Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Want to help build SB Nation? We're hiring! Bar-right-arrows



spread the word

Friday Morning Update: Need to Know Edition

It's all need to know info, right?

  • One of the unverified rumors circling KC this week has been that Damon Huard asked to be taken out of the Raiders game, or that he had gotten on Herm's bad side and coach got fed up with him. Not sure if either of those is true but I wanted to throw them out there.

  • Brodie Croyle and Pat Surtain are the only Kansas City Chiefs not practicing according to the injury report. Looks like Nap Harris and Will Franklin are a go this weekend but I'm unsure of how much they'll play, if at all.

  • Harm Edwards? It could stick.

  • Within two weeks, Tony Gonzalez should surpass Shannon Sharpe on the all-time receiving yards for a tight end list. He needs 85 yards to do it.That would give TG the most touchdowns by a tight end; the most receptions by a tight end; and the most receiving yards by a tight end. Greatest. Ever.

  • Eh, why not? Early Look: NFL Draft Top 100 Prospects from Rivals.com.

  • I suppose it's about time to start using this phrase - "The Nextel portion of Sprint Nextel has been losing subscribers even faster than the Kansas City Chiefs have been losing starting quarterbacks lately."

  • Jeffrey Flanagan says: "Be patient. It will get better."

  • One more item of note from the Comment of the Day on Flanagan's blog - "My family has had season tickets for 35+ years. I would like a partial credit towards next year, please."

    No. No you should not get a freakin' partial refund. Do you know how exchanging money for a product works? You paid to see a football season. Not a winning football season. A season. You did not pay for a specific football strategy. No team can guarantee wins. It was your decision to buy the season tickets. The Chiefs did not make you do that. Maybe if you paid an ounce of attention to the team you would know that the expectations for this year were zero. At least for the educated fans they were.

    You wouldn't demand a refund on your wedding because you and your wife got in a fight, would you?

    The reader comment ends like this: "How great would it be if all the fans boycotted and stayed in the parking lot for a whole game?" Seriously dude? You just lost your Chiefs' fan privileges. Give your tickets to someone who actually wants to watch football and stay the hell away from me.


  • Speaking of wives and the Chiefs...


  • More Quinn talk: Brady Quinn Will Not Be A Member of the Kansas City Chiefs.

  • No TV blackout in Atlanta. Get used to hearing about Chiefs blackouts this year. It's the lazy story to file on Wednesday for reporters because the sell-by date for the NFL is Thursdays at 1 PM for Sunday games.

  • I forgot where I read it but someone compared Damon Huard to a few of the guys in the cart in this clip.

  • styg50 from MHR picked the Chiefs to win this weekend!

  • Finally, and I'm stretching a bit here, does it bother you that Tyler Thigpen's alma mater's football program is only five years old? It has no bearing on his play in the NFL today but I'm just saying. That's a young program.

Wooh..that's a lot of links. Come back throughout the day if you don't get to read them all this morning. Enjoy those and we'll have this week's Know Thy Enemy coming up shortly. Also, please take part in our demographic poll below. Thanks!

Poll
Where do you live?
Northeast (PA, MD, DE, NJ, CT, RI, MA, NH, ME, VT, NY)
31 votes
Southeast (WV, VA, NC, SC, GA, AL, MS, LA, AR, FL, TN, KY)
42 votes
Southwest (AZ, NM, TX, OK)
20 votes
Midwest (ND, SD, MN, IA, WI, IL, IN, OH, MI, NE, KS, MO)
136 votes
West (WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, CO, UT, NV, CA)
37 votes
Hawaii or Alaksa
4 votes
Europe
8 votes
Asia
2 votes
Australia
1 votes
Somewhere else
12 votes

293 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 55 comments | Digg!

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thigpen

I think of how long his school’s had football every time I hear someone pump up his college accomplishments by noting he set all the records. Of course he set all the records, he graduated two years ago and they didn’t even have football before he got there.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 8:11 AM CDT   0 recs

Ha

He was their first QB ever!

by Chris on Sep 19, 2008 8:12 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

But He Set All The Records!!!

That makes him great!!!

:)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 8:19 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Seriously

what did Bones do to you?

All he’s ever wanted is to go out there, live his dream, play the game he loves, then go home and have sex with a skeleton. Why do you have to hate him for that, huh?

So he was the first quarterback. All that means is he set a high standard early! And if that’s not good enough for you, then you can go have sex with a LIVE person, okay?

Dear God, the kid hasn’t come out and said he’s going to toss for 300 yards. Give him a break (and a skeleton to have sex with).

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 1:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

If It Makes You Feel Any Better

I don’t begrudge the kid a living or an attempt to live the dream of being a pro football player. Seems like a nice enough guy, with a sense of humor I’d appreciate. It’s not really his fault that he’s the homeless man’s Mike McMahon…but unfortunately that’s the level he performs at so it’s not really a disservice to him to point that out.

Also, it’s nothing personal towards him and I won’t blame him all that much if he has a rotten game…like you said, it’s not like he’s promising to be Manning or Brady. It’s also not like he’s writing himself into the starting lineup.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 3:42 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

And when

he throws for 250 yards, 2 TDs, then goes home and bags three members of the Army of Darkness, you’ll be singin’ a different tune.

Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 4:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LMFAO

I love that movie.

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 4:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

One of the unverified rumors circling KC this week.....

is this just going about the residents or is there another outlet we should pay attention to?

by dkugler838 on Sep 19, 2008 8:28 AM CDT   0 recs

Interesting discussion

on one of the local sports shows yesterday here in Omaha, NE, the guest was a guy from Yahoo Sports or Fox (can’t remember which) who was asked about Vince Youngs future. He was saying that he needs an offense that will get him outside the pocket. Tennesse runs primarily between the tackles. The host then said he knew a perfect place for VY – with Chan Gailey. The guest then said “Yeah, Vince Young could end up in Kansas City.”

Just thought that was interesting. Could that be a good thing?

by dkugler838 on Sep 19, 2008 8:30 AM CDT   0 recs

With Chan Gailey I guess I see the connection

But I would not want this to happen one bit. Not at all. Him and Vick are in the same category, in my opinion. I just don’t like running backs with a penchant for injury.

by primetime 07 on Sep 19, 2008 8:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed in the sense

that he is very sensitive. However I wouldn’t put him in the Vick Category just yet. He got he feelings hurt and is pouting about it.

From a football strategy standpoint I think it would be good. If there was always the threat of playaction then it could open up the inside run game. If Vince gets out in the open and was asked to only make the easy throws to guys like Gonzalez, Bowe and Cottam then I think he could flourish.

Not trying to stir any pots just heard the idea and thought about it

by dkugler838 on Sep 19, 2008 8:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I hear ya

What I meant in the comparison to Vick is just on the football field. Neither are very accurate and haven’t really helped their teams do a whole lot. The Titans definitely made the playoffs in spite of Young.

by primetime 07 on Sep 19, 2008 9:11 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

oh definitely -

my thoughts are if Gailey can make the offense simple enough for him to be effective. Highly doubtful though

by dkugler838 on Sep 19, 2008 10:13 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

How Much More Simple Can You Get?

There’s just not a lot of variety in that playbook and they already dumbed it down for Croyle. And it looked like the Raiders defense started figuring out our plays pretty early in the game last Sunday, so how long will it take a good team’s defense to figure things out?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 10:24 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Couldn't believe they said that.

I didn’t think it could get more simple than last week.

Where’s a link to the Chiefs playbook when we need it?

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 19, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Croyle didn't even play last week...

So how can Gailey dumb it up any more, I thought the variety of plays was going to be unleashed because Huard got the nod. Then we had that bizarre sequence of QB confusion. Not so much to get Oakland’s Def. confused, but to create further confusion within our own offense.
We cannot bash Croyle anymore for the offense if he’s not in it at the present time. Gailey’s been around the NFL for a long time, and I would think he could easily put in an offense that could cater to strength of the QB’s, OH…..wait it was suppose to be Huard that started against the Raiders, no wonder why Gailey had three different QB’s under center. He realized Huard had a noodle for an arm, and couldn’t do much with him. Sorry………I forgot……

by aPacificChief on Sep 19, 2008 4:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Chris' Rant

I agree, Chris. I know fans are frustrated but it shouldn’t reach the level of refunding tickets.

And trying to boycott? I’m really, really glad 99% of the commenters here are much, much better than that.

by primetime 07 on Sep 19, 2008 8:34 AM CDT   0 recs

I'm sure

refunds and boycotts are posted all over the KC Star remarks.

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 9:08 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The Ticket-Holders Don't Deserve Refunds

I’m with Chris, when you pay for a season ticket it’s an investment like any other, and you don’t get to back out just because you made an unwise choice because you didn’t pay attention to what you were buying. Everyone knew the Chiefs would be bad this year…so even if they’re worse than we thought that’s just the risk you take.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 9:24 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Not saying they do

But they are the ones who keep the team the Kansas City Chiefs, and not the LA Chiefs. Revenue is the thing that keeps a team in business, and without the people who pay for the team either by buying tickets, merchandise, whatever, there would be no team to support.

Did we know the Chiefs would be bad? Sure. Did we expect to see handicapped offense and defense, that is supposed to help play mistake free football, meltdown completely? Not really. I don’t buy season tickets, but if I did, I would expect something a little more respectable than getting your ass handed to you at home.

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 10:22 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

An Analogy On Expectations, Utility And Service

You’re talking about being unhappy with your expectations, but when you buy a season ticket for any team, you’re not buying it with a guarantee of wins or losses…that’s just part of sports. The way the ticketholders make their voices heard is to not renew (same as you don’t go back to a store that gives you crappy service). Going to a football game, you’re not buying a physical good, per se, that you can return…you’re paying for the labor put out by the players and labor is a perishable product that you can’t return, it’s the equivalent of having a sales clerk be rude to you when they’re selling you a hammer. As long as the hammer does what’s promised, your gripe isn’t with the product, just with the manner in which it was sold to you. The “hammer” in this case is the season ticket and it’s only promise is that it guarantees you a seat at Arrowhead (which it provides)…it doesn’t promise that you’ll enjoy what the Chiefs’ employees do while you’re sitting there, even if the service (in this case the on-field performance) is rude and incompetent. So with the Chiefs there’s no entitlement to fan refunds unless the Chiefs set that as a precondition before selling the tickets (which I’m pretty sure they didn’t).

I don’t buy season tickets, but if I did, I would expect something a little more respectable than getting your ass handed to you at home.

And if you had purchased season tickets, and the Chiefs are as bad and as unpromising for next season as I believe they’re going to be, then I’m pretty sure you’d be considering non-renewal. I think a lot of fans are going to do that after this season’s up. And if the Chiefs well and truly stink I’m pretty sure that Clark Hunt’s going to be aware of that as well and he won’t be happy.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 10:37 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

A Slight Revision To My Rambling

When I say that you’re buying the labor, that was inaccurate. When you’re buying the season ticket, all you’re really buying is a reservation for a seat at Arrowhead. As long as you get that, the labor on the field is irrelevant because all the ticket guarantees is the seat.

Sorry, went stream-of-consciousness when writing my last comment, which is always a bad idea before my second dose of caffeine in the morning. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 10:45 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Well

The people I go with have had their season tickets since Arrowhead was built. So I am pretty sure they will keep renewing. Because when the team does eventually turn around, you want those seats :)

I guess its just the price you pay for being a loyal fan

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 10:47 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Always Is

If you pay for the tickets you do so knowing full well that there is no guarantee that your team will be any good. Of course, that’s why we watch sports in the first place…if we knew who was going to win before the game there would be no point. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 11:29 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

South Florida...

has only had a football program since ‘97, and been I-A since ’01. They’ve managed to do pretty well for themselves in a short amount of time. Then again, they count former starting Chiefs LB Kawika Mitchell amongst their alum, so maybe it isn’t soo impressive.

I was kinda dismayed at the turnout I saw on the TV this weekend. I’d kill for a chance to see 8 games every season at Arrowhead, no matter how much we suck (read: I can drink a lot of beer).

by stag on Sep 19, 2008 8:43 AM CDT   0 recs

A lot of Giants fans

were sad to see Mitchell go the the Bills after last season. He did pretty well out here and has a ring to show for it. Not sure how he’s doing in Buffalo so far.

I think he was the wrong style of player for what the Chiefs were after (and I don’t mean a good player).

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 19, 2008 8:51 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Coastal Carolina

Agreed that programs can build up in short times, like with USF (who have a QB that might be worth a look for us in 2009 or 2010 whenever he leaves), but the knock on Thigpen was more that he was a good Div 1AA QB, not a great one (and you need to be great at that level to make it in the NFL, ala Steve McNair) and when people refer to him as a record-setting QB they’re often deliberately trying to skew the evaluation because it wasn’t much of an achievement to set records at a school that didn’t have football before you got there.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 9:04 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Grothe is not a good passer, great runner and leader, but not a good passer

He is Tyler Thigpen in a bigger program.

Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!

by JasonM on Sep 19, 2008 11:09 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

He's Not Tyler Thigpen At All

By way of comparison, here are Thigpen’s numbers at Coastal Carolina (Div 1AA)

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/football/players/104363

And Matt Grothe’s at USF (Div 1)

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=173139

Grothe had an outstanding freshmen year as a passer, backslid significantly his sophomore year, but seems to have taken a big progression his junior year. The biggest knock on him is his height, his TD/INT ratio, which has been 1:1 during his first two years but looks pretty stellar right now (and those numbers come against one ranked opponent in Kansas and one solid opponent in UCF). His completion percentage was very impressive his freshman year, decent his sophomore year, and has been excellent this year. Assuming he’s able to carry on this level of performance, I think he’ll make a lot of teams’ watchlists whenever he decides to leave school. If he leaves junior year he’ll likely be a mid to late round pick. If he stays and maintains his current level of performance his junior and senior seasons, he’ll likely be a first day prospect.

Tyler Thigpen, on the other hand, was a horrible passer his freshman and sophomore year, an average passer his junior year, and had an excellent, and atypical, season his senior year, while playing at a Division I-AA school (which screams “fluke season” since his performance in the pros is a lot closer to his first three years than his senior year). There’s no comparison whatsoever between him and Grothe, especially once you consider the differential in the level of competition each school faced.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 11:27 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

He does have a high %, but his throws are horrible.

If you watched the kansas game how many times did he miss on a wide open target? I’m not saying he isn’t a good NCAA quarterback, but in the pros he will look just like Bones.

Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!

by JasonM on Sep 19, 2008 11:40 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

USF-Kansas
If you watched the kansas game how many times did he miss on a wide open target?

Less than 29% of the time…much less unless every single incompletion in that game was a miss to a wide open target (which it wasn’t). He completed 71.1% of his throws in that game for 338 yards, 2 TDs and zero INTs… accuracy was not a problem for him.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 12:06 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Aren't you a ku fan?

That’s why he is so good in your eyes. I will repeat, he missed alot of easy throws in the kansas game. He is a good NCAA qb, but will struggle to make it in the pros.

Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!

by JasonM on Sep 19, 2008 12:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I Repeat, He Hit 71% Of His Throws

So he didn’t miss “a lot” of easy throws because he didn’t miss many throws at all.

And yes, I’m a KU fan and it has no bearing whatsoever on my observation because it doesn’t change the numbers at all. Grothe had an outstanding game against a very good Jayhawks team.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 12:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

He threw 45 passes

he completed 32. he missed 13 times, half of those were bad misses. And to say the jayhawks are a good team is a joke.

Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!

by JasonM on Sep 19, 2008 12:47 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

We're Done With This Conversation

Thanks for playing :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

MIZZOU-RAH

I give you a hard time for that reason, plus you always argue your point till the end. It’s fun to argue.

Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!

by JasonM on Sep 19, 2008 1:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

HAHA!

M-I-Z

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 3:45 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Z-O-U!

I’m so disappointed they lost to USF. Being the one to bring them back to reality last year was so much fun.

Bones. It's not just a noun it's a verb. Not just a nickname, a movement.

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 4:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

LOL

I am going to the MU KU game this year, but it won’t be as exciting as last year since it won’t have the same implications.

Will still be fun to be there with my brother in law who is a KU fan and watch Reesing get his ass stomped again :)

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 4:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

"very good"

as in “very good at getting its ass kicked by a much better quarterback like Chase Daniel and those beneath him like Grothe.”

I’m feeling surly today.

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 1:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I do think you're being a little harsh on Thigpen

given his time and the amount of energy spent on developing him. I mean, this is the first time he’s ever received considerable coaching at the pro level. There was a reason Herm didn’t start him last week, he said walking into a home game against a division rival is a pretty intense experience. I’m not saying he’s a good quarterback, he’s not. He’s a great quarterback. Because he has sex with skeletons. He’s just not very good at actual quarterbacking things. But really, I support him way more than I do Huard. Why? Because like O’Hoolihan said in Dodgeball, “Because it’s sterile and I like the taste.”

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 2:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Like I Said

I’m not trying to be personal about it. I’m not calling the kid lazy or selfish or a problem child. But if you look at his performance in the pros and you look at his performance in college there’s pretty much zero reason to have this kid as the third-string QB on a team that’s not even sure they’ve got a 1st or 2nd string QB. He’s just not a prospect, at all.

That said, I guess there’s no reason not to start him against the Falcons. Herm’s not going to look for anyone else via free agency, he seems dead-set against playing the QB who gives him the best chance of helping the receivers develop (and possibly winning a game), and he seems to have no intention of replacing McIntosh anytime soon, so why not stick someone out there who has a chance of at least surviving the game? I’m not a sadist and it would probably be sadistic to put Huard out there behind Herm’s line in this game considering his lack of mobility.

Although, if they’re intent on tanking the season, they’re probably better off playing Ingle Martin instead. His numbers weren’t great but they were better at Div 1AA than Thigpen’s. A lot better.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 4:47 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I was at the game.

And the turnout and crowd noise was pretty much nonexistent. You can say you’d kill to see the 8 home games every season, so why don’t you go to one?

You better have a fat wallet if you want to drink alot of their $7 and $9 beers. I know they went down easy for me while the raiders were walking all over the Chiefs. Think I had 8 in the stadium during the game.

have you seen my baseball?

by IISaiNtII on Sep 19, 2008 9:11 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah, me too

Luckily I was brought along with some work people so it was all expensed.

If not, I just can’t justify (read: poor college student) spending $75 inside the stadium 8 times a year.

by primetime 07 on Sep 19, 2008 9:13 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Holla at that, +1

Plus, I drive 6 hours round trip to watch them get their asses kicked for 3 hours. Luckily, I get barbecue out of the deal… Sad…

-cw

by webby37 on Sep 19, 2008 9:21 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

me three

It may have been the most depressing atmosphere during a regular season game that I attended including the half full game last year. I had to get on a flight after the game (basically follwed the Raiders to the airport) so i was a little more moderated with 5 beers and no one else I was with had even 1.

by skibum1537 on Sep 19, 2008 12:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Bad example on the tix

The difference is that you don’t pay for your wife like a product

/at least you’re not supposed to.
//What do you mean “What am I reading?”, honey?
///grovel.

-cw

by webby37 on Sep 19, 2008 9:20 AM CDT   0 recs

I flipped the switch.

Positive thinking is on.

Chiefs first offensive play: play action to LJ, Bones rolls toward Anderson’s (that’s the DE’s name right?) side so he can take himself out of the play. Bones then heaves a bomb to Darling down the sideline, thus giving the Falcons a taste of what they dished out in week one (and fantasy points for me).

The D bounces back and we see some more forced turnovers like week one. Nothing spectacular, but solid.

Likely? Not a chance in hell, but it’s fun to dream.

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 19, 2008 9:48 AM CDT   0 recs

That's what I'm talking about.

I, too, have switched to positive thinking out of sheer desperation.

Truce, NJ? I’ll quit being an insufferable prick and we can both scream ‘BONES!’ together?

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 1:49 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1!

If we can’t dream a bit, we might as well take a long walk off a short pier.

I’m totally starting Bones (love the nickname) on my crappy fantasy team.

“Damn it Herm, I’m a quarterback, not a proctologist.”

by NJChiefsFan on Sep 19, 2008 1:55 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Boycott

Asking for a refund is obviously either a joke or incredibly naive, so I won’t discuss it.

I don’t have a problem with boycotts.

Wait. Just hear me out.

Does it damage the franchise? Absolutely. But if you’re a diehard fan that honestly and truly feels that management has wasted your supportive dollars over the last three years and you want to express yourself, there’s no other way to make an impact. You can go on here and rip apart Carl Peterson for everything and turn every argument into a reason it’s his fault, but in the end, that won’t affect management, because it doesn’t affect the bottom line. This is sad, but true. Boycotting is the only way to make an impact that doesn’t involve a public protest. If you want them to understand you won’t support them if they continue to make moves you feel are foolish, unwise, ill-prepared and otherwise overly conservative to the end of being contrary to the continued growth and prosperity of the franchise you’ve invested yourself in, the best way is to remove your dollars from their revenue stream. I don’t like it, and I wont’ do it, because I’m not there yet. But if I were a Lions fan, suffering through year 100 AM (after Millen)? I would totaly boycott that franchise. And if we’re rebuilding in five years, still the laughing stock of the league? I’ll be tempted to do the same, because they will have abused my trust.

For me the real horror is that scenario, because the end result is not just a bad football team. It means selling the Chiefs and moving them. And that I just couldn’t bear.

by Ridiculous Matt on Sep 19, 2008 1:57 PM CDT   0 recs

Two Things

One, I completely agree with your comments regarding boycotts. I can appreciate that you’re not there yet…I, however, have been following this team for 20 years and I simply don’t accept that anything will change until they hire a real GM. I’ve just seen too many five year plans come up short with nothing really changing…and whether Herm or Carl is the real GM is irrelevant because double-duty coach/GMs are just as bad as a GM who hasn’t admitted a mistake in a decade.

Two, the Chiefs aren’t going anywhere even if the fans boycott them. KC is a market that will support them, and there aren’t really more attractive options out there…especially considering the amount of cash the ownership has dumped into improvements at Arrowhead this offseason. They’re here for the long haul, so that threat should be off the table. And like you said, if fans aren’t voicing their protest in ways that affect the bottom line, most of the time the team won’t care and won’t improve. All that keeping quiet because of fear of relocation will do is increase the chances that nothing will change and that you’ll be stuck with a team that doesn’t care what the fans think.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Sep 19, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!