From the FanPosts. Excellent work, aPacificChief. -Primetime
I was doing some research on college QB's coming into the NFL, when I stumbled across something that might change the way we view college QB’s coming into the NFL. We have all heard the terms of a “Franchise Quarterback,” or a “Product of the System (system QB).” But I think I found a way to show the probability of a college QB being successful in the NFL regardless of the so called labels that he may be given coming out of college.
A lot of the information I have compiled is based on a statistical analysis of the productivity of a QB prospect coming from college. I know that statistics can be misleading if not taken in context, especially if those same stat’s become the sole indicator of judging the college prospect. But if you take the numbers along with the physical attributes (height, weight, arm strength), and their other intangibles (leadership qualities, level of competition) you will have a much clearer indication of the players ability to succeed in the NFL.
I found something interesting from studying past college QB’s who have succeeded in the NFL, and the other college QB’s who have failed to live up to expectations. Most who had some level of success shared a common denominator that gave them a higher chance to succeed. While those who did not have this certain attribute (at no fault of their own) have a higher likelihood to turn into a bust. I’m sure many of you are already saying, “So what the heck is that attribute already?” It’s quite simple really, its PLAYING TIME! I remember Herm Edwards saying that he would prefer seniors because they just had more game film to evaluate. Well, for a QB what is more important is not the film to study, but rather the repetitions they have playing the position.
Most of the QB’s coming out of college who have succeeded in the NFL have had at least three years of starting experience in their college programs. While those QB’s who had out of this world numbers during their college years, but only played for two years tended to only compete for the headline on, “Who was the biggest draft blunder for the team that drafted him, or the NFL’s biggest draft bust of all time”.
College QB’s who had finished their final year of eligibility, and graduated from college also have a tendency to contribute to the prospect’s chance of producing in the NFL. The NFL is littered with JR QB’s who have failed to live up to their labels of being a Franchise QB coming out of college. I found that the QB’s who declared early and entered the NFL as a Junior in some circumstances could be productive, provided that he was able to sit behind an incumbent QB for 2 to 3 years and learn the system (and that is if there is not significant change in the Offensive system they run). This is a study on statistical analysis which is trying to find a link on the likelihood for succeeding in the NFL playing QB.
Now I will give you the numbers to back up my hypothesis. The numbers is based on the college statistics accumulated by the QB prospect. I will go back 10 years and look at the top college QB’s coming into the NFL.
1998
Peyton Manning (Senior)
Year Comp/ Attempts Yards TD/ INT
‘94 89/144 1141 11/6
’95 244/380 2954 22/4
’96 243/390 3287 20/12
’97 287/477 3819 36/11
A 3 year starter.
Ryan Leaf (Senior)
’96 194/373 2811 21/12
’97 210/375 3637 33/10
1999
Tim Couch (Junior)
’97 363/547 3884 37/19
’98 400/553 4275 36/15
Akili Smith
’97 107/190 1298 12/6
’98 191/325 3307 30/7
Basically a one year wonder.
Donovan McNabb
’95 128/207 1991 16/6
’96 118/215 1776 19/9
’97 145/265 2488 20/6
’98 157/251 2134 22/5
Daunte Culpepper
’95 168/294 2071 12/10
’96 187/314 2565 19/15
’97 238/381 3065 25/10
’98 296/402 3690 28/7
Cade McNown
’95 122/245 1698 7/8
’96 176/336 2424 12/16
’97 189/312 3116 24/6
’98 188/323 3130 23/10
The knock on Cade was that he did not even have average arm strength. A Danny Wuerffel type of QB.
2000
Chad Pennington
’97 253/428 3480 39/12
’98 279/432 3419 24/7
’99 275/405 3797 37/11
Selected in the 1st round.
Marc Bulger
’96 19/42 352 3/1
’97 192/323 2465 14/10
’98 240/369 3178 27/8
’99 145/239 1729 11/13
Selected in the 6th round
Tom Brady
’97 12/15 103 0/0
’98 214/350 2636 15/12
’99 180/295 2216 16/6
Selected in the 6th round, and sat behind Drew Bledsoe. It was in Brady’s 2nd year that he got his opportunity to start after Bledsoe went down with an injury.
2001
Mike Vick (Junior)
’99 90/152 1840 12/5
’00 87/161 1234 8/6
Mike is a running back that happens to play QB, he was selected based on his raw physical talents. Not his refined skills to play the QB position.
Drew Brees
’97 19/43 232 0/1
’98 361/569 3983 39/20
’99 337/554 3909 25/12
‘00 286/473 3393 24/12
Chosen in the 2nd round because of his lack of arm strength.
2002
David Carr
’00 216/349 2729 23/12
’01 308/476 4299 42/7
Joey Harrington
’99 84/158 1180 10/3
’00 195/375 2694 20/13
’01 186/322 2415 23/5
A two year starter for the University of Oregon.
Patrick Ramsey
’99 310/513 3410 25/24
’00 229/389 2833 24/14
’01 256/448 2935 22/13
A 3 year starter for Tulane, but his numbers seem to regress after his excellent sophomore year.
Jump to 2004
Eli Manning
’00 16/33 170 0/1
’01 259/400 2948 31/9
’02 279/481 3401 21/15
’03 275/441 3600 29/10
Three years starting for Ole Miss.
Ben Roethlisberger
’01 241/380 3105 25/13
’02 271/428 3238 22/11
’03 342/495 4486 37/10
Three year starter for Miami of Ohio.
Philip Rivers
’00 237/441 3054 25/10
’01 240/368 2586 16/7
’02 262/418 3353 20/10
’03 348/483 4491 34/7
Started 4 years for NC State.
JP Losman
’00 58/115 722 4/2
’01 31/49 487 4/1
’02 230/401 2468 19/10
’03 251/422 3077 33/4
A two year starter, split time with Patrick Ramsey during his freshman and sophomore years.
Finally, 2005
Alex Smith (Junior)
’03 173/266 2247 15/3
’04 214/317 2952 32/4
Nice TD to INT ratio, but only two years as a starter.
Aaron Rodgers (Junior)
’02 164/265 2408 28/4 Junior College
’03 215/349 2903 19/5
’04 209/316 2566 24/18
Sat behind Brett Favre for 3 years, but started in College for 3 years albeit that one year was at a Junior College before transferring to Cal.
Jason Campbell
’01 89/142 1117 4/4
’02 94/149 1215 11/5
’03 181/293 2267 10/8
’04 188/270 2700 20/7
A two year starter for the Tigers.
Andrew Walter
’01 38/86 546 3/2
’02 274/483 3877 28/15
’03 221/421 3044 24/10
’04 244/426 3150 30/9
Rewrote alot of ASU passing records.
Kyle Orton
’01 107/216 1105 4/7
’02 192/317 2257 13/9
’03 251/414 2885 15/7
’04 236/389 3090 31/5
(Side note thought it might be interesting to point out considering the circumstances with the Bears)
Rex Grossman drafted in '03
'00 131/212 1866 21/7
'01 259/395 3896 34/12
'02 287/503 3402 22/17
Started 7 games in 2000, but his productivity decreased dramatically from '01 to '02)
Derek Anderson
’01 17/41 263 1/3
’02 211/449 3313 25/13
’03 261/510 4058 24/24
’04 279/515 3615 29/17
Look at the names of the Quarterbacks who are doing well in the Pro’s, and reference them to the time they spent with their College programs. Then ask yourself these following questions; Did the prospect start for 3 years for their program? Did their numbers improve from year to year, peaking at their final year in college before turning pro? Then see how they are doing with their respective pro teams. I don’t think its by chance that the few QB’s who remain in the NFL are enjoying some form of success with their clubs. Again its not an exact science, but the numbers cannot be ignored.
Under this hypothesis Sam Bradford has a high probability of being a bust in the NFL. The QB’s who did not succeed in the NFL was not because they lacked the talent to play the game, but rather did not have the experience on the field to compliment their abilities.
Sam Bradford
’07 69% 3121 36/8
’08 68% 4080 46/6
Nice numbers huh? But only two years of starting experience. Has all the tools to throw around the yard in the NFL, but only 2 years of game experience. I believe that Bradford should return to Norman for another year before turning pro. Then he would have a better chance of succeeding in the NFL.
If I am to go with the numbers, the QB's out of college who might succeed in the NFL would be Graham Harrell, or Matt Stafford. I put Harrell first only because he's the Senior of the two QB's coming out of college, but both are 3 year starters. If free agency is the name of the game then I would look at Andrew Walter from Oakland very closely, if not in '09 then in 2010. The three QB’s had a lot of time on the field to warrant a serious look from Kansas City.
Graham Harrell
’05 67% 422 3/0
’06 66% 4555 38/11
’07 71% 5705 48/11
’08 71% 4747 41/ 7
Matt Stafford
'06 53 % 1749 7/3
'07 56% 2523 19/10
'08 61% 3209 22/9
The first true freshman to start for the Bulldogs since Quincy Carter in '98, and Stafford started 12/12 games in '06.
Remember its not an exact science. ;)


There are 66 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.