Morning Update (Flacco Edition)
Right now would you take Flacco over Dorsey?
- Very interesting piece from Kent Babb at the Red Zone. He calls for a mulligan and takes another peek at the top 10 of the draft if we knew then what we know now. He says we would take Flacco. Wow, I couldn't disagree more.
- Herm Edwards on DaJuan Morgan: "He’s probably not playing as much as we’d like."
- Bob Gretz is talking playoffs.
- Another interesting one from Bob Gretz. He takes a look at the 5 senior players Bill Kuharich scouted in person this season.
- Adam at AA has a wrap up after his trip into the Black Hole.
- Pretty generic preview for Sunday's game.
- "When it comes to making the best of a bad situation, the Denver Broncos lead the NFL in taking the lemons they’ve been handed and making lemonade. And their offensive line is leading the way." What happened to our lemons?
- I'm not sure if any of you have heard of this but the NFL's Super Ad is featuring NFL players including the Chiefs' J.P. Darche, Derrick Johnson, Tony Gonzalez and Dustin Colquitt. It's funny and worth a look.
Comments
No
Don’t want Flacco. Falco? Thats another story, anytime is a good time for German rockers.
by HIV 2 Elway on
Dec 5, 2008 8:59 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Better question:
Would you have kept Wiegman for another year or two, helping stabilize and keep some veteran presence on the line or stay with Niswanger?
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 9:07 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes and No
Wiegman was not suited to play power football so I do not have a problem with them letting him go, the plan was to just overpower the other team.
But if we had known that we would be going with the spread then I would have wanted Wiegman. He is a very athletic center and very good in pass protection.
If they decided to run the spread full time starting next season we will be looking for a center exactly like Wiegman.
by tevans96 on
Dec 5, 2008 11:42 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
would you still want Flacco, now that Thigpen is playing very good?
by Wildcats23 on
Dec 5, 2008 9:09 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I wonder if the Chiefs are secretly planning a new defense?
Speaking about Aaron Curry/OLB/Wake Forrest
"He’s very athletic and gets to the ball," said Kuharich. "He’s a little bit straight line, but he has shown some pass rush skills. He plays up tempo. He would be better in the 3-4 defense than the 4-3."
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 9:17 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Babb's Column
I saw it and thought he was way off.
St. Louis needed linemen far more than another running back so there was no reason for them to take Forte, Eddie Royal has had a good rookie season but he’s not all that and if the Raiders were to take a mulligan I’d say they would have taken Clady or one of the Longs because their lines are a shambles, the Jets definitely wouldn’t have taken Gholston knowing how he’d struggle (and probably would have gone with a lineman as well), the Saints would probably still have taken Ellis (because it makes no sense to take Mayo because they already had Vilma), the Jags mulligan was ridiculous because while Keller’s good he’s never demonstrated he was a top ten player in this league (Jeff Otah or Glenn Dorsey would probably rank higher), the Bengals made a smart pick with Rivers (who fell prey to a fluke injury that shouldn’t be considered a sign that he’s a bust) and with the way my mulligans worked out the Pats would still have taken Mayo (which was the smart pick for them).
I’m just glad Kent Babb’s not running the Chiefs.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 9:46 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Basically
My projection of a redraft would be:
1. Jake Long – Dolphins
2. Ryan Clady – Rams
3. Matt Ryan – Falcons
4. Glenn Dorsey – Chiefs
5. Chris Long – Raiders
6. Jerod Mayo – Jets
7. Jeff Otah – Jaguars
8. Sedrick Ellis – Saints
9. Keith Rivers – Bengals
10. Darren McFadden – Patriots
(Yes, after looking at it I think Mayo gets selected before the Pats get him and the Patriots decide to go with the highest ranked player in the draft because Belichick is intrigued by the idea of adding him to that offense).
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 9:51 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So you would change our draft position with Oakland also?
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 9:56 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Whoops :)
Shift picks 4 and 5, but the players stay the same. :)
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:10 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I had to needle ya :)
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 10:38 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Redrafts Are Kind Of Pointless Anyway This Soon After A Draft
This is a discussion for 2011.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:13 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Mr. Babb
It’s hard to imagine that 34 NFL and Chief football intelligent fans could be wrong as of 9:57am.
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 10:06 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
oopps I mean 10:06
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 10:06 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DaJuan Morgan
During the preseason the Chiefs intended to play rookie DaJuan Morgan a lot at safety. Though he’s played some, Morgan has been involved mostly on special teams.
"He’s probably not playing as much as we’d like," Edwards said. "But there are some reasons for that. He was a junior coming out. He’s like Bernard (Pollard) was in his first year. We’re trying to bring him along slower like we did with Bernard his first year.
Which sounds to me like Hermese for “He’s not as good as we thought he was and it looks like we burned a 3rd round pick on a special teams player instead of drafting Jeremy Zuttah for our crap o-line. Whoopsie.”
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:11 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Time to take the diapers off, huh Herm?
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Dec 5, 2008 10:39 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not To Pile All The Chiefs' Woes On DaJuan Morgan
Because the kid is who he is and I’m sure he does the best he can and may someday become a decent player, but that draft pick really hacked me off this year because it summed up everything that’s wrong with this rebuilding effort. There was no reason to be taking a reserve safety over the offensive line talent available at that pick when the team was going with a QB with an extensive injury history. It was flat-out irresponsible and incompetent. When you’re talking about players with comparable levels of talent you should always go for the guy who can start at an area of critical need for you. It wouldn’t have been a reach to draft Zuttah at that point…Herm just decided to indulge his d-back fetish and now we’ve got to go into this year’s draft hoping to find at least two good starters for the lines the same as we did last year.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:47 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"but that draft pick really hacked me off this year because it summed up everything that’s wrong with this rebuilding effort."
I thought the rule of rebuilding was in each round draft the BPA.
Now you can disagree with the staff’s evaluation of who that BPA was, but had Zuttah been the BPA on the board when we picked, we would have grabbed him instead of Morgan.
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 11:10 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But If You Have Two Players Of Comparable Ability
And neither is a reach then you draft the one that fits a need. If I’ve got a football team with two outstanding running backs on it and I’ve got the first overall pick, I don’t draft another running back even if the running back is the BPA at that first pick unless there’s no other player of comparable ability that fits a need. Zuttah was not a reach at the point where we were drafting so Zuttah should have been our pick because he served a critical need and Morgan didn’t (and I’d be saying that even if Morgan had been getting more playing time this year).
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 11:54 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And my point is
our staff didn’t think they had comparable ability…some scouts (not saying ours did) had Morgan rated higher than Phillips, making him the top safety prospect. Based on some pre-draft predictions, I think Morgan was technically our biggest “steal” (in that there was the largest difference between his predicted draft position and where we actually picked him)…now whether or not he develops into someone worthy of being ranked to go in the first round remains to be seen…
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 1:31 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which Calls Into Question
The competence of the staff if Zuttah has been the starter this year for a playoff team’s line and Morgan can’t even crack the regular rotation on this team’s terrible defense.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 2:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
apples and oranges
and your claim assumes that Zuttah’s performance is responsible for the fact that TB is contending for the playoff’s…the rushing stat above makes me think its not a strong correlation.
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 3:37 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm Claiming That Zuttah's Performance
Is partly responsible for their offense being significantly better than the Chiefs’. They’re a playoff team because they’re decent offensively and good defensively.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 4:22 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think that's a bit of a stretch
there running game is as silly as ours (check that – it is 0.2 yards/game less silly than ours)…
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 6:08 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And Their Offense Is Ranked 9 Spots Ahead Of Ours
No, Zuttah is not solely responsible for that. But he’s a starter on that line, their offense more productive than our offense, and I can’t help but think we’d probably be ranked a little higher than 25th in the league in offense if we’d actually drafted more than one lineman who could play this year.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 6:19 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Two questions
1) Before the 2008 draft, did not nearly everyone on these boards praise the plan to draft the BPA, knowing that this was a multi-year rebuild?
2) Did you oppose the plan to use our 13 picks on the best players available each time our name was called?
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 8:28 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If You'll Find Our Post-Draft Threads
You’ll see that I stated I wasn’t at all happy with any draft pick after Jamaal Charles because the rest of the draft from then on failed to address the offensive line situation which was an area of critical importance. The only player I’m willing to admit I was wrong about was Brandon Carr. Beyond that at least one of those players we picked up shouldn’t be on the team because we should have drafted linemen sometime before the 6th round of the draft. And Morgan’s the prime example because he’s given the least value for his draft position.
I don’t oppose taking the best player available if the player of need is a reach at that draft position. I do oppose taking best player available if the best player available is at a position we really don’t need and is only slightly better than the best player of need. BPA isn’t a religion and it’s not a suicide pact…it’s a strategy and no strategy is an absolute. If the pick doesn’t make sense for your team at that pick you should diverge from it. And the Chiefs should have diverged from it with Morgan.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 8:44 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Morgan’s the prime example because he’s given the least value for his draft position.
So far. In year 1.
Talk to me again in 5 years and we’ll see if it was a good move or not. You don’t determine if a draft pick was a bust in his rookie year.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 8:46 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not bust
I meant a poor draft choice, not a bust
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 8:47 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If He's Not Seriously Pushing For A Starting Job By Year Three
And Zuttah’s still got a starting gig, Morgan was a bust.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 8:50 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thats ridiculous
Antoine Cason was drafted by the Chargers in the 1st round to be their 3rd CB. Since he was drafted ahead of Zuttah and Zuttah will be a starter does that make Cason a bust?
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 8:55 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I'll Talk To You In Three
If the kid’s not getting regular time in next year’s defense there should be serious questions about just how good he is. If he’s not pushing another player for a starting job in year three, he was a wasted pick. Defensive backs do not require two years to start showing that they’re good players and if they’re not able to compete for a starting gig by year three they’re probably never going to develop.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 8:49 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Plus
Morgan’s contract is only three years, after which he’s a restricted free agent. We’ll know who he is by then.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 8:52 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pollard did not play defense his rookie year
He started his second.
Both guys came out as Juniors and need work, but they have talent.
Morgan may or may not become a starter, but that doesn’t matter, the Chiefs need a good 3rd Safety to rotate in and Morgan is the perfect guy for that since he can rotate between strong and free safety.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 8:57 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They Also Need A Lineman Who Can Start Full-Time, Open Holes, And Protect Their QB
So given two players of comparable ability, which is more important…a reserve who’ll be rotating around with two other safeties and playing part-time on the defense or a guy who’ll be out there full-time with the offense?
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:58 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They did not think they had comparable ability
You obviously do, the Chiefs organization didnt. They thought Morgan was the better value so they took him. Only time will tell if that was the right move or not.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 11:52 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And If It Turns Out To Be The Wrong Move
Will you admit that Chiefs management was completely wrong for making that pick?
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 6, 2008 4:42 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You don't know it was wrong
You are dense as a brick wall and can’t see past your own opinions.
Zuttah is not a Pro Bowler yet and Morgan can’t be labled a bust. You can’t possibly know what is going to happen in the future or even whether Zuttah will turn out to be a good Guard in the future or if Morgan will end up being the Pro Bowler.
All you know is it wasn’t the decision you would have made and you don’t like the guys that made it.
That doesn’t make it the wrong one.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 9:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You Ducked The Question
You are dense as a brick wall and can’t see past your own opinions.
Says the guy who constantly ducks other peoples’ questions and hides behind devil’s advocate positions when he can’t win a debate on his own arguments.
I may not always be right, but at least I’m not a chickenshit.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 6, 2008 9:40 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What question am I ducking?
Teams have draft picks that don’t become superstars every year. Nobody can predict the future, not even you.
Second guessing everyone is ridiculous.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 11:27 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
Wasn’t it you UC that said grading draft classes was fruitless less than 3 years in advance?
by primetime 07 on
Dec 5, 2008 9:49 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Grading Entire Classes Is Fruitless Less Than 3 Years In
But individual players you can start judging based on their position. Defensive backs and running backs are two groups I start rendering verdicts on fairly quickly because they’re positions that players are generally able to step into quickly with minimal training. They can usually either play that position or they can’t and it becomes apparent very early in their career…whereas defensive line, linebacker, o-line, QB, wide receiver/tight end I tend to be more patient about because they’re positions that require substantial tutoring.
And it’s certainly valid to question the drafting strategy of a team’s management right away, and I think the Chiefs really screwed up by ignoring the line this season in the draft. Even if DaJuan Morgan ends up being a solid player (which he may well be) what is the benefit to the team of drafting another safety when there are major holes on the starting o-line? Assuming the team hasn’t already given up on Pollard or Page (and I see no indication that they have) the Chiefs have basically drafted a part-time player who’ll be in a rotation with those other guys when they could have had a full-time player on their line learning how to protect their QB (which is essential if this team wants to progress because if we lose the QB and have to start over the entire rebuilding effort will be derailed).
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:56 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Correction
If the “best player available”doesn’t make sense for your team at that pick you should diverge from it to take a player whose talent level is justified by that pick who does play a position that your team needs more.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 8:46 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
9 Spots ahead means nothing
Tampa Bay only has 27.9 more yds a game than we do.
The fact that there are 9 other teams that have between 0 and 27.8 yds a game more than us is absolutely meaningless.
They are also an established veteran team, not a 1st year rebuilding offense flipping between 3 QBs and only just finding their identity in the last month.
I have a sneaking suspicion next year we will be ahead of Tampa Bay offensively, and that with Morgan as the 3rd Safety and Zuttah the starting Guard for the Bucs.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 9:05 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah
And they’re in the playoffs and we’re one of the worst teams in the league.
Small increments are the difference between good and bad in this league, DJ…you conveniently ignore a lot that when defending this 2-10 team.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:59 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Total lack of reality
Tampa Bay is a veteran team with a stable and strong defense made up of very good players.
The Chiefs are in year 1 of a rebuild.
If you think they should be at the same place, you are a completely lost cause and completely out of sync with reality.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 11:55 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And
9 spots is more than a fourth of the league difference between our team and their team. That’s not a small difference at all.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 11:00 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's why you shouldn't be judging based on ranking
It’s completely fruitless.
27 yds is a pass to Mark Bradley. We could EASILY finish the season past Tampa Bay in yardage. Does that make us a better team? No. Neither would having Zuttah over Morgan.
Considering we are starting a 2nd year QB and Tampa Bay is starting a 10+ yr vet and 3/5 of our roster has been in the league less than 3 years and their team is composed largely of veterans and the fact that we struggled most of the year because of instability at QB, the fact that we are ONLY 27.9 yds behind them should be pretty encouraging.
Just doesn’t fit your agenda.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 11:58 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My Agenda Is To See A Winning Football Team
If you find that offensive perhaps you shouldn’t question other peoples’ fanhood.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 6, 2008 4:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That may be what you think, its not how you come off though.
Your agenda is your grudge against Herm and Carl. You have made the pretty clear the last several months. You nitpick every playcall, roster move and player they picked.
You sound more like a nagging wife than a fan, thats the problem.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 9:15 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My Agenda Is The Chiefs Being A Winning Football Team
If the Chiefs were winning, I wouldn’t have any problem with Herm or Carl. But they’re not, so oh well…too bad for them.
You nitpick every playcall, roster move and player they picked.
You’re right…because in 19 seasons Carl’s never come close to building a Super Bowl team and in 8 seasons Herm’s had a losing record. So everything they do is open to question until they prove they know what they’re doing. Executives and coaches with that track record don’t get the benefit of the doubt.
You sound more like a nagging wife than a fan, thats the problem.
When you start down this road this is all I hear:
Wah, wah wah, other people have opinions I don’t like and I hate it when they stick up for them. Carl and Herm are the greatest coach and GM ever and everything they do is beyond question because I have no standards as a fan and I’m happy with losing ballclubs because I don’t see myself as deserving of success in life. My biggest fear is of stating an opinion that somebody can corner me with so I just call everybody else stupid and irrational and hope that nobody notices just how shallow my positions are and how they collapse like a stack of cards whenever someone merely points at Herm’s and Carl’s record.
I used to think you were an optimist, DJ…but you’re not. You’re just in denial that you root for a football team being run into the ground by a couple of frauds and you’ll do anything to stop people from pointing it out to you. And that’s just sad. Let me know whenever you get back from the Land of Make Believe and we’ll actually discuss football.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 6, 2008 9:51 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Crawford
because in 19 seasons Carl’s never come close to building a Super Bowl team
Flat out lie.
The Chiefs when Marty was here were contenders every year and there were several years they were one of the best teams in the league.
I know I know, you will look to explain that away with some excuse for why the Chiefs suck but you’re the worlds greatest fan.
I used to think you were an optimist, DJ…but you’re not. You’re just in denial that you root for a football team being run into the ground by a couple of frauds and you’ll do anything to stop people from pointing it out to you. And that’s just sad. Let me know whenever you get back from the Land of Make Believe and we’ll actually discuss football.
You haven’t discussed football in 3 months. From the 2nd preseason game you’ve been on non-stop Herm and Carl bashing.
I’m not in denial. I’m not even an optimist. I’m a realist. I know that my place as a fan is as an observer and a cheerleader. I know that regardless of whether I like this call or that roster move, in the end it is not up to me who keeps their job and who doesn’t and regardless of who is playing or who is running the show, I’m still going to root for them anyway.
You want to play GM and second guess everyones decisions armed with hindsight and a grudge and only condescend to reply to those with a differing opinion to tell them how wrong they are.
News flash Crawford. You don’t know everything and you can’t tell the future.
I would much rather the guys we have now succeed than kick them out and bring in another bunch of guys that will want to do things completely different and extend the rebuilding process out for years to come or even guys that could be worse than what we have.
You say my “biggest fear is of stating an opinion that somebody can corner me with so I just call everybody else stupid and irrational and hope that nobody notices just how shallow my positions are”
Thats your problem Crawford. I have stated my positions numerous times and they have not changed in two years. You simply dismiss any opinion that you disagree with as irrelevant and shallow. I’m sorry you live your life that way, you must be very lonely.
The reason we always end up arguing is not because I can’t defend my position, it is that you totally refuse to see what that position is. I can only beat my head against the wall for so long and you aren’t worth the pain.
You made up your mind a long time ago that no matter what is done by the Chiefs organization it will be the wrong ones purely because you don’t like the ones doing it and thats the most arrogant, asinine position I’ve ever encountered.
There will be a time when enough time has passed that if they are not a contender changes will have to be made. That time was not the day Carl wasn’t fired when you wanted him to be, it was not the day Herm was hired and you didn’t like him because you heard bad things from disgruntled Jets fans, it is not in Year 1 of the rebuild and it is definately not just because you said so.
Sorry if that bothers you.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 6, 2008 11:48 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
DJ
How many years has HERM been building this defense? All three he has been here, just because the offense is getting some much needed attention it is year one? Nope, this team has been in a rebuilding phase for three years.
At least 10-6 next year taking our division, or Herm goes.
by Eric Allen on
Dec 6, 2008 11:54 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're So Full Of It
Flat out lie.
The Chiefs when Marty was here were contenders every year and there were several years they were one of the best teams in the league.
Oh really?. We got to the AFC Championship game one year and got blown out. Beyond that this team never got beyond the second round of the playoffs. In fact, we only won a playoff game in one other season under Schottenheimer. So while you may like to believe Carl’s line about how we were “contending” we weren’t contending…unless you’re using some definition of contending that means “did not advance beyond the second round of the playoffs”. When the team makes it to one AFC Championship game and loses by a large margin and only wins one other playoff game in the next 15 years they are not Super Bowl caliber team. They’re a team that went nowhere.
I’m not even an optimist. I’m a realist.
Says the man who blames everyone but the GM and head coach who built a team that’s won 6 games in two years. You’re a realist like a “truther” is a realist.
I know that my place as a fan is as an observer and a cheerleader.
Great, then leave the other fans who want to be unhappy with the direction of the team alone. If you want to be a cheerleader be like TXChiefsfan…he’s an optimist and we often disagree but he somehow manages to refrain from screaming “Carl Hater” when people voice discontent with the team and yet he’s still able to get his point across quite clearly while not insulting other people. Frankly, if AP needs an optimistic voice among the front-page contributors he’d be a better choice than you…he certainly represents the site better than you do.
You want to play GM and second guess everyones decisions armed with hindsight and a grudge and only condescend to reply to those with a differing opinion to tell them how wrong they are.
Gosh, I must have missed the terms and conditions that stated “Posters to Arrowhead Pride may not express any opinion on the team contrary to the GMs and may not disagree with any other poster if DJ doesn’t agree with you.”
Seriously, where do you get off lecturing anyone about the quality of their opinions? If Chris or Primetime feel a need to correct me, I’ll heed their request and change my tack…it’s their blog and I respect their opinions. You’re just a contributor like me with a couple of extra privileges so if you don’t like what I have to say feel free to ignore it or not respond like I do with most of what you write.
News flash Crawford. You don’t know everything and you can’t tell the future.
This is the fourth time in the last week you’ve made this accusation. Point out any instance where I have actually claimed to have ESP. Otherwise quit whining like a little child because other people are confident enough of their judgment to make predictions and stand by them. This is a fan site, that’s what fans do.
Thats your problem Crawford. I have stated my positions numerous times and they have not changed in two years.
I’ve never seen you state any concrete positions on what you expect from this team other than some vague hope that they’ll be good in a couple of years, and I’ve asked you before on this.
What quantifiable results this season would constitute progress? No answer. How many wins is a reasonable expectation from this team this season? No answer. What progress should we be seeing from individual players to judge whether or not they’re developing on schedule? No answer.
Now, it wouldn’t be a problem for you to give no specific answers, except that you rail on people who do set specific standards for being unrealistic or irrational by dismissing them as “Carl Haters”. Which basically makes you a rather annoying hypocrite because from what I’ve seen you put out you’re not willing to put any specifics on your own arguments out there for analysis and criticism, you just toss out vague terms that you can easily walk away from if whatever it is you believe turns out to be wrong. Easy to take shots at others’ positions when you don’t have any of your own…but it also doesn’t make your positions any more solid.
You made up your mind a long time ago that no matter what is done by the Chiefs organization it will be the wrong ones purely because you don’t like the ones doing it and thats the most arrogant, asinine position I’ve ever encountered.
And you base this opinion on what? The less than one year I’ve commented at this site? You don’t know me so you’ve got no basis to be questioning my “true” motivations…I’ve stated exactly when I gave up on Herm and Carl’s plan (this offseason, after they anointed Brodie Croyle as the unquestioned starter) and you’ve got no grounds to question that or my integrity.
You simply dismiss any opinion that you disagree with as irrelevant and shallow.
You’ve made this accusation before as well, and what you actually seem to be saying is “You dismiss my opinion as irrelevant and shallow” and that’s mainly a factor of your tendency to not provide specifics on your opinions, as noted above. Want to reverse that? Then take Truth’s advice and post specifics of what you expected from this team this year and what you expect next year in your signature block like others have. Then you’ll find me less likely to dismiss your opinions.
The reason we always end up arguing is not because I can’t defend my position, it is that you totally refuse to see what that position is. I can only beat my head against the wall for so long and you aren’t worth the pain.
The reason we argue is that when you get frustrated you tend to start accusing people of being “Herm/Carl Haters” to shut down debate then you start telling them to “calm down”. Nobody likes to be treated as if they’re irrational (a position you should have plenty of sympathy with, judging from your comments) so if you want the fights to come to an end, drop the “Herm Hater” crap and don’t tell anyone to calm down. Just argue with them on their points and if you find it too annoying, drop out of the conversation until you’re in a better mood. That’s what I do when I get tired of you.
Now, addressing your only football-related remark in that entire post.
I would much rather the guys we have now succeed than kick them out and bring in another bunch of guys that will want to do things completely different and extend the rebuilding process out for years to come or even guys that could be worse than what we have.
That’s a valid concern and I understand it. But where I’m coming from is that if you look at Herm’s and Carl’s records in their positions, there’s no indication that they’ll ever rebuild this team into a championship contender (which should be the point) and every indication that the best we can hope for is a few 10-6 teams. Now if you’re happy with 10-6 teams, fine…Herm and Carl might work out. But if you’re not and you want more (which is my position), then you’ve got to ask whether bringing in another management team would actually be throwing anything off track. A rebuilding effort that isn’t likely to achieve the goal you want it to achieve isn’t a rebuilding effort…it’s just a bunch of bad teams and a long waste of time. And for my position I’d much rather get a real rebuilding effort started sooner than later because I don’t see what Herm and Carl are doing as rebuilding in any meaningful sense…they’re just gutting a team and refilling it with lower salaried players in the hopes the fans won’t notice.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 7, 2008 2:12 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I too agree that we should have addressed O line more in last year's draft
and Zuttah probably would have been a better pick. But at the time, I think the Chiefs were looking for Greg Wesley’s replacement because they knew he would be traded or released. So in their mind, another safety to put with Page, Pollard, and McGraw was probably a higher need.
by TheQ on
Dec 6, 2008 8:32 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which Is Why I Question Their Strategy
Lines are the foundation for any team…if your d-line and o-line are bad, your team isn’t going to be any good. The Chiefs should have put a priority on offensive linemen when 3rd round talent was available at that pick…they already had Pollard and Page starting and McGraw and Wesley backing them up. Being a little weaker at the backup safety position is not an excuse to neglect your starting line positions when you’ve got talent available at that pick that isn’t a reach.
Also, it’s in line with the problems Herm’s always had with his teams. It’s not a coincidence that so many of his QBs get seriously hurt. He doesn’t do anything to protect them because he doesn’t make his offensive line a priority. That’s a large part of the reason he’s a losing coach. Until Branden Albert, the only time his team ever drafted an offensive lineman on the first day was in 2001.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 6, 2008 9:19 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Scary thought
What are the chances they do not draft a O lineman in the first 3 rounds again this year? And we still potentially need 3 new starters and a future replacement for waters. Wade Smith and Herb Taylor are our only reliable back up players on the line right now. Even though the line is improved over last year, it still needs to be a lot better if we are ever going to be a top ten offense again. Nothing is more fundamentally true than the games are won and lost in the trenches. It still sticks in my craw that we didn’t sign Hartwig or even bring in Scott and talk to him. What were we thinking?
by TheQ on
Dec 6, 2008 10:46 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Herm and the draft
How much say do you think Herm had in the draft? Isn’t that portion of management run primarily by Peterson? I remember the story of how the picked Carr as the birthday present for Herm, in like the sixth or seventh round. Doesn’t sound like Herm pulled the trigger on Morgan. But I agree, we had a relatively competent safety and needed to pick up a lineman instead of using a 3rd round pick on a backup.
by Chiefs4Life on
Dec 5, 2008 11:16 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not Sure
I made an assumption that the Chiefs went DB because it was Herm’s call because he apparently weighed in heavily on Carr’s selection (so it seems that Herm has a lot of pull), but I admit I have no evidence who said Morgan should be selected. That’s why I generally blame Carl for the poor draft record more than the coach…because Carl’s job title makes him responsible for the draft. But I dinged Herm in this one because he’s the one making excuses for why our 3rd round pick who was projected to get a lot of minutes on defense has only been a special teams player.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 11:59 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You draft players for the next 6 or 7 years, not just by what they do in year 1.
I really thought the Chiefs should have drafted Zuttah because it met our needs for this year, but in the long run, you get a much more talented team when you don’t pass on players that you think will be very good, even if you don’t need them at the time.
When we look back 3 years from now, will we still say drafting Morgan instead of Zuttah was a mistake? Very unlikely. Morgan may turn out to be a very good Safety and we could pick up a decent Guard just as good next draft.
If you draft for need and pass up talented players, THAT is a bad rebuild.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 12:06 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Unless
The player you’re passing on is also likely to be good in the long run.
If Zuttah had graded as a fifth or sixth round pick, I wouldn’t have been irritated because drafting him would have been a reach and a rather foolish gamble. But he graded out about where he was selected (just after Morgan), he fit an area of critical need (especially considering our then franchise QB’s injury history), and Morgan didn’t. It was a stupid pick at the time and it’s looked even worse as the season’s gone on.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 12:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You think every decision that is different than you would make is stupid
Morgan was rated by many as the 2nd or 3rd best Safety in the draft and was figured as a 2nd rounder that was still available in the 3rd.
Guard is not a high skill position and many teams have Guards that are 4th or later round picks and again, this was not a draft for a one year rebuild, there are many other opportunities to fill the position.
If it were me, I would have picked Zuttah because I had studied him and knew him and didn’t know anything about Morgan. But just because it wasn’t my pick doesn’t mean it was the wrong one.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 12:19 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
FINALLY You Take A Solid Position!!!
What I don’t understand is why you’re willing to concede it to the wisdom of Herm and Carl.
If it were me, I would have picked Zuttah because I had studied him and knew him and didn’t know anything about Morgan. But just because it wasn’t my pick doesn’t mean it was the wrong one.
Yes, it was the wrong pick. Know why? Because Jeremy Zuttah is starting on the offensive line for a team going to the playoffs and DaJuan Morgan is a special teams player who can’t get on the field regularly with the worst defense in the NFL and our offensive line still sucks. That’s what made it a bad pick.
Your pick was right and theirs was wrong…why on earth would you defer that position to the judgment of Herm and Carl? They’ve built a 2-10 team and can’t construct a good defense despite spending most of their draft picks on defensive players. Just because they get a paycheck from the NFL and have “Head Coach” and “General Manager” as their title doesn’t mean they have any clue what they’re doing or that they’re making smarter decisions than you would.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 12:51 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I am nothing but solid positions
So don’t know what you’re talking about there.
I am willing to concede that just because a different player than the one we drafted is playing better this year doesn’t mean that down the road our guy won’t prove to be the better one.
You are willing to admit this with Dorsey, why can’t you take a wait and see attitude with Morgan? It’s not as though the Guard position is what has been killing us all year. Morgan is a guy that they think can be very good down the road. Just because he’s not playing YET doesn’t mean anything, they didn’t play Pollard much his rookie year either.
Just because they get a paycheck from the NFL and have "Head Coach" and "General Manager" as their title doesn’t mean they have any clue what they’re doing or that they’re making smarter decisions than you would.
I’ve never said it did. I’m saying that anyone that judges a player by his rookie year is a fool. Zuttah could blow out a knee next week and Morgan could be going to the Pro Bowl two years from now. We cannot see the future and just because things don’t look fantastic in the beginning doesn’t mean they won’t end well.
It is irrational to jump to conclusions based off such a small sampling. Zuttah has done OK for a rookie, I woudn’t say he’s going to be a playmaker for Tampa Bay though. Tampa Bay only has .2 more rushing yds/game than KC does this year with Zuttah than KC without.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 1:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Really?
Tampa Bay only has .2 more rushing yds/game than KC does this year with Zuttah than KC without.
Interesting…
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 1:36 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
" I am nothing but solid positions So don’t know what you’re talking about there."
I think by “solid position”, UCrawford means “the position I am taking”
j/k UC =)
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 1:38 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That's kind of what I figured
Considering I haven’t changed my support for the rebuild in two years despite the losses.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 1:39 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thought this was year one, DJ?
At least 10-6 next year taking our division, or Herm goes.
by Eric Allen on
Dec 6, 2008 11:59 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Except
The guard position is killing us this year. Right guard has been a disaster area and they still can’t find anyone who can do a decent job there…which is especially important because of Sackintosh. If we had drafted Zuttah we’d have a legitimate young starter to develop and play there rather than having to filter through the rest of the league’s scraps like we’re doing now.
And I’m willing to give Dorsey patience because Dorsey’s good enough to get playing time on this defense. Morgan isn’t…and Herm’s comments make me believe that the Chiefs seriously misjudged his ability. And Zuttah would have been a starter for our offensive line. Depth is nice, but at this point the Chiefs needed a starter on the o-line a hell of a lot more than they needed a backup safety.
Zuttah has done OK for a rookie, I woudn’t say he’s going to be a playmaker for Tampa Bay though.
Most offensive linemen aren’t playmakers, they’re support. It’s more important his rookie season for him to be good enough to start while not being a sieve. So far he’s done well on both counts. Morgan, on the other hand, is a guy who isn’t good enough to get playing time on one of the worst defenses in the NFL. Now, maybe he’ll develop into something down the road, but I like Zuttah’s odds of developing a hell of a lot more than Morgan’s at this point.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 2:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And
Tampa Bay only has .2 more rushing yds/game than KC does this year with Zuttah than KC without.
They’re also ranked 10 spots above us in offensive yardage and 8 spots above us in offensive points. Call me crazy, but I think that’s a significant difference.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 3:03 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't agree
Right Guard has hardly been a disaster. After a shaky start (from transitioning from another position) Jones did an OK, though unspectacular job. Its definately a position we need to look to upgrade, but this is a team with plenty of holes and you can’t fill them all in one year.
If we had drafted Zuttah we’d have a legitimate young starter to develop and play there rather than having to filter through the rest of the league’s scraps like we’re doing now.
And we can’t do that this year… why? Again, this is not a 1 year rebuild.
Depth is nice, but at this point the Chiefs needed a starter on the o-line a hell of a lot more than they needed a backup safety.
That’s true, but you never know what is happening down the road. Maybe this year or next there is a glut of quality Guards but few quality safetys.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 3:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Future
Maybe this year or next there is a glut of quality Guards but few quality safetys.
Which would be understandable if you didn’t have holes to fill that year in your starting lineup at guard.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 3:36 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Drafting to fill holes when you are a crappy team
makes you the Lions.
I don’t want that.
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 3:38 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Drafting Crappy Players
Is what makes you a crappy team. The Lions stink because they drafted players with off-field issues (Mike Williams, Carlos Rogers) with high picks and players who were flat-out terrible (e.g. Mike McMahon) with their mid-rounders.
Reaching for players when you draft is how you have bad drafts. Zuttah wasn’t a reach.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 4:25 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
When you "need" to fill 10+ positions (i.e. when you're a crappy team)
trying to rebuild in one season by drafting based on need is as bad as reaching
In recent years, there have been several teams that should blow up the roster and rebuild, but instead flounder in mediocrity or suckitude because they draft to fix all the problems in one year
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 6:13 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Drafting For Need"
Is one of the most misunderstood statements in the NFL.
Drafting for need is bad when you draft a fourth or fifth round talent in the second or third round because there aren’t any third round talents at his position and you need to fill a hole at that position. Drafting a third round talent at a position you desperately need over a third round talent at a position you don’t need (even if the latter is slightly higher rated) is just common sense.
If the best player available in every round when you draft is a running back, do you draft seven running backs? Hell no…you look for players who aren’t reaches at the position where you’re drafting and you pick the one who fits your needs better.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 6:25 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Holes that can and were filled by temporary hole fillers
The Chiefs saw what they perceived to be a great value getting a quality Safety a round later than he was expected to be taken and they took that value.
This team has tons of holes to fill and probably will for a few years. They won’t fill every need this offseason either. But they don’t just need starters, they need depth too. In the end the quality of depth of a team often is what decides between a good team and a championship team.
Essentially this all boils down to what it always boils down to. You are expecting perfection and immediate results instead of looking at the big picture long term. Zuttah was a decent prospect, but lets face it he was not thought of as a Will Shields. It’s not as though we passed on a sure fire future Hall of Famer to get depth at Safety. The rebuild will not have failed just because we took a 3rd Safety instead of a Guard with our last pick in the 3rd round.
As I said before, looking back at this 3 years down the road this will be a ridiculously dead issue because the need for a starting Guard will have been met and we should have a very good and deep secondary.
by ChiefDJ on
Dec 5, 2008 8:44 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hit the nail on the head DJ
but in the long run, you get a much more talented team when you don’t pass on players that you think will be very good, even if you don’t need them at the time.
when bad teams ignore this line of reasoning year after year, you end up with the Lions =)
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 1:33 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No to Flacco
Look, if we had taken Flacco he would now be on IR and we would be marveling at Thigpen and wondering why we wasted a high pick on Flacco when we could have gotten Dorsey who would at this point probably be leading the sack count in the NFL with some team we probably hate.
Blame my wife!
by sir eccles on
Dec 5, 2008 10:18 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Exactly
And we’d be in worse shape for next year than we are now because we’d basically have botched our first rounder.
The problem with giving Herm a franchise QB is that he’s never shown any ability to take care of them. Baltimore drafted Flacco then signed Willie Anderson to protect him. Chiefs weren’t willing to do that with Croyle.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 10:20 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Excellent points
Or, worse, he wouldn’t have gone on IR, played terrible and we never would have found out about Thigpen.
by primetime 07 on
Dec 5, 2008 10:47 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Joe all day
He’s shown he can handle the NFL, and he has the perfect build for a QB. I like Thigpen but Joe is 5 inches taller and has a cannon also. Not to mention he doesn’t have a true # 1 WR to throw to. Dorsey should have at least one sack, IMO.
by GHOST OF DT on
Dec 5, 2008 11:39 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I Agree That Flacco Has Been A Better QB Than Thigpen
I just don’t really buy that he’s be a better QB than Thigpen if he was playing for the Chiefs. I think Herm would have tried to pound that square peg in the round hole by trying to force Flacco to play the loser ball offense, that Flacco would have gotten seriously injured because that’s just what happens to Herm’s QBs and we’d be back to square one.
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 12:02 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's funny
among all the pundits and draftnicks Glenn Dorsey was unanimously the best player to come out of the draft. Now columnists are beginning to throw the ‘B’ word at him(which obviously none of us believe). It’s as simple as this – if Dorsey doesn’t come into his own by year three its BLATANTLY OBVIOUS the KC Chiefs do not have the personnel to develop NFL talent. Period. The evidence for this case is already damning, but Dorsey is a prime example. If he’s yet another underachiever I truly believe it’s helpless rooting for this team until there is a regime change from top on down. I never thought the Lions would get their act together before us but depending on who they hire for GM next year, that very well just may be the case…
by KansasCityShuffle on
Dec 5, 2008 1:04 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Dorsey should show improvement in his second year. But if he’s shown only marginal improvement by his third year really there’s nobody else to point at other than the coaching staff. Too many players have failed to develop under this regime to lay the blame off on bad luck.
Hopefully, Herm and Carl won’t be here in Dorsey’s year 3 so we won’t have to find out. :)
The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way. If he can't win at least 9 games next season, Herm's a joke.
by UCrawford on
Dec 5, 2008 1:12 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Concerning the link about scouting
on Maualuga -
He has a tendency to miss tackles because he does play out of control
nevermind…Rey is not the next Junior Seau…
by PVChiefsfan on
Dec 5, 2008 1:35 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs

















