Another Positive Drug Test for Former Broncos RB Travis Henry
by Chris Thorman on Jul 11, 2008 12:43 PM CDT
in 2008 Off Season
8 comments
Ha. Good luck trying to swing your "false positive" excuse again.
A highly placed source in the NFL told Fox 31 sports reporter Josina Anderson that if Henry failed the test that the troubled player would be "up for a suspension".
This comes after Henry had successfully appealed a positive test taken prior to last season. Claiming the test was a "false positive", Henry won his claim against the NFL, though as part of the agreement he remained in the NFL's substance abuser program.
Earlier this spring the Broncos released Henry stating that the former Bill and Titan was "too inconsistent as a person. When you're too inconsistent as a person, you usually aren't going to win championships."
When the source was asked if Henry knew of the positive test, he replied, "I was told this result is recent. [Henry] should already be informed. If he didn’t know, he knows now."
There isn't much more to say that hasn't been said the other times Henry has tested positive in a league drug test. Stupid. Cocky. Can we get him the hell out of the NFL already? I suppose he's almost there.
0 recs |
8 comments
Email
Print
Comments
He's Already There
He’s 29 and a two time loser on drug tests (three if you count last year). I’d say that the already slim chance someone was going to give him a job has already vanished in a puff of smoke.
The question is, who’s dumber…Travis Henry or the women who were stupid enough to have kids with Travis Henry? Good luck collecting that child support now.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Jul 11, 2008 1:43 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I thought his lawyer said he was already broke
Like before the 2007 season.
by Joel Thorman on Jul 11, 2008 2:04 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Probably
Judging from Henry’s history I seriously doubt he’s a guy who has any idea of how to plan for his future. He’s one of those “athlete who can’t cut it in the real world and ends up living under a bridge” stories if I ever heard one.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Jul 11, 2008 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know I said
that it was a false positive Mike, but have you seen my roach clips?
by Eric Allen on Jul 12, 2008 9:43 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent decision, Denver
Tossin’ that turkey by the way-side.
It’s a shame to be so talented and so judgmentally retarded.
It’s like the people that win the lottery and 2 years later are flat broke. I just don’t get it.
by Ochophosphate on Jul 12, 2008 1:18 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
It's such a dramatic lifestyle change
The pressure to give money to literally everyone you know is enormous, I would suppose. Some people just can’t say no.
by Joel Thorman on Jul 14, 2008 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
What an idiot...
Seriously. Three positives? What the eff are you thinking?
by GonzosDirtyTrailer on Jul 15, 2008 6:32 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The Dude's Got 9 Kids By 9 Different Women
He got laid that often by not thinking!!! :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Jul 15, 2008 7:16 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
