The Case for Chan Gailey as the Chiefs Head Coach
Don't judge Chan's head coaching ability on the fashion faux pas that is socks with sandals.
via WPI
Chan Gailey should be given serious consideration for the Chiefs head coaching job. The turnaround job he did with the Chiefs offense in 2008 is indicative of his ability to turn nothin' into somethin' (eloquent, right?). His time as an offensive coordinator for the Pittsburgh Steelers and Miami Dolphins combined with an underrated tenure in Dallas as a head coach make him an interesting candidate to be the Chiefs next head coach.
Previous Success as an Offensive Coordinator
Gailey spent two seasons as the Pittsburgh Steelers offensive coordinator improving the team from an 11th ranked offense in his first year (1996) to a 7th ranked offense the next. In comparison, the next three seasons without Gailey saw their offensive rank dip to 28th, 17th and 17th.
Clark Hunt is an advocate for anything and everything Steelers. He admires the organization because of their continued success and respects the knowledge those having worked in Pittsburgh possess. His work there helped produce 44 wins over 4 years. I'm not suggesting that 11 win average is a direct result of his employment, but seeing a successful program first hand certainly doesn't hurt his chances for future success.
From 2000-2001 Gailey served as the Miami Dolphins offensive coordinator. His first season saw a middle of the road offense that ranked 16th in the NFL. The following season the team improved to the 8th ranked offense. Both seasons the Dolphins posted 11-5 records.
Like Pittsburgh, Gailey stuck around for 2 seasons and saw improvement in offensive statistical rankings.
Previous Success as a Head Coach
Gailey's success as a head coach has largely been forgotten or underrated. He spent 2 years manning the Dallas Cowboys until Jerry Jones prematurely fired him.
"I regret just giving Chan [Gailey] two years," said Jones, the Cowboys' owner and general manager. "When you really look at what he's done since he's left here and look at what he had done here – he took us to the playoffs twice. And I'm not talking about the fairness of it. I'm just talking about how I should have worked hard on some things where we could've made adjustments that were meaningful."
So, Jerry Jones, a guy willing to do whatever it takes to succeed, admits he made a mistake in firing Chan Gailey after just two seasons.
And why does Jones regret that move? Because Gailey's teams reached the playoffs both years, winning the NFC East with a 10-6 record in 1998. His two year stint left him with a head coaching record 4 games above .500.
Gailey, in an organization that was on the verge of overhauling its identity from the days of the triplets (Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin were nearing the end of their careers while Emmitt Smith was nearing the end of his productive years), demonstrated an ability to competently play the hand that was given to him. And play it well, mind you.
In contrast, Dave Campo took over after Gailey was dismissed and brought the team just 15 wins in 3 years, 3 less than Gailey's total in 2 years.
Somebody Get Him a Quarterback
What do these names have in common?
- Mike Tomczak
- Kordell Stewart
- Jay Fiedler
- Troy Aikman (11 games in '98 and 14 games in '99)
- Tyler Thigpen
All quarterbacks Gailey had to work with. And work he did compiling impressive offensive numbers despite an obvious handicap at the most important position in all of professional sports.
A Thinking Man's Offense
Gailey's known for his unorthodox play calling as an offensive coordinator. But this line from a 1999 article comparing Norv Turner and Chan Gailey's offensive systems speaks volumes about his ability as a head coach.
Turner dares you to stop him. Gailey challenges you to outthink him.
This is a key point, especially when applied to today's NFL. It's rare that players will have a major athletic advantage over another. In the NFL, everyone is athletic, everyone is strong, everyone is fast, etc. Gailey is cognizant of this and tries to beat opponents by out-thinking them.
Gailey as Head Coach Makes Sense
In an abysmal 2008-2009 season for the Chiefs, Gailey was one of the very few bright spots. He was able to adapt and maximize the talent he was given. This isn't just a one time instance, however, as he's clearly demonstrated this time and time again despite non ideal working conditions and a less than desirable compilation of talent.
I know he might not be the fresh face Clark Hunt is looking for, but Gailey's proven track record should render him as a legitimate candidate to replace Herm Edwards in Kansas City.
Gailey may not have been my first choice as the Chiefs' next head coach but let's face it. Bill Cowher, Mike Shanahan or Bill Parcells aren't coming to Kansas City. This is an unprecedented year for Super Bowl winning coaches on the open market, but Kansas City isn't landing one of those guys. Chan Gailey is available and is as good of a choice as any other.
46 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
or shorts?
Hell, he could be wearing a speedo for all I care, he’s a helluva coach!
The Day Herm Edwards didn't get his team ready to beat the Raiders at Arrowhead is the day he kissed his job goodbye.
So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehn GOODBYYYEE!
Needs to mate it with a nice pair of Zubaz.
by HIV 2 Elway on Jan 28, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions
I agree with you Elway
As soon as I saw that shirt I thought it was Zubaz 2.0 haha!
Let's call him...Trogdor the Burninator!
Who said Clark
wants a fresh face for the head coaching position? We knew he wanted one in the office as GM, but coach may be a different story.
Even with all the Haley hype, I don’t know if he’s proven himself enough for me to want him yet. Gailey has done some good things with mediocre talent, and honestly I think he is probably the best candidate that’s out there right now with a record to evaluate, and evaluate properly.
The Day Herm Edwards didn't get his team ready to beat the Raiders at Arrowhead is the day he kissed his job goodbye.
So long, farewell, auf Wiedersehn GOODBYYYEE!
Not a fan of Gailey at HC
Only because I’d like to see him stay at OC. I think if you promote him only to demote him in a year, he’ll walk.
Agreed
If they’re going to make Gailey the HC they need to give him several years…otherwise it’s creating a lame duck situation and, frankly, it’s probably more than a little insulting to Gailey.
I think there are better candidates out there than Gailey, but I also wouldn’t hate it if we hired him as HC.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
After what happened in Dallas, he may want that as a caveat to his taking over
3 or more years.
We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.
Ok already, if you don't agree with what I am saying, just don't email my mom again. She beat the crap out of me with my keyboard!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
at a guess
Pioli had Gailey as insurance, and possibly as the “gold standard” (the guy to measure against, in this usage). If Pioli can’t get “his guy”, or can’t lock in a better coach, Gailey migh be tapped.
If that’s the case, it’s not a terrible, plan, especially if SP has discussed the matter with CG, and they are both good with it.
If the O-line isn't built up, a rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will win more next season.
QBs drafted in the top 5, back to 2001:
Michael Vick, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Alex Smith, Vince Young, JaMarcus Russell, Matt Ryan. How many were worth that high a pick? You decide.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 28, 2009 9:55 PM CST up reply actions
Fair enough
Maybe a bit of the Peter Principle? But Gailey did have success as a HC. The argument may be more about whether he’s a SB caliber coach or not.
by Joel Thorman on Jan 28, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions
Gailey is better as an OC than he would be as a HC.
Have him focus on what he does best, instead of having to manage the whole team.
Plus the guy is getting older, he’s 57. The body might not be able to handle the workload that a younger candidate might.
Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.
by aPacificChief on Jan 28, 2009 11:55 AM CST up reply actions
57 to old?
I wouldn’t put him out to pasture yet! Younger doesn’t necessarily mean better able to handle the workload of a coach. I am all for the youth movement and young coaches, but also like having experienced coaches. I think as far as being a successful NFL coach, 57 isn’t over the hill. That’s just my 48 yr old opinion.
No offense about age intended
Would just like to see a fresh approach after 20 years.
Young Owner + Young GM = Young Coach with it a different approach.
Opinions are like A--holes, everyones got one.
by aPacificChief on Jan 28, 2009 5:44 PM CST up reply actions
None taken
Just defensive working around younger guys. I’d be more than happy with a young guy who seems to have good ideas and will get us to the Super Bowl while building the Chiefs dynasty for the next 10 – 15 year. At the same time, I’d be happy with a solid 57 year old as long has he can get us to the Super Bowl and begin to build our dynasty until that young buck comes along to replace him when he retires after the 3rd or 4th SB win.
That’s all I want. :)
I'd call the Arrowspread pretty fresh
That may lead back to wanting to retain him as OC, but you can’t really knock the guy for not coming up with something new. My question still remains what the heck are they going to do about our defensive coaching staff? If Gailey stays on as either OC or HC our offense looks to remain effective, but we need a complete revamp of the D.
I'm not opposed to Chan
Only if we’re committed to him for several years. I’ve said it before and I’ll continue to say it. If out intention is to hire anyone for a single year I want nothing to do with it. We won’t be building anything. It will not be progress. It will be a stop-gap and it will continue to retard the growth and development of our young players. Not to mention, it will scare off any good potential free agents this off-season.
So the question really is; Are we ok with Chan as HC for the next three years or more?
I'd Be Okay With It
I’d prefer the Chiefs went with someone else because I don’t think Gailey is the best candidate, but I also don’t think he’s a bad candidate and he might be really good as well.
Basically, Gailey getting a promotion would elicit a big “meh” from me.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
I'm Waiting Until The New Hire
So I can start making specific predictions on the draft or on next season. I want to do specifics. Plus, it’s more about my belief that Shanahan won’t be coming here.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
They might rehire him =)
That happens, right?
by PVChiefsfan on Jan 28, 2009 10:54 AM CST up reply actions
Run this through your gears, please:
I speculated that Herm might be retained, so Pioli mightbe able to bring in a college-level guy to groom into the HC slot, possibly as a Coordinator during his apprenticeship. OK, Herm’s gone, but how does that plan work with Chan at the helm for 3+ years? If you decide to consider this, I’d be interested in the upsides and downsides, as you see them.
If the O-line isn't built up, a rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will win more next season.
QBs drafted in the top 5, back to 2001:
Michael Vick, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Alex Smith, Vince Young, JaMarcus Russell, Matt Ryan. How many were worth that high a pick? You decide.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 28, 2009 10:01 PM CST up reply actions
Upsides & Downsides
Upside with Gailey is that he’s an excellent OC and was a winning coach for a very dysfunctional Cowboys team near the end of their core players’ career, so he shows promise. And he hasn’t had many years as a pro coach, so maybe he’s better than that. Downside is that he wasn’t a great coach with the Cowboys and apparently didn’t impress Jerry Jones enough to keep him around. He was also a solid but not great coach at Georgia Tech. Basically, the downside is that what we saw with the Cowboys may be the ceiling for him as coach…he’s 57 and it’s very likely he is what his record says he is and what his record says he is is a solid coach but not exactly a championship one.
I won’t be upset if the Chiefs make Gailey HC and I’ll be supportive of him until he gives me a reason not to be if they do, but right now I’d still rather the Chiefs went with Haley.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
Thanks, but...
I meant I wanted your thoughts on the idea of Chan as HC, and getting a (young) rising star from the college coaching ranks to “apprentice” under him, possibly at OC, as a potential next step at HC after Chan.
I bring it up because that would be one way to inject fresh, young, outside talent into our coaching pool, but less risky than making that prospect HC. I don’t think college HCs directly translate well to NFL HCs, in the main. Too many differences in the systems & players, so it takes some “seasoning” before a college coach can handle the top slot, IMO.
Two of the things that KC has been notably poor at under Peterson have been developing young QBs and developing coaches, IMO. This would be a way to get a start on the latter.
I pretty much agree with you regarding Chan at HC, though. He’s not a guy I’d get excited about as HC, but he’s not a guy that I’dworry about at that position, either. For the moment, he’s good insurance to have around.
If the O-line isn't built up, a rookie QB is gonna look bad next season. If the O-line is a lot better, Thigpen will win more next season.
QBs drafted in the top 5, back to 2001:
Michael Vick, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Carson Palmer, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Alex Smith, Vince Young, JaMarcus Russell, Matt Ryan. How many were worth that high a pick? You decide.
by Bleedingredandgold on Jan 29, 2009 1:04 PM CST up reply actions
I took that photo
LOL. I love the fact that a photo I took with my little dumpy camera at training camp is still being circulated around the net. Where are my royalties? I remember Chan walking up in those yellow shorts and I just had to get a shot. He’s my kind of coach but I’d still rather have Shanahan.
Judge a man by his cover
It shows his intent. It’s like showing up at a job interview in ripped jeans, are you really serious about the interview?
I look at someone like Tomlin who is young and has to really work hard to earn the respect of players who are often older than he is and he looks smart, looks cool, looks like he is in charge.
I look at that picture of Chan and think who is this slob? The first thing out of his mouth better be something good or no one will take him seriously.
Now, if he turned up wearing a ripped hoodie, then we have problems.
Blame my wife!
Wasn't this taken at training camp?
Isn’t it hot and muggy as hell in Wisconsin during the summers? Let’s cut the guy some slack for trying to stay, and obviously, look cool.
by HIV 2 Elway on Jan 28, 2009 10:55 AM CST up reply actions
Chan had no idea what he was getting into in Dallas.
If you read the book, “Boys Will Be Boys” about the super bowl years of the 90’s cowboys you learn that the organization was in a mess after Switzer bailed. The team was truley out of control on and off the field and Gailey was thrown to the wolves by Jerry Jones.
I Still Have To Grab That Book
I’ve only heard good reviews about it.
Herm Edwards will not be the Chiefs' head coach next season.
Neither will Mike Shanahan.
Gailey by default
If we really cant get anybody better, Ill take Gailey. I really think Pioli needs to keep riding the wave of excitement and make a big hire. But if Gailey is the man, then “meh”… he cant possibly be worse than Herm
Thats the attitude voters had about GWB...
and look what that got us.
by HIV 2 Elway on Jan 28, 2009 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
I'm thinking about agreeing on this one
I think if you do get rid of Chan you need to get a asst. coach or 2 coordinators who bring what Chan lacks to the tables. But you can’t argue with his numbers or results. His offenses do well.
Herm Edwards - the new Art Shell.
Haley
Haley is a Pioli guy, I’m pretty sure Haley already knows he’s coming to KC if the Cards’ win the super bowl. What coach wouldn’t jump all over the opportunity t go into this awesome free agent class a near fifty million dollars under the cap? Despite the hush hush rumors, I really believe Haley has always been our number one guy (after McDaniels bolted for Denver) If we don’t get him I see Gailey manning the front, he’ll prolly make some damn good FA moves, I’m excited
It's obviously Haley!
Notice how when you woke up this morning you didn’t expect to see a Chiefs head coach hired? That’s because it really is Haley who Pioli is focusing on. Granted I know no more than anyone else but just by logic and general obviousness Pioli is targeting the guy who Parcells wanted to bring in as Miami head coach. I am guessing that it goes beyond his playoff success, with Pioli likely thinking of him before all the ‘flavor of the month’ stuff happened.
They also know what they have with Gailey as a creative OC who can fit schemes to young (and perhaps not the most talented) players. I think the combo of Haley and Chan devising schemes before each game can itself be enough to be competitive and allow Haley and the DC to coordinate that side as well.
I think the combo will be great, but I am also very ready to see a solid defensive coordinator along with the hire.
home, of the....CHIEEEEEFS!
Gailey for OC...maybe
For all the credit he’s thrown his offenses shot their wad in the first half way too many times.
Maybe if they thought about baseball or the economy
they would last into the second half.
Seriously though the man can coach Xs and Os. I would be cool with him being the HC (but then who becomes OC, Price maybe, maybe not, but that an entirely new discussion). He won me over the way he took that stagnant offense and made something out of it midseason. I still think the coach will be Haley but hopefully they can keep Gailey as OC if that is the case. I’m be much more interested in finding out who the DC is gonna be.
Thankful
Even though we are dealing with the rumers, speculation, anticipation, and complete lack of valid news, I am extremely thankful we aren’t getting our coaches like Davis and his Raiders. Their staff is almost completely in place, but still no news on the HC. How strange is that?
It speaks volumns about the professionalism of Hunt and Pioli, and our coaching staff.
Nice post
+1
My first choise was Spags.
My second was Shanahan.
My 3rd is Gailey. I like him a lot and hope he gets a chance.
I still want Hugh Jackson in as OC (he’s a zone-blocking scheme / QB development guy). Or if we can’t fit him in at OC at least as OL/QB coach. I think Hugh is one of the real talents up and comming in coaching circles.
The Powers Of Astute Observation Are Often Mistaken As Cynacism By Those That Do Not Posses Them -- G.B. Shaw
absolutely
he is the best candidate. see my signature.
might be smart to keep him as OC, however.
Chan Gailey is the only guy with the balls to draft Tebow as a HB/TE/2nd QB and actually USE him that way -- alongside a pure passer to help bring on the future of the NFL -- the ghey-ly named 'wildcat'. Remember Kordell (slash)? Gailey took the talent and made it work.
It sounds absurd but I swear if you saw my chalkboard....

by 

























