Why Weren't the '09 Chiefs a Candidate for Instant Turnaround?
We see this time and again every year, which leads to the common maxim concerning the level of parity in the NFL. Of course, every year there are unexpected teams that turn things around. And every year there are teams that fall to the ground after high expectations. Thus, there's a "any year can be our year" mentality that's prevalent among most franchises and fan bases in the NFL.
The Cowboys went from one win to perennial contender. The Dolphins turned things around in the first year of the Bill Parcells/Tony Sparano combination. The Falcons did the same magic turnaround with a new GM and Head Coach in Thomas Dimitroff and Mike Smith respectively. So when the Chiefs bring in the most celebrated NFL executive of the last decade (maybe outside of Bill Polian) and a hot up-and-coming offensive guru like Todd Haley, the thoughts naturally led to "Yes, it's our turn!"
But obviously that hasn't been the case. The first-quarter of the '09 season finds the Chiefs looking as bad as last year's team and, in some instances, even worse (i.e. the Raiders and Eagles contests). There seem to be as many (or nearly as many) holes on our current roster as there was 9 months ago and that's with over half of the original team gone from the roster.
The reality is that most struggling teams in the NFL continue to struggle the following year. But the exception or two that comes along with each season brings hope that instant turnaround is possible.
So we'd love to hear your opinions. Why do you think the Chiefs failed to respond in the same way a Falcons or Dolphins team made the magic leap?
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
O-line wasn't improved from a terrible '08 O-line...
This team won’t win many games this year or next if the O-line doesn’t improve.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Oct 6, 2009 5:29 PM CDT reply actions
a few reasons
1) brutal schedule The fins had it easy compared to this year’s Chiefs team
2) instability in the roster and schemes… moves needed to be made, but it would have been nice to have the roster set before camp, allowing for some continuity
3) lack of a running game… the Fins established the wildcat and 2 solid RB, which allowed them to move the ball and be a dangerous offense, despite a mediocre passing game… Chiefs… not so much, as of yet
* "I doubt anyone will miss Connor Barth except UCrawford"
* the LB corps may become the biggest strength of the Chiefs in 2009
* The OL is NOT as bad as you think it is... give it time, and you'll see improvement this season
ill add poor talent
This team has not drafted an impact player in a long time. None of their recent picks is a big time and consistent playmaker. Dorsey, DJ, Bowe. Maybe solid at best but zero consistency.
by golfbard on Oct 6, 2009 5:37 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Jake Long and Justin Smiley were brought in
I think if the Chiefs had a new/better guard opposite Waters this line would be much, much better and that would give Cassel more time, etc and here we go…
We have a better guard
But for some reason Goff has been omitted from the “competition at every position” rule.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
Offensive line and running game and schedule.
Cant really include the dolphins in the turnaround teams anymore either since now its easy to see its a mirage.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
Not sure how you say we looked worse then last year against the Raiders either.
Go back and rewatch that game it was horrid.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
Still hope
Might sound ridiculous, but these next 3 games before the bye are very winnable givin the circumstances going on this season. Got home vs Romeo, at Wash and home vs Chargers who wont have jamal williams, maybe even Merriman and LT by then. These next 3 weeks will definitely tell where this teams going. LETS GO BOYS Gotta have Arrowhead rockin this weekend!
Glad I'm not alone
I’m hoping the same thing the next three weeks.
Nice to see a post here that isn’t negative.
by chrisclark_dfw on Oct 6, 2009 10:25 PM CDT up reply actions
Agree...
…However these teams could say the same thing about the Kansas City Chiefs.
by ChiefsFan90s on Oct 6, 2009 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Late start.......I really think that overall this is big. We'll see some different coaches
next year.
by jcox31mc on Oct 6, 2009 5:44 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
+1
At least defensively. Clancy wasnt their first pick or their pick at all, they got stuck with him.
"Success is never ending, failure is never final."
Looks like the Dolphins were a fluke...
Those teams sold out on Free Agents and played cakewalk schedules. Our O-Line is the biggest issue by itself though…
I ask myself this question every day.
I don’t buy that Miami had a quick turnaround because of an easy schedule, which I am sick and tired of hearing. Easy schedule means nothing in the NFL, you have to win the games on your schedule regardless of who they are. Plus winning in an Uber-competitive AFC east was HUGE for a 1-15 team especially with 2 games against an 18-1 team.
I think it is a 3-prong reason related to the offence. There is a bad O-Line, with a combination of poor playcalling and no Tony Gonzalez. No one is debating that the O-Line is pisspoor and most realize this should have been dealt with in the draft. Green Bay showed us last night that a team will struggle without a good O-Line but they still moved the ball very well against the Vikings Defense (better playcalling – quick slants and screens etc). Finally Tony. I think this is a better team with Tony on it, if no other reason, it gives Matt Cassel a legitamite 3rd down target. It’s been debated over and over the TG trade but with a young team struggling to learn how to win, you can’t discount having a guy like that on the team…no future 2nd round draft pick can replace that.
RIP Bodhi - Not tragic to die doing what you love. You want the ultimate thrill, you gotta be willing to pay the ultimate price.
by craig in calgary on Oct 6, 2009 5:57 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
If you weren't from Canada I'd rec you.
Don't Fuccop Succop
by chicks_love_chiefs on Oct 6, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions
I dont blame you
I’m considering moving. It was the 11th inning of Twins/Tigers and they preempted it for Flames/Canadiens.
I hate the NHL. If I actually cared who won the baseball game, I’d be crazy pissed.
RIP Bodhi - Not tragic to die doing what you love. You want the ultimate thrill, you gotta be willing to pay the ultimate price.
by craig in calgary on Oct 6, 2009 8:41 PM CDT up reply actions
But Tony only gives Cassel a Security Blanket for one year...
The trade for the 2nd round pick is the better move for this team. I agree that we would win more games with Tony. We would have one at least one, if not two with him this year, but then at the end of the year he would retire and be gone and we would be left with nothing… I miss him alot, but we are in this for the long rebuild… It is PAINFULL to watch…
I know...
its because each new regime inherited the third most important position in all of football: a pass rusher. The Dolphins transition to the 3-4 was actually good for the short run in that they had Joey Porter on their team. They had good value for picking Jake Long #1 overall and their current left tackle excelled at right tackle. Having bookend tackles and a dominant pass rusher will bring more stability to a franchise than you will ever know. I think if Hali progresses and we get the bookends we will be dramatically different. Also, Atlanta had a lot more talent than it seemed. Their disastrous season was the result of the Vick situation and an inept coach who quit in the middle of the freaking season!
Also...
Atlanta got bookends too by trading back into the first and getting Sam Baker. Guys we just didn’t have the opportunity this year to get that guy. You cannot, let me repeat, cannot draft an offensive lineman #3 overall. The only franchise left tackle I saw in the draft was Andre Smith and he had red flags all over the place.
I'm sorry...
when I said offensive lineman I meant right tackle. I’m an idiot. And Atlanta’s pass rusher was John Abraham.
Very True...
The Falcons had a great draft and both teams had a much better reserve of tallent and veterans to plug in…
Well...
We do not have two bookends on offense and we do not seem to get enough pressure…you might be right. Although I think our problems with player quality goes deeper than that (a pass covering safety, another wide out, a tight end, one or two more linebackers).
Bewsaf
Coaching
How many jobs is Haley trying to handle this year? HC, OC, QB coach, and WR coach? He needs to let go of some of his ego and focus on being the HC. The late pick up of Piloli led to a late pick up of Haley, which in turn led to led to late signings of Pendergast and the prolonged decision to keep Gailey. Pendergast was a mediocre DC before we employed him, and remains so to this day, and Haley never even considered letting someone else call the offense. Next offseason, we need a big turnover, but of the coaching staff.
P.S. We need to draft/sign some capable freaking O-linemen
decent summary
I like the analysis. I wonder about the ego complaints floating around. Fear-based controlling is probably as common, or maybe more common, than arrogance or ego-based controlling, and it’s really hard to tell them apart. I can’t determine which it is in Haley’s case but, as you note, Haley needs to be willing to delegate when he gets the hires he wants. He currently appears to have too many roles for a person new to head coaching to consistently perform at the highest levels.
i don't think it's as easy as targeting one thing
this situation is unique compared to the other situations. i would argue that our roster from 1-53 isn’t as talented as atlanta’s or miami’s in ‘07. there’s no doubt we’ve had a tough schedule. there’s no doubt our head coach is learning as he goes and making some mistakes. there’s no doubt we didn’t add a bunch of talent to our roster in the offseason. there’s no doubt our team is going through the growing pains of learning different systems on offense and defense. the short answer is it’s a bunch of things
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
So True!
And that just makes it even harder to watch… Knowing that we cannot pinpoint any one thing, but that there are just so many things wrong right now. All of these things contribute and place pressure on the places that are sound and cause them to fail as well. Patching these cracks will take time. I have faith in next year being quite a bit different…
I think some coaching changes will occur, specifically with Pendergast and Krumrie.
We need a guy who knows and has run staunch 34 defenses. I’d be confident saying that Romeo Crennel will be our defensive coordinator next year.
We need to try to pillage some of the Steelers’, Jets’, and Ravens’ assistant coaches.
Looking at past Chiefs "turnarounds"
I didn’t expect much from this team. There were serious questions about the talent level, very little veteran leadership, and the most key veterans didn’t seem to want to stay around. And this was BEFORE Pioli came in.
Vermeil made his turnaround look more difficult than it was. There were already a lot of solid players on the team and you knew who they were. And they weren’t running for the exits, either. His biggest problem was trying to put a new offense into place and keeping the defense together. He ultimately succeeded very well at the first, failed at the latter.
Marty’s turn around was a piece of cake. It was pretty clear the team had loads of talent and just needed a good coach, a new QB and a game plan. Marty came in saying he expected to be making a push for the playoffs his first season, and he did.
The one most similar to this one was Levy’s. Very little talent to work with. Some aging veterans rapidly bailing out (in today’s game they would be asking for a trade like Tony G). Marv built a foundation of Defense, Special teams, and running game. And it didn’t happen overnight. Marv made some mistakes so it took longer than it should have.
This team looked like the one Marv got so I was ready for a tough season. Just looking for the team to get better through the season. Special teams are really improved. Defense still making mistakes. I expect the offense to get it together before the D at this point.
So no, I didn’t really have high expectations. I didn’t think they were likely to be able to turn it around like Atlanta or Miami did. I had one post when I said they’d win 8, but that was in response to the 4 horsemen of the apocolypse commenters and not a real expectation.
My apologies for the length of the post.
Very true BC
This team was gutted before the current leadership came in. That’s why I keep saying we are closer to a brand new expansion team than we are a playoff team. For rebuilding you have to have some players to rebuild from and what is it like 24 former Chiefs are no longer even in the NFL? We had very little talent to rebuild from thus it isn’t just about fixing holes but building a new foundation on which we can build a team upon. I really believe it will all come together, but it is going to take longer than we hoped. From where this all started I think it may take 3 years before the Chiefs can expect to be a playoff team. Overnight fixes normally do not last, yes next season with no cap we can spend our asses off and maybe bring in some talent without worrying about the cap, but in time the cap will come back and then we will have to ask if the team can afford to keep all the hired guns to keep us winning.
is it me? or isn't about time the Lamar Hunt trophy belonged to His team?
I’m a Chiefs fan Dammit and I’m damn proud of it!
lol
most people on this site weren’t even alive when marv levy was coach. sad really. speaking of marv, talk about giving up on a guy too soon. that guy was doing a good job and would have taken us somewhere but the fans got restless and steadman gave him the axe, much to buffalo’s liking. this is an example of why fans need to have a little patience
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
I disagree about Marv
He was a level below Marty when he was coaching the Chiefs. He wasn’t going to make KC any better than a mediocre team. He did do a good job of getting in some talent and building a good D, Special teams and running game, but he was as bad with the QBs as anyone I’ve ever seen. His waffling between Fuller and Kenney makes Mangini seem decisive. Marv swore the Chiefs didn’t have the talent to be a passing team. But after he was fired Mackovic came in and the Chiefs went from 25th in passing in 81 (they were 21st in 82, the strike year) to 3rd in Mackovic’s first season in 83. The only real talent change was that Joe Delaney died during the offseason. So it makes it pretty obvious that Marv didn’t understand how to run a passing team, or get an OC who could. I like a lot about Marv, but I think Mackovic showed him he was wrong about talent being the problem. To Marv’s credit he learned from it and was a much better coach in his second HC stint with the Bills. So I don’t think people gave up on him too soon, I think Steadman was correct in firing him.
even with that deficiency
levy was better than mackovic. mackovic ran a good offense but that’s it. it’s all water under the bridge though.
Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day.
Harry S. Truman
I'll agree with you on that!
One of that happiest days of my life as a Chiefs fan was the day Mackovic got fired. Levy was a better coach than Mackovic. There were a lot of positives about Marv, not so many about Mackovic. I have a lot of fond memories of the Levy era, not so for Mackovic. I’d rank Marv as number 3 on the Chiefs coaching list, with only Hank and Marty ahead of him.
I posted this in another thread, but felt it would be more appropreate here, (my second post)
I’ve been a Chiefs fan since the mid seventies. (I was a Vikings fan before that (not real football anymore when it’s in a dome!) and yes, I rooted against the Chiefs when they won their only Superbowl.) I have watched the organization go thru its up and downs. I am not particularly excited with the teams progress thus far but truely feel that most of the problem lies in the following:
A) The poor attitude shown towards the Chiefs organization the end of last year by then current "stars" put a "bad taste in players mouths" possibly causing Better quality free agents to skip the Chiefs for other teams.
B) The late arrival in all aspects the new management team (Pioli/Haley/assembly of the Coaching Staff)
C) The depleted level of talent as well as the extreme youth on the team when the new management arrived.
D) Additionally, all our "stars" wanted out. This was compounded by the ill timed comments and actions from the new managment staff.
E) The slow methodical way in which every aspect of the team/previous assistant coaches/scouting staffs etc. was analized including late major changes to the coaching staff (Not that this was bad, just added to the "being behind the 8 ball" problem with the team).
If you add this all up it makes complete sense (to me anyway) why we are not having any success on the field. I still belive that, using Haleys "you play the season in quarters" mentality, the Chiefs will continue to see improvement and that this in turn will diffuse the "Toxic" atmosphere in the locker room. By improvement I’m saying we could finish this year 5-11 (1-3, 2-2, 2-2 by quarters).
Quite honestly I believe, given the rest of this year to stabilize the orginization, this team as a whole (with a few changes) will be much improved next year at this time. In fact, we all may be very excited with the outlook for post-season play this time next year!
If you don't recount the problems and issues of the past you are doomed to repeat them!!!!!!!
by Fan of the Red And Gold on Oct 6, 2009 11:41 PM CDT reply actions
2 Reasons
Trading away Tony G and Jared Allen and getting nothing in return but draft picks that turn out to be complete busts (cottam, charles, albert)

by 





















