Confidence in Croyle
via i.a.cnn.net
The Kansas City Chiefs' confidence in third-year quarterback Brodie Croyle is well-documented.
Making Brodie Croyle a third-round draft pick in 2006 after a celebrated but injury plagued college career showed Chiefs' fans the team was confident in his future abilities.
After throwing only twenty-four passes in over a year and a half with the Chiefs, the team again asserted it's confidence in Croyle in November 2007 when Herm Edwards made him the starting quarterback after Damon Huard was injured.
Despite losing every start he made in 2007 and despite throwing as many touchdowns as interceptions (6), the Chiefs did not sign or draft a significant challenger to the starting quarterback position.
Perhaps that is the ultimate sign of confidence - a team, which is gambling in many other areas of need with other young players, giving the keys to the offense to a still green, still unproven quarterback.
If Brodie Croyle fails to materialize as a starting quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs, it will put the entire Chiefs strategy on hold. The team is trying to fill too many needs, too quickly to have to focus on a major position like quarterback.
If Croyle doesn't evolve into the Chiefs' franchise quarterback this year, a major part of the foundation laid here in 2008 will be have to be redone. The quarterback position is the most important and arguably the most difficult to fill in the NFL. The Chiefs had a major luxury in this year's draft precisely because they didn't have to pursue a QB on the first day. Or even the second day of the draft.
After 2008 is done, the Chiefs will have invested three full years in Brodie Croyle, only one of those with him as the starting quarterback. With the timing the Chiefs are currently on, looking towards 2009-2010 as the years to see their plans fully materialize, to have to replace Brodie Croyle with another question mark would slow down the pace considerably. Perhaps irreparably.
So goes Brodie Croyle, so goes the Kansas City Chiefs.
Was Croyle's rather lackluster 2007 season due to the terrible offensive line? The lack or Pro Bowler Larry Johnson in the lineup? Or were the 2007 Kansas City Chiefs just that terrible of a football team?
I'm going with all three of the above. And it appears, so are the Chiefs.
As much of a cornerstone as the 2008 draft will be for the future of the Kansas City Chiefs, another cornerstone was laid with the 85th pick in the 2006 draft.
The Chiefs have been hoping that Brodie Croyle is the player the team can depend upon for years to be productive.
If you thought Matt Ryan was a gamble in this year's draft, think about the gamble the Chiefs have made with Croyle. It's almost too late now to turn back and give the reins to another quarterback. If the Chiefs have to during or after this year, so be it. But they're not planning on it. In fact, they're planning against that happening.
Behind even an average offensive line with even a mildly healthy Larry Johnson, I believe Brodie Croyle has the necessary skills to start for the Kansas City Chiefs. His injury history doesn't bother me.
2008 is not only a gamble for the Chiefs but the final test for Brodie Croyle.
His will be the narrative to explain this franchise's course in the latter part of this decade. Croyle, more than any other player currently on the squad, will determine our collective fate.
Is it star-crossed confidence Herm Edwards has in Brodie Croyle? Or is Croyle still on his way to becoming the Chiefs' first "home-grown" franchise quarterback since Lenny Dawson?
45 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2009 QBs
There aren’t really any good QBs coming out next year.
We’re stuck with Croyle for at least 2 years.
Look to Cleveland
After Derek Anderson leas the Browns to the AFC Championship this year, Cleveland will be looking to unload Quinn. I think, and this is 100% speculation, we can get Quinn for our 2nd rounder. The 2009 season will start with Brady replacing Brodie, God save us all.
I'll take Quinn over Croyle
I’m not that attached to the guy.
by Chris Thorman on May 5, 2008 10:47 AM CDT up reply actions
I like the group alot better if Stafford goes pro.
If we draft in the top 3 we should have our choice of top QB’s next year.
2009 QB’s:
Rudy Carpenter
Hunter Cantwell
Cullen Harper
Curtis Painter
Matt Stafford
Dan Lefevor(sp)
I'd take Stafford in the top 10 if he has a good year
But I don’t really know a ton about the other guys.
by Joel Thorman on May 5, 2008 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions
I like Carpenter alot but not top 10, he is a mid to late 1st rounder
as of now. The guy I like alot is Cullen Harper, he could be had in the 2nd round possibly. This is all speculation of course, they still have to play the 2008 season.
Croyle
He is not, nor will he ever be a franchise QB. We are simply wasting our time and resources with the Chandelier Brodie.
Chandelier?
He has had two major injuries which 1) were not the result of anything related to his “injury-proneness” or “weakness” – blowing out an ACL is a freak occurrence caused by bad luck – i.e. another guy hits the side of your knee just right and pop! done and done… 2) coming back from blowing out both ACL’s and still being able to walk and run, much less play football, should be sufficient evidence that he is not fragile.
I agree
So goes Brodie Croyle, so goes the Kansas City Chiefs.
Even an elite QB like Carson Palmer took 3 years to materialize. I’m not saying we can’t do it, but if Croyle doesn’t turn out to be a competent QB then that is a huge blow.
Got To Agree About Cleveland
I think we should look to acquire whoever loses the Derek Anderson-Brady Quinn competition. Quinn’s got too much potential to happily sit on the bench past this year…and the way his contract is structured probably means he’s going to be sitting on the bench a lot because then the Browns don’t have to pay him much as he won’t have a chance to reach most of his incentives (which won’t make him any happier…nor will the likely decline in endorsements as he doesn’t play). Derek Anderson’s not much older than Quinn and he’s more of a known commodity, so assuming he doesn’t regress this year I think the Browns will look to move Quinn sooner rather than later.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
I'd take Quinn in a heart beat
I was so pissed when the Browns traded up with the Cowboys to take him right before us.
I think, when given the opportunity, Brady Quinn will be a terrific quarterback. Started just about 4 years at a major university and performed at a high level while playing a pro-style offense.
by Joel Thorman on May 5, 2008 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions
Best Of All Possible Worlds
I wouldn’t mind seeing us do a dump trade to the Browns for Quinn…Brian Waters, Greg Wesley, Surtain and a second-rounder. The Browns are making a push to win this season and all three of those players fit needs for them (and don’t fit into our long-term plans). We wouldn’t be losing anything we need in player personnel and Quinn is worth a 2nd round pick.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
Just sitting here thinking
How do we get ourselves in this position every single year?
For about 4 years there we didn’t have to worry about the QB position with Trent Green. But we also acquired him at age 32. We knew we didn’t have more than a few years with him.
It’s just unbelievable how some franchises just can’t have quality QBs.
It's Peterson
He can’t scout or develop QBs…he’s taken quite a few QBs with fairly high picks in the draft and they’ve all been garbage.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
I know it gets old
but look back to the game at Indy – I think that was Croyle’s first official start, and thanks to the injury of Freeney the week before, our o-line looked a little more solid than wet toilet paper. Croyle made the right decisions, put the ball where he needed to, and ended up with a higher QB rating than Manning. If we had a decent kicker, we might have won that game…I still believe that Croyle will be the starter for many years. Now that we have surrounded him with upgraded receiving talent (Charles >>> Kris Wilson – Darling, Franklin, anybody >>> Stonehands Parker) I honestly believe he will do it. The mere fact that we DON’T have Terry or Welbourne on the line should improve his game just a bit – I bet he celebrated when we cut those wastes of roster spots.
I agree 110%
Would we even be having this conversation about Croyle if he and the Chiefs had beaten the Colts in his first start?
Seriously, this could have been something that would have completely changed the season. Our team was bad, but I think all sports fans realize how important motivation and riding a wave of energy is and how it can change games.
If Rayner hadn’t missed field goals, if Kolby had hit the right hole on 4th and 1, if the defense had been able to keep the Colts from getting that last first down, etc.
NOBODY expected the Chiefs to win that game, but if they had and there were plenty of opportunities, how different would the enthusiasm and motivation of the team for the young QB have been different if he had come in and made an immediate impact overthrowing the defending Super Bowl champs? The confidence that could have built in the team could have carried on to a much better record and many fewer questions about Croyle.
I think he has it in him to be a good QB. Will he ever be Peyton Manning? Probably not, but he doesn’t have to be. Last time I checked, Peyton had only won the Super Bowl once.
Croyle only needs to be the other Manning
or, if our defense ends up being REALLY good by 2010, Croyle really only has to be Trent Dilfer :)
Bottom line
I spent a lot of money printing up those “Brodie Bunch” T-shirts on cafe press and can’t afford to see him replaced!
http://www.cafepress.com/sir_eccles
Blame my wife!
Anyone else notice the poll?
Currently it’s 56% of the people think Croyle will be the starter for years to come.
Still close
I remember when I polled us right before last season about who should start – Croyle or Huard.
It was almost dead even after hundreds of votes.
by Chris Thorman on May 5, 2008 1:25 PM CDT up reply actions
That was a fantastic debate
I had just discovered the joy that is AP, and I laughed so hard at some of MAWK’s posts that my co-workers probably thought I was insane.
Brady effing Quinn???
Alright, on occasion the PARADE could be accused of letting the PARADE’s personal thoughts outweigh the PARADE’s football sense. The PARADE might even be considerd mildly homophobic by the aggressively politically correct.
BUT, I would rather trade our entire draft class and the remnants of our o-line for Jay Cutler, a leathal supply of peanut M&Ms (too soon?), and the entire cast of RENT before I see Brady Quinn play for the Chiefs.
Admittedly, much of my hatred comes from this running satire, but seriously, at some point satire begins crossing over into truth, and by that standard Quinn needs to never play for any team the PARADE supports.
by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on May 5, 2008 3:18 PM CDT reply actions
RE
What about his talent, which is what would be on the field?
by Chris Thorman on May 5, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions
WTF?
You’re basing an opinion of the guy as a football player off of an site that makes jokes about him being a closet homosexual? Seriously? The site doesn’t even come up with good jokes in that vein either, so it can’t be classified as satire…it’s just a bunch of stupid rambling bullshit that sounds like it was written by a guy who’s bitter because he got rejected for admission into Notre Dame. Hell, why not start deriving your sports opinions from site like “The Superficial” instead? At least they’re funny…even though they don’t know a damn thing about sports.
I agree with Chris…the only thing that matters is on the field performance and Quinn looks like he’s got some potential to be a productive QB.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
Breath, PARADE, breath
First off Chris, THE PARADE WILL GET TO YOU IN AN MINUTE UCRAWFORD! Normally the PARADE would unleash a vitriolic tirade for what the PARADE considers to be observations of a “talk radio” caliber, but in the spirit of civility the PARADE will take the high road (which surprisingly is the logical high ground for a change).
Chris, poorly thought out of you. How do Dallas fans feel about QB off field issues? Atlanta? How did that work out in our dealing with Jared Allen. Yeh, most of it is nonsense but the drunken episode yelling slurs at a gay club is something I would have looked down on by the end of high school. As I said, it wasn’t a “football sense” observation, but there are some very REAL implications of that nonsense, ask Marvin Harrison’s lawyer these days.
Now mister University J. Crawford if that’s even your real name, I’d point out to you and Chris that ole’ Brady is completely unproven in the NFL despite the perpetual espn HJ he’s received/ing. BUT WAIT, I conceed. I’m not even gonna contest his talent or how dreamy you guys may find him. I’m not even going to address how your feelings on South Bend and the aforementioned bloggers’ respective education are poorly, poorly misplaced. No, no, no. Not an issue with any of those.
My issue is really with where you find comedy sir. As Chris will be the first to tell you, KSK by association with Deadspin.com is one of if not THE premeir humorous juveneille NFL blog. I’ll admit the Quinn material may not be their greatest (mostly because of the sheer absurdity of the truth and ridiculous jpeg evidence), but I assure you, check the archives, the Rex “sex cannon” Grossman threads took potty humor to new levels. The KSK “gay mafia” is also responsible for much of the humor you may find at deadspin and withleather.com.
Consider this a friendly and educational reminder by the PARADE, when it comes to the lowest common comedic denominator, the PARADE will not be challenged.
by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on May 6, 2008 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions
Regarding Brady
I’d point out to you and Chris that ole’ Brady is completely unproven in the NFL despite the perpetual espn HJ he’s received/ing.
I wasn’t disputing that…that’s why I said potential to be a productive QB. If he were a guy warming the bench for three or four years and couldn’t take a starting spot away from 2007 Derek Anderson, I probably wouldn’t care about the guy because it would be indicative that he’s not that great. However, he was only a rookie QB last year (one that we would have considered drafting if the Browns hadn’t moved up), he would appear to be a better prospect than anyone coming out of college next year, and Brodie Croyle hasn’t shown that he’s the QB of the future so he’s probably worth the gamble. Right now we’re just rolling the dice on Croyle, and frankly he hasn’t produced enough at either the college or pro level to merit risking everything on him.
I’m not even going to address how your feelings on South Bend and the aforementioned bloggers’ respective education are poorly, poorly misplaced.
I don’t particularly care about Notre Dame. I didn’t go there, I don’t root for them, I think they’re almost always overrated and I think their current coach is kind of a fraud. But they are usually a very good football program and they put a lot of talented players into the NFL…which is why I tend to think Notre Dame players are worth a look. Quinn was a productive QB in college, he was productive playing for a bad coach in a pro-style offense, and his stats from college (and the level of competition he played against) indicate he could make the transition to the NFL and be very good, so I think he’s worth a look. If you don’t agree, that’s your prerogative…but if you want to be taken seriously, make your arguments from a football perspective, not off a bunch of bad gay jokes that you heard.
As Chris will be the first to tell you, KSK by association with Deadspin.com is one of if not THE premeir humorous juveneille NFL blog. I’ll admit the Quinn material may not be their greatest (mostly because of the sheer absurdity of the truth and ridiculous jpeg evidence), but I assure you, check the archives, the Rex "sex cannon" Grossman threads took potty humor to new levels.
If I want to hear potty humor, I’ll pull out my DVDs of “Dumb & Dumber” or “The Upright Citizens Brigade” and watch those…mainly because they’re actually funny. When I come here, I’m more interested in talking about sports. I don’t care about the gossip about players unless it pertains to the game on Sunday, I don’t care who’s sleeping with who or who’s in the closet, or who’s being accused by a blog run by Steelers fans of shouting insults outside a gay bar (which, as far as I can tell, hasn’t been reported anywhere else so it may very well not have happened). As far as I’m concerned that’s irrelevant to the discussion. If that’s what you want to focus on, that’s your prerogative…but you shouldn’t expect it to win you any points with the sports crowd when you trot it out during a serious discussion. Most of it is just off-topic crap that’s got nothing to do with anything.
And yes, I have the same opinion about Deadspin and withleather…they were amusing for about a week, until the jokes got old and I decided that I’d rather go back to talking about sports, which is why I come to blogs like this.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
Don't know much about Quinn,
But I, for one, think that Croyle will prove all the doubters wrong this year. By all reports, he’s been working hard to improve himself during the off-season. We know the O-line will be improved. We know the running game will be improved. I think we can say the WR corps has been improved.
With a supporting cast and and offensive coordinator that doesn’t have his head in his ass I think Croyle will be fine. He’s got the arm. He’s fairly mobile. His decision making has improved. And I call bullshit on being injury prone.
Finally, we have our own QB, not somebody else’s trash.
TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!
Hopefully
I agree with you that he at least deserves a chance under a decent offensive line. That may not happen this year but should certainly be improved by leaps and bounds in 2009.
It’ll be interesting to see how long we stay committed to him.
I think
He’d have to do quite a bit to screw up and lose the job. He doesn’t need to come in and be a hero. Herm just wants someone that can manage the game, move the ball effectively, not create turnovers, and pull out a big play here and there.
I think, given some tools to work with, he’s capable of that and more. A plus for him is that Gailey will have developed a system to play to his strengths.
TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!
Chan Gailey
I think he’ll be a good offensive coordinator and it wouldn’t surprise me to see the offensive line improve a little just because they’re not running plays as predictable and simplistic as they were under Solari. Guys like Kyle Turley and Chris Terry were going to suck last year no matter what system you put them in, but it’s tough for anyone to look good when the defense knows pretty much what’s coming. Maybe McIntosh will be a little better under this system (although I’m not holding my breath).
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
One thing I'll hand him
For being a scrawny lookin’ guy, he can put some serious zip on the ball. If his offseason work pays off and his decision making sharpens, he could show up big this year. The other thing I hope he fixes is his tendency to telegraph his passes. I swear there were a ton of plays last year where as soon as it was snapped he never took his eyes off of where he was going. He needs to look off coverage… help his receivers get open. This is probably because of his newness… but that garbage needs to change quick or he’s gonna fizzle fast.
Let’s take a look at this turkey with a full arsenal of weapons at his disposal.
Telgraphing
only looking at your first read because you know you will only have 2 seconds to throw the ball may or may not count as “telegraphing” :)
Brodie
I’ll be happy if he can complete a decent percentage of his passes move the ball into the endzone and not throw interceptions. Hopefully he’s worked out some of those problems this offseason.
In fairness to Brodie, though, I don’t think anyone could have looked good behind that line running that offense, so I don’t think he can be accurately judged based on last year. That said, however, he wasn’t a particularly great college QB either, so I don’t know where this insistence that he’s a franchise QB comes from. He’s got a great arm, sure, but that’s not going to get you far if you can’t complete passes. Croyle never broke a 60% completion rate in any full season that he played, he was fairly interception-prone, and there’s nothing about his other numbers at Alabama that stand out.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
I thought he broke some records for the Tide?
From the beloved wiki – “Croyle started the 2004 season hoping to help his team improve on their last record of 4–9. Croyle started three games, completing 44 of 66 passes for 534 yards with six touchdowns.[1] But during the third game of the season against Western Carolina University, Croyle tore his anterior cruciate ligament in his other knee.6 Croyle was forced to sit out the rest of the season, and the team finished with a 6-6 record.[7]
Undaunted, he fully recovered from the injury in 2005 and started all 12 games as a senior; completing 202 of 339 passes for 2,499 yards with 14 touchdowns and four interceptions and one rushing touchdown. Croyle led the Crimson Tide to a #8 national ranking, a 10–2 record, and a 13–10 victory over Texas Tech in the Cotton Bowl, where he earned the game’s Most Valuable Player honors.17[9] In his final season at Alabama, Croyle attempted a school-record 190 passes without an interception and a finalist for the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award as the nation’s most outstanding senior quarterback.[1] He also became the first Alabama quarterback to start every game in a season since 1996.[9]
His 2,499 passing yards in 2005 were the highest single-season total in Alabama’s school history. His total 202 completions and 339 passing attempts rank as the second-best seasonal marks in school annals.[1] His 2,311 yards of total offense were the third-best seasonal mark in the history of the school, and his 1.18 interception percentage was the lowest single-season mark in school history as well.[1]”
Don't forget that he got sacked 11 times by Auburn
Eleven sacks in the final game of his senior season and he kept bouncing back. Horrible O line. A receiver core that (with the exception of Tyrone Prothro) couldn’t catch a ball with a fishing net. and he still kept getting up and finished with a 10-2 regular season mark.
Some of you guys are going to be eating crow by the end of the 2008-9 season.
ELEVEN?
And I thought OUR O-line was bad…I knew that Croyle was surrounded by sub-par talent and that Bama’s line wasn’t great, but 11 sacks? That’s ridiculous…
The Problem Is...
...that Alabama’s passing records aren’t particularly mighty as they’ve been a predominantly running team. It’s comparable to Cale Gundy breaking all the passing records at Oklahoma back in the 90s. He broke them because he passed a lot and his predecessors hadn’t, not necessarily because he was good. Also, Alabama turned out three quarterbacks of note for the NFL…Joe Namath, Bart Starr and Ken Stabler. But those guys all played at Alabama back in the ‘60s under Bear Bryant and there haven’t been any franchise QBs of note to come out of that school since then, so I question the pedigree of the program as well. If Croyle was a guy with so-so stats coming out of a school known for making good passers, I’d be more optimistic. Problem is, Alabama doesn’t do that.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
Also
he was considered a first round pick until he slid because of his “injury proneness” ,which considering he had one freak injury in HS and one in college, seems a LOT like Flowers sliding because of his speed (say what you want about Talib, Jenkins, and Antonio RC… I think we got the most Pro-ready CB in the entire draft) He got hurt twice last season, but the first injury came on our second offensive play, and he finished the game with bruised ribs…the second injury was the result of Croyle wanting to be more like Trent Green :)
Brodie Leads
Yeah, Brodie has the worst legs under him since some long haired, big nosed kid also from Alabama took the NY Jets to Superbowl III.
But that doesn’t matter. Brodie leads from the heart. Let me tell you about this kid’s pedigree.
When Brodies dad, John Croyle, decided to forego a shot at the pros after graduating from Bama, Coach Bryant asked him what he wanted to do.
“I want to start up a farm so homeless kids can have a father figure and a chance at a good life, Coach.” He answered.
Bryant made a few calls and lined up financing for John Croyle’s dream and the Big Oak Boys Ranch was the result.
One of John Croyle’s teammates that year was John Hannah, the New England Hall of Fame lineman. When the elder Croyle told Hannah what he was doiung, Hannah told him, “When I get my signing bonus from the Patriots, I’ll give you something.”
Some weeks later, Croyle got a check from Hannah’s agent for the ENTIRE SIGNING BONUS.
So, as Brodie was growing up, the younger son of the head of this mission to teach boys and girls how to be good people, he was always in the position of the person others looked to. One day, a sherriff’s car drove up to Big Oak and dropped a little black kid dressed in rags.
Without a word, Broddie sized up the kid and deciding they were about the same size, went to his room and grabbed the new jeans and shirt his momma had just bought him and gave them to the newly arrived child. Broddie knew he needed them more than Broddie did.
Yeah, he’s got a great arm, I think potentially as good as Namath’s. Yeah, he needs to learn the Pro defenses. That’s why he stayed in the Arrowhead film room all off season. But one thing no Chiefs fan can ever doubt is that your entire team will play their hearts out for Broddie Croyle and that is the difference between a good football squad and a great one.
I believe you’ll be able to say about Broddie what Coach Bryant said about himself. He ain’t nothing but a winner.
Joe Namath
Unfortunately, if you put a QB with Joe Namath’s game out on the field in today’s NFL he’d wreck your team.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/N/NamaJo00.htm?redir
The game’s changed, and if Croyle’s a comparable QB to Namath, we don’t want him.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
Even Though...
...he does sound like a really decent person and it was a nice story. Problem is, that being a really nice guy doesn’t translate into wins unless you’re also able to complete passes consistently and keep the ball out of the opponents’ hands.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by 






















