Will the Kansas City Chiefs Have Major Issues at Wide Receiver?
Without the emergence of rookie Dwayne Bowe last year, the Chiefs wide receiving corp would have been in shambles. Bowe ended '07 with 995 yards receiving, which was nearly 60% of the total yards gained by all of the Chiefs' wide receivers. Jeff Webb, Samie Parker and veteran Eddie Kennison were nearly non-existent in 2007, with their 65 catches combined not even surpassing Bowe's own 70 catches. Parker and Kennison are no longer on the team, which means that the Chiefs most experienced WR on the roster is Devard Darling who is entering his fifth season. However, Darling has only started one game in his career so take his "experience" with a grain of salt. After that, the most experienced Chiefs receiver is Jeff Webb, who is entering his third season.
In other words, the Chiefs needed some help at the wide out position.
That help began with the signing of former Baltimore Raven Devard Darling this off season, who saw little action in Baltimore during his four years there. He came to Kansas City looking for an opportunity to start. Darling appears to be a quick, hard-working receiver who will battle for the #2 spot behind Dwayne Bowe. His signing isn't major by any means. He's an unproven wide out to throw into the mix with the others.
More than likely, Jeff Webb will be called on to be the #2 receiver but the job won't come without major competition. Webb's talent appears to be on roughly the same level as former Arena League player Bobby Sippio, who spent a mix of time on the active roster and practice squad last season. Neither have shown much of a spark, even when judged by #2 spot standards. Sippio didn't even catch a pass last year.
That brings us to the two receivers the Chiefs drafted this past weekend, Missouri's Will Franklin and Utah State's Kevin Robinson. Franklin should be familiar to most here - a burner who makes the occasional drop. He'll likely battle Jeff Webb for the #2 spot and there is no foreseeable winner in that fight. Franklin was a fourth round pick, which makes him a bit more touted than Jeff Webb, who was a 6th round pick back in 2006. Kevin Robinson initially appears to have been drafted for his fantastic return ability, something the Chiefs sorely need, even with the signing of another former Raven B.J. Sams this off-season.
The Chiefs receiving corp has only eighteen combined NFL starts. That receiving game is bolstered by the greatness of TE Tony Gonzalez but there is a dramatic drop off in "seen" talent after that. We have a clear cut #1 WR in Dwayne Bowe, with all four of our other receivers theoretically fighting for the #2 spot.
What happens when defenses key on Bowe and Tony Gonzalez? Who steps up? Will the Chiefs' receiving corp be another major problem for the development of QB Brodie Croyle? Does he have the help he needs to succeed?
Croyle better be living with his receivers and his offensive line this summer. He's going to need that chemistry.
0 recs |
21
comments
Read Related
Comments
Being a run-heavy team,
It’s no surprise that we don’t have pro-bowl caliber wide receivers. I like Dwayne Bowe, but I’m not going to judge him as a #1 until after this season. Sly Morris had a pretty good rookie season as well, and did pretty terribly his sophomore season.
I don’t think Franklin will be much more than a slot to replace Parker, but don’t quote me on that because he could surprise me.
I agree with you on Webb probably going to be the #2, Herm really likes him and he has a leg-up being the 2nd most senior WR now.
We really don’t need anything but average WR’s at this point. We need guys who will consistently catch whatever is thrown at them, but we don’t really need the typical big yardage guys like Chad Johnson. I actually think this is why we got Darling from the Ravens. We are going to have the same philosophy as they have. Run first, murder on defense, throw third, don’t turnover.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on Apr 29, 2008 11:36 AM CDT 0 recs
Good points
We don’t need another big time guy necessarily. I’m just a bit concerned because pretty much everyone but Bowe and Webb are unknowns. Darling is a 5th year buy but with very little playing time.
Call it fear of the unknown.
by Chris on
Apr 29, 2008 11:49 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Darling
did very well in Baltimore, despite not being utilized. He was second in touchdowns on the team, but was eigth in receptions. He wasn’t thrown to much, but did a damn good job with what he got considering he basically only played 1/2 a year and ranked as either the 2nd or third receiver on the team with minimal catches.. Could he be our #2 guy? I think he’s got as good a shot as Webb.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 12:17 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I would love for Chad Johnson to come play in KC though.
Johnson&Johnson could sponsor arrowhead stadium. Think of the revenue the Chiefs could get! Ok, that was a joke aimed at Carl, and it probably wasn’t funny. But i’m going to post it anyway.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 12:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I've mentioned this before
But I think you can make the argument that Herm doesn’t believe you need a “star” player. In fact, he probably doesn’t even want a “star” player.
Sounds crazy I know but something to think about.
by Chris on
Apr 29, 2008 12:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
New England didnt have a real "star" before they won their first SBowl did they?
by Lanier63 on
Apr 29, 2008 12:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
RE
Damon Huard!
Kidding. They didn’t really have any players who were marquee yet.
by Chris on
Apr 29, 2008 12:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Not really.
Although Troy Brown was a pro-bowler that year, and Terry Glenn was on the team, but I don’t think he played much in ‘01
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 12:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
And Automatic Adam Vinateri
Or however you spell his last name… But I’m not sure you can call a kicker your marquee player unless his name is Dustin Colquitt for the 2007 Chiefs.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 12:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Spread it around
I’d also say the Bowe strikes me more as a solid #2 option, but is forced to be our #1 because we’re so deficient in that area.
To combat our lack of quality receivers, I believe we’ll try and be a pounding short yardage team. Bowe is ideal for slot work. Tony can handle anyone they put on him. In addition, I think we’ll see a lot of Jamaal Charles/LJ lining up as a receiver or being thrown to in the flat. It may not be pretty, but it will allow Croyle to get rid of the ball quickly and allow the recipient to make yards after the catch. If nothing else, it will be good experience for the entire offense in how to execute in short yardage situations.
Hopefully we’ll be able to develop a couple guys to give us a consistent threat in the mid and deep zones.
The length of the pass is directly proportional to the time the QB has to throw the ball (provided by the O-line). In addition, the probability of completing the pass relates to the QB, WR, and CB skill level. Until the O-line proves it can handle the pressure, we’ll be doing a lot of short yardage drop-offs and screen passes. Here’s hoping LJ is ready to earn his money.
by Steve The Hedge on Apr 29, 2008 12:12 PM CDT 0 recs
Still not sure
why we’ve had such woes at the WR position over the years.
by Chris on
Apr 29, 2008 12:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Which years?
I thought the Chiefs WR corp was decent up until 06. The whole offense was old then, though. And if you’re referring to the late 90’s, don’t forget about all the coaching changes and philosophy changes that came with them…
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 12:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Sqeeky wheel
The WR position was never totally bad. Sure, it might not have been great or even good, but it wasn’t an embarassment. Tony G saw to that. Until this draft, our off-season work consisted of plugging the obvious holes in a quick-fix patch job trying to get the one last piece to the Super Bowl puzzle. Well, the window’s closed and with the loss of our legendary O-line, we’re seeing how much an offense depends on those 2 inches of daylight for the RB, or the extra .5 second of solid pass protection for the QB to get off a well placed dart. Hopefully we’ve picked up a couple solid pieces to rejuvinate the line and get those inches and seconds back.
by Steve The Hedge on
Apr 29, 2008 1:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
What about TG?
He’s our #1 WR. I know, I know, he plays TE but it’s a valid point. He will remain the go-to guy until he retires so having a team full of #2 WRs is not a problem.
by jboot1 on Apr 29, 2008 12:57 PM CDT 0 recs
True
I wanted to separate out the WR position for an objective look at what we had.
by Chris on
Apr 29, 2008 1:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Right.
And looks at Tony G’s season last year. They struggled to get him the ball in more than one game. There were 6 games where he had 5 catches or less. He didn’t have more than 10 catches in a game all season. His average catches/game was just a shade over 6. Bowe’s catches/game were even less than that. Outside of those two, no one else saw the ball that much.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Apr 29, 2008 1:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I really think
that with some considerable playing time, Webb could develop into a good, maybe better-than-good, WR. He looked better than Parker last year (no, that’s not saying much) and I think that as he sees more action, he could end up being a solid starter…Having Croyle throwing from somewhere other than falling on his ass should help too.
by PVChiefsfan on Apr 29, 2008 2:10 PM CDT 0 recs
If Webb could get to
The way he was in college he would be electric. I believe DJ was the one who posted a clip looking at a QB that had a lot of Jeff Webb footage that was pretty amazing.
by Eric Allen on Apr 29, 2008 4:15 PM CDT 0 recs
Charles vs. Wilson in the flat
So if Charles catches the same balls thrown to the flat that Kris Wilson got last year, does Charles turn some of those into big gainers? Or was the lack of production due to poor play calling and/or blocking—resulting in the same paltry yards no matter who catches it? I realize Chan Gailey is another variable. I’m just wondering if Kris Wilson lacked the ability to make people miss, leading to a meager YAC.
by sunny D on Apr 29, 2008 7:26 PM CDT 0 recs
Yes
to all of that…Gailey >>>> Solari (at least at play-calling) Charles is MUCH faster and shiftier than Wilson was when he was 10. Charles was the second fastest running back in the draft and played for perennial powerhouse Texas, and we stole him in the third round – the fastest running back was Johnson from East Carolina, and he stole some reacher’s money when he went in the first round.
by PVChiefsfan on
Apr 30, 2008 7:03 AM CDT
up
0 recs
YouTube
footage of when Kris Wilson was 10, perhaps? :-)
But even at 10, he was very versatile, you know.
(I kid. I wish him well.)
Yep, Charles could be fun!
by sunny D on
Apr 30, 2008 7:31 AM CDT
up
0 recs




















