Big Test for the Chiefs' "Gimmick" Offense This Weekend
In the great debate about whether or not to carry the spread offense into 2009, this weekend's game against San Diego is a major test. Not the only test but a big one.
It's not because of San Diego's defense prowess. Their D is ranked 25th in the league.
It's because the Chargers will be the first team to face the ArrowSpread game plan twice.
In the teams first meeting, the Chiefs were a two-point conversion away from winning the game in the final seconds. Tyler Thigpen threw for 266 yards and three touchdowns. The rushing attack faltered big time without Larry Johnson.
The spread sort of worked in this game. Two touchdowns in the first half showed promise but then an over reliance on the pass forced three 3-and-outs in the third quarter alone. The lone second half score came in panic time as Thigpen led an awesome 14 play, 60 yard drive to nearly time the game.
It appeared that the Chargers "figured" out the spread in the second half of the game. But then again, the Chiefs have been absolutely terrible coming out of halftime this year. I'm going to chalk up San Diego's second half defensive success to superior half time adjustments than to the failure of the spread offense. It worked in subsequent games and the Chargers didn't appear to come up with any silver bullet to stopping the Chiefs. Herm (and Chan Gailey apparently) can't coach well in the second half of football games. Period.
If the spread offense is here to stay, the Chiefs should be able to complete a similar effort this weekend as they did in Week 10 against the Chargers.
The key here is not look for huge improvement- San Diego has already played us and knows what's generally coming- but to see if the spread offense can survive a game plan that is familiar with it and is going to be specifically designed to stop it.
If the offense falters this weekend, the spread offense could certainly be to blame. I don't know how things will turn out. But if it does fail, my bet is that it fails because of poor second half coaching.
The Chiefs' offense will be under the microscope this weekend and every weekend for the rest of the season. And our coach's second half adjustments should be under the microscope too. This isn't a zero sum game- both will likely be to blame if the Chiefs' lose. The arguments for and against keeping the spread offense need to factor in our coach's ability to execute it effectively.
Big test against San Diego. Should be fun to break this game down come Monday.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Not sure if it works week to week...
But it definitely works better with a healthy Mark Bradley.
by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Dec 10, 2008 2:26 PM CST reply actions
Bradley
I think Bradley is the difference between an OK Thigpen game and a great one. Without Bradley he relies too heavily on Tony G in my opinion. I think Thigpen has better chemistry with Bradley than Bowe for some reason.
More faith in Bradley?
Bowe has had a case of the dropsies as Chris put it.
At least 10-6 next year taking our division, or Herm goes.
Chemistry
Its not that he has less faith in Bowe, just some guys have better chemistry in finding each other and connecting.
Bowe has had some drops, but he’s made some bigtime plays too. I think he’s just a different type of receiver than Bradley.
I agree
and in this game versus San Diego, we will have LJ, so that might create another wrinkle in their defensive game plan
He tried to run to
McSackintosh’s side which was a bad plan. He gives up early on run plays. There was one running play against Denver where if McSack would have done a kick out block, LJ would’ve gotten into the secondary. McSack didn’t and LJ was brought down. Man he sucks! Why no let him loose like Nap Harris?
LJ wants to be a HOF
running back. He wants to make plays happen and becomes overanalytical instead of trusting his instincts. He needs to realize forcing things to happen will NOT work.
Why did I quit drinking?
Can't argue with you
there because you have to start with a solid foundation. However, if LJ would have broken that (as he did other times in the past) we would have praised him. It’s not like he wasn’t successful in cutting back before (e.g. Bengals ’05, 49ers ’06, Raiders ’06).
I completely agree
and I have a heart attack everytime someone cuts back. I remember cursing Dante for reversing field…… Sorry Dante.
Why did I quit drinking?

by 






















