But that's dodging the question: do I think Herm Edwards should be fired in Kansas City? Yes. Do I think that is unfair to Herm Edwards? Absolutely yes. So there you have it: I think it's unfair to fire Herm Edwards, but believe it needs to be done anyway. I realize that makes me a bad person.
about 3 years ago
Chris Thorman
54 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I like Herm
Herm is a leader I think he has done a good job with such a young group . I like the way he handles himself in meetings he is positive even though the entire chief community hates his guts . But some of the decisions made in the games some of the play calling is very questionable especially when your trying to win close games. Good coaches make good calls in close games I think at times we lost so many close games and some of it is on the players and some of it is on the coaches . I hate to lose this guy as a leader but if it takes fresh blood with a fresh new system with young players that can be a big positive . Im tired of watching the chiefs ancient ways of playing we need to be more creative on the D side of the ball and O side .I dont think herm can bring fresh new ideas with this group of coaches .So in my eyes yes he should be fired.
Article pretty much sums up my feelings
Herm was doomed from the start.
He has inherent flaws as a coach that will likely prevent him from ever being a Super Bowl caliber coach, but with a team not on the precipice of disintegrating into catastrophe like the Chiefs were he would have done much better. Had they done what Herm knew needed to be done from the beginning we would like have seen the Chiefs emerging from the rebuild and competing for the playoffs in 2008 rather than going 2-14 in his 3rd year.
Regardless, Herm is in the last year of his contract and hasn’t shown (regardless of the circumstances) anything to merit an extension without which needed assistant changes can’t be made. With a new GM coming in and likely cleaning house, it makes no sense to keep a lame duck coach for a year.
Herms talents are in his ability to motivate players, so one thing I think we will appreciate down the road is that he was able to use that ability to keep the team together without their frustrations disintegrating into some really ugly off the field actions and comments. He held them together through the worst of it and I think his example and dedication to the NFL will serve our young players well as they go forward in their careers.
OK
Lets face it Herm could have squeezed out a few more wins than two this season. Any coach would be hated for that record, not just Herm.
I just can't see feeling sorry for Herm
Hell yes he was doomed. Yes of course it was a bad situation with little chance for success, but Herm didn’t really have any other options at the time and neither did Carl. He was on the verge of being lynched in NY and he jumped at the chance to get out. That was his biggest mistake. He took the job out of desperation and he didn’t really look at it carefully enough beforehand.
I doubt any top-flight coach would have come to KC after Vermeil left. Not one who would have taken half a minute to assess the sate of the franchise anyway. Peterson knew it was a mess and he also knew that Herm was pretty much all that was available. Herm had some good ideas but couldn’t win out over Carl because he didn’t negotiate a proper deal comming in. If he had taken a look at the situation carefully enough, he probably would have made a few demands (unless of course he’s that stupid!)
Two years later, Carl lost favor with Clark and Herm got his chance but it was way too late. Unfortunately for Herm, he really isn’t a skilled enough coach to control his own destiny. So now his ass is out. He’s a big boy and should shoulder his own blame, but I doubt he will becasue he has an incredible case of denial and has made an art form of deflecting blame!!
Now Pioli...
(It appears so, anyway!) This is a guy who is looking at every detail comming in and is making the all the proper demands to fit the situation. If he gets what he wants, he should do just fine.
sEXASSASIN
Was it our 2-14 record or 6-25 record over the last two years that has influenced you to some how believe Herm has done a lot of good things with our young team..What is that based on? It’s certainly not based on reality..It doesn’t matter whether its a business, organization or a team; the leader must always create results..These past two years have been terrible..Can you remember how BADDDDDD we we’re before thigpen emerged this year…The addition of Thigpen and bradley with the spread made this team bearable to watch yet we still didn’t win..
We have lost our entire arrowhead advantage..We lost our arrowhead pride..We got destroyed at home by oakland and many many teams the past couple of years…I can’t wait to hear your response because without a doubt you will somehow have one yet it really won’t address how Herm actually did a good job coaching our young players when all we did was lose lose lose and get our asses kicked..Sorry but I’m ready for Herm to be gone..He’s been paid 3 million a year..Why should I feel sorry for him..
Herm is a great motivator and very relateable to players..The buck stops there..He will continue to coach in the nfl but he will never ever coach in a superbowl ever..So he might as well start watching the damn superbowl cause he ain’t getting to one
by CALIFAN1986 on Jan 9, 2009 7:27 PM CST reply actions
Hell
I think he’d be better off learning to recruit and finding a nice gig in the college ranks. Seems better suited for it.
learnng to recruit?
He was a scout for some time.
Tell you what, why don’t /you/ do better with Carl hanging around your neck for a couple years, joggling your elbow, and insisting that the way to go is to be indifferent in the draft (CP’s record in the draft’s been atrocious since before Herm – look at his record with QBs, running back to the Marty years!), and bring in high-priced underachievers (Andre Ridon and Chester McGlockton, to name two) in order to field a “competetive” team.
Carl’s strategy (by their fruits ye shall know them) has ben to build teams that are /just/ good enough to fill the stadium, but neverto take the rissks it takes to build a SB team. Read the linked articles in the post, and some of the links in those.
Herm never had a chance, all right, and it’s far more about CP and fans who think that Herm’s had a few years, when the reality is that ./this/ was the first year he could get down to re-building.
He’;s got his faults, but don’t crucify him for things that were out of his hands via Peterson, hey?
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 4:56 AM CST up reply actions
First
I meant learn how to recruit in the college sense of the word. He’s not a skilled enough coach for the NFL. Good modivator, player’s coach, all around good guy; yes, but it’s not going to do him much good at this level. I’m not crucifying him for it. It is what it is. But I do think he would probably be great at the college level. He seems better suited for it.
Second, he took the KC job from a position of weakness becasue he wanted/needed to get out ot NY. He did no vetting of the situation here before he jumped all over it. BIG mistake!!
Sure Carl made a mess of things with Gunther and Vermeil. That’s why he didn’t have many coaching prospects at that time. He had an old team, cap problems and a lousey reputation and nobody wanted to come to KC. So who does he end up with? A coach who was building a reputation in NY as the guy who systematically dismantled their favorite team.
Herm and Carl both got what was comming to them.
You might be right
About Herm being better suited to coaching at the college level.
One of Herm’s faults, though, is that he trusted Carl when he took this job. From the reports associated with the original post, Herm thought he was going to come in and rebuild a so-so, aging team. Carl didn’t let him do it for 3 years. That changed things in many ways.
As I said elsewhere, Carl stle Herm’s honeymoon period. Were it not of CP, Herm might have had a young D at this time, and one that still had Jared Allen (given his draft position, one can hardly argue that he wouldn’t have been drafted in 04 anyway).
The “dont crucify him…” comment was more a general expression. Eric, below you, lays all the problems in the draft squarely at Herm’s feet, when it’s been well known that CP has been the final arbiter of the draft for a looong time.
He’s right about his clock management, conservatism, and for the most part, game management. OTOH, how many of Herm’s coaches have been /Herm’s/ coaches, and how many were dumped on him by Carl? You really thing Solari was more Herm than Carl? I don’t. I think Solari was one of “Carl’s Guys”, and you /know/ how Carl is about his “guys”.
Come to think of it, Herm’s greatest weakness, and one that I’ve not seen mentioned here, is that he may swell be poor at evaluating coaching talent, and bad at networking to bild a pool of such talent. Think about it: when talking about HCs coming in, people usually discuss who’s the HC going to bring in as assistants. That buzz didn’t really surround Herm when he came here. If I’m right on that point, then Herm really should get out of the NFL and into college if he wants to aspire to a career as a HC, until he can learn to evaluate potential staff, and build a network of such. That (if I’m right) is a /crucial/ lack in an NFL HC.
(See? I’m not all about defending Herm! ;-) He cannot depend on GMs to surround him with coaches who play to his strengths and cover his weaknesses, as we’ve seen in his time under CP.
As I said elsewhere, I have no problem with Herm being released, provided we get a HC with a philosophy that can use the cream (such as it is) of our players, and build from that, and I don’t me another Herm. I mean a guy who can /use/ current talent as the basis for a continued, successful rebuild, and a GM who can support it.
Alternativly, I am no more a rabid “fire Herm” guy than I am a rabid “keep Herm” guy. I have no problem if the next GM retains him (for an evaluation year in 09, if nothing else), while surrounding him with a coaching staff that can minimize his weaknesses – Carl didn’t do that. Especially if the GM can use 09 to findMr. Right as a HC, and not Mr Right Now.
Above all, I want long term solutions for our team, not a series of patch-overs that give us solid seasons and no hope in the post-season. If that makes me a bad fan, so be it.
P.S. to Eric: There have also been questions as to how Dorsey has been used, and extensive commentary about how D-linemen take a while to really develop. Get a stud DT next to him, and a servicable pass-rushing DE (or vice versa), and next year he may begin to emerge as a dominant player.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 4:19 PM CST up reply actions
Bleeding Herm has been alongside the scouts
Where are the superstars from his drafts? There are questions everywhere with the exception of the d-backs. Bowe, gets a case of the dropsies, Tank?, Turk, Tamba?, Hell there are even questions about Dorsey. Branden Albert appears to be solid. The continued running the ball up Niswangers butt, even though it would not work. He is way to conservative, cannot manage a clock, his overall game management is not good at all, he should have been fired at the end of last season, and it is Carl’s fault for bringing him in.
Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?
Eric,
I mostly replied to this (esp regarding blaming Herm for Carl’s drafting) in reply above. That being said, Herm’ not shown he has much affinity for dafting O-side talent, and CP’s not stellar there, either. As for D-line, Herm+Carl isn’t a good match (remember Siavii?). Pre-Herm, CP wasn’t notably successful at finding D-line talent. Herm may not be great at it, but he’s certainly not good enough to overcome CP (plus CP’s chosen staff) for that. You can blame it all on Herm, but I try to evaluate the whole thing.
As for “running the ball up Niswangers butt”: you /knew/ the O-line sucked from early on. Given that fact, consider Larry Johnson. You really thing LJ would have done better running to the outside? He’s never been good at that, or at screens and such, either. LJ’s a between the tackles RB, and always has been. If he’d been benched entirely, things wouldn’t have been any better, anyway.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 4:42 PM CST up reply actions
I will reply
I know you have lost your pride !! but i havent . Looking at the situation he was in ,you have to give him some credit all everyone does is cry about him cry about the situation .the qb ur ranting and raving about he didnt show up on a bus neither did bradley herm helped pick them up they seen talent . I still believe every week we had a chance to win if you were a real fan you would have seen we tried in every game no one gave up but the loser fans like yourself lost hope. I never lost hope and i know the players feel the same its losers like yourself who bring the team down .
haha I didn't bring anyone down
I’m actually apart of a family that continues to have season tickets yet don’t even live in KC anymore…And where did I mention that I gave up on KC..Never said that..
I think you’ll have a hard time justifying our efforts during the north carolina, oakland, cincinatti, and atlanta games…Did we give up those games? Go ahead and check the scores of those games and let me know..
I’ll always have hope for this team but for someone who used to go to every chiefs home game and now that I live out of town and watch the games on t.v. and see the stands completely empty and fans very apathetic towards the chiefs it’s hard man..It’s hard because I know that I have a hard time even watching Herm Edwards on our sidelines..I can’t stand the guy..I felt he should have been canned after the Indianapolis playoff game..But the moment he is fired, people will start showing up to the games again no matter who the new coach is..And yes Herm saw thigpen and bradley but every single other FA we signed did not even come close to working out..
by CALIFAN1986 on Jan 9, 2009 9:42 PM CST up reply actions
stop crying
Hey man dont take out your herm frustrations on me . Just stop crying, man up you dont need to tell me how many home games you been to or how many tickets you bought to prove your a fan you live and die with the teams decisions get over quit crying it will get better .
Unfair to Herm
I think what is unfair to Herm and his staff is the Chiefs having NOT fired them already. His firing seems inevitable and if that is true then it is not just wrong but cruel to let them continue to dangle AND not seek some of the other openings out there. And I agree Herm would be a good fit for college. Really letting Herm and crew teist in the wind is kind of cold blooded.
In all honesty the Chiefs need to be a little more cold blooded.
Too many times have they signed vets to big contracts when they were past their usefulness as a “reward”. Or keeping Peterson around at LEAST 3 (more like 10) years past when they should out of gratitude for turning the franchise around.
It wouldn’t hurt them to start looking out for the interests of the team over the interests of individuals a little more.
Soo we should have fired Carl in
1999 after we had been one of the most winning organizations in the league since his arrival? Considering we we’re complete and utterly terrible before he showed up then went to one of the most winning organization of the 90’s…Yeah right..Anyone who believes that firing Carl before maybe 4-5 years ago is just being naive..I believe Carl needed to step down but come our worst year with Carl before Herm got here was 6-10 in 2001…So we we’re basically very very competitive from 1989 til 2006…Why in the world would you fire someone that you are always competitive?
Listen the only thing I’m saying is telling us Carl should have been fired 10 years ago is pure stupidity..Carl made for a pretty damn good GM up until the last few years…He completely transformed the kc chiefs and gave the fans wins and gave the hunts money…Just curious for all of you who always treat the guy like he’s never accomplished anything..How good of a GM would you be?
by CALIFAN1986 on Jan 9, 2009 8:59 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed
He should have been fired the week after the season. I want the guy gone for obvious reasons, but the Chiefs shouldn’t be dragging this out to the point where it affects Herm’s (and his assistants’) ability to find new jobs elsewhere.
Besides which, the sooner we pawn Herm, Gunther and Krumrie off on some other unsuspecting team, the better off we’ll be for next year. :)
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
They have all been told
that they could seek other opportunities. Nobody is making them stay.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
It seems it would, at most, impact Herm
the rest can, but it would look bad if your HC were shopping for other gigs, especially if it were a step down (D-coord, DB coach). Even actively looking for a college HC job would raise eyebrows.
That’s probably why it’s been heard that Herm wants to be fired.
Is that San Diego State HC job still open?
by Ochophosphate on Jan 9, 2009 10:31 PM CST up reply actions
Difference...
between coldblooded and bad business. And in a business were you recruit players (free agents) and coaches that’s not a good look.
Agree with the article completely.
We’ve been calling for a complete rebuild for years, and we finally get one only to run out the coach that finally gave it to us. What?
Still, I probably want Herm to go. Basically, I’m with Clark. If it was solely my decision he and most of the staff would get a second chance (no Gunther, Krumrie or Curl; other positions are maybes except Gailey, who would for-sure stay). However, I realize any GM that his half-good will want to pick his own coach (which is why the Browns’ decision to hire Mangini is so royally stupid), and I really want a GM. So, I’m perfectly willing to effectively sacrifice Herm for a good GM.
You still have to win games.
They weren’t expected to make the playoffs. They were expected to do better than worst in team history.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
How is that he got a raw deal anyway?
His GM, the man who fired him got canned. Herm was getting criticized before he walked through the doors at One Arrowhead Dr. People new what kind of coach he was. Conservative and defensive minded. The defense was better until this year. Now it is terrible. He won a total of 15 games in 3 years. Coached two of the worst years, one of which is the all time worst in franchise history. No GM is going to come in and say “Great job I like what you have done with the place.” Sorry it isn’t going to happen.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
I say again: Carl thwarted Herm’s plan to burn the team down to the young talent, and rebuild via the draft from year one. He forced Herm to keep the oldsters, hoping that he could continue to field teams that were /just/ good enough to get to the playoffs, or at least look like they could, so he could keep butts in seats.
Herm’;s a bad fit for that strategy, so he got a couple years of accumulated bad will under his belt ith the fans, so that after the very first season of /finally/ doing what he’d planned to do from the outset, people bitch about the bad years he had while /forced/ to do it Carls way (which he wasn’t suited to, especially due to his weakness in aspects of game management).
All that being said, I won’t regret losing Herm, so long as the next GM doesn’t bring in a head coach that will re-gut the team of the young talent we got, but can build with Herm’s decent-to-good players (not everyone, to be sure – some guys are gone, even if Herm’s still here next year). The next HC need to be able to identify Herm’;s successes (esp. the one’s that need a little time to bloom), and continue to build the team.
Peterson /stole/ Herm’s “grace period”, and few people seem to realize that. Stole Jared Allen from Herm, too, come to that. He probably screwed up other things as well, in the vain hope that a coach who couldn’t manage to keep the old “plug-and-chug, keep the team winning enough to sell out Arrowhead, and keep dangling te empty promises of success nest year” mindset.
But none of that is importnt to the “Fire Herm now!” contingent. Herm’s a bad coach to them, and (from what I’ve seen here) Marty’s a better one, despite the fct that with the Jets, Herm /beat/ Marty’s chargers in the playoffs. On the strenght of that alone, Herm’s a better coach tha Marty, at least in the post-season.
But, for all of my rnting about the truth that Herm didn’t get a fair shake, he probably should be released. He’s lost the fan base, whether the hatred of him as HC is justified or not. I doubt that any HC in the NFL could succeed next year if he found himself in Herms shoes (not replacing Herm, but with the same baggae Herm now has) right now.
So be it. Just please, please, pleas bring in a HC who can use the quality players we have as the foundation to /keep building through the draft/, and not revert to the CP plan of indifferent drafting, wasting young talent (like the loss of Joe Horn, f’rex), and plugging in short-lived FAs solely for the purpose of selling tickets, and not building a team that has a solid core & contend for a long stretch.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 5:29 AM CST up reply actions
Carl thwarted Herm's plan?
Come on. Don’t forget the history here. Herm cane in out of desperation. He jumped at the chance to get himself out of NY. He did nothing to examine the situation before he took the job. He negotiated NOTHING that would have allowed him to rebuild anything. The agreement he signed kept him neutered until Clark had enough of Carl’s bullshit and took the time to hear Herm out.
Vetting is a major part of any job like this and Herm got exactly what he signed on for. When he signed on, a rebuilding effort needed to be part of the deal, but it wasn’t. He though he was inheriting Dick Vermeil’s high-powered offense and rebuilding was an after though once he realized the cupboard was bare. How can you be apologetic for that?
FWIW, I agree with you points on Carl. The man was a disaster. I’m of the opinion that his rediculous methods were what really wore Vermeil out and yes, they in part doomed Herm from succeeding. I just don’t think you can let Herm off the hook for his part.
And That's About Right
Carl was a terrible GM who made a lot of mistakes…it doesn’t excuse Herm for the mistakes he himself made. While the talent Carl provided Herm with was questionable in a lot of instances, Herm also got about the worst possible return out of whatever talent there was. Both of them deserve(d) to get fired.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Herm was supposedly running the show on the drafts
He was getting his style of players.
Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?
Herm came here trying to take a shortcut to the superbowl.
We had an explosive offense, bad defense he thought he could fix the defense, and there was his trophy. He toned down the offense, got rid of the coordinator who made it go.
Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?
In Fairness To Herm
He didn’t get rid of Al Saunders. Al Saunders chose to go elsewhere after Carl Peterson didn’t even consider him for the head coaching job and passed him over for Herm. So you can’t really lay Saunders’ departure on Herm.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Could have done the same thing Washington did
offered him associate HC of offense, with a pay raise, and I bet he stays.
Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?
It Didn't Matter
Saunders was upset and wanted out of KC…there was nothing that was going to keep him here. He felt he deserved a chance at the head coaching gig and Carl didn’t give him one. He thought he might have a better shot somewhere else. Herm could not have changed that…Saunders’ departure was not his fault.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
True but...
if Saunders stayed he would have been hand cuffed. Herm from day one didn’t want the explosive offense. He wanted ball control. WOW that worked out.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
That article made me want to throw up
Why dont we go and cry on Herm’s shoulder with him. Poor thing, I feel so bad for him. Boo Hoo.
Wake up people! Do you not realize this is a business also. This isn’t Madden football. Herm got the chance to coach this team. He knew Carl coming in here as well as anyone. HE IS NOT A SUCCESSFUL HEADCOACH. Some people are nice guys, but just cant do the job. Oh and by the way, Clark fired Carl already.
If anyone one of you performed in your jobs the way Herm did, you would be looking at the unemployment line and you know it, unless you fire grenade launchers for a living.
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
Eff yeah
’Cause if it were Madden, we would be 16-0 getting ready for the divisional round of the playoffs with an expected outcome somewhere in the 77-0 range.
by Ochophosphate on Jan 9, 2009 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
Maybe Hunt has a different vision how a team needs to be ran
Is it possible that Clark sees some value in herm as a coach? The statement was made that herm did a good job of keeping the team together thru some disappointing times. Based on the players apparent approval of him I believe that to be true. Herm has no business interfering in the game time strategy offensively or defensively. That is why you hire skilled OCs and DCs. Herm shouldn’t be calling timeouts or challenging calls unless somebody in the booth is telling him to do so. Maybe hunt sees a situation where the oc, dc, and hc have equal accountability to the management of the game. The OC’s and DC’s function being obvious and the HC being responsible for the players effort, all of which are answering to the GM. I believe herm could succeed with those responsibilities. No passing the blame to the HC for anything other than players giving less than 100%. There are plenty of examples of HC’s that were outstanding tacticians and piss poor leaders. Mike Martz comes to mind. Very few individuals have the ability to excel at both and you can only do so much effectively. I will be getting back to my margarita’s now.
Then you are taking all accountability away from the HC
What is the point of having one then?
Indecision is the key to flexibility
Inspiring the players to give there all every play
The ultimate accountability is the GM’s. He needs to assemble the staff that can teach good technique, effectively manage the game offensively and defensively, provide players that are capable, and have them motivated. The goal is to win the game. He wants OC’s that are going for it on 4th and short in the opponents territory late in the game. Not kicking field goals to reduce the margin of defeat or punting because that is what the HC’s grand daddy did. Not DC’s that are going prevent to protect a lead because some HC thinks that is the way to manage a game. Basically doing there jobs. Scoring points on offense and preventing points on defense.
As long as Carl was here
the HC did it their way. Look at the different styles of teams we had. They all were based on the coaching style. That is proof by how other teams coached by these guys were coached. You can blame the GM and rightfully so, but the HC is Carl’s boy and he should go. There were so many coaching blunders and mismanagement of games. Not to mention all these guys who are coaches were hired by Herm so they were Herms guys. Gun was kept because Herm wanted to keep him. That was decided by Herm when he was hired. Herm doesn’t get a free pass and should be fired. Raw deal my ass.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
If the HC wasn’t allowed to execute his plan, but was forced to do it the GM’s way, over his objections, then it’s all the HC’s fault, eh?
I presume you are an employee somewhere, with a boss who has the final say. By your reasoning, if the boss tell you to do it /his/ way, over your objections, and the project fails, it’s not your boss’s fault, it is /your fault/. Your boss may be out the door over the failure, but you deserve to go too, because even though you did your best to make an unworkable plan work and follow orders, /you/ failed to make an unworkable plan work. Especially when the boss’s plan served mostly to showcase your weaknesses and disguise your strenghts. Ergo, you must not be good at what you do. (Yes, directed at you, but as a hypothetical situation to illustrate, not as a personal attack) That’s what Carls’ done to Herm, and the bulk of the fans have bought it in KC.
I’d be /real/ interested to know just how the hiring and retention of Cunningham worked into it, because he’s (IMO) caught in pretty much the same situation, since he’s been forced to try and run the T2/C2 defensive scheme, and that obviously doesn’t play to his strengths, either. From everything I’ve read, that scheme requies a vesry specialized, fairly hard-o-get group of playersand I suspect Gun could not only evaluate talent to serve that scheme, he could neither teach or direct it well. Herm might be to blame, but even more so was CP, since he knew Gun well, and if he had a lick of ability left to compare skillsets to schemes, he should have /known/ Gun wasn’t suited for it, and advised Herm accoringly, and gone out and got someone who cloud do so before Gun’s name was mud.
Hrm had no chance, because it wasn’t until this year that his appeals to CP’s boss carried any weight at all. From what the articles related above (and their link-children) indicate, it looks like CP’d become KC’s Al Davis, in his own mind. Once “his” team got taken away, he sulked.
Herm’;s got his faults, sure. And hey, if he’s gone and he’s replaced with a HC who shares his vision of building a solid, sustainable team that will contend for years, and run deep into the playoffs, maybe with a SB appearance and victories, even better. I won’t cry. Herm won’t starve, and he’ll have his money from the last year of his contract – plenty to sustain him while he finds his next job. But Ido feel badly that he’s gotta take the blame for failures that are much more on Peterson, the guy who wanted him to keep patching up a ‘74 LTD and get wins with it on the NASCAR circuit, until the owner finll forced CP to let the man do it his way, and he still couldn’t win because his new car was only half-built.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 5:58 AM CST up reply actions
If Herm is such a good coach
why aren’t other teams all over him? Everyone knows he is gone.
Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?
Where did I say he was
a “great” coach? Yes, you said “good”, but teams don’t “get all over” good coaches, they do that with great coaches. Assume, for the sake of discussion, that Lane Kiffin was a good NFL coach (not sayin’, either way on him). No teams were “all over him”. Likewise Denny Green. I’d call him a “good” coach, but not a great one. when he went to AZ, teams weren’t “all over him”, either.
No one seems to notice that I’m not ignoring Herm’s faults. But the above scenario was based off the information in the linked articles. One of them included comments from a “highly placed Chiefs insider” that indicate that Herm wanted to start clearing out the oldest team in the NFL (article didn’t mention the age of the team, but it was, remember?), and buildng a yong team, but was overridden by Carl. You wanna say that was flat-out wrong, then I invite you to provide evidence that Herm wanted to keep playing old players, ad shoring them up with bad-value free agents in order to continue to be “respectible”.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 5:07 PM CST up reply actions
As a matter of fact.
I answer directly to my boss. That is how companies are ran. It is called a chain of command.
At least successful companies like the one I work for. Herm was given the keys and he failed. Carl doesn’t get a free pass and that is obvious. You talk like Herm is a great coach and Carl didn’t let him do his job. Herm new what he was getting into when he took this job, so don’t act like poor Herm didn’t get to do it his way. Herm new that this was a team of veterans, so I have to call bullshit on your logic. Herm was going to get run in New York for doing a shitty job there. Defend Herms sparkling win loss record as a coach.
UHHH…..Gun was kept by Herm, he made that decision. Herm when he was hired was hiring coaches and chose to keep Gun. As for the cover 2 or tampa 2, that was Herms decision. He knew what players he had every year he was here. He chose to continue running that with no defensive line, which is what every successful over 2 has to have. Herms decision.
The first season Herm was here, the team was full of veterans and they were poised to make a playoff run. Our defense sucked and our offense was pretty good. Trent Green goes down and Huard manages the team. We ultimately made the playoffs with a shitty defense and an average offense. We lose a winnable game in the playoffs because stubborn ass Herm announces “We gonna run the ball” and boy did we. How many passes did we attempt in that game? Oh and we got zero first downs in the first half. The O coordinator, Herms choice. That worked out great.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
I talk like?
I point out Herm’s shortcomings in nearly every post regarding him. I even pointed out a new one up-thread today, or at least one that I haven’t seen here or anywhere else before. One that is a better argument against him continuing as an NFL HC than his poor clock managment, at that. (My point was regarding asessing coaching talen, and networking for such, see above on the thread.)
I make it clear consistently that I have no problem with him being terminated, so long as his replacement doesn’t screw things up worse (by “worse”, I mean building a team that can be counted on to consistently deliver 8-8 to 10-6 seasons, but do nothing in the playoffs. We’ve had that for years). Kindly get a clue when you are assessing my position.
As for your vision of what Herm inherited: are you serious? “poised to make a playoff run”? The team was ancient, and the D was in utter shambles. If you think we were a draft and a FA period away from a SB win, then the results were even /less/ Herm’s fault, because that falls directly on Carl’s hire of Herm. Herm isn’t a guy suited to do a final tweak on a team like that and general them into the SB. So, that hire goes right on CP. Matter of fact, Vermeil was probably better-suited to do that, and we saw how “successful” he was. If Vermeil couldn’t make it into the SB,Herm sure-hell wouldn’t get there. Herm’s not that good, and not that kind of coach, either.
And you are wrong about Herm being “given the keys”: according to a high-level insider who was cited either in one of the listed articles, or a secondary article (Prolly from Yon) that was most assuredly not the case. So, given that, and given CP’s long history of involvement/meddling in and with coaching hires & other personnel, unless you have reliable data to back up your assertion I’ll take the journalist with insider source report over your unsupported assertion, sir.
Oh, and for the record, I don’t count propaganda spewed at press conferences, or opinion pieces from columnists to be “data”, especially in cases like this.
Two final points: against the Colts, CP put Dunn on IR, because he thought the season was over. Remember that? Dunn was important to that runing game. IIRC, LJ was tearing things up pretty well that year, and was viewed as the strength of the team. Who were our prmier recievers? Our passing game was a West Coast varient, and what D did the Colts run? A varient of C2/T2, which is designed to stop the WC system. Furthermore, the Colts had been soft against the run all year, and only firmed up at the last minute, so to speak.
Two: you ignored my point. You answer to your boss. As I said, if your boss forces you to do things his way and with the assets he wants you to use, over your objections, and despite your best efforts the project fails, by your own logic, you suck at your job, and have no business being there.
And I will say again, the more I consider Herm’s problem with coaching staff (noted upthread), I’ll agree that he’s gotta go. But I’m not about to mistake CP’s screw-ups as being Herm’s failures. in KC, Herm’s biggest weakness was that he couldn’t overcome his boss’s failures.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 5:53 PM CST up reply actions
Herm new what he was getting into when he signed his contract.
Remember when Herm came to KC. All this shit was what New York was saying about Herm. The fans in KC were scared because he was going to change everything. He didn’t because we had a shot at the playoffs. The next season they decided to go a different route. Herm won 15 F*^%ing games in three years. That is a pretty shitty coaching job.
The playoff game you speak of. That is coaching. We announce to the world we gonna run do football you can count of that. What do the Colts do? put everyone up on the line of scrimmage on every damn play. What do we do run on every first down and damn near every other down. We didn’t get a first down until the middle of the third quarter. Oh by the way that was the first time in a playoff game that a team didn’t have a first down in the first half. Another great record under Herm. Jason Dunn was hurt in week three. Oh and he still had lingering affects the following season.
Herm couldn’t over come his own failures. Look at his career stats. Not to good.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
I recall the Colts game where we backed in very well
Dunn was still playing at the end of the season. He mght not have been at his best, but he probably would have helped. On CP, that one.
You ignored the fact that C2/T2 is built to /beat the west cost passing O. You ignore that LJ was still a elite RB at the time, and the O-line was supposedly a strrength, and pretend that stating what was obvious to every sportswriter in the country like Herm was giving away some big secret. You also ignore the fact that the team Herm inherited wasn’t good enough to enter the playoffs in a decisive fashion, but backed in. If Herm’d been handed a playoff caliber team, your blaming him for the Indy loss would have merit. He didn’t get one, and he was forced (according to the insider report I mentioned) to try and keep that carrot dangliing so Arrowhead would stay full, and CP could keep those ticket prices high. That Solari’s first year as OC, as well. Herm’s got a piece of that bad move, but I seriously doubt that it was just Herm. When CP wants a guy in place, that’s what happens.
I understand your argument quite well: Good riddance to Carl, bt never cut Herm one millimeter of slack. All failures are his, and his alone. CP didn’t have anything to do with anything, and all suckiness in KC will go away when Herm goes away. (Exaggerated to make a point. How much of an exaggeation, I leave for you to define, if you care to bother.)
WhatI don’t think you understand is my position, so here it is: Herm isn’t a great NFL HC. He may not even be an average HC, but what CP did to him has made him look far worse than he really is.
If Herm had been allowed to start rebuilding from the get-go, and dump a bunch of age (As the insider report indicated he wanted and planned on doing), everyone would have expected a bad first season, but he might have been able to be a little more selective about the older players he was dumping. He might have been able to keep some O-line talent, f’rex. Ergo, the rebuild woudn’t have been quite as drastic, and his season one rebuild might not have been as bad, and likely not the wreck this season was. (Solari would have still been a problem, though, because Herm isn’t networked enough to have a “guy” to bring in at OC, and probably still would have been stuck with him by default). Thing being, that would have been rebuild year 1, and people would have held still for it, and given him some time to work.
What Carl did was steal that grace period. In year 3, Herm /finally/ got his way, and started a rebuild. Finally. And now that it’s going, when things went worse than expected (remember when people were talking 4-12, maybe 6-10, 9-7 at best, at the beginning of the season?), there’s no patience left for Herm, and he’s gotta go.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 9:04 PM CST up reply actions
lest ye think I drinketh the kool-aid
Now, here are some problems I see in Herm:
1) I think he has real problems evaluating his staff. He went along with Solari, for one. He saddled Gun with the C2./T2 D, and it’s become clear that he wasn’t suited to run it (and if he just can’t cut it at DC, it amounts to the same thing: poor evaluation of coaching personnel).
1A) Herm doesn’t appear to have networked very well. Said it before, but again here: Most HCs come into a new team with a list of people they want to work with them, and they are pretty firm about having some portion of that list on their staff. This is actually a controlling factor which both underlies and overlays point 1, and taken with 1, is a crucial flaw in a HC. It may be a product of point 1 and point 2, coupled with Herm being a nice guy that produces a very bad mindset: Herm, by all acounts is a nice guy, and easy to get along with. This might lead him to believing that because he can get along with ‘most everyone, that he can succeed with ’most anyone. This simply isn’t true in the NFL. In the NFL, it takes the right mix of people, not a group of buddy-buddies who all get along swell.
2) He over-values loyalty. He trusted Carl. Mistake. He may not be able to differentiate from where personal loyalty ends, and Business begins. So yeah, he owns a piece of the hosing he got from CP, just like Kiffin owns a piece of the hosing he got from Davis (Kiffin didn’t get everything in writing, and trusted Al, which allllowed Al to screw him over in various ways).
3) He appears to be lacking in evaluating players, especially on O-line & D-line. Since CP managed to head up the effort to land Tait, maybe Albert was CP’s win., and not Herm’s. OTOH, given CP’s notorious fails on D-line of late (Allen don’t count, being one of those late-round gems, and those are luck as much as anything else), perhaps Dorsey was Herm’s win, or possibly Gun’s, or a scout’s. In the end, we fans don’t really know what goes on in the off-season personell eetings, we can only guess.
4) He doesn’t self-evaluate well, either. It’s a well known fact that Herm has trouble with clock management, game management, and (to a lesser extent in the latter half of this season) challenges. r at least it’s well-known to everyone but Herm. What’s going through his head, I do not know, be it denial, indifference, or out-placing the blame, but that’s not important. What /is/ important is that he hasn’t shown much in the way of improvement in any of those areas over the years, going back to his time with the Jets. Those /are/ learnable thngs, and yet Herm hasn’t learned them, for some reason. But there’s no discernable difference between “can’t” and “won’t”, at his level.
(I regard this to be a more critical item than his history of failures in these areas, which has been done to death, anyway.)
5) Herm’s too devoted to his O & D schemes. Most HCs are known for favoring particular schemes, but the ones who survive adjust those schemes to fit their people. Herm appears to lack the flexibility to bend /before/ the season is wrecked. I still think that our D would have been better if Herm had let Gun re-vamp the scheme at the same time that Chan got to abandon the power-run for the spread. Might have picked up 2-3 more wins that way. Which leads to…
6) Herm places too much emphasis on the season as being “practice”. Yes, you have to play young players in order to develop them. Not being willing to do that was Marty’s great weakness (Joe Horn being a shining example of Marty’s failure in that area, but there are other things, as well. But this is about Herm.) But If he really did plan on treating this season as a giant training camp, he should have had the balls to say it right out: “KC fans, this isn’t a football season. I don’t priomise you win one this year. This whole season will be devoted to traiing the youngsters. This year, We Play to Learn the Game. Period.” While I’d have admired him for taking that stance, and personally strung along with him on it (for this season) (and I pretty much have, which may be why I am slower with the tar & feathers than some ;-). But if he had come out and said that, he may well have been fired on the spot – and with good reason. Fans expect wins, and rightly so.
7) finally, Herm doesn’t manage pre-season well. I don’t mean the games, I mean training camp, and probably OTAs as well. One thing that I won’t blame on CP is that Herm’s teams look sloppy in preseason, and don’t start decisivly. Not here, not over the last 3 seasons. The first 2-3 teams are /not/ when you get your team gelled up and on the same page. It occasionally happens to various teams and various coaches (usually due to circumstances – the Colts because of some problem of Manning’s, this year.). Herm’s teams have started every year disjointed & confused. That cannot be an accident. One team of vets, one team mixed, and one team of rookies. Were it just this year, I’d give him a pass on this point., but not over 3 years.
There you go. Seven serious flaws that can be attributed to Herm, and all good reasons to let him go, and most points sufficient for termination on their own, since they are long-term faults. Perhaps being sent back to the minors, so to speak, would allow hm to learn to correct them.
One more comment to follow
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 10:13 PM CST up reply actions
For all I ripped Herm myself...
I can see possibilities for keeping him here under a new GM.:
1) The new GM & owner agree he has to go, but the GM only has a limited number of HC options that would be available for 09, and they agree that none would fit well in KC. In this case, Herm’s retained, surrounded with some new assistant talent (preparing for the kind of HC the GM & owner want,probbly a loger list of candidates, maybe accompanied with some phone calls & such.)
2) The new GM wants a college coach to step in. Clark agrees, but points out that college guys who come into the NFL at HC level don’t have a good track record. Again, Herm’s surrounded with new asisstants, including the college guy (in the role of OC or DC, prehaps, with the tag assistant HC), and spends a year understudying Herm before succeeding him. There’s an added benefit to this one: New HC gets to learn the staff & personnel, and probably have a say in the Draft (not control, mind, but influence). Herm would probably hold still for it, because I suspect he views himself as a teacher, at heart, and it would allow him to exit his last year here with something resembling honor, rather than utter disgrace of being booted. Besides, one year under Herm won’t seriously taint NHC in this case. I’ll admit, I rather like this one, if we can’t land an experienced, competent NFL HC along with GM. (one who won’t waste what talent we do have.)
Damn, I had a third, but watching the Cards stomp the Panthers distracted me, and I lost it.
Anyway, I’ve been rather extensie here, so it will be easy to nit-pick me to score points. If that’s what you do, so be it. Personally, I’d rather discuss things, rather than (as some do, but I accuse no one in particular) simply squawk “Herm SUCKS!” followed by text of varying length which are designed to do little more than to justify the poster’s assertion.
Besides, don’t you think this site would be less interesting if the only discussion of Herm was in how badly he sucked, without a few voices of dissent? Me being me, if this site were nothing but a love-fest for him, I’d probably be pointing out drawbacks & flaws for him, instead… ;-)
And a big TY to anyone foolish enough to actually /read/ all my screed. It’s worth every penny you paid me for it. There’s an old saying about opinions…
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 10, 2009 10:41 PM CST up reply actions
Herm new what he was getting into when he signed his contract.
Remember when Herm came to KC. All this shit was what New York was saying about Herm. The fans in KC were scared because he was going to change everything. He didn’t because we had a shot at the playoffs. The next season they decided to go a different route. Herm won 15 F*^%ing games in three years. That is a pretty shitty coaching job.
The playoff game you speak of. That is coaching. We announce to the world we gonna run do football you can count of that. What do the Colts do? put everyone up on the line of scrimmage on every damn play. What do we do run on every first down and damn near every other down. We didn’t get a first down until the middle of the third quarter. Oh by the way that was the first time in a playoff game that a team didn’t have a first down in the first half. Another great record under Herm. Jason Dunn was hurt in week three. Oh and he still had lingering affects the following season.
Herm couldn’t over come his own failures. Look at his career stats. Not to good.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
























