The problem you have when you go to suspend a player is the NFLPA will always argue, with some success, that all discipline must be progressive. In other words, first a warning, then a fine, then progressive fines before you suspend a player.
That is what the Chiefs faced. There was no precedent for Johnson's actions to warrant the length of suspension they decided to impose. The largest fine that I know of for an inappropriate comment similar to Johnson's was $10,000 to Joey Porter. There has never been a suspension that I know of for making comments about fans, though there have been fines -- but certainly nothing like the amount Johnson would lose during his two-week suspension.
I go over these points because as a GM you listen to these points from the lawyers. I would not be surprised if they recommended the Chiefs not suspend Johnson because the case would be hard to win. If the suspension is overturned, you the player comes back without any loss of money. One factor to remember is that besides lacking precedent, you also did not use progressive discipline.
Chiefs, Johnson both have incentive to make marriage work
From CBS Sports
18 days ago
NJ Chiefs Fan
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I can't wait....
Till LJ is out of the league, has spent all his money, and realises “oh crap, I have to pay taxes on this stuff still?”.
by Section304 on Nov 3, 2009 3:20 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't wish him ill,
but this isn’t the first punk-like behavior, either. Seems to me there is a clear history/pattern of behavior that totally justifies a 2-game suspension (or more). I just can’t believe that they’re looking at this in isolation.
No question. Otis Taylor should be in the Hall of Fame.
by hmills110 on Nov 3, 2009 5:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think he'll be one of those ex-NFL players
that end up in prison. He’ll beat the hell out of some girlfriend or hooker and he’ll have no NFL or money to keep him out.
Air Cassel - approved for takeoff
by kabrink on Nov 3, 2009 9:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah well they don't have to play him.
it sucks that the team will lose some money but just bench his stupid ass. He should be benched for the terrible job he’s been doing on top of the fact that he is a dick burger.
Please help send my girlfriend to Broadway! Visit http://magonbroadway.blogspot.com/
by Patrick Allen on Nov 3, 2009 3:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
true
but he’s going to just sit around on that bench mouthing off about how he isn’t getting any carries. It’s called locker room poison.
Blame my wife!
Waiting until August 2010
by sir eccles on Nov 3, 2009 5:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blah, blah, blah...
LJ should be suspended just for having his name come up so often this past week or so.
by Scott B. on Nov 3, 2009 3:28 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
thats fine
I really dont care that much if he gets paid or not?..just dont play him
by dwil2009 on Nov 3, 2009 3:30 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Johnson’s got reason to want to make this work…yeah, right.
He’s at the end of his career, he’s not getting another contract and he hates his coach. Anyone who thinks Johnson is going to change is delusional.
Moderator - Arrowhead Pride
Predictions for 2009
1. Todd Haley's going to struggle with managing his staff in his rookie year as head coach.
6. The Chiefs will go 7-9 in 2009, good for 2nd in the AFC West. Revision: We go 5-11 and finish behind Oakland.
7. Ryan Succop will not perform better in 2009 than Connor Barth did in 2008.
8. The Chiefs will have a bottom 10 defense this year.
9. RB will be a problem area this season on offense.
by UCrawford on Nov 3, 2009 5:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs



















