The Chiefs and the Franchise Tag
Here's some info on the franchise tag and what it means for the Chiefs.
Franchise Tag
Means a player that is scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent (players are eligible to become an UFA with 4 years of service in the league) will be offered a 1 year tender at the average of the 5 highest paid players in the league at that position OR a 120% increase in their previous year's salary.
There are two types of franchise tags. An exclusive rights franchise tag puts the player's salary at the average of the top 5 highest paid at his position OR a 120% increase in his previous year's salary. The numbers are taken from the current year's franchise tag numbers (in this case 2009). It's called exclusive because the player can not negotiate with other teams during this period.
A non-exclusive franchise tag is similar to the exclusive rights tag but the numbers used are the previous year's franchise numbers (in this case 2008). In addition, the player can negotiate with other teams. However, if a team chooses to offer the player a deal, his original team has the option of matching the terms of the deal. If the offer is NOT matched, then 2 1st round picks are given up as compensation. You'll notice most of the players that have been franchised are given the non-exclusive tag. Notable exceptions to this include Nmandi Asomugha in 2008 and Dwight Freeney in 2007.
In both instances, if a player signs an offer sheet from his team the money is automatically guaranteed.
Transition Tag
A transition tag is similar to the franchise tag with a couple notable exceptions. If you'll notice in the chart below, the number is a bit lower only because it's the average of the top 10 paid players at that position.
So why wouldn't teams offer the transition tag instead? Because if a competing team makes an offer that is NOT matched by the original team, there is no compensation given up.
| Position | Franchise Tag | Transition Tag |
| Quarterback | $14.65 | $12.44 |
| Cornerback | $9.96 | $8.37 |
| Wide Receiver | $9.88 | $8.39 |
| Defensive End | $8.99 | $7.78 |
| Offensive Line | $8.45 | $7.74 |
| Linebacker | $8.3 | $7.48 |
| Running Back | $6.62 | $5.92 |
| Safety | $6.34 | $5.13 |
| Defensive Tackle | $6.06 | $5.45 |
| Tight End | $4.46 | $4.07 |
| Punter/Kicker | $2.48 | $2.26 |
Another fun part of these tags is what's called a poison pill. Let me give you a hypothetical of a poison pill. Let's say Matt Cassel gets slapped with the transition tag. The Chiefs would make an offer that says his contract becomes fully guaranteed if he isn't on the field for 70% of the offensive snaps. So, the Patriots would essentially be unable to match that deal because they have that guy named Tom Brady on their team who will likely be getting the majority of the offensive snaps. The poison pill is sneakier than a snake. I love it.
Matt Cassel
The rumor is that the Patriots will apply the franchise tag to Matt Cassel. It will likely be non-exclusive so they have the ability to negotiate with other teams. Cassel and Brady would combine for approximately $29.2 million of their cap space so chances are Cassel won't be on the roster all season (assuming Brady is 100% by September).
Julius Peppers
A defensive end, Peppers will NOT be tendered at $8.99 million, the number for his position. His cap number last year was a shade under $14 million, so a 20% increase in his salary would put his salary just under $17 million.
Jordan Gross
He was tagged last year. This year, if the Panthers choose to keep him, will put his salary at approximately $9 million.
Terrell Suggs
He was tagged last year as well. There was some confusion as to whether to treat him as a linebacker or a defensive end (which was eventually settled via an arbitrator). His number in 2009 will be $10.17 million.
If any of the above players are slapped with the franchise tag, I can't imagine the Chiefs would be wiling to drop 2 1st round picks as compensation. Think of it this way....would you be willing to give up Glenn Dorsey and Brandon Albert for any of these players that will also command a top contract?
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
I think
it would be a waste of precious salary space if we inked a big name in the offseason. Peppers, Haynesworth, Gross, Suggs, etc. I think are going be retained by their respective teams and in order to get any such caliber players to come to KC it would require some serious coin. I’d like to see us continue to build through the draft and sign second tier FA’s like we have been doing the last 2 seasons but the difference being Pioli’s selecting them not Peterson. As it stands now the only FA that seems like a great fit here is Bart Scott
by KansasCityShuffle on Jan 30, 2009 12:44 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Haynesworth, by the way
Had a clause in his 2008 deal that if he hit certain incentives the Titans couldn’t franchise him again. He, of course, hit those incentives. The word is they’re trying to negotiate a long-term deal.
by Joel Thorman on Jan 30, 2009 1:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He Also Just Said
That he’s not taking a hometown discount…so he can be had by anyone willing to pay.
Much as I respect Haynesworth’s skills, I hope the Chiefs don’t sign him, though…too many injuries and missed games over his career. Those build up over time and the Chiefs don’t want to be the team holding that contract when his wheels fall off.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
by UCrawford on Jan 30, 2009 1:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Isn't that what happened with Williams several years ago?
He played for us late 90’s I think, led the team in sacks and sat out a year or something?
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 30, 2009 1:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny
we haven’t talked about his attitude problem. I don’t remember LJ stomping a players face in a game..
by GHOST OF DT on Jan 30, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's because it was a one time incident
LJ, on the other hand, repeatedly made similar mistakes.
by Joel Thorman on Jan 30, 2009 1:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's Because He's Not A Chiefs Player
So I don’t really care that much about his attitude problem unless the Chiefs are lookign at signing him. Also, since I already said I don’t want the Chiefs to sign him, I don’t really consider his problems important enough to discuss…same as I don’t consider Jeff George’s or Kellen Winslow’s or Brad Pitt’s attitude problems important enough to discuss. They’re not relevant unless those people are likely to become Chiefs.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
by UCrawford on Jan 30, 2009 2:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i personally
dont want to see peppers in K.C. hes 29 and and is making all kind s of demands now for how he wants to play and what kind of D. I would rather have JA back. Suggs would be nice but I dont think the ravens let him go. Bart Scott would also be a great addition and would open our draft options up
by DT58forever on Jan 30, 2009 1:03 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Thats interesting
Has any player ever gone back to their original team and had the same success as a player they had with that team the first time?
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 30, 2009 1:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not That I Can Think Of
Mainly because NFL careers are so short and by the time a player hits his third contract he’s close to done.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
by UCrawford on Jan 30, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is it too early to start making Donnie Edwards jokes?
by KansasCityShuffle on Jan 30, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oops
didn’t read your next line
by KansasCityShuffle on Jan 30, 2009 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
eg. Edwards, Law
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 30, 2009 1:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
You know looking at this
I added up the Franchise numbers and hell, I have a $100.84 I would donate to sign those guys!
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 30, 2009 1:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Haha
Meant to put *In Millions on there.
by Joel Thorman on Jan 30, 2009 1:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
haha...LoL...I think I've got another $5 bucks to throw in..
Wait let me check in my sofa ??? Yup ….$5.37! Can that get another LB to go with DJ and Curry?
Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.
by aPacificChief on Jan 30, 2009 5:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Curious
I am curious to see if Pioli will go out and sign a big name. That was not the way the Patriots approached free agency. However they had the prestige where players would take a discount to play for them. Am sure we are going to have to fork up some money initiallly to get players to choose us over more winning organizations (that is until we win the SB). The HC we select will also affect the free agents we sign!
by Nelly on Jan 30, 2009 1:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I would be interested to see what kind of relationship he hwas with agents
We all knew it seemed like every agent hated Carl, but it’s possible an agent with a good relationship with Pioli might steer his client towards the Chiefs.
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 30, 2009 2:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn't it be Denny doing the dealings with the agents?
There was a post on AP about how Thum is generally liked.
Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.
by aPacificChief on Jan 30, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think your right
but I am sure Pioli will be involved in the intital hard numbers part of the negotiations.
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 31, 2009 9:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really would like
Dansby, Scott, Or Suggs, preferably Suggs and one of the others mentioned. But for offense I think if we signed a guy like MArk Tauscher to play RT and than maybe another OL for depth i think we would be in better shape on our line because Tauscher has had a good career and is still at a decent age, and it would help our cap tremendously, than if we signed Gross. IF we signed Gross we would probably only be able to afford one of the three linebackers i mentioned above, with Tauscher we could sign probably two
by IamtheGreatest on Jan 30, 2009 3:34 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I Like Dansby Too
But I’m betting he’s either a franchise tag or gets the long-term deal he wants.
I’m not high on Tauscher because of his age (32 this coming season) and because he’s coming off a serious knee injury (torn ACL). Nor am I high on overpaying for Jordan Gross (who’ll be making LT money as a RT) when the Chiefs could just draft a LT at #3 who’ll likely be less expensive than Gross and be younger than Gross (after which we can either put him at RT or move Albert to RT if the new guy is a better LT than Albert). I’ve seen a few people who are against using the #3 pick to draft a tackle (because they think it’s overpaying for a RT and they’re locked into the idea that Albert must stay at LT, which is not a given) push the idea of signing Gross, which makes no sense to me…first, because Gross is going to be looking for LT money on the market anyway (because that’s the position he’s playing in Carolina and he’s not going to take a pay cut to come here and switch positions), secondly because we’ll be paying a tackle we draft at #3 about the same salary as Gross would get or less (and he’d be a younger player), and third, because Branden Albert has all the tools and skills to be capable of being a great RT if he needs to be moved and he’s making a RT salary anyway.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
by UCrawford on Jan 30, 2009 5:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Haven't seen this brought up
but are we to Franchise anyone this year? Not that there’s much of a point with this roster, but who would it be….
by dkugler838 on Feb 5, 2009 1:25 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 





















