Kansas City Chiefs Lack A Spark In 24 Point Loss
![]() |
Stats are here.
Again there's not much to say. We were dominated in most facets of the game. LJ got back to 100 yards and Bowe scored again.
Unfortunately, 22 incompletions and 3 interceptions won't win you anything. Our offense looked pathetic but at least this game helped re-focus the problem on the QB.
I don't know what else to say anymore. I guess you could say we made some progress from last week so maybe that was rock bottom?
0 recs |
217 comments
|
Comments
We were just demoralized
In what should have been our two easiest games.
We are a great candidate to go 0-16 at this point.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's a plus
Oakland lost on a last second FG
Blame my wife!
by sir eccles on Sep 21, 2008 3:11 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That does make me feel better
Thanks
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but
at least they were in a position to win. Something we can’t say for what should have been the two easiest games on the schedule.
by Seth_C on Sep 21, 2008 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not even close
This game was worse than the OAK game in my opinion. 38 frickin’ points!
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To a rookie QB!
And another rebuilding franchise!
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
To be fair
I think this Falcons team is being underrated. I mean, they’re actually really solid. Houston’s a good corner, they have playmakers up front, Turner’s a beast, Ryan’s got a good arm and the receiving corp is improving.
But then, you can’t turn around a team that’s rebuilding and make them competitive in a year. We’re proof of that.
(Atlanta 2-1; Miami DRUBS the Patriots…wait….)
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Falcons Are Not Good
They gave up 2000 yard rushing last season, they dumped their best cornerback (flawed though he was, he was still better than anyone on their roster now) and most of the new guys they brought in to replace departing players on D were rookies and young guys, same as we did, and they still held our offense to 2 TDs. The Falcons played a rookie QB who was one of the worst passers in the NFL at this point and our defense made him look like a star. This team was at the same point we were last year and they destroyed us.
At some point you have to quit making excuses and just admit that while we might have some talented young players on the roster our coaching staff is simply not getting acceptable performances out of most of them. The Chiefs got blown out by the teams that should have been the easiest on their schedule. They looked utterly unprepared and the head coach seems to be in denial that there are serious problems with his gameplan.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
Seriously.
It’s hard to defend you from DJ’s accusations that you’re purely negative when you NEVER say anything positive. That’s a rookie quarterback that’s 2-1. He’s got a strong, smart arm and made some great throws today, no matter what the defense was. God, man, I have to ask you. I’ve been with you in the Herm bashing, but do you get anything from football outside of just getting to point out how much we suck?
You make me look like DJ sometimes.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 9:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Herm sounds like a beaten man
in the post game press conference
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
If Denver loses today
We are only 2 games back… that’s really not that bad.
by Vince D on Sep 21, 2008 3:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha
But the difference is that Denver has shown they’re capable of beating quality opponents. We just need to win a game.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious???
Vince, the Chiefs are not even in the same class as the Broncos….and I HATE the Broncos. The Chiefs will be lucky to win ANY GAMES this year. And, by the way, the Broncos come to Arrowhead next Sunday.
by TopGun on Sep 21, 2008 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let me have my optimism
It’s all I’ve got left.
by Vince D on Sep 21, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m scared already. I have several friends that are donkey fans – it’s gonna be a tough week. I don’t think I’ll be answering my cell phone or checking emails for a while.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude...
We cant even beat the Raiders. We cant even beat the Falcons… And these teams (including us) are among the worst in the league!
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Falcons
I think the Falcons have really turned it around, but the Raiders, I can agree with.
by Prospero15 on Sep 21, 2008 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
So what do you think Herm does week 4
Start Thiggie, Start Huard……… or mayble Ingle???……..please no.
by Prospero15 on Sep 21, 2008 3:17 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I say
We go with the guy that gives us the best chance to win… Huard… And THATS NOT SAYING MUCH.
Shouldnt Brodie be ready to go by then though?
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I bet Damon's really pissed right now.
by Prospero15 on Sep 21, 2008 3:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He has every right to be pissed off. He hasn’t gotten a fair shake since he signed his contract extension. But he has been the consumate professional. The man is a saint.
by TopGun on Sep 21, 2008 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If wining was the goal
Huard would have started this week. I understand starting Tyler – but the TEAM needs a win !! If he’s healthy – you gotta go w/ Huard.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't understand starting Thiggie
If player progession really is the goal. Then Huard would be in. I bad qb regresses the whole team.
by Prospero15 on Sep 21, 2008 3:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And...
THATS whats pissing ME off… I understand Herm wants to see what he has on the bench, but when the guy you put out there is 12/30-something, with 1 TD and 2 ints DURING the game, WHY KEEP HIM IN THERE? At SOME point you wanna try to win, right
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can we trade for Eli Manning
Watching the Giants OT at the moment, wow.
Blame my wife!
by sir eccles on Sep 21, 2008 3:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
This is pathetic....
Oh my gosh. The Chiefs look worse than anticipated. Why are we playing a quarterback that throws into double team coverage? Why are we runnning the ball with 4 minutes left in the game and we’re down 17 points? I have never been a Herm Edwards fan. I feel so sorry for Damon Huard. Here’s a guy who filled in so well when Trent Green got hurt. He won football games that year for us. Then signs a big extension with the Chiefs. Since then, he as NEVER gotten a fair shake from the Chiefs. Herm said this week, “Tyler deserves a shot.” Why???? What has he done to deserve a shot? Tyler Thigpen is not ready to be a starting QB. Herm Edwards and Carl Peterson are ruining this franchise.
by TopGun on Sep 21, 2008 3:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
You start the best players on your team. If not then move him and let him play SOMEWHERE. He deserves at least that from the Chiefs !!
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tyler Thigpen
needs to go back to his 3rd String. Cause he could never be a starter ANYWHERE in the NFL. Damon deserves a shot more so than Thigpen, before he gets too old.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
BEFORE
he gets too old?
At what point does he get old? 36? He’s already 35. If you want to argue for a trade, for Martin, for anything, that’s fine, but I think arguing for Huard is shortsighted and essentially this:
“He HAS to be better than what we have NOW!”
Which is essentially what we’ve been doing for the last two years.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh and you think that THIGPEN
gives us a better shot than Huard? FINE! Herm wanted to see what we have in the kid… And there… 60 minutes… Happy NOTHIN’!!!
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't care about wins
If you’re looking for wins, you need to re-examine priorities. This isn’t about winning. This season is about building to the future. And Thigpen’s not a part of that, but he gives us more opportunity to use the athleticism we have, and he makes plays. A lot of them are bad. But that scramble, the touchdown throw, the mobility?
Damon doesn’t have that.
I honestly want them to start Damon for a half so we can see the difference. We had a few moments where we could have gotten back in this game today, and Thigpen was part of that.
And then we ran draws on 3rd and 5 and tried running on 4th down. Because we’re geniuses.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very true
As absolutely disgustingly horrible as we were in the first half, we still had opportunities to at least be competitive in this game. If Novak had made the field goal and if they had been succesful in scoring a touchdown instead of getting stopped on the 6 inch line, the score is 31 – 23 and a one score game.
But this is what happens when you have a half built team and you’re running your 3rd string QB to see what he’s got. You don’t make plays that you should make and the young guy thats really not talented enough to start in the NFL makes mistakes. What else do we expect?
I agree with Matt that we get nothing out of starting Huard. At least by letting Thigpen play we are confirming that he shouldn’t be a part of the future, just like we need to see Croyle play to confirm that we need a different starting QB, or if he gets things turned around, that he can be.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreeing with you
makes me feel uneasy. It just feels wrong. Like writing with my left hand, or drinking Bud Light.
DJ, as an avid Herm supporter, I gotta get your thoughts. The coaching staff was not great today, would you agree? That 4th down run kills me. Just kills me.
Oh, and I’ll add one more for people to flame me for.
as much as I hate that we ran on that play?
Marcus Allen, Priest Holmes, Christian Okoye: what do they have in common?
They all would have gotten that touchdown. I’m just sayin.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not going to argue about coaching today
Its a losing battle because whether its the coaches fault or not, until they start winning its just banging your head against the wall.
All I know is that if your players can’t get you a 2 yard gain NO MATTER WHAT THE CALL, its a sign that you have some problems which we already know we do.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't care
about the win. Again, don’t care about the win. Chris and I actually agreed. If we’d scored on that drive and lost by 10? We’d actually feel pretty good about the game.
But it was like, LJ showed flashes (when wide-open holes were opened), the o-line showed flashes, thigpen actually started to play… (gulp) well. And then the coaching staff shot us in the foot. It was really defeating to beg the players to play better only to have the playcalling ruin us.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you think should have been done there?
Seriously, if you’re going to second guess everything, what do you call on 4th and 2 and still blame it on the coaches if that play doesn’t work?
The play they SHOULD be calling is an up the gut dive, but the offensive line has proven they don’t have the ability to block that type of play.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No way.
Play action outlet pass to cox or tony. back of the endzone lob to bowe, cross pattern to darling, quarterback bootleg scramble. Any of these options, had they failed? I would be blaming Thigpen. By denying him that chance, ti just killed me. I’m not being inconsistent. I know you think that everyone that blames the coaches is inconsistent, just hear me out. I really liked what our offense called right up until that 1st and goal. And then we got conservative again. Just broke my heart to see them waste that.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But there is the problem
You DONT blame the players. Everyone blames the playcall or coaching. The PROOF of that is exactly what we are talking about here. 4th and 2 and you DONT want to run the ball?
LJ was one on one on the outside with a guy and couldn’t beat him. Most of the time he will, this time he didn’t.
This is exactly what I’ve been talking about this season. Sometimes its not the playcalling. Sometimes it is just up to the players being able to execute the play. The run with LJ to the outside had a MUCH higher % chance of success than any pass play.
Who you going to trust to get the ball in from 2 yards out? Your Pro Bowl RB that has over 100 yards rushing in the game at that point or your 3rd string 7th round draft pick in his 2nd year that threw for only 38% accuracy and 3 interceptions today?
I would have been throwing a fit if they had had him throw it in that situation.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"sometimes"
but as much as you say we always blame the coaches and never the players, you’re the same with coaches. You really think the playcalling was good today?
Players made mistakes. Tyler was HORRIBLE in the first half. Our defense failed in every phase of the game.
I’m just trying to see if you’ll admit that the coaching staff ever makes mistakes, because it really seems like you’re trying so hard to protect them that you’re ignoring it when they make mistakes. Were there other times that were bad playcalls? Like the 3rd an 5 shotgun draw?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
How can you POSSIBLY blame the coaches
When you have a QB throwing for 38% and throwing 3 interceptions?
You want to talk about the 3rd and 5 draw? You mean the one that went for long gains and first downs the other two times they ran it?
Do coaches make bad calls? Sure, every coach does, otherwise teams would be going 16-0 every season.
The problem I have is that EVERYTHING gets blamed on teh coaches. If Bowe drops 4 balls including the game winning touchdown, its bad coaching. If Thigpen throws for 38% and 3 INTs, its bad coaching. If Jarrod Page bites on the playaction and Ryan hits his WR for 68 yards, its the coaching. If they run LJ on 4th and 2 and he’s got one guy to beat and can’t do it, its the coaching.
Tell me when it IS the players fault and not the coaches?
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
DJ
at some point you just need to be fair.
Yeah, Tyler put us in a hole. I’m not blaming the loss on the coaches exclusively. It was a collective ball of suck. The Patriots game wasn’t bad coaching. They actually coached really well in that game.
But am I going to blame the coaches for being too conservative and failing to creative effective gameplans and more importantly for failing to prepare the players? Yeah. I’m not saying he should be fired. I’m saying he needs to do a better job. Thigpen actually got better as the game went on. I actually credit Dick Curl a lot because I was making fun him for talking to Thigpen, but as the game went on, Bones settled down and started trusting the system and you could tell the coaches’ advice was getting through to him.
But man, your arguments would go a lot further if you didn’t just deflect everything to the players screwing up the awesome gameplan that’s been devised.
It’s funny, I was actually talking to Chris about how good Page is and how much improvement he’s shown, and that really his biggest problem is looking for the big play and getting caught on play action. Then i look up. D’oh!
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure if you can come up with a gameplan
Our players are capable of executing, they will listen, because thats the problem.
They come out and try to throw deep on the first down of the game and the QB gets sacked.
The reason I’m deflecting is because I think you want them to do things the squad isn’t capable of doing. You can’t throw the ball deep if you have a noodle arm or inaccurate QB and an offensive line that can’t hold long enough to do a 5 step drop.
Right now everything is being SCAPEGOATED onto the coaches but I’m telling you man, I can’t tell whose fault it is with all the mistakes being made by the players right now.
Tell me what gameplan is going to be succesful with a QB that only completes 38% of his passes and your O-line can’t block a simple Guard-Tackle hole for 3 or 4 yards?
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But
we opened up the offense on two drives inside two minutes in the first three games and we have good results from them. We actually do better when we suit the gameplan to the personnel instead of hammering a bad gameplan where it doesn’t fit. Does that make sense? Can you at least try to see where we’re coming from and admit that it’s possible?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's a cop out DJ
You yourself said Herm had his hand in personnel so he’s the one responsible for bringing them in therefore he’s the one responsible for how they play.
It’s simple accountability.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying the players are bad
The players are making mistakes.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
So you’re really saying we have a talented offensive line that’s just having mental “whoopsies?”
You’re saying that all three of our quarterbacks are top level talent that just aren’t trying hard enough?
You’re saying that our defense just doesn’t have its head on straight? Isn’t that Gunther’s responsibility to screw them on?
Players have to execute, but the gameplan has to be sound. If the gameplan is sound and the players don’t execute, it’s coaches’ responsibility to get guys in who will. I’m not saying he’s supposed to magically create a superbowl winner. But we’ve talked about being competitive. We haven’t been competitive. Part of that is players and part of that is coaching. Just try and keep perspective.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have I ever said that?
So how do you determine what is the coaches fault and what is the players fault? If the play is succesful its because the players made it happen and if the play fails its the players fault? Because thats what you sound like you’re saying.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I meant
If the play fails its the coaches fault
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotcha.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get tired of having to defend the coaching
But I pretty much never hear “Oh man, we could have won that if Tyler Thigpen could have thrown for 50% instead of 38%” or “If Pat Thomas, then Brandon Flowers, then Jarrod Page had made their tackles instead of letting Turner break off that 50 yard run, we would have still been in the game” or “If Page hadn’t bit on the short route and covered the deep route like hes supposed to, they wouldn’t have gotten beat on that 68 yard pass”.
No, instead, every thread is about “Playcallings bad and Herm needs to be fired”. Nobody ever gets into specifics except this one play on 4th and 2 that we were talking about which I bet if you polled the site most people would say running it in that situation was the right thing to do.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're probably right
I’m trying to give you as many points as I can to further the conversation but you just won’t budge.
Most people would probably say to run. I don’t agree, but then, I just want Thigpen to throw it, because he’s terrible but amusing.
I mean, I’m just trying to say that it was 50/50. That’s what it’s been this whole year. It’s been a complete fail. Bad players playing badly after being badly prepared and then having bad gameplans.
It’s not players, or coaches. It’s the entire team.
My only problem is that Tyler Thigpen isn’t at the top of the chain, and he did score a touchdown today when we got away from the usual gameplan and started slinging it a little bit.
(did LOVE the screens today. Keep that up Herm/Gailey!)
But you won’t even admit for a second that the coaches have done anything badly. It’s just “they did the same amount badly that any coach did.” And even primetime who usually defends your way of thinking disagrees. Can’t we try and agree on things and see each other’s points instead of holding onto what is, at this point, rhetoric?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats because its pointless
I can think of some plays that I would have called differently, sure.
Im sure there are a lot of plays they would call differently if they had better players at QB, O-line, etc. But they are trying to call plays based on the players we’ve got.
I’m not going to join in the bashing bandwagon, I’m trying to be a roadbump to it. To be honest with you, I could care less if Herm is fired tomorrow and the head coach / offensive coordinator of your choice are put in, the team is still going to be bad because the talent we have is inexperienced and most of the experience we have has no talent.
To me, complaining about playcalling with the above problem is just looking for a scapegoat because the team sucks.
I want to see the players get to a reasonable performance expected of NFL players and THEN we can talk about whether the playcalling was bad or not. Until that happens though, it makes absolutely no difference.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's all tied together
and I think most people would agree. The coaching staff is at the front of the team’s direction.
And we’ve been sliding backwards continually. Today was one of the few times we started to move forward after going down 24-0.
That Thigpen scramble was great, by the way. Also, I really like how Page plays, even with the play fake gaffe. However, our D-Line is just wretched. Tamba got just destroyed today.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bowe had a good game again
He had the bad game against New England, but he’s a solid player.
I don’t know what to think of the D-line. Tank and Dorsey did a good job stuffing the run up the middle for the most part, but we got creamed on the outside. I don’t know what the deal is with Hali. He is pretty much invisible for most of this year, the past couple years even if he wasnt getting sacks he was at least in the backfield causing pressure.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's really regressing
I think Allen may have been the key to his success. That post you did with his progress seems to have hit a significant bump.
I like our corners. They’re a little off on routes, but that’s all experience stuff. I like their attitude and size. I think we might have something going in the secondary if we can just improve the front seven.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where was DJ today?
I didn’t hear his name called a single time.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
They got the second level
and shut him down. I think DJ is the kind of player who could be a playmaker and game changer with guys around him, but he’s not a rock. Donnie was going to be that guy, but age caught up with him. It might be linebacker time with the top pick since it seems like no one wants to draft a quarterback (except me).
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
After what I have seen
We need a durable QB who can make throws down field.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm pretty close to that point
of drafting a good QB (if there is one, which Im not convinced of yet) with the 1st round pick.
But it scares me to death. Drafting a QB could and usually does, turn into a colossal bust.
It also means you aren’t addressing areas that its more likely that player will be a good contributor with that 1st round pick like at MLB, DE or what have you.
You think teams like the Titans with Young or Cardinals with Leinart are happy they spent those picks on those guys instead of a player at another position that could be playing every day?
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We also need more o-line help.
But if Herm is still here defense will get the first pick.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 6:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depends on what players are there
He’s had 4 1st round picks and has spent 2 on defensive players and 2 on offensive players. I think it just depends on who the best player is when their turn comes up.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You think the Falcons
wish they had taken Dorsey? Not to rag on Dorsey, but Ryan looks great very very early.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's tough to tell
Because he’s supplemented with 2 backs who nearly have 500 yards, average 6 yds per carry and combined for 6 TDs.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still......
With the whole “Vick” thing not entirely behind them, having Ryan show as well as he has this early is a real good thing for the Falcons organization and their fans.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Solid point
They HAD to draft a QB. Just sucks they HAD to give him $70 million too.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No that's what you hear.
If he had called that pass, I would have been really happy with them. When we opened up from 2:00 in the second through the third? I was really happy with the direction of the squad. Then we went back to the same crap we’ve been running for two years. And we failed. Again.
It’s looking at the overall direction. I think when we’re 0-3 and have been embarrassed by two of the worst teams in the league, there’s enough blame to go around.
I just want to be clear,here. So you think the coaches did a great job today and did nothing wrong, but the players just screwed up a full proof plan and that if the players (who were’n’t hired by the coaches, they just appeared, as if they were magical spirtes) hadn’t screwed it up, it would have been a mighty victory?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tell you what
You give me a list of 5 plays that you think they should have called instead of the ones they did that you can guarantee would have been more succesful and I’ll agree with you.
Right now I could give a crap about the coaching. I want to see players executing plays and frankly I don’t care what plays they are.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You seem to
go through the same progression every week. You’re frustrated with the game, so you pile on the players and defend the coaches and attack commenters.
I’m not blaming you, we’re all frustrated.
But the answer is probably in the middle.
I couldn’t tell you what plays. I would have run a play action fake to charles out of twin back to either tony on an out or lj in the flat. But I’m not an NFL coach. I don’t know what i’m talking about. But clearly the playcalling wasn’t succesful at some point because not only did we get creamed, but we went 4 and out from inside the 8.
Jesus.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only reason Im defending the coaches is because
They are being scapegoated.
Herms had winning seasons on teams that had talent. If he really was as horrible a coach as people are saying he is now that wouldn’t have happened would it?
Clearly it takes two parts. A cohesive semi-talented team + coaching.
Everyone else is taking the side of blaming the coaches, Im taking the side of saying the players need to be held accountable for not executing the plays.
Think it pretty much balances out.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He also has
a career sub.500 record. But you’re right, that argument is useless.
Thing is, no one on this thread was scapegoating. You jumped to that. I asked about that one play because I thought it was bad mangement. But come on, you know I’m not that dumb. It’s not like we were “that” close to winning. Tyler put us in a huge hole.
I just wanted to see what you thought about a place where I thought the coaching staff failed. Clearly you don’t think the coaches have done anything wrong this season. which is evident by the way we’ve been wiped off the map.
It will help your argument in getting people to be patient if you admit when they make mistakes.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Scapegoating happens all week long
And there are posts on this thread where it has been done. As I said before, not eveyrthing is about you. :)
Anyways, Im done talking about it. If we start winning it will go away, if we don’t, Herm will get fired and the next coach will come in and I will defend him when we have the exact same problems.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The coaches
Put the players in the best position to succeed, the coaches are not doing that.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 6:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
On agreeing with DJ
Agreeing with you makes me l uneasy. It just feels wrong. Like writing with my left hand, or drinking Bud Light.
If a season ever needed people with a sense of humor, it’s this one.
Thanks for the LOL, Matt.
by sunny D on Sep 21, 2008 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The guy wants to play
Show some class and let him go somewhere else. He’s done nothing but gut it out for us whenever he’s been asked to play. No one could have won for us (behind that line) last year. Prior to that all he did was WIN games for the Chiefs. All I’m saying is – if were not going to play him – give him to someone who will.
I support playing Thigpen while we wait for Brodie to heal – but it’s not fair to Huard to have to sit when he KNOWS that right now he IS the best Q.B. we have.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huard
would not make the roster on any other team in the NFL. I’m just going to tell you right now.
A 35 year old backup would not make the roster anywhere in the NFL. Neither would Thigpen. But don’t act like Huard is some warrior. I’ve heard several people notice that Damon plays with no intensity, no leadership, and no drive. He just goes out, throws an out-route to the flat, and gets sacked a lot.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
People need to stop trying to martyr the players on the team
Huard was straight up told that he was on the team to mentor the young guys this year. He’s a glorified coach because he is too old to be part of this teams future. He knew that when he decided to stay. In all honesty, Hurad is not good enough for people to feel sorry for. He’s lucky to still have a job.
It’s the same thing with Tony G, he knew the team was going to be rebuilding and there was a good chance he would never sniff the playoffs again. He wanted to remain a Chief no matter what.
These guys have their own choice in the matter and they have CHOSEN to remain Chiefs.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We owe it to Tony
to say “if you want, we’ll trade you to Pittsburgh. Is that what you want?” Out of our division, playoff contender.
We shouldn’t punish him for being true to this franchise.
Also, never mention Huard and Tony in the same sentence unless it’s describing Huard underthrowing him on a 10 yard pass.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thats the thing
Tony doesn’t WANT to go anywhere. The fans are trying to make a martyr out of him. He wants to be in KC and retire as a Chief so we need to quit trying to pawn him off.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't know
that, DJ. We don’t know if the team has just said “we won’t take the cap hit” or what. We have no clue. Unless Tony’s personally told you or said in an interview “I don’t want to be traded to a championship contender” I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting a good guy who did right by your team to retire a champion.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you mean we don't know?
He’s asked practically every week after every loss.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Chief DJ
the only guy in Chiefs Nation who doesn’t want better for Tony.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frankly I could care less
I love Tony G, but it obviously doesn’t make a whole lot of difference if he’s there or not right now. If he wanted to go somewhere else thats fine.
But he has made it clear time and time again that he does not because he is a Chief first and foremost no matter what. Kind of wish some Chiefs fans had that kind of loyalty to the team.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:34 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you don't already have that loyalty
Then you’ve already moved on as a fan. It’s seems clear that we’re all fans or we wouldn’t be here listening to you beak off :) I don’t appreciate not being considered a fan because I happen to dissagree on a paticular subject.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There are a lot of other people in KC than that come to this website
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The real fans
are the ones that support Herm. The rest are bandwaggoners and negative nellies. Am I getting the gist of this argument?
We’re all fans here. We just have different opinions on what’s best for the franchise we all love.
Except people that don’t like Herm. They’re just evil. Like Carnies. Smell hands. Smell like cabage.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You know thats not what I meant
Maybe everyone you know sits through every losing game, most of the people I know refuse to watch them and sit around bitching about them all day when they read Jason Whitlocks column in the Star
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need better fans.
Chris and I watched that whole Godforsaken game today and instead of being livid we’re on here talking about who did well, who improved as the game went on, and who needs work.
Also, how awesome was that Thigpen to Bowe touchdown?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lost my connection for a bit
DJ – My comment wasn’t meant to be any kind of personal attack and I sincerely apologize that it came across that way.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont take anything personally
We all get a little irritable on gameday. :)
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was talking to Chris about this today
What’s it going to be like when we’re all good again, regardless of how we get there?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't imagine
what I put up with being one of (maybe) 5 Chief fans in this city !!
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure just as soon as
A. We get rid of Carl Peterson
B. We get rid of Herm Edwards
C. We get better players to fit the system
D. The players we have start executing
E. We will never be good we will always suck
And there you have the gamut of Arrowhead Pride opinions.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had an interesting chat w/ Jabari Arthur
I was on the sidelines for the Stamps game (CFL) yesterday. They picked him up this week when the Chiefs released him from the practice roster. Nice kid – had nothing but good things to say about his experience down there !! I’d post something if I had any talent for doing so……..
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 5:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Access
That’s the difference between the MSM and blogs. If you’ve got the access then we WANT to hear it! Besides, you know I’ll try to fix your grammar anyway :)
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice, that helped :)
It was a one time, 2 day “Fantasy Head Coach” deal. Very cool experience. The day before the game we had full access to the players, the dressing room etc… I get to do it again next year (but I digress)
Thanks for the encouragement – I’ll think about it.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 6:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta agree with DJ
I think Tony has made it clear he wants to be a Chief, despite the circumstances.
by Chris Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 4:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And
We may owe it to him to trade him but if he doesn’t want to be traded, we can’t complain.
by Chris Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay.
That’s cool. I just tend to want to reward the good locker room guys who helped us win, instead of just giving gobs of money to guys who pouted on the sideline in between huge runs today and mouth off every thirty seconds.
Call me crazy.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I had a dog and his name was BINGO !! Good call !!
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What choice is that ??
Play me or I quit (and leave how much $ on the table – that’s just stupid) – Play me or release me – play me or trade me ?? Those are club options not player options.
So what your saying Huard should expect to sit and watch Ingle Martin come in if Thigpen gets hurt ?? Or do we bring in another Q.B. so Damon can sit ?? If he’s never suposed to play – release him (which we clearly aren’t going to do). So I’m not sure what you’re getting at here !!
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would
LOVE it if we cut him. LOVE it.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it would be the best thing as well
Since they have no intentions of playing him – why hasn’t he been released already ??
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pity.
The word is pity.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He didn't win football games
he just didn’t lose them. Our O-line is worse. Larry Johnson’s not going to win football games for us with this O-Line. Be careful what you wish for with Damon. Remember, he never played significantly better than Thigpen, it just seems like that because you’re reacting to what’s happening now.
"NEVER GOTTEN A FAIR SHAKE?’
Really? Starting all those games wasn’t a fair shake? Thigpen’s a bad quarterback, that much is obvious.
Huard is a bad, OLD quarterback. There’s no point in playing him.
We noticed this while watching the game today. All of Thigpen’s “good” passes were longer. They were based on the old “playing catch” principles, just using arm strength in the open field. His bad, terrible, horrible throws, were all short, to intermediate, which essentially are influenced by practice, coaching, and learning your progressions. So basiclally we can have Damon who is terrible at long throws and really good at throwing to the flat, or Thigpen who’s bad at throwing deep and HORRIBLE at throwing short. I’ll go with the guy who can at least hit Bowe in stride for a touchdown. That was a nice pass, give him that.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I recall
Huard hitting Darling perfectly in stride against N.E.. If Darling had better wheels – that play would have tired the game.
anyway…. this is a counterproductive discussion.
It’s Thigpen for now. Herm’s made that clear. I’m good w/ that – let’s move on…….
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I recall
Huard hanging balls repeatedly up in the air. He doesn’t have a strong arm. Never has. Check the scouting reports, look at the tape. The guy simply can’t throw long. Thigpen can’t throw well.
I know it sounds nuts. It sounds nuts to me too. I want the worse quarterback with more ability. Does that make sense? Damon’s a better quarterback (by, like, a percentage point), with less ability and more experience. That’s why he doesn’t make the same mistakes. Because he’s thrown the little two yard out-routes for 14 years.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:54 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not good with that.
I’d RATHER play Huard until Brodie comes back… Just MY OPINION!
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because
from your use of CAPS AND BOLD LETTERS AND LOUD NOISES! I can tell that you just want the team to win. Which is fine, but the whole plan is to try and win a Super Bowl,and that means building a foundation. And you need big plays to see who can make them.
Think of it this way. In the third quarter, Thigpen threw a nice pass that went too far, out of bounds, deep to Bowe, and he caught it anyway. But the throw was close, and deep.
If Huard threw that, it would get hung up and picked off because he doesn’t have the arm strength. So instead, he’d throw to Cox in the flat.It would be complete, and he’d get tackled after a gain of two.
But all that does is frustrate Bowe. And we don’t want to do that.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:58 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ok, Ridiculous Matt...
If youre reading anything I’m saying… then you’d understand that I dont think that Thigpen is good enough… I want to win games while Brodie is out (:::here com your caps::: WITH HUARD!!). Thigpen sucks. I’d rather evaluate Brodie than Thigpen.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
why do you
want to win games so badly? If it means hurting Bowe’s development and increasing the number of times Cox gets whacked so he’s not able to block as well?
I mean, I want them to win if they can, but it’s not the goal. I get what you’re saying. I mean, everyone here agrees that if we could, we’d have just about any other starting quarterback in the nfl, right? Does anyone here really think that Croyle, Huard, or Thigpen is better than what we can find elsewhere through trade or free agency?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want Croyle to start...
As planned…
Then we can see what he offers (when healthy).
Meanwhile, Huard can play to try to give us momentum and a couple wins. EMPHASIS on ‘try’.
I’d like to pick up Jeff Garcia next year and draft another stud QB.
Play Garcia for a year or 2. And either have Brodie or the kid step up.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 4:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
wins
only move us further from the top of the draft class. Wins mean nothing if we’re just masking our ineptitude.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
HAHAHA!
That “bad, OLD quarterback” has a better chance to win than Thigpen. It’s blatantly obvious. I mean, it shows in the game against New England. Now, I’m not saying that Huard is that guy to give us our WINS… NO! Ofcourse NOT! The rest of our team has to rally. ESPECIALLY our O-Line. Huard is a statue in the backfield, BUT there is a distinct difference between getting our asses handed to us, and losing the way we lost last year… We never got too far behind, besides the game against Denver.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:53 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Shows in the game versus New England"
really? Because I saw him be just as much a part of that loss as anyone.
But we were also never threatening. That’s the difference with Brodie and, for about a quarter with Thigpen today, we actually had a shot at threatening. We looked like a mobile offense.
With Damon we’ll get two first downs, he’ll have 15 yards, we’ll punt. There’s no play potential. He can’t make plays. Thigpen can. He doesn’t a lot of the time, because he’s a worse quarterback. But he has more of what we’re looking for.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow..
I’m BARELY making sense of what you’re saying.
But we WERE in threat in the last drive against New England. Huard did his job. He threw a PERFECT pass to D-Bowe. And he dropped it. LJ ran up the gut, O-Line didnt make room. Huard threw another pass that D-Bowe WOULD have caught, if it wasnt for that nasty P.I.
Huard made the plays he needed to.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:59 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And until...
Brodie comes back… I’d rather have that better chance at winning with Huard then an evaluation thing with Thigpen.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gee I always thought that
when your STARTING Q.B. goes down – you put in your 2nd stringer NOT your 3rd. Thigpen will get better (agreed). But do you want him as your 2nd guy behind Brodie ?? Thigpen should be holding a clip board for one more year at least or let Huard go……..release him if you have to – but to play Thigpen over him at this point is ridiculous Matt !! (sorry I couldn’t help that – I trust you know this is all just fun banter :)
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I really hope
they start Huard. I really do. Because we’ll be right back to last year when we were all begging them to put Brodie in (I know, UC, not you, I know), because Huard was terrible. God, it’s days like this that make me see how DJ sees things, we’re so overreactive some days just because we want one more win, so we can be 3-13 versus 2-14? really?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't have a Q.B.
that’s capable of beating the Bronco’s. So your point is moot…
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I totally agree. I said this above, but I’ll ask again. Would anyone not rather have a better quarterback on roster than the three we have? I would kill to go back and trade LJ and our 5 pick to get Ryan.
I’d give anything, and I think Dorsey’s going to be great. I love everything about Ryan. Arm, focus, leadership, moxy. He’s great.
We all know neither Huard nor Thigpen is the answer. it just comes down to whether you’d rather watch Huard throw out routes to Mike Cox or watch Thigpen overthrow Bowe.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I gotta go...
Leave it at that.. Huard sucks, but he’s better than Thigpen. I dont wanna see neither of them. But if I had to choose.. It’d be Huard.
I’m waiting for Brodie to come back.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 4:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ryan is having success because his team can run the ball
Looked what happened with the Chiefs in the 2nd half. LJ got going and all the sudden Thigpen looks 10 times better.
It all starts with the offensive line being able to block the run. If they can do that, it makes everything else about the team look a whole lot better.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He also
drilled several long passes. Give him that, DJ. He’s purely got more quarterback talent than the guys in our jerseys.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:24 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why was he able to do that?
Because our defense was looking for the run every time.
I’m not saying Ryan doesn’t have talent. I’m just saying that when you have a running game that is making the defense look bad they bite on every play action pass and end up out of position.
If we had a running game with the Chiefs any of our QBs would look a lot better and be completing some passes down the field as well.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:27 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude
everything doesn’t start and end with the run. I know you think it does, but it’s no longer 1990. It’s a balance. It’s not just setting up the pass with the run. It’s keeping the defense guessing no matter what. Because a lot of the time we saw today that there were holes, and there was effort, but because the defense freaking knew EVERY time we were going to run? They held us on first down. There’s establishing the run, and there’s being predictable.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But it does
The Patriots with Tom Brady have enough talent on their team to pass every down. They are the only team in the NFL that can do that. Every other NFL team has to run the ball.
Ryan is a young QB and young QBs that have the world thrust on their shoulders with no running game fail. Plain and simple.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree.
here’s the main difference between me and you.
You think they should run to set up the pass and think that I think running to set up the pass isn’t important. In reality, I think we need a balanced offense because since the rule changes to restrict cornerbacks, youv’e seen more scoring and less power running games. You can run the ball with a multitude of running backs like denver or new england without restricting your cap space by signing a guy toa billion dollars.
It’s not plain and simple. NFL football is not plain and simple. That’s the kind of thought that’s gotten us in this situation. It’s a remarkably complicated game.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes every team needs a balanced offense
But a young QB ESPECIALLY needs time to learn how to play in the NFL. Its completely different than college.
If you don’t have a running game, the defense just keys off on your QB like teams have been doing with the Chiefs and destroying the QB.
Patriots can get away with it because they have a good O-line thats been together a while, a Hall of Fame QB and the best WR in the NFL.
Every other team in the NFL, even the Colts, has to run the ball.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 4:50 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again
I’m not debating we need to be able to run.
But it seems like in every key situation you want them to run. That passing should only be a bail out option. But that’s what causes the run,run, pass, punt offense. We need to mix it up.
To be fair, teams have been keying off on our quarterback even when we have run the ball.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not true at all
But the whole reason the Chiefs aren’t having success on offense is because they can’t succesfully block the run.
LJ breaks out in the 2nd half and all the sudden our offense looks 100 times better than in the 1st. WRs magically start getting open because they now have to honor the run.
You need to mix it up, but doing that is not succesful until you have established the run first. Right now we are playing with far below average, barely belong in the NFL QBs and they are NOT going to be succesful throwing the ball if we aren’t running it well. The 1st half was a perfect example of that being true.
by ChiefDJ on Sep 21, 2008 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
it’s true that when the running game got going our offense looked a lot better.
But we tend to want to establish the run right into an early,deep grave sometimes.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you told me that LJ
would run 24 times for 122 yards and a touchdown and we would lose 38-14 I would never have believed it. The running game is important, but it is equally important to be able to pass. The game definitely is changing.
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 5:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
::caps:: AGAIN!
We’re waiting for Brodie (which shouldnt be more than 2 more weeks) MEANWHILE, I’d rather play our 2nd string QB then an incapable Tyler Thigen!
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 4:08 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What
so being 2nd string gives you some right? He’s old, he’s immobile, and he has no arm.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:11 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Okay
it’s a personal opinion.
I hate Damon’s game. He’s a journeyman quarterback that played over his head in 2006 and had us sneak into the playoffs. He’s got a weak arm and no big play ability, and he’s a statue behind an O-line that necessitates mobility. His completion rate is high because he throws 2 yard outs, and he got a lot more scores over the last two years because our defense was better than it is this year.
Thigpen’s a bad quarterback who at least showed a little improvement as this game went on and has physical tools. I’ll take “bad that could get better” over “mediocre who masks his ineptitude.”
But again, I don’t care that much about wins. Or the caps-lock.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just got back home from watching the game
And that was rough. Thigpen had flashes of competence, which was nice.
The overwhelmingly feeling I got from this game was, again, the lack of direction and planning by the coaching staff.
by Chris Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:31 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Some bright sides
Chris and I watched the game together, and I have to say, I feel like there were more bright spots in this game than I was expecting.
First half until the last drive: Thigpen looked like the worst quarterback ever. In the history of the football. Not just the NFL. Ever.
But then, something happened. The chains came off, and the two scoring drives? Those were good. Even Chris, who I can tell absolutely hates Bones’ throw, was pretty impressed. We were coming back. And then?
We ran the ball on 3rd downs. and then on fourth down and goal.
Our defense really let us down today. I’ve been protecting them saying that the offense was putting them in impossible situations, but the defense really let us down.
I’m not saying Thigpen is a good starting quarterback, but he made some plays, like the scramble.
I KNEW people were going to start screaming for Damon after this game, but bear in mind that Tyler’s driven two touchdown drives. The last interception was a gimme, the game was over and Bowe fell down. He’s a bad quarterback, I’m not saying he’s not. But he started to at least improve. With Damon, you’re going to get the same marginal to below marginal production on every play.
At this point, I want them to start Damon just to shut up all the people that forgot how abysmally pathetic and uninspiring he has. I’d rather suffer with a terrible quarterback with potential than with a terrible quarterback with no upside.
There are no trades coming, there is no upside. And just when we started to put together some drives, our coaching absolutely killed us today. You can say all you want about the players, but at the end of the day, the players got us down the field, most effectively in the two minute drill, outside of our “normal” offense, and the playcalling was horrid.
Mike Cox is for real. That guy’s a tank. It’s nice to have a legit fullback again. Albert had the one terrible play where he got destroyed by Abraham, but other than that, he played really well, especially in the run game.
Page continues to show that he’s really an up and comer. On a team with no playmakers, he’s stepping up.
The linebacking corp is turning into a weak spot with Donnie Edwards age. That’s not good.
Have I mentioned how good Matt Ryan looked? I would kill to have our franchise be where the Falcons are at with coaching, personnel, general management, and direction.
Think about that.
Again, it’s fine to call for Damon, but just make sure you have your “PLAY MARTIN!” post ready when he fails as well. Tyler had three drives where he looked good and he really did make some improvements in this game. That first 28 minutes was wretched, no denying it, but he got better. Pay attention to that.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:34 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Matt Ryan looked like a great NFL QB today. His poise, his throws…Atlanta has a solid foundation there.
by Chris Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But just as it was already brought out...
At least Huard gives us a chance to win… At least Huard HAS won for us before. Thigpen had chances in both games against OAK and a full game today… and nothin’. And it must be easy when LJ can break over a 40 yard run on a drive.
Im not saying Damon is our savior… Im actually anticipation Brodie to come back, the guy that was ORIGINALLY to get the nod and chance.
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:43 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Damon
also lost a ton of games for us last year.
He doesn’t WIN us games. He just doesn’t lose them. And that doesn’t help the direction of the team. We need to give Bowe the chance to go out and catch some balls. Damon gives Mike Cox the opportunity to catch some balls. Also, that 15 yard scramble Thigpen made where he juked the guy for the first down? Damon tries that and he’ll break his hip.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
If You Want To Play That Game
Croyle had a lot more to do with our losing ways than Huard did, since the Chiefs didn’t win a single game that Croyle started and Croyle performed worse than Huard.
At least Huard gives the other players on offense a chance to develop. Thigpen, on the other hand, can’t hit 50% of his throws and continuing to stick him out there is just validation of Herm Edwards’ incompetence as a head coach.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 4:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here we go.
I knew you’d come calling.
Huard doesn’t give a chance for the offense to develop. Today clarified that for me. Bowe had the opportunity to make plays. Do you notice that Bowe didn’t take off until Croyle came in last year? Huard can’t throw deep. Huard’s great for Mike Cox’s catching stats, but that’s not really what we need, now is it?
I don’t really care about wins, we’ve been over that. If we had let Thigpen throw on that fourth down, I’d feel a lot better.If he’d thrown an INT, I would be like “okay, he can’t do it, let’s ditch him and bring in Huard.” If he’d thrown a touchdown, we’d say “hey, two touchdowns, that’s not a bad day.” He had moments today where he looked like he could lead, especially that last two minute drill (why do our offenses only look good in the two minute drill? could it be that the rest of our offensive plan is flawed? Naaaaahh).
I’m just saying, I’d rather lose with Thigpen and have the potential for guys to make plays than win by 3 with Huard knowing we still looked anemic.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You Must Love Unsubstantiated Arguments...You Make Them All The Time
Huard doesn’t give a chance for the offense to develop.
And that opinion is based on what? The fact that he led to our scoring drive against the Patriots? The fact that he’s statistically outperformed both Croyle and Thigpen as a passer? No wait, those facts actually disprove your argument..
Oh wait, I forgot…it’s because Huard’s old and an old QB with some ability is therefore worse than a young QB with no ability so therefore starting a guy who can’t be counted on to execute half of his plays is soooo much better than putting in a guy who can actually complete passes.
Seriously, I have no clue where you get your ideas on football.
Bowe had the opportunity to make plays.
Sure…when the Falcons D let up after they had a huge lead. When they pressed us, though, Bowe got shut down just like everyone else because Thigpen couldn’t get him the ball.
Do you notice that Bowe didn’t take off until Croyle came in last year?
No, I didn’t notice that…mainly because you’re wrong. Bowe’s best game of the season came against San Diego (164 yards and 1 TD) while Huard was the starter. And he had more yardage in the first seven games of the season than he did in the last nine (when Croyle got most of his starts). Maybe you should look up the actual numbers first before you try engaging me in an argument about statistics instead of just pulling the numbers out of your ass…because you should know by now that I look them up :)
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/players/gamelog?playerId=10467&sYear=2007
I don’t really care about wins, we’ve been over that
Well then this season should make you ecstatic, because there’s a pretty good chance we won’t have any this year. Of course I don’t really consider that a good thing since a team that goes winless and gets blown out by other bottom feeders is a team that lacks either talent or coaching, or both…and because losing is contagious.
If we had let Thigpen throw on that fourth down, I’d feel a lot better.If he’d thrown an INT, I would be like "okay, he can’t do it, let’s ditch him and bring in Huard."
Ah, so failing on fourth down pass attempts is the only event that would cause you to give up on Thigpen? Very lucky for Thigpen, considering how infrequently those come along. I figured it might have been when he threw that pick-6 to Houston when Thigpen targeted Dwayne Bowe after Bowe fell down (and wasn’t open before he fell). Or when he completed 20% of his passes when the Atlanta defense was actually playing their best. Or when he flung the ball way off target on deep throws. Those are usually the tipoffs to me that a QB lacks the ability to be good enough to start. Personally, I was yelling for Huard after the 1st quarter…when there was at least a slim chance we could be competitive. But of course, I was at home watching on TV so I suppose I can’t really fault Herm for not listening to my advice…although he should have been smart enough to figure that out on his own, considering he does this job for a living and all.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 8:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
OUCH!
I’m not sure I want to go the the Annual Arrowheadpride Picnic!
I WAS invited right?
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's Nothing Personal Against Matt
But this isn’t the first time he’s trotted out this argument and it’s probably time that someone told him that it’s not supported by the numbers or reality he seems to think supports it :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 8:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is what I like
about this format. It brings out different sides to how we view our team.
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 8:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh you
and your silly reliance on facts and science.
fine. Damon Huard iz teh shitz.
Like I said, I want them to start him so that maybe people will remember how little quarterbacking ability the man has.
You’re really big on completion ratio. I just see a lot of three yard outs when Huard’s in. But that’s just me. Please, Herm, put him in. Please?
By the way, using the “The Falcons weren’t really trying” was a weak argument. The rest of your comment was thorough, effective, and convincing. But seriously. Come on. This is the NFL. And if you go down the “They weren’t really trying!” road, you wind up with all sorts of assumptions that are hard to define. I admit Huard’s a better quarterback. I just know that our team isn’t going any further with him than Bones. Hopefully Herm will give Huard a shot next week and we can answer the question.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 9:14 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
Because in the half of football I saw him play against the Patriots I saw him lead us to our only scoring drive. And in the second game I saw him hit 50% of his throws in four attempts, which is something that Thigpen has yet to do.
And what I actually said was that the Falcons defense let up on the Chiefs once they got a lead…which they did. Then when the Chiefs started climbing back into it they clamped down again and made Thigpen look like a guy who had no business playing QB in the NFL.
I admit Huard’s a better quarterback. I just know that our team isn’t going any further with him than Bones.
And I agree that Huard’s not a guy we want starting, but he’s the only legitimate starter we’ve got and our receivers need a guy who can get them the ball, which Huard can do. It’s not just about the quarterback right now, it’s about everyone else on the offense who need to know that their QB at least knows what he’s doing out there and can perform at an NFL level. Thigpen can’t. Unless he can stay healthy, Croyle certainly can’t. If the Chiefs let this go on, the players will give up on the season. We saw it happen at the end of last year when the players knew the team wasn’t competitive, we’ll see it happen as soon as they players realize the coaching staff can’t fix things this year. Nobody’s going to go all out and get themselves beat down any more than they have on a team that doesn’t care about winning…they’ll coast if they think it will get them through the season with less injuries. That’s just the way it is with bad football teams.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thigpen 2TDs.
More than Huard. Scoreboard! Suck it!
*that’s sarcasm by the way.
Again, I really want to see us with Huard. One thing is that the Huard we’ve seen this year and last year isn’t the same Huard we saw in 2006 and the first few weeks of 2007. He’s lost something. But maybe not. Maybe he’s a tiger, waiting to be unleashed! Rowr!
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 11:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huard's Decline
One thing is that the Huard we’ve seen this year and last year isn’t the same Huard we saw in 2006 and the first few weeks of 2007.
I won’t argue with the position that Huard’s not as good as last season. He’s getting old and decline’s inevitable with all players, but I can’t help but think that part of that is because his line is so bad on the right side. I agree that he’s probably not going to be anything special…best we can probably hope for is a QB in the top 20, and even that’s probably wishful thinking (he finished 22nd last year). In the top 25 would probably be more realistic, but I think it’ll be better than what Thigpen will ever do, and probably Croyle as well (he didn’t look much different in his first game than he did last season…even before he got hurt). And I also agree that Huard needs to be gone by the start of next season…he’s only an option for this year at best.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 21, 2008 11:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
*fist pound
See? I find all of us arguing about Huard vs. Croyle and Huard vs. Thigpen and the end of the argument is that
THEY BOTH SUCK. WE NEED A NEW QUARTERBACK.
Along with a new O-line, D-line, linebacking corp, wide receiver corp behind DBowe, coaching staff, general manager, concessions guy, ticket manager, parking lot attendant and mascot.
*not actually true. the concessions guy, ticket manager, parking lot attendant and mascot all do great jobs. keep up the good work!
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 11:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where We Differ
Is that I don’t see too many options out there that are worth what we’d have to pay.
Don’t get me wrong, despite all my bagging on the team I do believe a youth movement is the way to go, and the way you have a successful one is to hang onto your draft picks and only spend them when you have a guaranteed return of value (and also to have a coach who can develop that talent, but that’s another debate). Brady Quinn is not a guaranteed return of value…he’s a backup QB who’s playing behind a starter that isn’t that good. I’d rather the Chiefs put their entire focus on grabbing Losman this offseason, drafting a lineman with our top 5 pick, and drafting a college QB sometime after that rather than shoot the moon with our top 5 pick on Brady Quinn in the hopes he’ll be a superstar. This is how we got into trouble with Brodie Croyle this year…the team bet the farm on the idea that Croyle was ready and able to play and stay healthy and that backfired immediately.
Also, remember that this is Carl Peterson who’s high on Brady Quinn. He’s gone off about Quinn’s presence, and charisma and intangibles, but when was the last time that Carl Peterson was right about his evaluation of whether a young QB was able to play in the NFL? If there’s one thing that Carl Peterson has proven over his tenure here it’s that he’s completely incapable of figuring out who is and isn’t a good quarterback until that quarterback has had a track record in the NFL (Grbac, Bono, Montana, Krieg, Green, DeBerg…all had substantial playing time before coming here). Every time he’s gone after a prospect that’s an unknown quantity he’s failed miserably. Do you think a top five pick is worth expending on an unproven QB based on Carl Peterson’s track record?
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 22, 2008 1:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
I wouldn’t mind it, because at least it’s doing something. To be honest, I’m a much bigger fan of going after free agent veteran qbs than drafting. I feel like the draft is a bust. They rarely come available, it’s true, but then you get situations like New Orleans getting Drew Brees. Of course then you get situations like Matt Schaub (vomit).
But I guess the best option would be to set us up with a competition with a young backup qb and a top draft pick and see which one sinks or swims. I know cap problems are there, but we’ve got the space to burn at least.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 22, 2008 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Doing Something Is Not The Same As Doing Something Good
Drafted QBs are never something you want to bet your franchise on, which is why I think Quinn is such a bad trade. We’re basically drafting Quinn with a top 5 pick and we’ve got no idea whether he can play or not (because he isn’t playing in Cleveland). We’ve got a lot of areas we can work on…offensive line, defensive line, linebacker, etc that pick can address that will be less of a crapshoot than Quinn.
You’ll note, by the way, that Brees was a unrestricted free agent signed by New Orleans for zero compensation, much like Losman is this season and that his numbers weren’t that much better than Losman’s over the course of his career to the point he hit free agency. Plus, Losman’s not coming off shoulder surgery like Brees was, so he’s not the gamble Brees was. Is Losman the answer? Maybe not, but he’ll do until the answer comes along.
Schaub, on the other hand, was traded…and he represents the big problem with trades for backup QBs. You never know if the guy is going to justify the pick you give up for him.
As far as this relates to Quinn, I think it’s a moot point anyway. I suspect Quinn will be the starter in Cleveland before long based on how badly things are going right now so I doubt the Browns will deal him.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Sep 22, 2008 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re:
Unfortunately, 22 incompletions and 3 interceptions won’t win you anything.
…ahem:
Passing___CP/AT___YDS___TD__INT
B. Griese___38/67___407____2___3
Not sayin’… Just sayin’…
by Mully on Sep 21, 2008 3:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Ok...
But Griese threw for over 400… ADD throwing for only a little over 100 to that list of “WONT get it done.”
by ROC 27 on Sep 21, 2008 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our offense
isn’t geared to throw long. Most of the passes are geared short. They have been since the current coach took over.
I would love to have Griese, by the way.
And Thigpen had a stretch there where he was actually really accurate. And was picking up yards. We were also using screens, long throws, and working the sidelines.
Then we went back to Herm Ball. Fail.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Touche
It was also against Kyle Orton and Co. who gave 2 of them back.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 4:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would give
three bottles of port for Neckbeard. He’s exactly the type of quarterback we could win with. Would I rather have someone with “talent”? Sure. But I’ve forgotten what that’s like.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Breaking
St. Louis Rams are pushing the Chiefs for title of worst team in the NFL.
Down 17-3 halfway through the 2nd and Seattle is in the red zone.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 4:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I watched the Rams last week
they still have playmakers and I think they have (gulp) the coaching edge. I know it sounds nuts, but they seem to just catch bad break after bad break, versus us who leap headlong into ineptitude.
But don’t worry, when Huard comes back, we’ll win!
*shoots himself
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I watched a bunch of that game as well
and I agree – they do seem to be shooting themselves in the foot.
I really hope Thigpen starts – you’re too funny to lose to suicide at such a young age.
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 4:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
See
that won’t help though, because Thigpen will start, and struggle, and people will hammer him. I want to see Damon fail more than I want to see Thigpen succeed.
This is what this team has done to me. I actually root for some of their players to fail so that we can have clarification of how much they suck. What universe am I living in?
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Note
this isn’t true. If they put Damon in, i’ll root for him, just like the rest of you. I’ll just be throwing up in a bucket the whole time.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Matt...you got any extra paper bags?
Damon’s got a noodle for an arm he’s about lost all his zip on his passes.
by aPacificChief on Sep 21, 2008 4:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd toss you one
but my arm’s like Damon’s and it’ll just get caught in the wind and float away.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know the tension is high this afternoon
And I thank everyone for not insulting those they disagree with.
by Chris Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 4:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
no need to insult anyone
I love all of you. Except Damon. And DJ. Just kidding. I love DJ. Not Huard. He can get bent. Also, his highlights look stupid.
Everyone take a second and realize how much we’re arguing over backup quarterbacks behind a quarterback everyone considers bad.
We’re A. The most devoted fanbase in the NFL and B. In Hell.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
oh,
and to make that point I really should SAY that what I THINK is that HUARD is BAD!!!!!
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 4:38 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dont think hes bad!
uuuuughhh
Naming my son Brodie Damon
by troy145 on Sep 21, 2008 6:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
Fred Taylor just showed more heart and intensity than any Chiefs player has all season. The old guy can still get it done.
Note: Old running backs>old quarterbacks.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Fred Taylor
Then let’s make a run at his son who looks to be pretty unreal for an 8th grader paying varsity. So, 8 more years?
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 5:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We should be good about then.
Sounds good. Break!
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brodie made varsity in 8th grade
Naming my son Brodie Damon
by troy145 on Sep 21, 2008 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Matt Jones
fresh off his offseason coke bust is lighting up the Colts right now.
The world is weird.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 5:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I really don't want to rub salt in an open wound
but we have other BIG problems beside the Quarterback position. Kickoffs were horrendous and the missed kick might be the end of Novak (Where’s Feeley when you need him?). The defense is a sieve. I really thought that old man Gunther would have had that shored up for this week, althought the Falcons offense is more balanced and better than anything we had seen this year. Our D line should be better! I don’t get it. Glen Freakin Dorsey and Tank Tyler should be controlling the line of scrimmage. I am sure that part of Herm’s rebuilding plan was for our defense to be good enough to keep us in the ballgame but what we have seen so far scares me. This is the side of the ball we have addressed more since Herm has been here. The linebackers are quite average and quite frankly they have to be tackle machines when you play the Cover 2! And do I really need to go over the O line?
I feel better.
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 6:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Should be o-line first
Gotta score points, if you cannot score points you have no chance.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 6:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dorsey's not going to dominate
he’s too young. Honestly I think most of the run problems were linebacker issues today, without seeing tape.
Yeah, the fact that we play with a 9-7 win goal is kind of compromised by our inability to find a good field goal kicker.
I’d like to say again that Tynes won the fucking NFC championship after we let him go.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Linebacker issues
To me, a lot of our problems seemed pretty fundamental like careless tackling by guys like Pat Thomas. Not being prepared to play falls on the coaches. Or not having the ability to play falls on the coaches.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're clearly unaware
that preparedness falls on the player. All coaches do is select who plays, design the plays, talk to the players, and invest time and energy to those players.
Or something.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 6:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dorsey could dominate!
I truly thought he was the most Pro ready player in the draft. I know D tackles struggle early,but I thought he would be better than most. If Herm does not lose the team, and these young guys start to learn from this adversity, I still think we can show improvement towards the end of the year. This has to come from players like Dorsey.
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 6:28 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know why Herm likes McIntosh....because he uses the swing gate approach on Kickers too..
I guess we’re gonna be bringing in Connor Barth again.
by aPacificChief on Sep 22, 2008 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
When you can score and score quick you always have a chance.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 6:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Balance
Not if we’re playing the Colts in the playoffs, apparently.
You need to have balance. Good defense, good offense. Good passing, good running. Good blocking, good blitzing. Good tackling, good coverage. It’s balance. Yeah, you’re going to be better at some things than others. But you can’t overcompensate for being bad at something by being really good at the opposite.
Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.
by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 21, 2008 6:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You need to have competent d
But the defense has been put first the last three years, it has got us nothing, yes you need to have balance. You also have to be able to score, there is no substitute for points.
by Eric Allen on Sep 21, 2008 6:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Right now
I would say that we are towards the bottom of the league in Offensive and Defensive stats. Special teams are not very good either. I would love some balance.
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 6:22 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Rams
are dead last in offensive and defensive yards and 2nd to last in offensive and defensive points.
And they’re gettin’ worked in Seattle so hopefully it stays that way and we can continue to be 2nd worst.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I never
thought that I would root for other teams to be worse than us. Could it get any worse? Oh yeah, if the Rams start winning!
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 6:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
We probably don't have to worry about that
I don’t see a winnable game until week 11 against the 49ers.
Then again we’ve already passed our two easiest tests and lost them both.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
is brodie starting next week?
Naming my son Brodie Damon
by troy145 on Sep 21, 2008 6:35 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The original diagnosis
Was 2-3 weeks. I imagine Herm keeps him out longer than necessary so my guess is nope.
by Joel Thorman on Sep 21, 2008 6:56 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Westbrook twisted an ankle
When do the LJ to Philly rumors get started?
by TheQ on Sep 21, 2008 7:05 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I understand that
daily Hyperbaric Chamber sesions can significantly reduce recovery times w/ certain injuries (knee, shoulder). Does anyone know if the Chiefs use or have access to one for their injured players ?? The Flames (NHL) use one here for their players. Just curious…….
by Cat Stabber on Sep 21, 2008 7:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I cant believe theyre knocking down Yankee Stadium
Im a young guy so Ive only been a sports fan for about 10ish yrs, but man… just seems like such a shame. A real piece of America.
And I effin hate the yankees.
Naming my son Brodie Damon
by troy145 on Sep 21, 2008 7:39 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
DJ's break out year
he looked awful. just awful. looks like this won’t be the break out year I’ve been hearing about every year since his rookie campaign. well, there’s always next year, and the year after that…
by rdub on Sep 21, 2008 8:37 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
LJ, play-calling, and predictability
Anyne got the numbers on how often we’ve passed this year, when LJ’s in, vs. when he’s not?
I think that they are keying their ‘s on LJ, since he can’t/won’t pass-block.
If I’m right, play-action won’t work, and scheming against us is damn near a slam-dunk. On /one/ drive, LJ ran like he meant it, and it got results. The he either quit inside, or the D adjusted the scheme, and shut him down.
I think out play-calling is predictable because LJ makes us predictable. Based on this season’s numbers, can anyone prove me wrong?
by Bleedingredandgold on Sep 21, 2008 8:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















