4 Reasons Why Brodie Croyle Should Start

I was just thinking about this so i made a list.
- Starting Brodie Croyle would benefit Matt Cassel in a way because he would take less hits and less punishment until we see Scott Pioli overhaul this offensive line.
- Starting Brodie Croyle would help are offensive line because I have noticed Brodie Croyle gets the ball out quicker where Matt Cassel likes to hold on to it.
- Starting Brodie Croyle would help out Dwayne Bowe Because Brodie likes to throw like 30 yard passes alot but Matt Throws a lot of 3-10 yard passes.
- Starting Brodie Croyle would help out Larry or whoever is the starting quarterback because he runs beautiful Boot legs and Play Action passes.
This may just sound right to me because I love watching Brodie play and I like his strong arm and pocket presence and quick instincts but hey Matt Cassel has good soft throws and good mobility tell me some of your comments and let me see what you think.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
0 recs |
170 comments
| Add comment
Comments
Not just no...
..but HELL NO!
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Nov 3, 2009 5:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
forgot one thing
WOW WHAT A GREAT ARTICLE
Hate Larry Johnson.
by royalsfan99 on Nov 3, 2009 6:11 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
umm...no.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 6:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
crazy talking everywhere
Brodie would get killed for one and Matts hands above Croyle
by tomahawk44 on Nov 3, 2009 7:30 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I wouldnt say he is hands above Brodie...
I do think he is better but not by much. I think this contract may come back to haunt us.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would say Cassel is way better without a doubt.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 3, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Is that it?
Whats your proof, Brodie never played for the Patriots. Way better would be Matt Ryan or Phillip Rivers. Cassel is not way better, He has not proven he can win in KC just like Brodie, and Brodie’s teams were way worse then the Chiefs are now. Im not argueing Brodie is better but anybody that Argues Cassel is better needs to tell me why because I dont see it. The only thing that makes him more suitable as a starter is Brodie’s injury risks.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
The Pats gave up more sacks than we did last year.
Cassel took 48 sacks last season,…the Pats OL was terrible.
Do you honestly think Croyle could take 48 sacks?
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No I dont
Also, Alot of the problem was Cassel holding onto the ball. The O Line doesnt suck for NE this year and it is the same. I saw a segment on ESPN about this last year and they showed matt Cassel getting sacked after holding onto the ball for 8 seconds, Then they showed Brady getting the ball out in 4.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Aaron Rodgers is the most sacked QB this season
He is also the highest ranked QB by QB rating.
Not too far off Cassell last year. There is more to this than that. Our WR corps is crap and the play calling has been very questionable.
When we have to score and Haley let’s Cassell loose, he has been near brilliant.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 10:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He let him loss in the Raiders game...
He blew that game for us. Also, Aaron Rodger is way better then Cassel and Brodie combined.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can't argue that Brodie isnt a more accurate passer...
and a better passer all around. Maybe Cassell makes better decisions, Idk about that. Brodie has way more upside and talent. He has a stronger Arm and is way more accurate with the deep ball. Its not a coincidence that Cassell looked for Welker all the time in NE.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely can
Go to nfl.com and look at their comparative passing stats.
Also consider when Haley unshackles Cassell to go downfield he shines…and Cassell has a WIN as a Chief. Croyle has zero…and Croyle has about 10 more starts…and has only lost. Every. Single. Game.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 11:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats irrelevent...
Croyle played under a different coach with a way less talented team. Also, If you beleive Cassel is a better deep ball passer your crazy. Brodie has better arm strength, Cassel had a problem is NE throwing the deep ball and he has all year. Sure on those 10-20 yard routes Ill take Cassel all day but 20-40, Brodie is miles ahead.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 11:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You obviously didn't watch NE last year.
Nor did you watch Croyle fail to move the team when necessary with fewer sacks, more starts, and a better defense than this Chiefs team this year, and he still has zero wins.
It appears that you have forgotten all of the games Croyle started and lost in the 2007 season…not just last year. Cassel, with one win and a worse defense and offensive line already has more wins than Croyle.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 11:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Thigpen also has more wins, with the same line, defense and still has better stats than Croyle.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 11:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So Cassell and Thigpen outperformed Croyle with the same conditions on the Chiefs
I fail to see any grounds for your argument.
They both have wins for the Chiefs, where Croyle does not.
They both have better stats then Croyle.
They both have not been repeatedly knocked out for the season.
Croyle has proven absolutely nothing other than you like him. If he can finally prove he can play, I will support him over Cassel.
However, he has only proven he can lose with the exact same team that Thiggy and Casssel can win with, and that he has continued his proneness to injury that has plagued him since high school.
We went over this all of last season.
The argument is stale, and nothing has changed other than 2 other QBs have come in after him and done what he has failed to do.
WIN.
And he has at least 10 more starts than any of the other two.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 11:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone keeps
giving Cassel credit for a win as a Chief; of course you’re referring to the win against Washington. If that is all you have, I would be embarrassed to even bring it up. Cassel didn’t score a single point in that game. He stunk in that game just like all the rest. He looks like a deer caught in the headlights.
Normally, I give dreamers a pass but I’m finally fed up. The more I see Cassel the more I believe he could be the biggest single factor that the Chiefs are the worst team in the NFL. The only reason he hasn’t been jerked is obviously Pioli’s stupid mistake of giving him a “superstar status” contract.
Please quit defending him. Even a little kid knows it’s wrong to pretend he’s great.
Haley and Pioli both know it’s a mistake. They must, if they know anything about football at all. If they continue ignoring it, they will be gone.
Arrowhead Stadium was once the 12th man, but is no longer. Very soon it will be empty and Haley / Pioli will see the door if they continue to try shoving Cassel down our collective throats.
It’s long past time to bring in Brodie, a proven star in college, obviously better in every way over Cassel
by choirboy on Nov 4, 2009 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
...and a proven failure in the NFL.
Cassel has won games in NE and KC. Brodie has been handed the starting job on a silver platter twice and couldn’t do anything with it. To use your own line: “Even a little kid knows its wrong to pretend he’s great”. Brodie had chances, and couldn’t do it.
Cassel may not be “the star” that you want him to be, but calling him the “single biggest factor the Chiefs are the worst team in the NFL”? Hardly. Defense and Offensive Line are by FAR the greater issue here. In his 6 starts, he’s given our defense a chance to hold a lead and win the game in three of them. They did it once. And I see you’re one of the people who refuses to see that Washington was the #3 defense in the league going into that game and came out #5.
The statistical reasons Cassel is better have been all over this Post. I’m not “in love” with Cassel by any means, but Brodie has never shown me anything to make me believe he’s a starting NFL QB…ever. Cassel has, and he’s a leader on the field, whereas Brodie looks scared.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 9:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Who have they played?
And I see you’re one of the people who refuses to see that Washington was the #3 defense in the league going into that game and came out #5.
Not a single team with a win at the time. The Giants? Yes, but not so Giant now. Let’s see where their D ranks when they get the rest of the NFC East twice.
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Nov 4, 2009 10:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If we're playing that card...
Our schedule has been a nightmare so far. If we’re throwing out the Redskins’ defensive stats because they’re perceived as “weak”, can we throw out Cassel’s stats against the tougher teams?
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I could argue
with you ( Kalo) point by point all day but it would be useless. All I know is that this is the worst team the chiefs have ever put on the field and Matt Cassel is their leader.
I really believe that almost any QB would be an improvement. Washington lost that game. The Chiefs didn’t win it.
by choirboy on Nov 4, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Worst ever?
We’re 7 games in…how can you possibly justify calling it the worst ever?
I think your hatred for Cassel is distorting your view of this team a bit.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your wrong DT and im sorry for getting off in the middle of our convo...
But you wrong, Our o-line was worse last year and way worse the year before. Also, I dont care about numbers because you cant compare Cassell in Ne to brodie last year in KC. Cassel has not played good this year.
Also, I dont like Croyle over Cassel, but Cassel has yet to prove he can throw the ball down feild with any accuracy. Thats why Dwayne Bowe is declining in catches. If you logic is right, Thigpen is better then Cassel because he had better stats last year in fewer games. Thats your logic.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 10:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
You think the 2007 O-line was worse than 2008 O-line? You do remember that the 2008 line got 2 QB’s out for the season.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 4, 2009 12:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You can also add Huard
Huard had 4 wins in 2007, Croyle had none.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 3, 2009 11:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely,
Huard too.
That should be the most damning evidence. :)
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 11:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
right...
this is evidence of skill…..to paraphrase –
uhhh no.
by Cassel is a west coast pretty boy on Nov 3, 2009 11:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NOT IRRELEVANT!!!! NO Way!!
Your way off there. It’s not irrelevant. Winning is the ONLY relevant stat…PERIOD! You think Dan Marino gives two shits about his records?? Hell no!! He himself said he would trade every stat ever for a superbowl ring. WINNING is ALL this league is about.
Croyle has potential yes. But he has never won a game as a chief…EVER!!! Don’t care about any other stats but winning. Jim Plunkett didn’t have great stats…but he won!!
Tell me what records does Terry Bradshaw hold?? Hmmmmmm?? That’s right…the only stat he holds the market on is the ONLY one that really counts…4 superbowl rings…talk to Montana about that as well.
Montana doesn’t hold all time records like Manning and Brady…but he’s got 4 rings doesn’t he?? Winning is everything in football. You don’t play for stats, you play for the ring.
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 7:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And To Harp On A Point
While Croyle’s had shitty teams throughout his career, this is the only season in which he’s outperformed his backup (and he only played in one game and I suspect that if he takes the field again we’ll see those stats take a nosedive). For his career Croyle’s stats suck and he doesn’t win. There’s no reason for anyone to be demanding that Cassel be benched for him.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 4, 2009 8:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He let him loose in the Cowboys game when we tied for OT
And at the end of the half in the Chargers game.
Cassell can move/throw downfield when we have to and Haley chosses to. He has proven it every time this year.
It is only when Haley is desperate that he lets Cassell play.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 10:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why didnt he drive us down the feild
when we HAD to in OT twice. Once again, Im not saying Cassell is a bad QB and I hope he is our franchise guy and he leads us to a playoff victory. But, Im not ready to say he is miles ahead of Brodie.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 11:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cuz Haley went back to conservative calls
Went away from the no huddle
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 3, 2009 11:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly what everyone does...
Give Cassel a pass. Im not saying Croyle is better, But if Cassel is way better then Croyle, Then Thigpen is way better then Cassel when you look at the numbers.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think either of them are all that fabulous ...
Cassel holds the ball far too long – stats on sacks both in NE and here this year (vs Brady’s sack stats this year and previously) absolutely PROVE that (see Martin manley UFR post on that)
Croyle has a distincet tendency to get injured – his past history PROVES that
Croyle, on the other hand, has the arguably better arm … Cassel has the “experience” of being a starter for a full year (2008)
now, given that this is an evaluation year anyway, I’d not be upset in the least if Croyle was the starter for the second half of the season (or even the next, say, 4 games and see if he CAN do anything) … if he falls apart, gets injured, throws INTs by the bucketful, whatever, then we know … if he’s at least AS GOOD as Cassel, what have we lost by giving it a shot?
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
by upamtn on Nov 4, 2009 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Besides the 60 million?
No in all seriousness I agree with your post. I never once said Croyle was better. I even said Cassel should start. All I said is Cassel hasnt proven anything except he knows how to have horrible games and mediocore game. He hasnt had a very solid game like Croyle did week 1 against one of the best Defenses will play all year. Croyle does get injured and thats his only knock.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For someone that keeps saying
He didn’t say Croyle is better than Cassel, you keep saying all the ways you think Croyle is better than Cassel. A lot of times!
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 4, 2009 5:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yah gotta agree with woodman..(just don't tell any1)
that was haley and his play calling…
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly..
Thank you Kray I have no more need to express the issue
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 11:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sixty Million Reasons Why Brodie Croyle Will Not Start
Matt Cassel’s contract.
Not that Croyle deserves to start anyway considering he’s still never won a single game…something Matt Cassel was able to pull off in his first year here.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 5:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Oh, And One More Reason Why Croyle Will Not Start
He’s still fragile and can’t be trusted.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 5:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Did nothing aggainst the washington to deserve a win
and Brodie led his team to 20 points in the week 1 in Baltimore so yeah has matt done that gemme a Hell No
Hate Larry Johnson.
by royalsfan99 on Nov 3, 2009 6:04 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
13 points.
7 of those points were 1st and goal from about the 7, off DJ’s INT return.
Croyle also was clearly flustered at times between plays.
All the other things you say about Croyle are probably true. Cassel’s more of an upgraded Thigpen. Croyle is MUCH more likely to be hurt in the current situation, and he MIGHT very well have more upside down the road. Let him keep learning, getting bigger and stronger (looks tougher this year), while they sort things out in other areas. We’re a long way, yet, from being able to say that Cassel’s limiting KC’s ability to win.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Nov 3, 2009 6:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He Won A Game With A Crappy Team
Brodie’s never done that.
Give it up man…the kid’s never going to be the Chiefs’ starter because a) he’s not good enough, b) he’s not durable enough, and c) they’re paying someone else $60 million to be the starter. Any one of those things are enough on their own to keep him on the bench.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 7:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Someone post the pic already
Brodie…….(beating)……..Croyle…….(a)……….should……….(dead)………start……..(horse)……
Brokie Crumples has shown us all we need to see in the past 3 years.
He’s can ride the cap outta that exercise bike.
Other than that…hes a walking injury waiting to happen.
Just let him hold the clip board and pretend he’s a Professonal Football Player. It makes him smile. —
Cassel is our starter, and Guiterrez > Croyle.
You CANNOT win games from the trainers table.
You CANNOT lead the team in a walking boot on a back board.
Beside’s the seat on the new exercise bike is already broken in for the real players, so Brodie has done his job and earned his contract.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
by Texas Chief on Nov 3, 2009 6:15 PM CST reply actions 6 recs
God Bless ya, Tex
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
by stagdsp on Nov 3, 2009 6:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
x

Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Nov 3, 2009 6:50 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 7:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I still dont think Cassell is much better...
Cassell hasn’t shown he is betterI hope we resign brodie for sure. He is way more accurate and has a way better arm. True he gets injured but none of us would last a snap behind the Chiefs line. I dont think Brodie should start but If Cassel keeps throwing 3 ints a game, He might.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You are funny.
Have you seen Brokies stats? Brokie isn’t as good as Thigpen let alone Cassel.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 3, 2009 10:25 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Like I said...
Brodie isnt the nest Steve Young, but neither is Cassell. Cassell threw 3 ints last week, I dont think Brodie has ever done that. Cassel hasnt even proven he deserves a job in the NFL, Just like Brodie. Im just speaking the truth.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Croyle has also never won a game for the Chiefs.
Cassell and Bones did.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 10:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thats the best Arguement....
But Who is to say Brodie wouldnt have won a game with this years team. Im not argueing Brodie is better but How can you honestly sau Cassel is way better?
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brodie has a 116.QB rating this year...
Whats Cassel’s rating? We cant compare what Brodie did with the Chiefs to was Cassell did with the Patriots. We also cant compare what Brodie did with a totally different Chiefs team to what Cassel is doing now. (Even though its not much better) So, Where is your proof of Cassel being way better? Is this just your opinion? Or is it a fact?
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's one game, where we had every break go our way..and we still lost.
Erykah Badu, I have accepted your proposal. So, Mrs. DTR, let's get to consummating...you are on notice.
"All praise Chiefus."
by DThomasReigns on Nov 3, 2009 10:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was being feasicist....
And I know I didnt spell that right. What I was trying to get across is we cant compare what Brodie did last year or what Cassell did with the Patriots to now or what Brodie did the last 2 years. The teams are totally different on both sides of the ball.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is this really how you debate...
one SHORT sentence with lots of !!!!!!! CAP LOCKS
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
wait! I thought the "beating a dead horse" pic itself was now considered to be (wait for it) ...
… beating a dead horse
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
by upamtn on Nov 4, 2009 11:06 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
i dont like the score on that youtube video!
i hope this isnt a sign of the future! Also if the line keeps playing the way they are then Croyle might just end up finishing the year! Poor Cassel, but the Jags dont have a very dominant pass rush so we should see something this weekend out of Cassel and Bowe.
by jrcnc on Nov 3, 2009 6:31 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Croyle should continue to sit
until KC Wolf is ready to start at RG, which should be any day now
by Ribs59 on Nov 3, 2009 6:34 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
hes got those crazy eyes...
prolly has a mean streak
A man who says he can, and a man who says he can't are both right. Which one are you?
by Bashman on Nov 3, 2009 8:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel will start until he finally gets hurt playing behind our horrible O-line.
The Brody can come in and get destroyed. Then we can get a look at Gut until Cassel is healthy agian.
by saskwatch on Nov 3, 2009 6:36 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
there ya go saskwatch...agreed to an extent..
if Cassel gets benched I want Gutty in there.
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hope you’re joking, or you just lost all credibility in your arguments
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone EXCEPT Cassel
He would not start for MOST college teams and after six games I am sick of watching him make this average team look like chit. I bet Alabama, Texas or Florida would beat the Chiefs if Cassel started against them.
by kcchiefstd on Nov 5, 2009 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is that serious?
No college football team would beat an NFL team. None. Not even Florida v. Detroit (or whoever you think the worst team is).
by T-Rich on Nov 6, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent proof reading before posting.
I will give you one reason why not… Benching Cassel in favor of Croyle prevents Cassel from developing that special bond that great QB’s and their receivers have.
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Nov 3, 2009 6:48 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Cassel will never
Have that SPECIAL connection because he is not a special QB he should not be starting in the NFL period.
by kcchiefstd on Nov 5, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait a second.... Are you Brodie Croyle????
Or is this his hot wifey?
www.treasuretrooper.com/cashisnow
by Prospero15 on Nov 3, 2009 7:34 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I really like Brodie Croyle's ability
but everytime he took I hit I was afraid his leg would fall off. I’ll take a pass.
by stram#1 on Nov 3, 2009 8:06 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Cassel SUCKS
He is a terrible escuse of a QB he would not start on any of the top 10 college teams.
I don’t care who comes in just give me someone who is actually good enough to start for a college team. Maybe even Brodie FOR NOW atleast he started and set RECORDS in college. Not ride pine the whole time and I don’t want to hear how good Palmer and Lienart are. Yes Palmer is a very good QB but Lienart has not proven much yet and you would think Cassel would of started Lienarts Junior year but he was not good enough to WIN games so he did not.
by kcchiefstd on Nov 3, 2009 9:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Either You're Trolling
Or you haven’t watched any of the games Croyle’s played in the last four years. But that is a delusional argument.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 10:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I seem to remember this type of stuff from this chap...
I think he actually believes it…
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 3, 2009 10:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Then he needs to step away for the herbal remedies
and get a big dose of reality.
by stram#1 on Nov 3, 2009 10:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Big Dose of reality
Cassel lost the raiders game.
Cassel was a big part in the loss of the Chargers game, dude fell apart.
If he keeps regressing……..
by mcclanahanman on Nov 4, 2009 12:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Eh?
First of all….is this Rue McClanahan’s husband because that would be amazing…?
Second, you cannot really argue Cassel lost the Raiders game…The game he drove the field and scored to take the lead in the 4th quarter and handed the defense a 4th quarter lead against the worst offense in recent history…He did not do great, but he in no way lost that game…
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 4, 2009 12:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Defense Lost That Game
By letting Russell have a good drive on them.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 4, 2009 7:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel didn’t throw any picks in that game? Oh yeah, he did. And was that the game where he threw a 2 yard pass inbounds to run out the clock in the first half? Fantastic
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Remind Me Again
What’s Cassel’s win percentage versus Croyle’s?
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 4, 2009 9:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
That’s what I thought. And how many years has Cassel been here compared to Croyle?
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 5, 2009 7:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Croyle has 9 starts, Cassel has 6. Wow, you are really putting me in my place with these staggering statistics.
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 2:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't understand...
…how you can outright dismiss what everyone with football knowledge accepts…He does not suck, get over it…you are not correct.
I am not saying to believe everything “experts” say…but if he sucked he would not be where he is.
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 3, 2009 10:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Atleast he isnt Derreck Anderson Right?
Cassell is a top 20 QB for sure, Brodie is a very good QB who has had some good games, He suffered from the same problem that Cassel has been getting excuses for all year. I dont remenber Brodie ever throwing 3 ints but I could be wrong. I like Brodie as a starter in this league if he can stay healthy. Cassell has shown way more tuffness though and can manage to get out of the way when someone is running right thru the swiss cheese o-line of ours. I wouldnt say Cassel is way better then Brodie by no means. But Brodie has done nothing to make me think he could come in a win a game that cassell cant.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 10:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't remember Brodie ever staying in the game 4 quarters...
Not in a few years anyway
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 3, 2009 11:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yup
But those occasions were few and far between.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 4, 2009 7:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, he has gotten hurt in every single game he has ever played in. Nice facts, but not true at all
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't Put Words In My Mouth
He’s gotten hurt in most of the games he played in and he’s never played two full games in a row without getting hurt.
He’s a nice kid, but the guy sucks as an NFL QB.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 4, 2009 9:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What happened to your statement that you were done with the Chiefs, about a week ago?
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 3, 2009 10:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no thanks kcchiefstd...I'll pass..I don't smoke crack..but tks!
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I said if Cassel starts after the bye week and I also said I am a Diehard Chiefs fan
I guess like a few others you don’t keep your FACTS straight
by kcchiefstd on Nov 5, 2009 3:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ummmmmmmmm just what do you mean by ...
“Starting Brodie Croyle would help out Larry or whoever is the starting quarterback because he runs beautiful Boot legs and Play Action passes.”
dudem wtf are you talking about? Larry as what? and Brodie might be the best at the Play Action since Steve DeBerg, but until we get an actual, you know, RUNNING GAME, no defense will bite on a play action
as for "Starting Brodie Croyle would benefit Matt Cassel in a way because he would take less hits and less punishment … " you just want to see Brodie in a wheelchair, is that it? what??? Look, Cassel is paid very well to take hits, and he takes them better than Croyle ever could
your idea about “Starting Brodie Croyle would help are offensive line because I have noticed Brodie Croyle gets the ball out quicker where Matt Cassel likes to hold on to it.” is invalid because the RBs and WRs won’t have time to get anywhere with too quick of a release
and, finally … “Croyle would help out Dwayne Bowe Because Brodie likes to throw like 30 yard passes alot but Matt Throws a lot of 3-10 yard passes” is also invalid, because Bowe’s never been that far down the field, and most certainly couldn’t make it that far with a QB getting rid of the ball in a hurry … that’s diametrically opposite of your other point … you can’t have both those things together
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisiton!
by upamtn on Nov 3, 2009 10:24 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
read my comment upamtn...i said the same thing..."wtf are you talking about"...lol
great minds…great minds…
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes people can connect the dots. And it can’t be debated that Cassel holds on to the ball too long. What’s worse: An incomplete pass, or a 7 yard sack? Not a hard decision
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel 60 million dollars..
Thats all that has to be said..
by Kcbiggyblue on Nov 3, 2009 11:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Biggy...
That doesnt make him better
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 11:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But its the reason he will start over croyle regardless (unless of injury)
Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!
by SuperTurtle on Nov 4, 2009 5:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and why LJ
should start before Charles and Smith and Savage?
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Nov 4, 2009 6:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
too bad isn't it?
Don’t see him enough.
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Nov 4, 2009 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can the same be said for Jamarcus?
Yeah, I dont think so.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 3, 2009 11:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But, he is better..
Plus he has to have some chemistry with this offense when he does have time to throw the ball next year.. Assuming we fill in the holes in the o-line..
by Kcbiggyblue on Nov 3, 2009 11:19 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You dont know if he is better...
Also, Im not argueing Croyle is better. I beleive Croyle is a better pure passer. He is better under center and at reading defenses. Why do you think Cassel held the ball for 7-8 seconds in NE, because he cant read defenses. Does anyone remenber the segment on ESPN last year explaining why Cassel got sacked so much? they showed a clip or Brady getting rid of the ball in like 2-4 seconds and Cassel holding onto it like 20 times for 7-8 seconds. He cant read defenses. Brodie gets the ball out faster, He has better arm strength, and he is way more accurate on the 20-40 yd throws thats all im saying. I do beleive Cassel is a solid QB but they are 2 different kinds of QBs. You guys keep argueing wins and numbers but Thigpen is an example of the system around him.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 10:59 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok ok...listen..
right now I will stick my neck out and say that in the past…in the PAST Brodie was a better pure passer…I don’t disagree with that. It’s been so long now since he’s put himself in a position to win and secure a starting position that it’s impossible to say anymore.
One game in Baltimore is not a testament to a pure pro passing QB who can’t stay healthy long enough to be evalutated. Part of being a champion is being in the game. Favre…stays in the game…Manning…in the game…Croyle…in the hospital…always…so that’s the deflationary factor right there.
You can’t say what he IS better at anymore, cuz we havent’ seen him play in so long for any stretch of time.
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah he played againts the best defense we faced all year in the 1st week of the season....
and had a better game then Cassel has all year. If your going to talk to me, atleast read every post. I never once said Cassel sucked and Croyle was better. All I said was Cassel hasnt proven that he is the better QB. You are exactly right about Peyton and Brett Farve, They play in the games. Cassel is the only Chiefs QB to miss time this year so whats your point. Cassel hasnt done shit in KC at all. As of right now, He is nearing the bust factor. Alswo, I totally agree that Peyton and Manning are great QBs, Peyton would have the Chiefs @ 4-3 right now. I like cassel, I had mixed feelings when we traded for him but what ive seen at times tells me one day he could be a good QB. Ive seen the same from Croyle. To be honest, I would feel better going into battle with Croyle right now because I prefer a pure passer, Cassel is not that. He dinks and dunks.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He put KC in a position to win Week 1, so you argument is completely false.
And are we comparing offensive lines of Indy, Minnesota, and KC? Because that will also make your logic look very terrible.
And take a look at the two hits that Croyle was injured on last year. He didn’t get bumped, they were legit
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Croyle didn't put us in a position to win week 1
The defense and special teams did.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 4, 2009 10:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Cassel didn’t win against Washington, the defense and Succop did. Can’t have it both ways
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 1:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel did get us in FG range
Croyle had nothing to do with the Special teams TD, and had to move the ball a whole 3 yards to get the other TD after DJ’s int.
So yes Cassel did have something to do with the Washington win.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 5, 2009 12:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe more than 2 touchdowns were scored in the Baltimore game…
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 2:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't think I had to break it all down for you.
I guess you didn’t watch the game or forgot what you were arguing about. You said Croyle put us in a position to win week 1. So I explained the two TD’s he had nothing or very little to do with. He did score 1 TD and moved the ball again just close enough for our kicker to make a 53 yard FG(lucky we have a kicker with a strong leg)
So that isn’t putting us in a position to win that game, we would have been blown out 10 to 38
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 5, 2009 5:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, seriously dude?
Succop nailed two 46 yard field goals (and another almost 40 yards) in the Washington game. How does Cassel get credit for “moving us into field goal range” in that game, but Croyle got lucky because our kicker has a “strong leg” against Baltimore. YOU CAN’T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 8:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You don't reliaze the difference between a 46 and 53 FG is a lot.
And I did give him credit for it. Still means they would have beat us by 28 points
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 5, 2009 10:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
How can you honestly sau Cassel is way better? (quoting Darwithabar)
Like this; “CASSEL IS WAY BETTER”!! we cool?
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 7:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Right?
Really, Im trying to have educated conversation with people. The Day anything anyone says is productive will call you. lol
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Brodie = injured and losing
I like the kid, and have supported him in the past, but the only thing good I’ve seen from him in his entire tenure as a Chief was the Week 1 performance against Baltimore. He got sacked 3 times. Based on previous history, I can’t say that he would’ve made it through some of the 4 and 5 sack games.
And you’re basing your analysis of Croyle on an opening day game against a faltering defense. Yet you’re choosing to ignore that Cassel actually dropped the Redskins from 3rd to 5th place in total defense in his WIN. That’s higher than the Ravens have been all year.
Nobody here is saying that Cassel is the second coming of Chiefus or anything, but he’s going to start on his will to win alone. You look at Brodie and you don’t see that fire or desire to lead his men. Cassel has that in spades.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 8:24 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I have a desire to win, but I won’t be starting for the Chiefs. And look at the Redskins schedule before the KC game. NOT A SINGLE TEAM WITH A WIN. STOP QUOTING THEIR DEFENSIVE RANKINGS. KC didn’t score a single touchdown in that game, he didn’t exactly carve them up or anything.
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would also guess
You don’t have the ability to play football at a pro level. Both of these guys do (regardless of what side you stand on), so I was comparing their on-field ability. Not yours. Let’s try not to stray away from the comparisons this post was started on.
Washington may fall apart as the season goes along. As it is, they’ve got the 2nd ranked pass defense, and Cassel is in the minority of QB’s who haven’t turned the ball over to them (McNabb, Stafford). He also had Bowe drop two balls inside the 20 that would’ve kept drives going…and while they may not have led to a TD, it certainly didn’t contribute and can’t be solely pinned on him.
You’re free to believe what you want about our QB situation. If you believe Croyle is better, go right ahead. Croyle has worse statistics than Cassel (Turnovers, TD/INT ratio, and most importantly: win percentage) in a Chiefs uniform, and has trouble staying on the field. That’s what I base my opinion on.
On, and if we’re going to dismiss Cassel for having one good season in NE as an anomaly, how can you be sure Croyle’s Week 1 performance wasn’t one?
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 11:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel has
an infuriating mental slowness. He doesn’t have what it takes to play the QB position and he never will. That’s why he never got to play in college and will never make it in the NFL.
After every snap of the ball I find myself saying OMG and then he gets sacked. Am I really alone?
by choirboy on Nov 4, 2009 9:52 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
...he's already "made it" in the NFL.
Or did you sleep through last season? You can say all you want about NE’s O-Line and Receivers, but you’ve still got to hit your man in the hands and win games. He won 11 games last year and led the #5 offense in the league.
Your comparision (Brodie Croyle) has a worse TD/INT ratio, worse completion percentage, and most importantly: an overwhelmingly worse win percentage.
I really don’t get the call for Cassel’s head when the guy below him has worse stats and an injury problem.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 10:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Derek Anderson had 1 good year, and made the probowl. So we should get him, right?
Oh yeah, one good season doesn’t prove anything. Especially when it comes with a powerhouse offense.
And maybe Croyle has IMPROVED over the past few seasons. WHAT?!? I know, shocking.
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Your bagging on Cassel for having 1 good year?
Croyle hasn’t even had 1.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 4, 2009 10:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Again
Croyle has never outperformed his backups when he was the starter. He’s never even been the best QB on his own team. Huard both won more games and put up better numbers. And Huard was just a so-so QB.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 5, 2009 7:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Cassel has proved he should be the starter by beating who?
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
He’s posted a 3,000 yard season…which is more than Croyle’s ever done. And he’s shown he can stay healthy despite leading the league in sacks, which is more than Croyle’s ever done. And he’s started six consecutive games, which is more than Croyle’s ever shown himself capable of because he’s fragile. So I’d say that on that basis alone he’s beaten Croyle pretty handily.
There is no case for Croyle to be a starter here. He’s got no trade value because he sucks and he’s fragile, he’s never outperformed his backups over the course of a season, he’s never won a single game here despite having the starting job handed to him last year (because he sucks and he’s fragile) and because he’s not worth re-signing (because he’s fragile…and because he sucks).
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 5, 2009 5:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel posted 3000+ yards on a juggernaut offense with 2 of the best receivers in the NFL fresh off a 16-0 team.
When did Croyle play on a team like that, for comparison?
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 9:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And I’m not really in support of putting in Croyle over Cassel, I think doing that during the season is a bad move (for Cassel’s mindset, and the good of the team, etc). I just don’t buy the fact that Cassel is a superstar because of one good season on a loaded team.He struggles reading defenses, so he holds on to the ball too long resulting in sacks, and hasn’t looked very accurate this season. Hopefully it’s something that’ll get better as he gets more experience.
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Once again,
Brodie has never had a decent team around him. Cassel looks awful now doesn’t he. Remember the Chargers game?
I expect more of the same this week.
by choirboy on Nov 4, 2009 10:55 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
3 ints...
I dont think Brodie has ever done that
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he hasn't played long enough to get three int's...member that??
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He has played more games as a Chief then Cassel
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1000
He has played, and finished a lot of games. Look up the stats kray
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only stat that matters.
Croyle 0 wins
Cassel 12 wins
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 4, 2009 10:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
12 wins? Oh, you’re counting 11 that came from a team fresh off a 16-0 season?
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 1:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And Croyle got 0 wins fresh off a team that went 9-7
So your point is what? Cassel got 5 less wins than the team did the previous year. Croyle got 9 less wins than the team did the previous year.
And Croyle was given starter reps in the offseason, so he had chemistry with the first team.
Cassel didn’t work with the first team in the offseason, and still won 11 games.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 5, 2009 8:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Again, comparing two completely different teams with the same stats. How does that work? Please tell me
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OK how about this
Huard a career back-up and Croyle on the same team same year and Huard got 4 wins and Croyle 0 in 2007.
I don’t know how many different ways too put this,Croyle has not stayed healthy since High School and has worse stats than Cassel, Huard and Thigpen.
In only 6 games with the Chiefs Cassel has as many TD’s and 3 less int’s than Croyle has his whole career.
Chiefs set an NFL record,most roster changes in 1 season.
by bringbacktheglory on Nov 5, 2009 5:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Croyle’s struggled in his first season starting in the NFL, on a bad team? No way, that’s crazy. And a veteran didn’t? Wow, this is shocking. It’s amazing how people just assume Croyle is the same player he was last time he played, and that he doesn’t get better.
by T-Rich on Nov 5, 2009 8:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We had a chance to win in Baltimore
Someone choked! Yes the defense gave up a late TD but, He still had a chance for a game winning drive.. Cassel executed the game winning drive great against dallas.. It was the D that couldn’t do anything against Austin..
by Kcbiggyblue on Nov 4, 2009 12:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What Game Winning Drive Against Dallas?
Cassel did the same thing against a weaker defense @ home TWICE!
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So when Cassel loses, it’s because of the defense? And when Croyle loses, it’s because of him? Sorry buddy, but you can’t have it that way. Cassel had 2 possesions in overtime against Dallas, including one at midfield, and couldn’t get any points. That isn’t on the defense
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and...
And I’m not bashing Haley but I don’t see what makes him so great for us. Anyone can come in and be a drill sargeant. That’s not a skill. I went thru bootcamp and I can assure you, it’s not hard to be a hardass. That doesn’t get Haley a medal ok?
Being a great coach comes down to one thing in the end..“you are what your record says you are”…Bill Parcells. Period.
I’m not bailing out on Haley because he deserves time to learn this job too, just like everyone else. But throwing titles at him and accolades for the sake of accolades is kool-aid delusional. You have to EARN that reputation. Ok?
What has Haley ever done that makes him so special? Seriously, I’m not taking anything from him in AZ, but let’s be real for a minute. He didn’t draft Fitz or Boldin and he didn’t trade for Warner. So I say good for him that he did a good job over in AZ. But really, who couldn’t? Seriously, what human with the skill set to even become an OC for any NFL team couldn’t do something miraculous with that offense?
That’s like taking over as Mohammed Ali’s coach AFTER he became an elite boxer and taking credit for it. Their already stacked with talent and experience. Warner could call his own plays. He doesn’t need an OC anymore than Peyton does. Petyon calls whatever he feels like once he lines up. He calls more audibles than anyone.
So I’m not drinking the kool aid simply because he has a different style than Edwards. That alone does not make you anything but different.
by krayfish on Nov 4, 2009 11:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
While I agree about Haley.....
Fitz does credit him with taking him to the next level.
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Curse
I just realized similarity to this
Croyle #12 – Gannon #12
Gannon was not allowed to start once Grbac was healthy. WHY? Because Elvis was the higher paid QB on the roster. and our then GM CP went after him (Elvis) and rewarded him with a fat contract.
Croyle was not allowed to start despite what Haley said, both QBs were neck to neck eventhough towards the tail end of training camp, Cassel started to look really bad throwing so many INTs. Croyle not starting because Cassel is the higher paid QB on the roster. and our current GM Pioli went after him and rewarded him with a fatter long term contract.
Curse of the #12? of simply because the GM f*&^ked up and is forcing the coach to play the high priced QB?
Predictions as of 06.24.2009.
Larry Johnson will be a top 3 fantasy pick once again in 2010 (after a monster season in 2009.)
Dwayne Bowe will be a 2009 Pro Bowl selection.
Brandon Flowers will have at least 6 INTs in 2009 season.
Todd Haley will have a sideline shouting match caught on TV yelling at one of his asst. coaches.
by 58 was my friend on Nov 4, 2009 12:50 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree with the poster on this one...
Cassel has played HORRIBLY other than a couple of games this year. The San Diego game did NOT have to be as bad as it was. Cassel could have been a difference maker and he continued to do the same things he’s been doing. Missing open receivers and holding the ball too long.
I’d say Cassel should get another week but, if he plays that badly again, Croyle should get a chance to show himself. If this is an evaluation year (that’s what it looks like to me) then, Brodie SHOULD get a chance. You have to ask yourself this at the very least: What can it hurt??? Seriously, this is the worst offense I have ever seen from a “professional” football team. You never know, maybe Croyle’s quicker release and accuracy is exactly what this offense needs in order to put up some points.
by Chiefsfan1970 on Nov 4, 2009 1:36 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree..
but it may not even be the worst offense in the NFL this year, But I agree Offenses this year are the worst Ive ever seen them(The bad ones).
OHANA!
by darwithabar on Nov 4, 2009 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It's an
evaluation year for everybody except QB. This regime doesn’t care if Brodie or anyone else is better. Cassel is their boy and it’s a fatal flaw which will come back and bite them in the butt.
I have lost all hope. These guys were supposed to be great judges of talent but their first draft was a bust and it seems like every transaction they make is a downgrade.
by choirboy on Nov 4, 2009 2:13 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
*sigh*
Last time I’ll say it: we’re only 7 games into the season. Calling this season a waste and the draft a bust is completely unfair by comparison to other FULL seasons.
We were 2-14 last year, with not a whole lot of positives for this regime to carry over on either side of the ball. We had a much easier schedule, yet we couldn’t seem to win. This year’s is harder. There’s only so much you can do with little talent and difficult scheduling.
All I’m asking is to wait until the end of the season before generalizations like “Cassel/Jackson/Haley suck and are the worst ever at their positions”, and especially “This is the worst Chiefs team EVER”. There’s over half the season left, with several winnable games. Criticizing the coach/QB is fine and all, but “bust” and “worst” are jumps to conclusions right now.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Noone will take you seriously if you call a gorup of rookies seven games in "busts"
….its just nonsensical
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
by woodman212 on Nov 5, 2009 12:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Cassel playes like he did at the end of the last game,
he should be pulled and Brodie should get a go. No ill could come of it, and it might do Cassel a bit of good to know he’s on notice. If that’s the plan for every other position, I don’t see why it doesn’t work for QB.
by NJ Chiefs Fan on Nov 4, 2009 2:43 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
Technically he did get pulled...=)
…and I do agree. He shouldn’t get a free pass, and if he comes out, can’t hit the broadside of a barn, and throws a pick or two, I have no qualms about Brodie spelling him.
But starting Brodie over Matt this week? No.
"I don't know if I want to go to New York. They'll have to pay me a lot more money because I like it here in Kansas City." -- Roger Maris
by KaloPhoenix on Nov 4, 2009 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Croyle- huge arm
gets rid of the ball quicker than cassel
but has some durabilty issues and by some i mean alot
Cassel- very accurate from short to mid
able to create plays with feet
doesn’t have a big time arm
To be honest This o-line is one of the worst I have ever seen, Cassel rarely gets 4 seconds to throw the ball, but When the o-line does a decent job almost every time Cassel is indecisive and trys to scan to long. I believe that IF Croyle did not have all the health issues he would be the starter and rightfully so because of his abilities but he will not be because of his tendency to get hurt and the fact that Cassel is getting paid ALOT~ but take away the factors of the 60 million dollars and Croyles health issues and just go by abilities Croyle would be my pick
by IamtheGreatest on Nov 4, 2009 3:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
He gets more than 4 seconds to throw a lot of the time. He holds on to the ball way too long. Even a great offensive line wouldn’t be able to protect a QB for 8 seconds consistently
by T-Rich on Nov 4, 2009 9:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
let me make my point clear because of the 60 million dollars and how bad this line is, I think Croyle would get killed so that is why Matt Cassel is and should be the starter, but on talent I believe Croyle is better
by IamtheGreatest on Nov 4, 2009 3:07 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
My take is that
Both Croyle and Cassel have talent in different areas but both lack command of its offense, thus lacks leadership.
By leadership, I mean as a starting NFL QB, you’d have to take everything in strides and be accountable for actions; you must show your will to succeed when given the opportunity regardless or circumstances (sucky o-line). These two don’t show me that they want the starting job enough.
My observation is this: When Cassel was a backup in New England starting in place of Brady – he’s played without looking behind or worries of getting bench or booed – simply because there was less pressure since he is only .. I meant literally ONLY" a backup for that team.
Croyle played extremely well in week 1 starting in place of the true starter (Cassel – who was nursing his injured knee) When Brodie was “THE STARTER” last season, he didn’t play up to it or at least never stayed healthy long enough to show it. Some players are just that – when they are playing with nothing to loose since its not their starting job, they tend to play better. Once they are put in a permanent starting role, they started to tightened and make mental mistakes.
That is the case with Matt Cassel at the moment. he is not mentally strong when he walks up to the line. Just look at him second guessing his own reads of the defense and then stares at chiefs sideline as if he needed confirmation from coaches that he is seeing the same thing the coaches are seeing.
Predictions as of 06.24.2009.
Larry Johnson will be a top 3 fantasy pick once again in 2010 (after a monster season in 2009.)
Dwayne Bowe will be a 2009 Pro Bowl selection.
Brandon Flowers will have at least 6 INTs in 2009 season.
Todd Haley will have a sideline shouting match caught on TV yelling at one of his asst. coaches.
by 58 was my friend on Nov 4, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ALL I KNOW IS THIS
Brodie Croyle 9 starts 0 win
Matt Cassel 6 starts 1 win
Matt’s clearly the winner here plus he’s got three more games left to show he could be a 35% winner.
Predictions as of 06.24.2009.
Larry Johnson will be a top 3 fantasy pick once again in 2010 (after a monster season in 2009.)
Dwayne Bowe will be a 2009 Pro Bowl selection.
Brandon Flowers will have at least 6 INTs in 2009 season.
Todd Haley will have a sideline shouting match caught on TV yelling at one of his asst. coaches.
by 58 was my friend on Nov 4, 2009 4:53 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
over it....
haven’t we debated the Cassel/Croyle issue til we’re blue in the face? It’s like choosing the lesser of two evils. Neither have proved shit. At this point, I’ll be happy with a 3-13 season as it’s at least some sort of improvement.
by HeatherChiefsLvr on Nov 4, 2009 5:29 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
Very well said.
Neither have proved shit.
Predictions as of 06.24.2009.
Larry Johnson will be a top 3 fantasy pick once again in 2010 (after a monster season in 2009.)
Dwayne Bowe will be a 2009 Pro Bowl selection.
Brandon Flowers will have at least 6 INTs in 2009 season.
Todd Haley will have a sideline shouting match caught on TV yelling at one of his asst. coaches.
by 58 was my friend on Nov 4, 2009 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cassel is just taking a beating until they get Brodie an offensive line.
They are hoping Cassel can make it a few years, and by then, they will bring Brodie back in to take the Chiefs into the playoffs etc. etc.
by WyattChief on Nov 5, 2009 12:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is the WRONG argument
I don’t think anyone really wants Croyle we just know that Cassel is a 60 million dollar mistake and we definatly need to upgrade the QB position or we will not get better that is the truth Cassel = Croyle = Guttierez = NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO WIN COSISTANTLY none of our QBs are GOOD NFL QBs We have a GLARING hole at the most important position on the field and wasted 60 million on a SCRUB.
by kcchiefstd on Nov 5, 2009 3:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















