Chargers released WR Chris Chambers.
At this time of the year, Chris Chambers must clear waivers. Each team will have chance to claim him by 4 p.m. Tuesday.
Via Twitter
over 2 years ago
NJ Chiefs Fan
34 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
I wouldnt mind picking Chambers up
Atleast he can hold onto the ball. I just go back to that hit Page unloaded on him last year and he held on.
that was the reason they released him
at least this year, he’s been unable to hold onto the ball…I remember seeing him drop several easily catchable balls during the Chargers-Broncos game. He has 4 official dropped passes this year (12th in league), 1 behind Bowe, who is 5th.
by Kristospherein on Nov 2, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions
wow.. that seems odd...
I wonder if they are doing a roster shuffle like the Pats did a couple weeks back… or if he’s really out of there.
I can’t imagine he will clear waivers
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
does he really have to go through waivers?
i thought as a vested veteran when you got cut you became a free agent immediately
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
unless it has to do with it being after the trade deadline
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
after the trade deadline
they do pass through waivers
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
3rd, if I remember right
Detroit
St Louis
KC
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
doubt it
they have next to nothing in the WR dept
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
I'd cut bobby engram for him
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
by stagdsp on Nov 2, 2009 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Yes, please.
Presuming he makes it to us on the waiver wire, I’d gladly take him over some of the “22 guys off the street” we’re holding onto right now.
sorry there a new order every week based on wins tampa be nymber 1 then there is like 5 1 win teams
have no clue where chiefs be
According to the NFL.com standings ...
It would be:
1) Bucs
2) Rams
3) Browns
4) Titans
5) Chiefs
6) Lions
That is, if their overall league standings are reflective of the waiver wire listings.
plus hes not worth 2.4 million for 9 games sorry
hes to old and slow
he did play for Miami, which is Parcells' team...
6 degrees of Haley/Pioli
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
31 years old
no one will take that 2.4 mil hit, he would help us, but really….kind of pointless to bring him in at this point in his career….I can see a couple teams very interested, playoff teams, maybe a team like the steelers, the jaguars, a team that has a chance at the playoffs…heck, denver would fit.
Can he play Center or Guard?
If not I will take a pass…. Chambers has been in decline for the past couple years. None of our receivers will reach full potential with our line in shambles.
Yet I agree with stag… if he is picked up drop Bobby Engram.
Im guessing they released him because
1. he hasn’t been reliable…He’s barley caught any balls this season.
2. Malcom Floyd is emerging and im pretty sure he will take the #2 spot at WR.
3. They are making room for a LB.
The Story Goes
he was released because of;
a) the emergence of Malcolm Floyd
b) the play of Legadu Nanee
I’m surrounded by Chargers idiots out here and they provided me with the scoop…
Put this in your pipe and smoke it:
1. Chiefs will be at least 8-8 and vie for division champs
2. DJ will break out and finally have his year
3. LJ returns to form
4. DBowe drops will reduce
by kcchiefsfan72 on Nov 2, 2009 7:11 PM CST up reply actions
He'd be a perfect fit for the rest of the stone hands receivers we have
no thanks.. please no more scrap heaps.
I would take him
Any guy available that is an upgrade anywhere on the roster should be brought in….imo.
We signed Engram and Toomer…..Pioli or Haley doesnt have any issues with older WR.
"Its going to be a challenge, its going to feel like forever, and there will be difficulties. But we will emerge on the other side of it stronger than we were when we entered." ~ Sudden
Makes you wonder why they let him go...
They do have some morons for Coach/GM so he could be decent…
Haley would be able to tell if anyone can.
Don't forget to be an AP-vangelist...Tell A Friend...
"Pick him up...."
Mock “yeah” ing “yeah” bird “yeah”
Chiefs Top Five Solo Tackle Leaders:
Demorrio Williams -37 Tackles
Mike Brown -33 Tackles
Mike Vrable -25 Tackles
Corey Mays -24 Tackles
Brandon Flowers -19 Tackles
IF he clears waivers
then I would be okay if we picked him up in free agency. Cut Engram for him.
I'm officially on the 'Draft Eric Berry' train.
Haley-Crennel 2010.
PASS!
We have enough to bitch about with Bowe dropping balls. No thanks.
Braccae illae virides cum subucula rosea et tunica Caledonia-quam elenganter concinnatur!
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
