Take action and get Jackson!!!

by swift347 on Aug 31, 2008 11:03 PM CDT Comment 8 comments

While Chad Jackson is still unproven, and recently cut from the Pats. I think he would be an excellent addition to our thin wide reciever corps. Just because he was cut from the Pats doesn't nessecarily mean he is a bad receiver. Players come and go from the Pats for many reasons, buried behind talent, Belechick's charm, and many more. The only concern that I would have is whom would be getting the axe. We've already cut Tyron Brackenridge, a player who I was quite fond of. I would sure hate to lose Dantrell Savage. I assume he would be next. Considering they've kept B.J. Sams around for some reason.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

0 recs | Comment 8 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

While I thought that I had surely gotten to this first. It's come to my attention that the guys over at AA had already posted a near identical post. Either way love the idea.

Steve Caskey

by swift347 on Aug 31, 2008 11:09 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

You Know

You don’t have to post everything you’re thinking in the subject line. You can actually write stuff in the bottom portion too :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Aug 31, 2008 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Wow, I didn’t see his name mentioned among roster cuts today. Just because he was cut from the Pats receiver corps doesn’t say much as a lot of good receivers have come and gone through the years. Jackson particularly is a good fit for us because he’s young and has good speed. I would bet a pretty penny too his hands are better than Devard Darling’s

by KansasCityShuffle on Aug 31, 2008 11:24 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Should we just call it now and say the C-boys take him? They’re hurting for wideouts apparently and they don’t ever hesitate inking available talent

by KansasCityShuffle on Aug 31, 2008 11:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Not sure

If I am not mistaken. The two years he has been in the league he has less than 300yds. receiving. I am not sure he is any better than some of the young guys that we already have.

by cmpotter on Sep 1, 2008 12:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Injuries

Chad was injured most of his first 2 years. I was following him closely and had high hopes. He was supposed to be the “Donte Stallworth” replacement, but never quite made it. Word is he’s a great physical player, but had trouble with the playbook. I hate to use the term “third receiver”, but Jabar Gaffney ended up with that monicker behind Moss and Welker.

Blogger at SBNation's New England Patriots blog, Pats Pulpit

by MaPatsFan on Sep 1, 2008 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs