Perhaps no team in the NFL has needed the minicamp and OTA season more than the Kansas City Chiefs.
This team will be a work in progress all season long. Yes, the season starts in May and will likely end in December for the Chiefs.
Thanks to a potentially strong draft class, Kansas City will be a team to watch in the coming years. But it may be too much to expect the Chiefs to be a contender or to even finish .500 in 2008. This season, no doubt, will be all about a youth moment in Kansas City and it began in the minicamp season.
ESPN - Youth movement coming to Kansas City - NFL
Anyone else sick of the "youth movement" angle when talking about the Chiefs? Get used to it because that's what you'll be hearing all year long. - Chris
2 months ago
Chris
7 comments
0 recs |
Read Related
Comments
I'm Not Sick Of Hearing About The Youth Movement
I’d just like to see it already in games that count. Having a lot of young players on the roster, quite a few of whom seem like they could be good, is a hell of a lot more exciting than hoping that Priest Holmes can still play or that Roaf and Shields could squeeze out one more season or that our aging wide receivers don’t drop from “league average” to “unbelieveably horrible”. All of that crap was what waiting for the 2006 and 2007 seasons were like for me.
Young players mean potential and hope and I like how this team looks a lot better than I did last year. So the press can talk about the youth movement all they want because it’s more fun to root for a team full of young players who can develop over a team full of old guys who you know aren’t going to win a damn thing or get better in following seasons.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Jun 18, 2008 8:36 PM CDT 0 recs
Also
I’m all pumped up for football this season because me and my buddies have already started on our fantasy league for 2008-2009 and I’ve got LaDainian Tomlinson and Steven Jackson as keepers.
I’m not ready for the fall, but I’m definitely ready for football season. :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Jun 18, 2008 8:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Exactly!
Youth, hope, the future and unlimited ceilings are much fun than hanging on and being focused on a closing window of opportunity as we were the previous few years with the offensive line. That window closed, and a new, exciiting and occasionally frustrating door has been opened.
I remember being excited to see how well Derrick Johnson could play, for example. (I know we’re still waiting for “dominant,” but he’s pretty good.) But this year, it’s a whole list of people, including 2nd year players like Tank, Turk, how far Bowe can go, emergence of Croyle along with Dorsey, Albert, Flowers, Carr, Morgan, Charles, whoever starts at WR and so on. There are story lines all over the place!
And they have a chance to come together as a team more than many other franchises this year. In fact, how about putting a point differential on team chemistry. Home field advantage is generally considered about a 3-point advantage, isn’t it? I’d venture to say that if two teams have equally talented players, that the team with good communication, support and understanding among the players is also worth about 3 point a game. On to training camp, player potential and teamwork!
by sunny D on
Jun 18, 2008 9:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Let me put it a different way
Can you already tell that the media’s line about the Chiefs for camp, preseason and probably a good part of the regular season will involve the phrase “youth movement”? I didn’t mean to say I was sick of the actual youth movement, more sick of how I know that phrase is going to beaten into our heads.
by Chris on
Jun 19, 2008 7:10 AM CDT
up
0 recs
And that "youth movement"
will be the headline even more than wins or on-field accomplishments. I hear ya. I suppose it will take a couple of good wins for the Chiefs to lose that tag and have the focus shift to playoff contender and best third-down defense in the league. I take it, Chris, that you’d like to see the story lines shift to excellence and away from youth as an excuse? Good point.
by sunny D on
Jun 19, 2008 9:26 AM CDT
up
0 recs
At this point
it is a bit aggravating to hear people who have no knowledge of the team, other than the fact that Jared Allen was traded and that the team is so young, grab on to those two things and relegate the Chiefs to the standings cellar. However, I believe that in the long run they will all be proven wrong as most are unable to see the actual upgrades that are being accomplished at each position.
The Chiefs were in every game but one last year and had every chance to win them until the defense wore out from dragging two offenses around the field. We all know the improvements coming on offense, better line, LJ’s back with Charles as relief, better recieving corp, a real offensive coordinator, etc. This team will surprise people.
I wish I could save all the predictions made by some of these knotheads and put them on display for all to see at the end of this season. Egg will be applied to faces and crow will be eaten. I’m not tired of hearing people discount the “youth movement,” as it is going to make watching this team surpass all those low expectations so much more fun.
by Halfbreed5050 on Jun 19, 2008 9:25 AM CDT 0 recs
I'm Not Sure They'll Surprise People This Year
After all, rookies are still rookies and there’s a steep learning curve in the NFL for most of them. But I think they’ll be more watchable than last year, and (if they keep having decent drafts) I think they’ll be better next year, and so long as they keep building on that and improving I’ll be happy with them.
I can understand what Chris was trying to say about the press harping on that angle, but that doesn’t bother me too much either since I’m glad to be reminded that we aren’t tolerating the status quo (which is what had been happening for the Chiefs for way too long). Young players challenging for starting jobs (for which they’ll eventually be challenged by other young players) is always welcome news.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Jun 19, 2008 11:57 AM CDT
up
0 recs












