Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

Scott Pioli "Excited" about Kansas City Chiefs GM Opportunity

Pioli_feature_medium

via media.scout.com

Here's a Sunday night treat for you.  Don Banks of Sports Illustrated is reporting that Patriots VP of Player Personnel Scott Pioli is "excited" by the opportunity the Kansas City Chiefs GM opening presents.

Reading the latest tea leaves, that puts Pioli in the Chiefs' wheelhouse. League sources tell me Pioli seems excited about the opportunity in Kansas City, which he's believed to be interviewing for Monday.

With the latest news that the Browns appear willing to hire George Kokinis and Eric Mangini to fill the GM/Coach openings, this should bring some excitement to Kansas City as it appears the Chiefs are in the lead for Pioli's services.

Clark Hunt's hush-hush nature regarding the Chiefs GM search caused many (of us) to speculate that he's getting behind the eight ball in the hiring process.  However, it appears the Chiefs are still very much in play for Pioli's first GM gig.

Why Kansas City?

Banks reports that Pioli is intrigued by the plethora of young talent on the Chiefs roster including players like Branden Albert, Brandon Flowers and Brandon Carr.

We've all heard that Pioli and his family have connections in Cleveland.  However, his wife was born in Wichita, KS and still has family there.  Banks speculates that Kansas City may be a better fit for Pioli's family.

From a lifestyle perspective, Kansas City might be a better fit for Pioli than even Cleveland.

On top of all that, if Pioli were to choose Kansas City, he'd have over $30 million in cap space to play with.

Put all of that together and Kansas City is the best GM job in the NFL right now.  And Pioli is still perceived as the best GM candidate in the NFL.  A match made in heaven if you ask me.

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

wow this is great news!!!!!……now clark lets get him in there and get this once proud and feared franchise turned around!!!

GO CHIEFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by kcchiefsfan56 on Jan 4, 2009 6:51 PM CST reply actions  

Awesome...

We will see what happens…This seems alot like Don Banks just trying to say he predicted it in case it does happen…But he says what alot of us have been saying for a while…

Also…that picture of Pioli makes his moobs look quite intimidating…He migh tbe trying too hard to imitate Parcells…

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 6:59 PM CST reply actions  

I truly hope this isn't just another leverage play.

I want Pioli…as long as he doesn’t hire Ferentz as HC.

by DThomasReigns on Jan 4, 2009 6:59 PM CST reply actions  

then would

josh daniels(i think thats his name) be our next head coach? or would he go for somebody like mike shanahan and daniels as OC? any any event this is exciting news

by chiefs8288 on Jan 4, 2009 7:00 PM CST reply actions  

Not sure

But Clark made it clear that he’ll hire the GM then the rest is pretty much up to the GM.

Josh McDaniels and Kirk Ferentz from Iowa are the names I’m hearing being linked to Pioli.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:02 PM CST up reply actions  

i dont know ive heard that

shanahan would like to some to KC so

GM- Pioli
HC- Shanahan
OC- McDaniels
DC- TBD
   that would be one hell or an orginazation

by chiefs8288 on Jan 4, 2009 7:05 PM CST reply actions  

Doubt it

The Broncos still own his rights and the owner Pat Bowlen specifically said he would support Shanahan going to any team EXCEPT Kansas City.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:07 PM CST up reply actions  

...?

I didn’t know you could restrict anything after you fire a man in the NFL…

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 7:09 PM CST up reply actions  

I may be wrong actually

I realized that right after I posted it. The Broncos are still paying him for the next 3 years which is where I got confused. I’m thinking of players that retire, not coaches.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:12 PM CST up reply actions  

ahhhhhh

understandable….Interesting thing about the Broncos paying him as Florio pointed out the other day, if a team hires him for less than 7 million a year they have to pay the rest (it is offset by the new team, basically) and so he could take a job for less money in the first 3 years of the contract, knowing he would be guaranteed 7 million, it just wouldnt be all coming from his new organization…

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 7:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Bowlen is only on the hook for Shanny's salary for the remainder of his contract, since he fired him.

Anything Shanny makes from a new coaching job will be deducted from the amount per annum Bowlen owes Shanny.

He has no control over Shanny’s rights. He would if Shanny retired/resigned.

by DThomasReigns on Jan 4, 2009 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Thats funny!!

We may be "playing to win the game", but it seems like we're coaching to lose.

'09, a new era begins.
For the land of the free and the home of the CHIEFS!

by R2J_24 on Jan 4, 2009 7:09 PM CST up reply actions  

ok so i cud be wrong

thanks for telling me i didnt hear that

by chiefs8288 on Jan 4, 2009 7:09 PM CST reply actions  

This is HUGE!

We may be "playing to win the game", but it seems like we're coaching to lose.

'09, a new era begins.
For the land of the free and the home of the CHIEFS!

by R2J_24 on Jan 4, 2009 7:10 PM CST reply actions  

Ha, Primetime..

You changed the pic…I liked the Moob shot!….come on

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 7:12 PM CST reply actions  

Haha

Figured him smiling was more appropriate :)

And that first one scared the hell out of me.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Sweeeet!

Wouldn’t it be a kick in the head if things broke for KC for a change…and this is why I scan this page more than the Star because I don’t know what they’re reporters are getting paid for. I want news and if not that give me conjecture or innuendo :)

by FrankPitts on Jan 4, 2009 7:16 PM CST reply actions  

I have a gut feeling

Pioli and Josh McDaniels will be coming here, and possibly even Matt Cassel as well.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jan 4, 2009 7:37 PM CST reply actions  

Franchised with the intention to trade...

…That’s how the news is out, in fact…Mike Lombardi originally reported they would Franchise him to gain compensation for him…That’s still surely the case…They cannot have 30 million of cap space tied up in two players of the same position…

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 7:46 PM CST up reply actions  

It'll be interesting

I’d imagine the move has something to do with Brady’s knee…maybe buying them time while they find out about Brady.

And, Peyton’s cap # is over $20 million…

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes, insane...

they may rework his deal…but who knows…

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 7:50 PM CST up reply actions  

They can't re-work it until a new CBA is in place

By re-work I’m assuming you mean push money to the future.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 7:55 PM CST up reply actions  

yea....

ooOOOOooo that is interesting…

I dont want an uncapped year, personally….

by woodman212 on Jan 4, 2009 8:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Don't forget the cap goes up to 136Mil. next year

That still leaves plenty of space fort he rest of the team. People forget that the cap space is increasing.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

Thigpen WILL NOT be the Chiefs starting QB next year IMO. He can compete for the job and should be 2nd or 3rd string.

by THE_TRUTH on Jan 5, 2009 8:26 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm tempering my excitement, but ...

this sounds pretty good. The Patriots have been a premier franchise due to the operation of the entire organization. Their ability to fill holes while sticking to their plan is envied by any football fan of any other team. He won’t have the same coach, but it sure would be nice to see the Chiefs run with a sincerity to win a championship.

by etp_stl on Jan 4, 2009 7:48 PM CST reply actions  

This would be a major coup for Clark Hunt if this happened

Making his first major hier as owner of the franchise be bringing home the premiere GM candidate of the last couple of years would be making a huge statment to players and coaches around the league that this isn’t the same old Kansas City anymore.

by ChiefDJ on Jan 4, 2009 7:58 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah

He made a ballsy move firing Carl (even though it was warranted) after having been in charge for a couple years. This is his moment to make an outstanding decision.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 8:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Awesome news. Just awesome. It really sucked having Chris Mortenson talk about all these moves including GMs and HCs and they would just say the chiefs at then end of sentences. I guess Clark does do a good job keeping things secret.

by NakedDave on Jan 4, 2009 8:06 PM CST reply actions  

This is terrible news

I don’t want the New England jerk running KC no matter how much the team he comes from wins. And as far as Cassel goes words is he will franchised.

by DLChiefs on Jan 4, 2009 8:28 PM CST reply actions  

Any reason why?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jan 4, 2009 8:33 PM CST up reply actions  

If the guy is a jerk

And we are built into a perennial playoff contender. I’d be happy to root for that jerk.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 4, 2009 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I would like to see some evidence of him being a jerk.

If the Royals signed Cashman, I don’t think people would be bitching. I don’t get it. I agree with Prime on rooting for a jerk if we are winning. Afterall we were rooting for a jerk for 20 years why change now.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Jan 4, 2009 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

cmpotter with the zinger

by SayHeyWerd on Jan 4, 2009 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Got anyone better?

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Jan 4, 2009 8:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Great News. GREAT NEWS

by SayHeyWerd on Jan 4, 2009 8:51 PM CST reply actions  

The other things we have going for us...

…is that we have a fairly new owner with perhaps a bit less ego than some of the other tenured owners. Word is the Browns were turned off by Pioli’s desire for so much control. I guess the Browns front office feels like their track record speaks for itself??? Oh well, it’s their money so they can consider themselves football geniuses if they want. So to recap, aguy like Pioli should look at the Chiefs and see a team that

A) Has alot of young talent but isn’t necessarily married to any single player (great for a personnel guy)
B) Has cap room
C) Has a Fairly new energetic owner willing to put his trust in the new GM
D) Should have a head coach opening soon and some marquis coaches without jobs
E) Plays in a city that supports it’s team with a college-like fervor
F) Already has pretty good trading chips in LJ and a high draft pick (if necessary)
E) Is located in a city near some family ties…good to hear his wife has family in Wichita
F) Despite it’s recent woes is a storied franchise going back to the start of the league

Did I miss anything?

GO CHIEFS!!!!

by Mclovin1 on Jan 4, 2009 8:54 PM CST reply actions  

Oh and if he needs advice

He can pick up the phone and call his father-in-law……….Bill Parcells.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Jan 4, 2009 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Parcells

Haven’t I been hearing that Parcells could be wanting out of Miami? Wouldn’t that mean if Pioli has obvious ties to him that he may consider being HC in KC? Just a thought.

by NorthwestChief on Jan 4, 2009 9:08 PM CST reply actions  

Parcells is staying in Miami

It was announced today

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Jan 4, 2009 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

It sounds like things are in motion, good deal.

I think we wind up with McDaniels as HC, Crennel as defensive coordinatoor. I like the idea of an offensive minded HC with a proven DC who has a superbowl ring. Already excited for next season, heres to scoring more than 15 points a game!!!

Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?

by Eric Allen on Jan 4, 2009 9:36 PM CST reply actions  

Yeh, but he also said

it is up to Scott. Just speculation on my part, but did he, and Scott somehow tie themselves together, with Scott knowing full well he was going to be a GM somewhere?

Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?

by Eric Allen on Jan 4, 2009 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

McDaniels

sounds like he is going to be the next HC in Denver. He is the front runner right now.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Jan 4, 2009 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

I would take Crennel as DC here.

I do not think our defense this year is all on Gun, but it is time for change across the board.

Lets hope Clark lets the new GM start fresh, with his guys. Who would want a coach, who has lost twice as many as he has won in KC?

by Eric Allen on Jan 4, 2009 9:54 PM CST reply actions  

What happened?

Woah, I was reading this thread, and I thought I read that Pioli was actually interested in the GM gig. Then my head became all fuzzy, and then I remember the floor rushing up to meet me.

I wonder what this thread actually says?

/reads

*THUMP.

Ridiculous Upside: All the "Almost NBA" info you can handle!

by Ridiculous Matt on Jan 4, 2009 10:41 PM CST reply actions  

If I was Pioli

and hypothetically came to the Chiefs (which I don’t believe he is), why would you waste the money on Cassel? Why with our young talent and great draft picks would you want to recreate the Patriots when you have the tools at your disposal to create your own? I guess I can understand if he brings McDaniels in and they’re looking to install their system, but Matt Cassel was never a great QB prospect and is New England’s version of Thigpen. I’m not stating Matt isn’t a good quarterback, its just he’s had the luxury of being developed by the best organization in football. His salary won’t be worth it especially when we’re in good sitting to draft and develop our very own franchise QB who’s gonna be a better prospect than Cassel.

I’m just all together weary of huge contracts really…

by KansasCityShuffle on Jan 5, 2009 1:01 AM CST reply actions  

+1

New England is smart for putting the franchise tag on Cassel. They know he’s a hot item right now and some team may be sucker enough to give away a #1 pick for him. Got to hand it to NE they know how to play the game.

In order to sign Cassel a team must be willing to give up a 1st and 3rd for him, but most likely will trade Cassel for the bargain price of just a number one, and make the SUCKER team feel like they just walked off with a deal. A 1st round draft choice for a pernnial backup who had ONE good year? Yeah right!

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Jan 5, 2009 1:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Correction on the compensation package that has to be paid to NE if you sign Cassel after a franchis tag.

Compensation for Cassel is not 1st and 3rd, but rather two number ones!

Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.

by aPacificChief on Jan 5, 2009 6:33 AM CST up reply actions  

NO ONE

Is giving up 2 1st round picks for Cassel, and DEFINETLY not the Chiefs who have the #3 pick and likely a decent 1st round pick next year.

Possibly, after the draft, some team will trade 2010’s #1 pick for him, and the Pats may well do that if it looks like Brady is improving on his recovery.

The Pats are ‘playing the game’ astutely as always…all the more reason Clark needs to make Pioli an offer he can’t refuse.

by kcsno56 on Jan 5, 2009 9:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs
Stag_20silhouette_small
Weekly Official AP Mock-tastic Thread 1/31-2/6 Post-Senior-Bowl-edition

Recent FanPosts

Small
Whats Your Opinion ?
Small
Former Players
Okoye_small
Setting the Trenches: Offensive Line
Small
The Three Most WTF Moments of the Chiefs Season
Chiefs_logo_small
Need some help, KC trip
9aaaa629560faa267f0a91faca7f420d-getty-135962716_small
Ben Grubbs.
Small
2012 Free Agency & Draft Predictions
Tobias_small
Options At Quarterback for 2012
Small
Nation Wide Mock Draft
Images_small
Flowers vs Carr: 1 vs 2??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Small Jon Yoon

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI