Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


The Patriots reportedly signed Maurice Price this week after the Chiefs waived him earlier this month and sent him to their practice squad.

The Chiefs have not announced the move, but multiple Boston-area media outlets, such as the Boston Globe, reported the acquisition. Price also was removed from the Chiefs' online roster.

Link 9 months ago Ajax_tiny ChiefDJ Comment 50 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

i think we'll live to regret this

he will fit in well with the patriots. Hagans isn’t half the receiver Price is.

by KS on Sep 24, 2008 7:53 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So If He Turns Out To Be Good With The Pats

Does that mean that we can all finally admit that Herm Edwards doesn’t really have any ability to judge player talent outside of defensive backs?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 8:01 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have to think so.

Hagans is such a disaster – I can’t see what would justify wasting a roster spot on him when Maurice Price sat on the practice squad. I don’t think I was hallucinating during the preseason when Price looked like a pretty excellent rookie receiver.

Also, Where the hell is Will Franklin the last two games? He’s not injured, but I haven’t seen him play at all.

by KS on Sep 24, 2008 8:50 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Franklin

He played some last week. I saw him line up in the slot on at least 1 play.

by Tuggurnaut on Sep 24, 2008 9:00 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah...

I saw him play too, but he didn’t stand out at all…
Of course I don’t think Thigpen could have hit him anyways.

http://www.kcchiefsfootball.com/
Go Chiefs!

by bigknoxy on Sep 24, 2008 9:18 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

SUM BEE!

I really liked Price and was pulling for him to make this team. The Patriots have been known to be good talent evaluators and they took a chance on him, I think that just about says it all.

http://www.kcchiefsfootball.com/
Go Chiefs!

by bigknoxy on Sep 24, 2008 9:19 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We need a "where are they now" post

Listing all the players who Herm cut from our roster and were picked up by other teams and went on to get superbowl rings and stuff.

It’ll make us feel bad because there isn’t really a complementary list of players discarded by other teams which we picked up who are now super awesome.

Blame my wife!

by sir eccles on Sep 24, 2008 10:08 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tynes and Kawika Mitchell

Tynes was nothing special as a kicker but he was better than Novak, and Medlock (probably not Carney, though, who is having a good year so far this year).

Kawika Mitchell was a key component of that Giants defense and he’s helped turn Buffalo’s defense into an outstanding squad this year. Funny…you’d think we might have wanted to keep him since we’re pretty hard up for linebackers right now.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Add Kicker

To the list of positions Herm is terrible at evaluating. Right up there with QB, offensive line, and linebacker.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 10:31 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yea, Mitchell hurt.

I think there will be far more players that are out of work than doing well on other teams.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 24, 2008 10:31 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wiegmann

Doing well on a very good Broncos offense…starting, in fact.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 10:35 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yep

Was supposed to be a fill-in when the assumption was that Nalen could go now with Nalen on IR it appears the job is his.

by primetime 07 on Sep 24, 2008 11:03 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Youth Movement

Herm wants to be the guy who discovers the guy. That’s it. That’s why he plays the young guys.

by ashleylat on Sep 24, 2008 10:48 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Basically

A scout trying to validate his predictions? I could definitely see that.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 10:50 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Excellent insight, ashley
Herm wants to be the guy who discovers the guy.

Any strength taken to an extreme can become a weakness. I think you nailed it.

by sunny D on Sep 24, 2008 12:17 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Gosh dangit

Why did he have to go to the freaking Patriots?! You know a receiver is good when the Patriots think he’s good enough for their team. Our best preseason receiver… why do we still have BJ Sams? I feel like I could do a better job as head coach than Herm Edwards.

by Vince D on Sep 24, 2008 11:26 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Pats

Make all WRs look great. It’s that Tom guy. He’s good. We should sign him next year. And Moss.

by primetime 07 on Sep 24, 2008 11:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Whoa...

There are a lot of reasons to second guess Herm and the facts in this post don’t merit that criticism.

Tynes: Lest we forget the playoff game in Indy? Guy was decent but even in the Green Bay NFC championship he choked on the first one. Any coach in their right mind would have balked on keeping Tynes after that game. And then there’s this viewpoint.

Mitchell: We knew he was good, we tried to keep him. He wasn’t better than ‘Jared Allen let’s franchise him great,’ but put a guy like Mitchell in defense with Umenyiora and Strahan and of course he’ll get better.

Carney: He was born in 1964. He’s the kicking equivalent of bringing in Vinny Testeverde. There’s 20 years in the NFL there, not an ‘evaluation’ project so much as a speculation in longevity.

Price: Er, yeah he should be good on the Pats, they’re a good team and he’s got Randy Moss to help bring him along, and eventually a health Tom Brady. That said, I’m not too jazzed with the Pats of late, Matt Casselgreyskull is not a good quarterback, he barely beat us, and last week’s Miami game was an embarrassment. Finally, Belichik, according to Herm complimented Herm on what we’re doing, so of course they want Price, and the whole situation is a Catch-22 of stone throwing.

Hagans: Why do we hate Hagans so much? Yeah, the little experiment against Oakland looked pretty pathetic, but so has Thigpen, and Hagans is 1 for 1 with no turnovers and a decent play that got called back for a penalty. I’d just like something to backup this theory that he’s vastly inferior to Price.

NOW, FOR PARADE COUNTERPOINT

Mason Crosby: Drafted after Medlock, Medlock was a UCLA guy, Crosby was at UC Boulder. Carl made a BIG mistake there, BIG, no ifs and or buts, the Chiefs might have a far different attitude if we had the best up and coming kicker in the league for the Herm Edwards points and sound machine.

Napoleon Harris: That six year deal was stupid. He’s an aging malcontent who got paid and is content to miss tackles.

The Development of Brodie Croyle: The PARADE maintains a lingering hope that Croyle comes off of this injury, looks serviceable, puts together at least a couple wins and manages to stay health. This remains to be seen, but we’re reaching cut your losses capacity. With 20/20 hindsight, Herm and Co. made a major mistake not starting Brodie at the beginning of last season. We half-lied to ourselves about being competitive, and we were pulling a straws with the Huard debacle, the excuse was our o-line is so bad that we don’t want to shell-shock the kid. Bad move, this is the NFL, we shoulda shell shocked him, our o-line wasn’t getting better in one off season. I’d rather have four more games of tape of Croyle getting sacked/injured than those four wins now. Croyle has a miserable 11-12 more games to get through, we’ll see how he does, but the Chiefs must be swift and terrible the moment he goes down or this off season if he’s atrocious.

That one’s more 20/20 hindsight bc the jury is still technically out on his talent, but the development was a definite fustercluck.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Sep 24, 2008 12:37 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh and Casey Wiegmann...

Undersized and part of last years abomination, you could say he was unfairly lumped in with the Turley/Terry losers, or that judging by Cutler pass protection this year, he’s got a solid supporting cast. I was never sold on Wiegmann despite being a great center for the ever shifting Vermeil offenses.

I wish him well, but I’m okay with letting him go with Niswanger looking just as competent in my opinion.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Sep 24, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Wiegmann

He wasn’t great here, I’ll agree. But he’s been pretty solid elsewhere so I can’t help but wonder if the difference is that now he has a coach who actually knows how to use him and the offensive line? Especially considering that our line looks just as bad now that we’ve replaced him with someone younger.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 1:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Rebuttal
Tynes: Lest we forget the playoff game in Indy? Guy was decent but even in the Green Bay NFC championship he choked on the first one. Any coach in their right mind would have balked on keeping Tynes after that game.

Great…and who did we replace him with?

Mitchell: We knew he was good, we tried to keep him. He wasn’t better than ‘Jared Allen let’s franchise him great,’ but put a guy like Mitchell in defense with Umenyiora and Strahan and of course he’ll get better.

Valid points all…and who did we replace him with?

Carney: He was born in 1964. He’s the kicking equivalent of bringing in Vinny Testeverde. There’s 20 years in the NFL there, not an ‘evaluation’ project so much as a speculation in longevity.

Good point about his age…and who’d we replace him with?

Finally, Belichik, according to Herm complimented Herm on what we’re doing, so of course they want Price, and the whole situation is a Catch-22 of stone throwing.

Did you ever consider that Belichick might have complimented Herm on the job he’s doing because he likes having a more or less guaranteed “W” on his schedule when we face them? After all, Belichick’s got a reputation as being a bit of an asshole :)

Mason Crosby: Drafted after Medlock, Medlock was a UCLA guy, Crosby was at UC Boulder. Carl made a BIG mistake there, BIG, no ifs and or buts, the Chiefs might have a far different attitude if we had the best up and coming kicker in the league for the Herm Edwards points and sound machine.

But the point is, it didn’t work out. Medlock was terrible. And the guy they brought in to replace Medlock (Rayner) was terrible. And the guy we brought in to replace him (Carney) was good, but we decided not to keep him and so the next guy we brought in (Novak…who didn’t outperform Barth) has also been terrible (while Carney’s having a pretty good year). The point being that of course we’d be optimistic if Herm and Carl’s kicker choices had worked out…but they always seem to go with one of the worst available option so I don’t think they deserve a pass for bad luck. They’ve simply made stupid decisions on the kicker situation.

Napoleon Harris: That six year deal was stupid. He’s an aging malcontent who got paid and is content to miss tackles.

Ugh…just, ugh. Nothing else to say there, we’re completely on the same page. Of course since we gave him a big contract, I’m sure that he’ll still be populating our roster until Peterson eventually leaves considering how Peterson hates eating bad contracts.

That one’s more 20/20 hindsight bc the jury is still technically out on his talent, but the development was a definite fustercluck.

I was on the record preseason as saying that Brodie should never have been given the starting QB job without any serious competition being brought in, so technically my opinion wasn’t hindsight :)

You’ve made some good points in this post, but honestly I think that all of them are either valid criticisms of the job Herm and Carl have done or directly lead to valid criticisms of the job Herm and Carl have done.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 1:00 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Some critques on your critiques sir...

Glad you agree we agree sorta, gist-wise I think we’re all on the same track, I’ll just illuminate my ramble a little here.

Tynes and Carney should have been rendered moot by the drafting of Mason Crosby.

Bellicheat isn’t that purely evil, but it’s possible he says that to all the girls and Herm’s just dumb enough to repeat it.

I think I was saying we shouldn’t have had competition for QB spot just for the pure sake of moving on with the ‘brodie croyle experience experiment.’ But, that might play to your point. Herm does this ‘competition’ speech, which I think is complete crap. Maybe it is, maybe it’s a competition that always turns out in what the coach’s better judgment tells him to do (Trent thought so). Either way, it’s lame, you make decisions as the head coach, that’s the job, don’t tell us all your tough questions get settled in a winner-take-all game of 500 at the end of practice.

Damon, Brodie, you may be asking yourself why I brought you here to my house, and you may be asking yourself why I have a game of whack-a-mole in my basement…

Ultimately, my point was lets not focus on the adequate to marginally good players that may have gotten thrown out with the bath water, there are some clear failures (Medlock over Crosby) and big potential failures in the balance (Croyle? Barth? The O-line save Waters/Albert, Pretty much the entire LB situation).

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Sep 24, 2008 2:10 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heh
Bellicheat isn’t that purely evil, but it’s possible he says that to all the girls and Herm’s just dumb enough to repeat it.

I think that about says it right there. :)

Either way, it’s lame, you make decisions as the head coach, that’s the job, don’t tell us all your tough questions get settled in a winner-take-all game of 500 at the end of practice.

Agreed.

Ultimately, my point was lets not focus on the adequate to marginally good players that may have gotten thrown out with the bath water, there are some clear failures (Medlock over Crosby) and big potential failures in the balance (Croyle? Barth? The O-line save Waters/Albert, Pretty much the entire LB situation).

Valid points all.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 2:24 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

NFL News Update
In a strange turn of events, Roger Goodell announced that a 10-second sideline session of whack-a-mole will be used to make all quaterback fumble review decisions, replacing the long reviews “under the hood.” Sources close to Goodell mentioned that he had been surfing blogs to stay in touch with the fans before creating this new system.

by sunny D on Sep 24, 2008 3:45 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Awesome

Will we suck at that too! Funny stuff!

by Eric Allen on Sep 24, 2008 4:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Price

As far as my frustration with losing Price: I can’t say he’d be an elite WR. But in the preseason games (yeah – against scrubs) I like the way he got open, came back to the ball, caught the ball with his hands, and hung on to the balls that were thrown to him. Traits that I was looking forward to testing in regular season games.

PARADE, appreciate a throttle on the hindsight express. Truth is somewhere in the middle of all these decisions. LIke I’d appreciate having Wilkerson this seaon. (As well as Kawika.) Although I have hopes for DE Johnson and believe he deserves a roster spot. Turk and Hali could improve, but I have to believe Hali is approaching his ceiling of potential.

by sunny D on Sep 24, 2008 1:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've seen this before..

Maybe not the same situation exactly, but an iffy WR we let go that turns pro after a couple years.

Hmm.. Joe Horn?

by WMR on Sep 24, 2008 7:52 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh give me a break

Price hasn’t proven anything yet. The reason he ended up on the practice squad was because he got injured, just like he did with the last team he was on before we picked him up.

He looked promising in the preseason and I would have liked to see him in a real game, but it is what it is.

by ChiefDJ on Sep 24, 2008 10:02 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I did wonder why

he didn’t move back to the roster if he was doing good in practice. I guess the Chiefs thought they had seen enough. Too bad. I would have rated him our 3rd best WR after the preseason.

by TheQ on Sep 24, 2008 10:06 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Price may never be any good, but he is young. And is not Sams.

Thank goodness we still have Sams though. He was more worthy than Price for a roster spot on our rebuilding team that has one decent NFL receiver. If we didn’t have Sams, our kicks would be returned by some rookie, and we’d end up seeing what Savage can do. No need for that, let’s keep an older guy who fair catches two punts at the 7-yard line, and let Price go to a team that knows how to spot talent and develop it.

Millen’s gone, so there is no longer any doubt which NFL team is the worst-run. Everyone except for General Manager For Life Carl Peterson knows who that team is.

by Offense of the 70s on Sep 24, 2008 10:21 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually

I’d rank us third-worst right now. Oakland and St. Louis have us beat. Al Davis is always going to screw things up these days, of course, but there’s also something seriously wrong over in St. Louis…just a screwed up, dysfunctional organization.

But I think we’re solidly third-worst in the NFL right now. Our GM and head coach are terrible.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 10:28 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And that 3rd string QBs not too great either eh?

And that nobody MLB we have? Or how bout that young superstar WR we have that gets a case of the drops every once in a while?

I know you’re on a mission to make sure everyone that visits this site knows how much you despise the coach and GM, but maybe we can spread the blame around a bit to other parties that deserve a share as well?

by ChiefDJ on Sep 24, 2008 10:37 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Really? Who?

Because, last I checked, the GM was the one responsible for bringing those players in and the coach was the one responsible for making sure the players either execute what they’re asked to do or, failing that, that they get replaced in the lineup by players who do a better job.

It’s never the coach’s fault with you, is it DJ?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 24, 2008 11:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's never any one person's fault,

To continue your logic: Lamar Hunt was an awful owner.

He hired Herm, extended Peterson, and let the teams of the 70s continue as they did for so long.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 25, 2008 5:44 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BTW

I totally don’t buy that.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 25, 2008 5:45 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lamar Hunt Was A Terrible Owner

A great person from what I hear, a man who did a lot of really good things for the NFL, a philanthropist and a class act, but as an owner he basically let his team rot. He left it in the hands of Jack Steadman forever, then he left it in the hand of Carl Peterson well past the point where Carl had shown he’d lost his chops.

Was he the worst owner in the NFL? Absolutely not. And I’m sure he wanted the Chiefs to win. It’s just that when it came down to it, he chose Carl Peterson over the success of the team. Some people find that kind of loyalty admirable, and I suppose they’re right. But he deserves the criticism that goes along with it when the team goes nowhere because of the choices he’s made.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 25, 2008 8:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But didn't he do a great job

when he hired Peterson the first time?

That was a significant step up. If I remember right, no team won more games in the 90s than KC.

We were a game away from the big one. It’s Hunt’s fault we didn’t make it, because he hired Carl, who hired Marty, who didn’t coach well enough for the kicker to hit a fieldgoal.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 25, 2008 8:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or

the kicker should have made the kick.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 25, 2008 8:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually

It was Peterson’s fault for bringing in that kicker. Lin Elliott was terrible well before he arrived in Kansas City. He was Dallas’ kicker before that and he shanked quite a few clutch field goals for them (68% FG his first year 50% the next). The guy was a choker, that’s why Jimmy Johnson dumped him. I was gritting my teeth when he signed with the Chiefs because I knew that guy was trouble even if he had two decent regular seasons with us…he folded when the kicks were important.

As for Lamar Hunt, like I said below, I didn’t fault him for the first few years of Peterson. I faulted him for not getting rid of the guy when he couldn’t build a team capable of winning a playoff game after Marty left.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 25, 2008 8:40 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He Did A Very Good Job With Peterson At First

Then he went back to not paying attention to what was going on with his team again.

Good owners don’t just turn a team over to a GM in perpetuity and not pay attention. They don’t give somebody a job forever just because the guy did pretty well at the start. When you basically wash your hands of the team and don’t place any expectations of results on your staff, that’s neglect.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 25, 2008 8:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I never said the coach didn't get some blame

But you forgot the most important part of your equation:

The players have to play.

If we had a coach you liked, you would be talking about plays players made. But since you hate with a burning passion the GM (which I think helps to color your hatred for the coach since he was hired by Peterson who you thought should have been fired) EVERYTHING falls in their lap.

Well Peterson/Herm don’t make Bowe drop balls. Peterson/Herm don’t make DJ miss tackles. Peterson/Herm don’t make Tony G get offensive pass interference penalties at inopportune times. Peterson/Herm don’t make Huard underthrow Jamaal Charles by 15 yards.

You can criticize the coachs, you can criticize the GM. But it doesn’t change the fact that sometimes the players just make mistakes and it costs you games because of it, just like in the above examples.

by ChiefDJ on Sep 25, 2008 7:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Players

Agreed, the players have to play…and when they don’t the coach either needs to ride their ass or he needs to make changes.

Damion McIntosh…can’t block worth a damn, terrible lineman, has been for two years. Who keeps putting him into the starting lineup and won’t give his backup any playing time?

Dwayne Bowe….multiple drops, terrible game. Did he get benched for that? No. Did Herm run extra hard practices with the receivers to eliminate mental mistakes like that? Not that we heard of. Has he improved? Not really. So who’s responsible for cracking down on him and pushing him to improve?

Tyler Thigpen…had a terrible game against Oakland. Really horrible. Didn’t outperform Huard (who was in for all of four throws). On most teams you get benched or cut for that kind of performance. But he gets a start, after which he proceeds to have another terrible start. Whose call was that?

But it doesn’t change the fact that sometimes the players just make mistakes and it costs you games because of it,

Right, players do make mistakes…and it’s the coach’s job to push them to eliminate those mistakes and to hold them accountable when they don’t or when they underperform. Where’s the accountability here? Good teams in the NFL don’t tolerate underperformance…if a player makes constant errors or can’t improve on his game killing flaws that player is taken off the field and somebody else is put on in his place. But not with Herm’s Chiefs. Here, if a QB stinks, he gets a promotion, or gets the uncontested starting job while the guy who outperformed him gets stuck on the sidelines and has the coach say in the press that he’s only good for coming off the bench. Here, if a WR drops a key TD pass at the end of a game when there’s no reason for him to do so (and largely stinks through the rest of the game) he keeps his starting job and gets a pass. Here when a tackle can’t do the basics of his job, he keeps starting because the coach doesn’t feel like disrupting continuity (even though all he’s continuing to do is stink, and get his QBs killed).

Do I blame the players for making errors? Sure. But at some point you’ve got to look at the big picture, and realize that these errors aren’t restricted to the rookies…they’re team-wide, even among the vets, and yet nobody on this team seems worried about losing their jobs or getting benched when they put in a crappy performance. There’s not a football team out there that succeeds when the players aren’t held accountable for what they produce on the field…and that lack of accountability falls squarely on the coach and GM.

Whether it’s Herm doing a crappy job of preparation, or the players just being unwilling to work on their games, or the players being unable to do what the coach asks doesn’t really matter…what matters is that they’re not producing what they’re capable of producing and the coach is the one responsible for that because he’s the one who runs the practices, comes up with the gameplan and fills in the lineup. This isn’t a completely talentless team. We’re not this much worse, talent-wise, than the Raiders or the Falcons. But with Herm at the helm the Chiefs have sure been playing like they’re that bad, and that falls entirely on the coaching staff.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 25, 2008 8:29 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Rams suck hard right now, but they won a Super Bowl in Carl Peterson’s 11th year as GM of the Chiefs. Their championship was a while ago, but it came what, seven years AFTER Peterson’s last playoff game win?

Winning a Super Bowl buys you a lot of slack. No playoff wins this millennium can’t compare to that.

I hate the Raiders so much that I can’t be at all impartial, but they did just beat us in our building and have won two in a row against us. Right now, they’re ahead of us in the standings. Al Davis is evil, ugly, obnoxious, stupid, arrogant and senile, but right now even he’s ahead of CPGMFL.

by Offense of the 70s on Sep 24, 2008 11:34 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Maurice Price is the future. He’s fast and always shows up. I think Kansas City made a bad choice but New England made a very smart one. He’s going to make things happen for the Patriots…. MARK MY WORDS!!

by mpbiggestfan on Sep 24, 2008 10:50 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yeah i agree Maurice Price will be good, Chiefs are doomed now…every choice is always a wrong one…. :(

AD

by ali_djoo on Sep 25, 2008 12:15 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chiefs_small
"Twas the Night Before Football"
P1_extra_bmm_1stcast_may08_small
"53"

Recent FanPosts

Zachdixiebama-0030-2_small
Chiefs Sack Leader Poll
Img_1134_small
Steve McNair is dead at 36
Small
A look back (Herm years)
Small
the 53 Man Roster
Pict0200_small
BECAUSE I'M BORED LET'S PLAY GM FOR THE DAY
Kcchiefsd_small
Happy Independence Day!!!
Images2_small
A Rockin Chiefs Post
Images2_small
Pioli pulls the Trigger
Small
2009 AP Fantasy League(s)?
Chiefs_small
2009 Season

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Editors

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris

Tg_small primetime 07

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Brodie_small Official Arrowhead Pride Parade

N505381175_257425_5488_small connerman

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports