Browns Decisions Affecting the Chiefs GM Options
Just this afternoon, ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported that the former NY Jets head coach Eric Mangini is the favorite to land the Cleveland Browns head coaching job.
The Browns have continued their search process, interviewing other candidates, but sources say Mangini had a "compelling" interview and owner Randy Lerner is fascinated with him.
If Mangini gets the job to replace the fired Romeo Crennel, the favorite to become the team's general manager is George Kokinis, who is the director of pro personnel for the Baltimore Ravens, the sources said.
This decision by the Browns to possibly hire Eric Mangini is interesting to Chiefs fans for a couple of reasons.
First, if the Browns do hire Mangini, that means that Scott Pioli will likely not be brought is as the general manager in Cleveland. Pioli reportedly wants total control of the Browns, with filling the head coaching spot one of those demands. You'd have to believe that Pioli would not come to Cleveland if they already hired a head coach, especially one who burned the Patriots in the spying scandal.
Naturally, if Scott Pioli doesn't go to Cleveland, then him going to Kansas City is still on the table. Pioli is scheduled to interview with the Chiefs no later than Monday.
Next, the Chiefs were reportedly interested in Ravens Director of Pro Personnel George Kokinis as a possible GM candidate. If Mangini is hired and Kokinis follows, this removes one of the candidates Clark Hunt has been rumored to be interested in. If Clark Hunt is interested in Kokinis, he's not showing it. I doubt he is because as late as December 31st, no team had contacted Kokinis for an interview.
This report about the Browns liking Mangini so much is also an indicator that perhaps Scott Pioli had too many demands for the Browns or was asking for too much control in his demands. The Browns may have already given up on Pioli and are starting to move forward.
Pioli's demands will likely be a point that the Chiefs and him clash on, especially if Pioli doesn't want to leave New England for anything less than a perfect deal. Who knows? Scott Pioli may not leave the Patriots for anything less than $10 million a year and the only person who knows that is Scott Pioli. We may be wasting our time here but there is no way to tell until after this upcoming interview with Pioli.
For those fans coveting Scott Pioli as the Chiefs GM, it appears you're still in luck.
Dawgs by Nature has the Cleveland Browns perspective on the whole thing.
0 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
I personally dont want anything to do with Mangini
and I think any owner who hires a coach without his GM at least agreeing in some part, is setting himself up for a problem down the road. That being said, its funny how all the media seems to be covering everything but Chiefs news.
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Jan 3, 2009 3:10 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
2 things
1. Media is covering everything but the Chiefs is a sign of how tight lipped Clark has been, at least that’s how I see it.
2. I’d think the Browns would avoid another ex-Patriots coach after Crennel. Maybe they’re still curious.
by Warden11 on Jan 3, 2009 3:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus
the media sees us only needing a GM, where most of these other teams are in need of both a GM and a HC – there is a lot more fodder out there for them to pick up on.
by Ochophosphate on Jan 4, 2009 12:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
You hire the GM, before you settle the HC.
On a side note:
Just wacthed Goofy-boi and the Chumpsters beat the Ponies, and had a thought to throw out: The OT argument is generally made as first points scorec VS both teams get a touch. My thought being, what about making the rule that the first team to score more than six points wins?
Personally, I think that both teams getting a touch is a lame idea, but I don’t much like the whole notion that you only have to get close enough to kick a FG to win. A TD, plus a succesful PAT, or 3 FGs sound better to me.
So, now y’all can call it a dumb idea.
If the O-line isn't built up, any rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will look better, next season, too.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 3, 2009 10:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Remember
The Ravens are still in the playoffs. It is very unlikely you will hear anything about their candidates until the season is over. The main reason we are hearing anything about Pioli, aside from his extensive qualifications, is that the Pats are out of the tournament.
I think we will really start to hear more next week should the Ravens and Colts be eliminated this weekend.
by RedNose on Jan 3, 2009 3:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
I like the fact we are looking at candidates of teams who are in the playoffs. I also like that this decision isn’t being rushed. Cleveland seems like they are paranoid that the other jobs are better.
Indecision is the key to flexibility
by cmpotter on Jan 3, 2009 5:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Playoff GM..
….would be a good thing. I think that will happen due to the fact of Pioli wanting to “wear” the pants. But I would sincerely enjoy Pioli coming in and giving Big Perm the ol’ Donald Trump!
Good post Chris
by 8GlausISaHoss8 on Jan 3, 2009 5:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
of course we’d want a playoff GM. I think everyone here views the Patriots as a playoff calibur team and ont he same level as a team liek the Ravens.
by SayHeyWerd on Jan 3, 2009 6:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Colts lose
So I guess Polian is available to interview in the near future.
by ChiefDJ on Jan 3, 2009 10:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















