Brady at QB, who’s supposed to be one of the three best in the league. The offense should be better, but they can’t punch it into the endzone.
And Cassel was helping them punch it in last season by just running the QB draw -
not something you want Brady doing.
If anything, I’d say that New England slightly improved their O-Line over last year. Our upgrade at RT was their cast-off, after they addressed that position, for example.
Anyhoo, I’m no New England expert, but what little I know is in line with what you’re saying.
Keep in mind, you’re mostly disputing with people who give QB/RB too much credit or too much blame, depending on whether things are going well or going poorly.
I think you have a firm grasp on the TEAM play concepts extant in the NFL. When the game is being played at its highest level, backup RBs and QBs have a way of surprising everyone with how good they are when they’re on good teams. It should never stop you from looking for the very best you can, but it all has to be in the context of TEAM, else Donovan McNabb, Barry Sanders, and Dan Marino would sport multiple SB rings.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Actually, O'Callaghan was a developmental player.
He never beat out Nick Kaczur for the job in New England, so what the Chiefs actually have is New England’s back-up RT from a season ago.
What you said above is dead on – I wish more people would see it and understand the point you’re making.
If everybody got it, what would be the point of saying it over and over and over again?
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Its my opinion
That its good if your starting QB has a low INT rate. Its like Chris Chambers was saying, this isnt all on Cassel, the recievers have to run the right routes and catch the balls they get their hands on.
Exactly right.
But at times, especially on some of the shorter passes, Cassel isn’t showing a lot of “touch,” and he’s not making the subtle moves that give him a clear passing lane (too many batted balls that shouldn’t be). But he can make more happen than Trent Green could, already. I don’t know how many of you remember it this way, but Green could throw it on a frozen rope if NOBODY disrupted him beforehand. Get a finger in his jersey and even if he escaped, he was off-balance and wouldn’t make the throw and he was ZERO threat to run with the ball.
The more subtle things should come, over time, but they really need some continuity and repetitions with a REGULAR set of receivers (RB, TE, WR). I’d blame Haley for this lack of continuity, but I think that this was a year in which he shouldn’t’ve let himself get stuck on any personnel configurations or individual players. And I don’t think his approach should change. I just think they need to get more talented players in who will EARN their starting spots, week in and week out.
Heck, with all the new faces, it hasn’t even been a question of “starters,” but just making "the right 53. Considering where they were in May, LOOK at all the new faces they’ve turned up and the new guys ARE better than the previous corps. And while the stats are nothing to brag about, it’s clear (to MY eye, at least) that the WRs and TEs on the field are markedly improved over what was a pile of shit in August.
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
Yeah, we seem to agree on a lot.
Maybe that’s why people avoid religion and politics. If you disagree, you’re wasting your time. if you agree, there’s really nothing to add. ;o)
Prediction for '09: Chiefs are looking like a .500 team, especially considering Denver's inattention to D-Line, Chokeland's disarray, and a San Diego team that looks like it's on the decline. With a weak schedule, Chiefs steal a few and win between 7 and 9 games, and if .500 or better, will contend for supremacy in a weak division.
yeah, like you can analysis cassels mechanics
sorry but I really cant take you seriously when you say something like that. Oh Brain Brohm should be our QB, he cant even beat out Ryan freaking Fitzpatrick but he is better than cassel. good call dude, how about you tell me how Glenn Dorsey isnt using his hands correctly next post
I take that back
Brian Brohm is a back up for the packers, but he is obviously better than cassel because he was really good at Louisville. Nice one
Am I the ONLY person that can see that Cassel has a WEAK-ASS arm?
Look at his deep throws (the few that he’s thrown all year) and that’s all the proof you need. A 40 yard pass looks like a freakin punt! Chambers has had to slow down, and almost wait for all the deep balls he’s caught this year.
Brodie throws it with some balls, he just needs to hit the target.
I would say that Cassel's arm is probably mid-range for an NFL QB
His deep range and accuracy aren’t great. But his accuracy on the move is better than most quarterbacks in this league. Watch Peyton Manning or Tom Brady throw on the run – it’s ugly. If you need further proof of this, just go and watch the highlights of last year’s New England team. Watching the Jets and Dolphins late season games would be particularly good – watch the play at the end of regulation in the Jets game – slips a sack, gets outside of the pocket, and throws an accurate pass to a covered Randy Moss for the touchdown.
I’m sure this argument will fall on deaf ears, but a quarterback really only needs to have an adequate arm to throw deep and stretch the field a bit. It might surprise you to find that one of the knocks on Brady was his overall arm strength, but he was the best QB in his draft class at throwing in that midrange. Much more important is the ability to throw with velocity and accuracy in the 15-30 yard range (like your average 15 yard out to the sideline). Cassel’s arm is more than adequate for that – he wouldn’t have stuck in New England for 4 years if he couldn’t throw that route.
Get the man a QB coach – mechanics breakdown in all sports; that’s why you have QB coaches, hitting coaches, and pitching coaches. Not having one is just harming KC’s investment.
Why
Invest in a QB who is 28 years old, was a back-up to T.Brady for 4 years, and the dude still needs a QB coach!? Yet we still sign him to a 6 year contract, and everyone is saying he still needs a couple of years to improve, he’ll be 30 years old by then. I’m tired of excuse’s for the guy, yeah i know our team as a group is not that good right now, but they are better than what T.Thigpen, B.Croyle, and D.Huard had when they started yet they don’t get the same excuse?…………come on now lets be fair.
Let's be reasonable - hall of fame players still need positional coaching
Tom Brady has his own QB Coach that he still calls when things aren’t right, and that’s beyond what the Pats provide for him in Bill O’Brian (and before that, Josh McDaniels).
Look at it this way – an injury of some kind (whether documented or not) can cause a player to alter his throwing mechanics. It happens all the time in baseball – the mechanics get altered, and then more and more things go wrong, and you suddenly have a player that is so far from his normal mechanics that he’s a shell of what he was – less accurate, less velocity on the ball, etc. A QB coach can look through film and see what’s going wrong, and help the player correct them.
And yes, the Chiefs overall are probably a better team right now – however, Thigpen, Croyle, and Huard and the giant benefit of playing with the greatest tight end of his generation, and Dwayne Bowe. It’s not as if the cupboard was bare when they were playing. Watch Thigpen play (in his gimmick offense that became progressively less effective) and lock on Tony Gonzalez. Defenses knew what was coming, and they couldn’t stop it. Cassel would be a hell of a lot more effective if he had a sure-handed tight end who ran past the first down marker and caught the ball better in traffic than anyone in the NFL.
Cassel
Is no HOF player, lets get that straight right off the bat. It did help have T.G to throw to, but i don’t think Cassel could even get him the ball. You just don’t see it in the players atitude when they walk on the field Cassel is not a leader and just doesn’t have that spark. There was just something about Bones that made the team have more energy and the WR’s catch uncatchable balls, maybe i’m crazy but it seemed that way to me.
Oh no, I certainly didn't mean to imply that Cassel was a Hall of Fame player.
I was really referring to Brady with that, and in general to other players in both football and baseball. I don’t think Cassel will have Hall of Fame career, just that he’ll turn out to be very good.
I think that you’re quite mistaken in Cassel not being able to get the players the ball – he managed to do it in New England, and that’s with Randy Moss, who has a history of losing interest when things aren’t going well, and Ben Watson, who’s maybe half of the tight end that Gonzalez is.
Maybe you’re right about Cassel not being a leader, but hey, he seemed to be a leader in New England, so maybe there’s another factor at work. Or maybe all the players on the Kansas City offense are just too worried that the guy next to them is going to screw up that they have no energy. I never got to see Thigpen play – I wish I had.
Hey
I know he didn’t look that bad in N.E but people need to realize that having R.Moss, W.Welker and B.watson, can make any QB look good. I know B.Watson is no T.G but he does catch the ball when it’s thrown to him. I’ll take those 3 players anytime, against what we have now. Hell W.Welker alone is more of a force at WR than anyone we have on our team, including Bowe.
Actually, Ben Watson has a history of drops - it's kinda heartbreaking as a NE fan. And people in New England were openly wondering if they should trade Brady - he looked good.
And yes, the New England receiving core last year (including Kevin Faulk and Jabar Gaffney) was very good; however, for them to be as successful as they were (and it was something like 56% of their passing yards were after the catch) the ball has to be delivered on the money so they can catch and run. It helps that they were on the same page as Cassel most of the time – you didn’t have receivers who read differently than the qb and ran the wrong route (remember, New England’s receivers usually have a tree of routes that they can run on any given play and have to read the defense before and after the snap, and hope that the qb has the same read.
Cassel was able to trust them to do that – I don’t think the same can be said for Wade, Bradley, and Co. Chambers said as much earlier this week.
Regarding Watson, I can think of two passes from last season that he let go right through his hands – beautifully thrown balls from Cassel – that bounced off of him and into the hands of a defensive back.
In the end, I really don’t know – maybe he just sucks. I sure hope not.

by 
























