Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Chiefs' Chances at Pioli Coming Down to the Wire

416588_medium

via media.scout.com

The Browns interest in Scott Pioli is apparently causing the Chiefs to act.  Quickly.  Kansas City has officially requested permission from the Patriots to speak with Pioli.

This likely means that the Browns, who also contacted New England offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels about their head coaching vacancy, are going to step up their efforts to land Pioli.

The Browns are in New England meeting with Pioli today.  Per Adam Schefter of the NFL Network:

Those within the league say the Browns would like an answer from their leading candidate, Scott Pioli, today. The Browns are meeting with Pioli in the New England area today. If Pioli takes the job, the Browns general manager search is over and the search for a new head coach will commence.

The Browns are apparently putting the pressure on Pioli because they're looking behind their shoulder as the perceived leader in the clubhouse for Pioli's services and see the Chiefs coming.  Per the Boston Herald:

With the Chiefs now officially putting their hat into the ring, it could lead to a situation in which the Browns put the full-court press on Pioli assuming their meeting with him goes well.

The Browns have also contacted Falcons' President Rich McKay about the GM vacancy.  It's possible that contacting McKay was a way to garner leverage on Pioli by showing him they are willing to go in a different direction.

By all accounts, the Browns are the leaders for Pioli.  The Chiefs, if Pioli is indeed their #1 candidate, are getting backed into a wall and need to act.

What are you going to do, Clark Hunt?

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

GET MOVIN!!

If Pioli is the man Clark wants he better get a move on. I wish I knew who all he was looking at for GM. Baltimore and Pittsburgh are in the playoffs. Maybe there are people in those organizations that he is targeting. I just hope he can make a decision SOON! This organization is in dire need of some direction. NEW direction.

by ksjhwk on Dec 31, 2008 3:04 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Frustrating

So, we announce the ‘resignation’ of Carl early, mainly to get a jump-start on looking for a new GM.

Cleveland waits until after the season to fire their GM, yet Lerner gets the jump on Pioli and interviews him first??

Its clear by the official request for an interview, that Clark is interested…so WHAT is going on here? Let’s GO CLARK, get after it!

I can accept that the reason we don’t see KC in the ESPN crawls or on PFT is because he is keeping the search quit, but I can’t accept having one of your primary targets interviewed by Cleveland first when we had a big head start.

by kcsno56 on Dec 31, 2008 3:17 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Prime

BTW, nice post.

by kcsno56 on Dec 31, 2008 3:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a case of first come first serve

Pioli has ties to Cleveland and word is he WANTS to go to the Browns. If that is the case it doesn’t matter how much noise Clark makes, we may not have a shot at him anyway. If thats the case, we need to just move on to the next candidate and go from there.

Pioli is the big name candidate, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he is the only one that can put together a winner.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 31, 2008 6:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Chill out

Just because the Browns were the first to get there to talk to him doesn’t mean they will acquire him. It may be a bad thing for them. If they are indeed interviewing coaches before they even get a new GM, how do you think Pioli will view that? That means that he doesn’t have a say in who the new HC is right? So automatically he doesn’t have complete control of the GM side. They are also not wanting to wait for an answer either. Today or else? How does that sit with him? Do you guys think that Pioli hasn’t already decided on which team he wants to GM?

It would be a completely opposite situation when he talks to Clark, wouldn’t it. No pressure, think about it, you have complete control and bring in your own staff.

by oldchiefsfan on Dec 31, 2008 3:26 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Why worry

Yeah Clark is interested, but not desperately interested to the extent that Randy Lerner is. Lerner needs to make a splash to appease the fans after this year’s disaster and will bend over backwards to get Pioli. My totally unfounded guess is that Clark can’t/won’t compete with that, especially since Pioli already has connections with Cleveland. From everything Clark’s said it seems he’s targeting a younger player personnel guy like Dominik, Kokinis, Whaley etc., and I think that’s what we’ll get. Pioli would be nice but it seems far-fetched at this point…

by Maddogmag on Dec 31, 2008 3:26 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Worried

Because IMHO, Pioli is the #1 candidate on the market. He’s also NOT old, no he doesn’t have much hair, but he’s 42 or 43, thats considered very young for NFL GM’s.

Also, if you think Lerner has more pressure from his fans than Clark does, you’re nuts…and you weren’t at the last two home games.

Clark HAS to know he needs a home-run GM. Pioli fits the profile…his only negative is that he’ll probably command the highest salary of the GM’s on the market. We’ll see if that’s what keeps him from coming to KC, if so, its a further sign that another era of cheapness is taking over one of our sports franchises.

Oldchiefsfan: I hope you’re right, and that Pioli takes offense to CLE’s interviews…my guess is, Lerner is just using all of that as leverage so Pioli doesn’t think he’s their only option. If he’s hired, he’ll be hiring the coach, if they hire a coach first (which won’t happen) then Pioli won’t end up there.

“Do you guys think that Pioli hasn’t already decided on which team he wants to GM?” As for this question, I don’t know, its why if I were Clark, I’d want to interview him.

by kcsno56 on Dec 31, 2008 3:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Still not worried

As to the young part, I’m aware of Pioli’s age, I suppose instead of young I should have used “under the radar” or “less well-known,” as that was my intent. As for the pressure, you’re right, I wasn’t at the past two home games and I’m definitely not Clark Hunt.

I do know that the Chiefs weren’t 10-6 last year, expected by all to contend for their division this year, and didn’t rashly give their GM and head coach an expensive extension after last season just to have to buy them out after this one. The Chiefs also aren’t in a division in which there are already two perennial playoff teams (and well-run organizations) to contend with. The AFC West is open, which should entice a potential GM but also makes Clark’s situation far less desperate.

What the Chiefs did do this year is did force their fan-hated prior GM into resignation and from every Chiefs fan I’ve come in contact with that alone bought Clark a lot more slack than Lerner has right now. They’re also in an acknowledged rebuilding situation, so even if we didn’t expect 2-14 we had no right to expect 11-5 or better. I have every faith that Clark will hire a competent person to takeover football operations but I’m not going to fret about that person being Pioli. Personally, I’m sort of worried that for several years now Pioli has been built up as golden boy. That’s a lot of pressure to put on a guy and also a lot of pressure on a franchise to get big results and fast. Regardless it will be who Clark decides it will be.

by Maddogmag on Dec 31, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also worried

Because just like with free agents the first contact is often the last contact.

by FrankPitts on Dec 31, 2008 7:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

This entire Browns situation

Proves exactly why the GM job in KC should be considered by any sane person far more desirable than Cleveland. As stated above by oldchiefsfan, they’re interviewing coaches before they even have a GM in place (although they are interviewing the guy that everyone seems to think Pioli will bring with him). That shows me that the organization is not willing to cede total control to the new GM. Also, Cleveland is trying to strong arm the man who has all the options in the world. Cleveland is hardly the most desirable franchise to go to. The city is dying. The employment base (and therefore, potential revenue base) is weaker than any other available market excluding Detroit. And yet they have the cajones to DEMAND that a guy who has been the most sougth after GM prospect in the last three years make a decision by the end of the day?!?!?! You gotta be kidding me. But there are so many other reasons why KC is the MOST attractive GM position available:

1. The chance to bring in a franchise QB yourself and put your own stamp on the team early.

2. The patience that Clark has shown in NOT firing Herm YET. He will let the new GM have his choice of keeping or dumping Herm. That patience is also something the new GM will be able to look at as attractive when it comes to his own job, too.

3. Speaking of his own job, the very fact that we held onto Carl Peterson for 19 years shows that our ownership is willing to give a long tenure to a GM in order to produce results.

4. Money. We have more cap space than anyone. We have boatloads of young talent that will emerge as stars over the next few seasons.

by Sudden on Dec 31, 2008 3:58 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Sudden

I hope/wish that you’re right, but don’t see it.

I agree with your opening paragraph as to how Lerner is bungling the situation with Pioli, what it tells me is he thinks he’s already got the guy in the bag. I also promise you that when its all said and done, he doesn’t take that job unless he has total control of hiring a coach and personel. He wouldn’t have passed on other offers if he didn’t feel that way.

1. Disagree. I have to think that having a quality young QB is considered a plus, not a minus for a new GM. They aren’t that easy to find, and its one less thing to get done. They also have one of the best LT’s in the league, and probably the #1 young LT…so the 2 most important positions on the team are set.

2 & 3. I’m not sure the Herm situation is a positive or a negative. Its probably a net even. Many would probably like the slate clean before they arrive. Judging from Clark’s comments on the matter publically and privately, it sounds like he wants to bring Herm back. Now, I imagine he would allow the new GM to fire Herm, but that will take convincing, something that is just another headache for a GM. Depending on the individual, this would probably be countered with your loyalty argument. Peterson’s ‘reign’ is a better example of loyalty, and a big plus.

4. Disagree bigtime here. KC has a reputation throughout the league as being cheap. Now that may very well be changing, but being $38 million under the cap LAST year is not going to be something a potential new GM is going to be clicking his heels about. Even before last year, we were under the cap at least $10 mil in the previous 3 seasons. There was a time we spent to the cap every year…this hasn’t been the case recently. Its not a story that gets covered much, but its a fact. NOW, its certainly possible that Clark is going to change this, but its yet to be seen.

As for the ‘boatloads of young talent’ uh…I SERIOUSLY disagree with this statement, which is the EXACT reason I’m so worried about this hire. We have a lot of young players, but few young stars or even impact players. Cleveland is miles ahead of us right now talent wise. No I know its not popular to say…

The good news is, in the hands of a capable GM like Pioli, we can get LJ dealt (maybe for a 3rd?) and with a solid draft, start a REAL rebuilding process next year, which includes quality, young FA acquisitions, a huge draft, and some actual WINS next year.

by kcsno56 on Dec 31, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

re: Chiefs and the cap

I’ll trust you on the numbers but we were in cap hell back when Vermeil arrived so maybe management is being a little flimsy with the money these days?

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 4:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Staying under the Cap

and being the “Cheaps” was largely done so the Hunts could drop massive money into renovating Arrowhead and creating a practice facility that we can use to lure big time FAs. I’m pretty sure that Clark noticed that Sea of Red turn into the Sea of Red Seats. He knows that he’ll lose more in revenue that he will spend in expenses if this continues. I expect him to make some big signings this offseason in order to at least generate enough buzz to sell tickets. He is already targeting the highest priced GM and Coaching prospects on the market.

As for quality QB… Brady Quinn? Ha. His draft position fell the Dow in October for a reason. He played at a college known for its routinely soft schedule (with one exception a year, courtesy of Pete Carrol) and history of being the single most overrated team in any sport at any level. Brady Quinn will be a bust. I am simply not sold on him. There’s two contracts that are gonna decimate the money Pioli would have to play with in CLE.

Few young stars or impact players: We are set at CB for years to come with Flowers, Carr, and Leggett. Dorsey will step into prominance next season, Tank proved himself pretty well this tear IMO (warpaintillustrated agrees w/ me). Phat Albert will lock down LT for a decade. Cottom will become an top 5 FF TE once TG walks off into sunset. And I think we have a lot of players who underperformed this year because of the single worst coaching staff assembled in the history of the NFL. Art Shell could’ve won 6 games with this roster.

by Sudden on Dec 31, 2008 4:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

?

Brady Quinn actually faced one of the nation’s toughest schedules.

2004 – 7th
2005 – 1st

And, he was coached by the same guy that coached Tom Brady. And routinely put up huge numbers his final 2 years. And played in a pro style offense (In fact, Weis said during Quinn’s senior year that he could 75% of NFL offenses right then).

His numbers actually indicate that he should be a great QB in the NFL. His college numbers are similar to other highly effective NFL QBs when in college throughout history. I would venture to say that based on just his college numbers (and how they translate knowing completion % and # of games started are the best indicators of NFL success), Quinn was one of the most NFL ready QBs to come along in a long time.

He’s only started like 2 games in his career.

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 5:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

In fact, Weis said during Quinn’s senior year that he could run 75% of NFL offenses right then.

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 5:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Cap/Cheap/Quinn

Sudden…I LOVE your enthusiasm about our youth…but I think you may be seeing them with red tinted glasses.

Where to start…the Hunt’s have NOT dumped massive money into renovating Arrowhead. They got a pretty sweetheart deal from the taxpayers. Don’t get me wrong, I voted for it, but the Star’s comparison of our renovations vs. comparable projects showed that the Hunt’s were putting in a FAR smaller % of the project than other NFL owners.

Brady Quinn…I may not like him as much as Primetime, but there isn’t a GM in the league that wouldn’t trade Thigpen/Croyle/Huard for Quinn/Anderson/Dorsey. Its not remotely close. They are FAR stronger at QB, particularly starting QB.

Again, appreciate your enthusiasm about our young players, but c’mon, we have seen nothing to expect ‘star or impact player’ out of Tank or Cottam…and if I’m being honest, Dorsey. I am still hopeful that a new defensive staff can get Dorsey back to his LSU production, but essentially we are pretty solid at CB, and thats it on defense…which is why we were dead last statistically there in the NFL last year. On offense…you’ve literally got 2 young starters that can be called impact players: Albert and Bowe.

Lastly, I’m all onboard with getting Herm out of here, but coaching was only part of the problem. A great coach (certainly not Shell), MAYBE gets us 6 wins last year, but this is a roster with a TON of holes, and very few answers…all the more reason we need a homerun GM hire.

by kcsno56 on Jan 1, 2009 11:37 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: D-line
…but essentially we are pretty solid at CB, and thats it on defense…

I think the defensive line is still TBD. 3 of our four projected starters have 2 or less years experience. I know they played awful this year but I’m still holding out that A) Dorsey becomes a star and B) the rest of the guys become serviceable.

by Joel Thorman on Jan 1, 2009 12:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

A little slow

I wish they hadn’t moved quicker. You can’t lag, they had a 2 week jump on the Browns for goodness sake.

by FrankPitts on Dec 31, 2008 5:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

However

They couldn’t talk to Pioli until the Patriots season was over….same as the Browns.

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 5:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Asking permission" to speak to Pioli

Doesn’t mean that we have just now started talking to him. It is a public way of making him know that we are really serious. There is always a lot of talks going on behind the scenes and through intermediaries.

Just like the Browns talking to McKay is a way of pushing Pioli, the Chiefs “announcing” they are getting permission is a way of telling Pioli we want you and we’re serious about it, even though they have no doubt already had some conversations.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 31, 2008 6:16 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that's right

We can’t contact other coaches in the middle of the season without their employer’s permission.

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 6:28 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Coaches are different than front office people

And the season has been over since Sunday evening. :)

by ChiefDJ on Dec 31, 2008 6:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Which is why I was saying that the Chiefs couldn’t get a jumpstart on GM talk.

But you can not contact front office people during the season. Per the NFL bylaws: ‘Unless otherwise provided for in this Policy, no club may request permission to discuss employment with a non-player, non-coach employee of another club, whether or not that employee is under contract, during the employer club’s playing season, defined as the period from the opening of preseason training camp through the club’s final game of the season, including postseason if applicable.’

FrankPitts said we had a 2 week jump on the Browns….not really as it pertains to Pioli. Neither of us could talk to Pioli until the Pats’ season was over.

And yes, you do have to ask to speak with front office people.

by Joel Thorman on Dec 31, 2008 6:44 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

But you and I both know

That people in the NFL talk all the time. Sometimes they do it through intermediaries, sometimes they do it person to person.

Clarks two week jump got GM candidates 2 weeks of looking at KC to decide if they were interested in going there. But I have no doubt whatsoever that the Chiefs and Pioli have been talking AT LEAST since the season for both teams ended on Sunday if not likely before.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 31, 2008 6:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Not a time to panic

Clark is going about this the perfect way. He opened the door early by giving all the potential candidates time to look at the organization over the past 2 + weeks, and now he is letting out bits of news. I’d think a GM candidate doesn’t want an owner who is demanding, reporting every detail of their business, putting the GM under pressure, etc. I also think that the other top candidates will contact Clark if they are interested and he will have leverage. He seems to be very, very savvy.

I’d be more than happy to get Pioli, but he isn’t the only top candidate out there. I really think it is great that Clark is looking for the guy who will be the best and can last another 20 years as the Chiefs GM, this time giving us SB rings. The guy that wants to turn the Chiefs into a dominant force for many years to come. Wisdom and patience is key to finding the best GM for us. This isn’t a popularity contest, or a #1 draft pick. Peterson was the popular choice at the time as well. Not to say he was a complete failure, but he sure didn’t produce what was expected.

by TXChiefan on Dec 31, 2008 7:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Beaten to the punch

http://cle.scout.com/2/826162.html

How much do you think Crennel has to do with any of this?

If Pioli does indeed come in I’d expect to see McDaniels as HC and Crennel serving possibly as DC. If they brought in Cassel things would get interesting and fast in Cleveland.

by KansasCityShuffle on Dec 31, 2008 7:56 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

If the rule is still active, I think some of these people are still in the playoff scenario
Lerner has also set up interviews with New York Giants defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo, Tennessee defensive coordinator Jim Schwartz, who spent three years in the Browns’ personnel department as a pro and college scout in the 1990s, and Patriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels, a Canton, Ohio, native.

Lerner also received permission to interview Atlanta president Rich McKay, who was bumped upstairs last year but is said to be craving a return to a GM-type role. That interview is expected to place Thursday.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&id=3803143

What am I not understanding about no contact with personnel?

…during the employer club’s playing season, defined as the period from the opening of preseason training camp through the club’s final game of the season, including postseason if applicable.’

We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 31, 2008 9:27 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Another one
EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. — The Detroit Lions are interested in speaking to Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator Leslie Frazier for their vacant coaching job.

Vikings coach Brad Childress confirmed the contact Wednesday by the Lions

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&id=3802724

We need a future defensive leader, his name is James Laurinaitis and he can be selected in round 1 of the upcoming Draft.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 31, 2008 9:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry, It's all been done before!

Hey fellow Chiefs fans…don’t worry there are lots of excellent GM prospects out there. I.E. Mark Ross just to name one. Seriously though there are several good GM Prospects out there right now…HELLO!! And Herm who? For any of you that still hold out hope for Herm maybe deserves a chance, maybe he will be ok etc…..WAKE UP!! Seriously. Let go of the emotion and turn on your I.Q. switch. Your probably the same lego heads who got a twinge of excitement at the mention of Bill Cowher or Marty Schottenheimer coming here in any capacity. NO NO NO!! The NFL is going thru a regime change. Happens every generation. Age makes this inevitable. The Cowhers, the Vermeils’s and yes the Schottenheimers have all had their day. Why do you want to put fresh paint on a condemned building? Their done. They had their day. Hell why don’t we let Bill C. and Marty have a Wii bowling tournament to see who gets to come to KC. Listen, if nothing changes….“NOTHING CHANGES”. We need to get out of the ‘lets recycle’ thinking mode here in kc. Why don’t we bring Joe Montana back and fire Thigpen. And Marty can be our GM and Bill Cowher can coach and Len Dawson can be our scout director and Marcus Allen can replace Larry Johnson and Methuselah can take over the Owner position…LISTEN NIMRODS.. If you want to be a team of the future then you gotta start with youth. I.E. the tampa bay devil rays..Listen..young players cost less and have more to offer. Their fresh, their healthy and their eager. Their hungry. They have something to prove. Their not beat to death from years of abuse in this league. Their CHEAP!! We need a whole new young staff from the top down. A fresh very young GM and a young coach and a young team. If you don’t grab the hot young brains before they become the next belichek’s, then their gone forever. No one is gonna get Belichek out of New England now. THey got him first. Grab these young guns with their fresh new ideas. New offensive and defensive schemes and let em’ go crazy. Look at what Miami did with that direct snap to the running back play. Geez, are ya kiddin’ me? The whole NFL freaked on that shit like it was some new discovery. College has been doin’ weak crap like that for 30 years. The NFL needs a mover and a shaker to come along and break the rules. Live on the edge a little and make this game more exciting. The chiefs are in a perfect position to be the team to do that. We got a young new excited owner. Now let’s keep the trend going.

by krayfish on Dec 31, 2008 9:35 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Oh and by the way

Before anyone gets offended let me just say; I am not disrespecting great coaches like Marty or Bill C or Vermeil. It’s just that we KC fans have been subjected to 20 years of a retarded philosiphy that goes something like this; We didn’t win the Superbowl this year so we better hurry and panic and buy a veteran or two that are in their last years and let’s patch together a team and pray for a one time win. Yes KC needs to change it’s attitude about building a winning team. You can’t bring in Joe Montana when he’s too old to last and expect to have a solid franchise winning team. THere’s no future there. It’s all about the instant gratification. But there’s no substance there. There’s no foundation at all. But that’s what we do here in KC. We did it with Vermeil too. We ran out and tried to grab some defensive players (veterans) from other teams that were old and over the hill. Not that they didn’t contribute, but look at the results. NO SUPERBOWL. And worse…no future. Where are they now? We are always looking for the quick fix. The flash in the pan. We keep trying to patch and plug worn out tires. We need to do what we’re doing now. Keep drafing young guys and hire young coaches and GM and office personnel. Chemistry takes years to build. YEARS!! That’s why Brett Favre, even though he had some brilliant moments because he is amazing, couldn’t get it done in NY. He hasn’t played with those guys long enough to build trust and to get in each other’s heads. If we keep bringing in old guys who have never played here and we sign them to one and two year contracts we will never succeed. Time has proven this…we suck. By the time these veteran players start to get in sync with one another..they retire. On the other hand if we let all these young guys start their careers here and continue to work together until they click as a team, as a unit and build that chemistry with one another, then they will have years to play still and only get better together. That’s how dynasties are built.

by krayfish on Dec 31, 2008 9:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with everything you said krayfish…but that’s what it seems like Herm is doing. I’m no Herm enthusiest but it’s not his fault that he is nearly 2 years behind his rebuilding plan. He wanted to do that when he first got here but Petersen wanted the quick fix. I agree with Herm that we have laid a great foundation for our team and it can only get better from here. Have another great draft and pick up a few younger veterans that haven’t gone over-the-hill and we can be a MUCH better team than we were this year, and I think Herm can do it…what he wanted to do from the get-go.

People say Herm sucks…but it’s not totally his fault. It’s his fault by him being the coach but he had someone behind him saying no to a rebuild until there was no other alternative. I’d just like to see where it goes with him. The players really like him and admire him and listen to him and, most importantly, learn from him. If he can show in this next year (God willing the new GM likes Herm’s direction) then I can almost garentee that things will be different. Herm has a great eye for draft picks. No one can deny that. I’m just a guy riding the fences on where the Cheifs is going because my voice doesn’t have a say in the matter, but I look at and listen to, not the win/loss statistic but what the players are doing, what they think about their coach, and how they are progressing. Herm is a good coach and more people would be behind him if he did this from the start. It probably would’ve fared better for him but…here we are and nothing can change that. I am fully behind Petersen leaving, but Herm…I would like him to stay but I will also give the new coach a chance to prove himself if that is what the new GM wants. I also hope that Clark lays it all out and gives Pioli what he wants under the terms that we are rebuilding and not patchworking. We’re making a dynasty here…one that will shine through the ages, and it can and will happen as long as the rebuild is seen though.

There's no hope with dope...

by chrisjo07 on Jan 1, 2009 6:14 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Big Hire

Ok…to the anti-worried crowd, I appreciate and respect your calm at this time.

This is, without a doubt, the most important decision thats been made in the organization in 20 years. THAT’S why I’m worried. This hire’s importance can’t be overstated. Most fans (I agree, probably not most on this site…) will care more about the name of the 1st FA we sign, or who we pick with the #3 pick, but as all of you know, this decision will shape all of those.

With that in mind, YES, CLE got the jump on Clark, Primetime is right that you can’t talk with management or players during the season, but since Clark had more time to compile his list, by the time the season ended Sunday, he should have requested permission to talk with Pioli the next day. There is no excuse for CLE beating him to the punch.

The latest is CLE wants an answer today (1-1). It doesn’t sound like we’re interviewing him today…so CLE is clearly trying to get him to commit before he talks to us…again, I think Lerner believes that CLE is Pioli’s prefered destination…and he may be right. With that in mind, he’s using the little leverage he has to apply pressure and get Pioli locked up right away. This may backfire…I certainly hope it does, but if you hear today that Pioli is going to CLE, its pretty simple, Clark got outworked/outhustled by Lerner. NOW, would Pioli have come here if Clark gotten an interview? Who knows.

With that said, it LOOKS like we may still get an interview, and if thats the case, I hope Clark does everything he can to not let him leave without a signed contract.

Lastly, am I SURE that Pioli is going to be the best GM hired this offseason? No, and no one is. But he is, pretty clearly considered the #1 candidate on the market by most of the league. If Clark wants another long term guy (there will never be another 20 year) Pioli is a GREAT candidate, and again, without knowing who is next on Clark’s list, getting him hired would be huge.

by kcsno56 on Jan 1, 2009 10:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Plainview_small
Talk Steelers with BTSC
Chiefs_pic_small
A little love for the Kool Aid drinkers (-!
Kool_aid_man_small
The Kool Aid Drinker’s Manifesto on the Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

041_small
5 ways the Chiefs get a win this Sunday
Small
Time To Go To The War Room
Turtle_article_small
AP Power Rankings Week 11; You Could Make It At Receiver For The Chiefs Edition
Us_on_thanksgiving_08_small
Beyond this season...
Fama150_small
TGIF Prediction Poll - Kansas City vs Pittsburgh Steelers
Small
Arrowhead Pride's name sealed in ..... brass?
Kool_aid_man_small
Log Jam at the Bottom
Itsgood2_small
Thursday Night Football Open Thread
Iron_cross_real_small
Nothing to Lose or Everything to Lose
104_4223_small
My new Mock 2.0

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation


Managers

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris Thorman

Tg_small Joel Thorman

Editors

N505381175_257425_5488_small Matt Conner

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Small Jon Yoon