Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Herm Safe

If noone else is watching Monday Night Countdown, Mort just reported that Herm is likely safe this year and even next year. He suggested that 2010 would be Herm’s pressure year as renovations will be complete and they will want a good product on the field. The reasoning he suggested was that Clark admires the longevity and consistency that the Steelers and other organizations have and that he likes coaches with personality and integrity and Herm certainly has that. Personally, I wish he would have found someone better before committing to longevity, lol.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

0 recs | Comment 177 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Good for longevity

I agree the more successful teams do have a consistant head coach. One thing I’ve noticed is that not to many people on this site like Herm. I personally think he’s alright. He isn’t the greatest but he makes some good calls. Some bad. We should give Herm a chance next year. And the year after that depends on what moves we make in the this offseason and how well we do next year of course. Hopefully next year we will win at least 6. Maybe since we play in a bad division maybe even win it.

by NakedDave on Dec 1, 2008 7:16 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Difference Is

That successful teams commit to good coaches…they don’t commit to coaches who’ve lost most of their games for seven years just for the sake of “longevity”

Herm could run this team for 100 years and the Chiefs will never be worth a damn as long as he’s in charge. He was a loser in New York, he’s been a loser here, and he’ll continue to be a loser in the future. Because he’s a terrible football coach.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 7:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Regardless of history

He’s sure off to a great start here..

by KansasCityShuffle on Dec 1, 2008 11:45 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's not as though he inherited a great team

Vermeil knew the jig was up. He knew that by bringing in veteran players he had a limited window in which to win and unfortunately, they missed it.

Its pretty tough to expect fantastic results when you start out with nothing. It is going to take time to get the level of talent back up to what is necessary to be competitive. It doesn’t matter what coach you bring in, if they don’t have talent on the field, they aren’t going to win a lot.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:42 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Three Years In

And you’re still blaming Vermeil. How about the guy who actually assembled that team, who’s still running it? Why not blame him?

Oh, that’s right…you only shift blame to people who are still working for the Chiefs when it doesn’t make them look bad enough to be fired.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 8:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Says The Guy Who Posted The Picture Of Jesus Flipping The Bird :)

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 1:01 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm glad I didn't see that

It’s times like that I am happy I missed something, but sad it was even done.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 1:08 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Looked That Up

The tattoos were legit, but apparently they’re just temporary tattoos…non-permanent. :)

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 1:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ohh

Well that makes it soo much better…

by primetime 07 on Dec 2, 2008 2:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And Apparently Painless

So it’s not like the kids are going to be psychologically scarred. :)

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 7:34 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're still using his losing record in three years against him so why not?

If there had been more than 5 quality players out of 53 on the roster left a year after Vermeil left then it might be different, but there wasn’t.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Who?

Vermeil? I haven’t bitched about Vermeil at all. I thought he was a pretty good coach in charge of a flawed team.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 7:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Granted...

Herm didnt inherit a GREAT team, but he did inherit a competetive/ contending team. In 3 three years he has run this team into the ground… And I suppose thats something that should happen if you wanna “re-build from the ground up”… I just think that there was a better way to go about this “youth movement”.
A lot of people were giving Herm the excuse that the team needs guys on the team that bleed red and gold. Day 1 CHIEFS…. And while thats fine and all, it’s gonna take a little more than a team full of rookies to go anywhere. And I think that Mark Bradley and Tyler Thigpen are perfect examples of that. I mean, Thigpen was on the Vikes and Bradley was a Bear… NOT CHIEFS to begin with.
So, I think (considering our cap) a few more Free Agent aquisitions would have helped to speed up the process a bit.

It’s gonna be interesting to see what kind of moves we make this off-season in FA.

by ROC 27 on Dec 2, 2008 11:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I knew that it was gonna be tough to rebuild

but I thought “from the ground up” meant not having to dig a thirty foot hole first.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 1:09 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Normally It Doesn't Mean That

Unless your goal is to build a cheap team the first season. Which I suspect was part of the motivation this year.

Ironically, we’d be a lot cheaper if we hadn’t signed Demorrio Williams to a big contract…or cut Napoleon Harris because Gunther couldn’t get along with him.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 1:16 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

However

if Nap leaving, means we can get Laurinaitis, then it will come a close second to letting Allen go, IMHO.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 1:27 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The goal was

….to recoup some of the org.’s expenses for the stadium rebuilding. They actually paid a portion of the cost. That was a business decision through and through….bank on it.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 1:57 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Thought Whitlock Was Just Conspiracy Theorizing When He Said That

But I’m of the opinion now that’s what’s happening.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 2:02 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nice find

Mort said, Herm “cinched it” regarding his job for next year and the year beyond.

by primetime 07 on Dec 1, 2008 7:20 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yes...

with a second win…haha…made me shake my head…

by woodman212 on Dec 1, 2008 7:24 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Two Fucking Wins And He Cinches His Job

That tears it…Clark Hunt doesn’t give a shit about this team and if he publicly makes that statement neither will I.

Two years before a head coach has to provide any results is absolutely unacceptable in today’s NFL.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 7:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Especially When He's Been Here Three Seasons And The Team's Gone Backwards Every Year

If this report is true it just means that Clark Hunt’s cut from the same cloth as his dad…a guy who never cared whether the Chiefs were competitive as long as his bottom line was in the black. People used to call Lamar Hunt a class act. Personally, I don’t think anyone who rips off his customers by giving them a mediocre product to reward his personal sycophants (while operating out of a taxpayer-subsidized stadium) is anything more than a thief.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 7:39 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Completely the opposite

Lamar cared more about the NFL as a whole and the Chiefs suffered for it. As long as they were profitable it was all he cared about.

I think Clark is the opposite. He doesn’t have the commitment to the NFL as a whole as he does to the Chiefs. He is doing what he thinks NEEDS to be done and he has the guy he thinks can do it. I know you and a lot of other people disagree, but just because you don’t like the guy he has chosen to do the job does not automatically mean Clark doesn’t care. I think he cares much more than Lamar ever did about making the Chiefs a winner.

He made a commitment to Herm to do the rebuild. If he had told Herm his job was on the line if he didn’t put a winner on the field, I’m sure they would have gone about things much differently. Instead, they are taking the long view of rebuilding this team the right way and Clark is making it evident to everyone that he is not going to bail out on the plan midway through just because things got tough. Clark is willing to give up money in ticket sales to make sure this team is built into a championship caliber team sooner rather than later.

This will make the Chiefs a much more attractive organization to quality coaches in the future as well. Knowing you have an owner that is going to stick with you if there are some hiccups along the way rather than fire you whenever the fans get upset means a lot to good coaches looking for some stability.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 1, 2008 11:13 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Bones Would Be My Guess

But I don’t think it really mattered. If this story is true Clark Hunt never cared about results and he probably would have kept Herm even if Thigpen had played like he did in Atlanta. He doesn’t care.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:13 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And Addressing Your Points
I think Clark is the opposite.

Based on what? His teams have won six games in two years, he’s got the same guy running the show who put the team in the toilet to begin with, and his team’s draft record has been disastrous. You can wish Clark is the opposite all you want. But the results indicate he’s not any different than his old man…he’s just cheaper and has an even higher tolerance for crap.

He is doing what he thinks NEEDS to be done and he has the guy he thinks can do it. I know you and a lot of other people disagree, but just because you don’t like the guy he has chosen to do the job does not automatically mean Clark doesn’t care. I think he cares much more than Lamar ever did about making the Chiefs a winner.

Seriously, DJ, that’s just a load of gibberish backed by not a shred of proof and it’s clearly contradicted by the team’s consistently declining performance under Clark Hunt’s reign. What you think is happening has no apparent relation to what is actually happening.

You sound like you’re in a cult.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:19 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You sound like a Raiders fan

Seriously, I’ve never heard someone who hated his own team more. You have not one shred of anything good to say about them ever no matter what happens. All you do is point fingers.

How do YOU know what Clark is trying to do or what he wants? You’re pissed because you can’t stand Carl Peterson and by extension, Herm Edwards and have decided that no matter what they do its going to be crap.

The team had to be rebuilt and whether you want to accept that fact or not doesn’t matter one bit because you’re not in the decision making loop. You’re just an impatient fan that likes to bitch.

You can’t make something from nothing and no matter how much you kick and scream and cry, it is going to take time to rebuild this team. Just because you don’t like it and dont like the guys in charge doesn’t change that. If you cant stand anyone in this organization: you complain about the owner, gm, coaches AND players; why do you continue to watch? You obviously have no reason to.

Go watch some team you actually enjoy instead of bitching about this one all the time.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just can't wait

I seriously CANNOT wait for this to unfold. I haven’t been more confident in the fact that this team is headed in the wrong direction due to the incompetence of management. Herm, Carl, Clark…it’s just a fact.
BUUUUUT…I said I’d give it another year and that I’d apologize if they even JUST make it to the playoffs. IT won’t happen, this rebuild is a joke.

The improvement is a facade and the QB is a band-aid. Fine, you guys want to rah-rah the Chiefs management….so be it.

How long is it going to take before you admit that you’re wrong? That these people can’t lead? My stipulation is simple…playoffs in 2 years…I’ll admit I was wrong.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 7:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm confident that we are headed in the right direction

In all honesty, it really comes down to if we find a franchise QB, and yes, that is on management.

by I need more Esteban on Dec 2, 2008 10:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fortunately For Them

They seem to have a pretty intriguing candidate with Thigpen. Maybe he won’t be the answer but he might do until the answer comes along.

Unfortunately, even an excellent QB can’t win if he’s not surrounded by the right pieces (e.g. Carson Palmer, Dan Marino) and the Chiefs don’t have enough pieces to win even with a great QB. Mainly on the defensive side of the ball and (I’d argue) on the coaching staff.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 11:35 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Intriguing is the right word to describe Thigpen

But until he beats a contending team and can string along a few wins (say, 3)….I’ll just view him as a band-aid. IF he does the aforementioned then I’ll seriously accept him as a starter.

I think that’s a safe and fair evaluation.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 3, 2008 7:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm Not Going To Hold The Standard That High

QBs contribute to wins, they don’t win the game on their own.

If he can complete 60+% of his throws next year and keep his TD/INT ratio about where it is (or improve on it) while still doing his downfield passing, I’ll say we’ve found our answer at QB.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 3, 2008 9:25 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well

We want a QOF that’s been discussed ad nausem here…the above is my stipulation. No more one wins or even two wins in a row (which hasn’t happened yet with him).
Give me 3 in a row then an understandable loss to help get into the playoffs. Light’em up and if mgmt. can’t get anyone to help other then Bowe or TG…not my problem. I’m not the decision maker there :)

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 3, 2008 9:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And You Sound Like A Moron Who Can't Structure An Argument Or Make An Intellectually Honest Argument
Seriously, I’ve never heard someone who hated his own team more.

No, I hate the management of our team…not our team. There’s a difference. You, on the other hand, are perfectly happy with our team being mismanaged because you have no pride in this team and you don’t care about results. Otherwise you’d be questioning why the hell a guy who hadn’t built a Super Bowl caliber team in 19 years is being left in charge of the rebuild…since all that probably portends is that at best we’ll go through all these bad years to watch more mediocre teams. But you don’t, and you call people who do question irrational and that’s why I said it sounds like you’re in a cult.

How do YOU know what Clark is trying to do or what he wants?

I don’t…I don’t care what his intentions are, I care what his plan is achieving. I judge by the performance on the field and it’s been garbage. We got a fluke win over a not-great Denver team and a narrow win over a terrible Oakland team and we’ve been blown out in half of our games (by teams that have no business blowing us out). We were bad last year and we’re worse this year, and Clark Hunt thinks everything is fine because he’s not even expecting this team to be competitive in games. Know how I know that? Because he hasn’t fired anyone in charge for building a team that isn’t even competitve in half its games…which was his stated goal before the season

You’re pissed because you can’t stand Carl Peterson and by extension, Herm Edwards and have decided that no matter what they do its going to be crap.

Yeah, and if only the results on the field didn’t keep backing up my case, you’d definitely make me eat my words with a scathing rebuttal instead of just whining “Herm Hater”.

Make an intellectually honest argument providing objection evidence about how this team has improved on the field by going younger and I’ll reconsider my position on Herm.

The team had to be rebuilt and whether you want to accept that fact or not doesn’t matter one bit because you’re not in the decision making loop. You’re just an impatient fan that likes to bitch.

You can’t make something from nothing and no matter how much you kick and scream and cry, it is going to take time to rebuild this team. Just because you don’t like it and dont like the guys in charge doesn’t change that. If you cant stand anyone in this organization: you complain about the owner, gm, coaches AND players; why do you continue to watch? You obviously have no reason to.

Go watch some team you actually enjoy instead of bitching about this one all the time.

Standard DJ…you can’t come up with a single achievement to point to demonstrating that this team has improved from last year (which is the point of going younger) and you bitch at everyone else to cover your weak argument in the hopes they won’t notice that you’ve never substantiated your position that this team is improving (whenever you’re actually willing to take a position, that is, instead of just playing devil’s advocate to insult other peoples’ arguments so nobody will question you).

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 8:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Okay dude calm down

calling some one a moron just because you disagree with them is unacceptable. And shows that you have a problem with insecurity.

You tell DJ that all he does is bitch at people to cover his weak arguments which is what you constantly do.

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Problem Is

He doesn’t really make arguments. He just claims we’re getting better then calls everyone irrational for not believing it.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:16 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It's easy to point at a house under construction and find holes in the walls

It’s frustrating to listen to someone that is willing to throw the whole team under the bus just because of his grudge against one or two guys in charge.

You have no more proof that the Chiefs will not develop into a quality team under Herm and Carl than I have that they will.

You think you are making brilliant points but the truth is they are so much unsubstantiated fluff that there isn’t much to respond to. You have gone into the realm of wacko conspiracy theories where what you are saying makes sense to you and those who agree with you, but really have no basis in fact. Neither of us have a crystal ball and there are arguments either way in both mens past that it can either be succesful or a disaster and pretending that you do is foolish.

I don’t know that Herm is a coach that can take the Chiefs to the Super Bowl, but I know he’s a damn site better than you give him credit for looking for excuses (that sound ridiculous) to explain away his previous successes.

You are looking for perfection at a time where things are really ugly and cannot be otherwise because of the cards that have been dealt. I honestly believe that your opinions are based solely on your dislike for Carl and Herm and that if it were a guy you liked, you would be more than willing to go through this and be patient with the process. If not and you want to flip managment every two years until they are a Super Bowl contender, you will never be happy ever because thats the biggest recipe for failure ever.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:27 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And It's Easy To Pretend Your Argument Is Correct When You Ignore All Facts That Dispute It
It’s frustrating to listen to someone that is willing to throw the whole team under the bus just because of his grudge against one or two guys in charge.

The team is 2-10. They were 4-12 last year. I suppose I should be arguing how Herm should be coach of the year for their performance.

I’ve never thrown the whole team under the bus…I’ve blamed the people I hold responsible, the ones who assembled and run this team. That’s Herm and Carl (as well as some of the position coaches whose units are dramatically underachieving). You don’t do that because you don’t ever hold anyone responsible for anything. Also because you’re kind of a chickenshit when it comes to taking a position that anyone can ding you on…whenever someone hits you with an argument you can’t rebut you just slip into devil’s advocate mode without telling them and insult their positions. Personally it wouldn’t bother me if you actually made arguments and backed them with proof even if those arguments were wrong…I’d even respect it if you could concede points. But you don’t…you just live in denial and pretend that it’s the rest of the world that’s crazy when your arguments are undermined by what actually happens on the field. That’s largely why I’ve found your arguments so irritating lately…because they’re really more trolling than arguments.

You have no more proof that the Chiefs will not develop into a quality team under Herm and Carl than I have that they will.

You’re right…I don’t. I just believe it thoroughly, which is why I said I’d be happy to put money down that the Chiefs will never be a playoff team with Herm and Carl in charge. I accept the possibility it could be wrong, but I also tout the high probability that I’m not. I also state specific goals for what I expect from this team to be classified as successful. What specific goals do you think they should achieve? I don’t recall you ever stating any.

I don’t know that Herm is a coach that can take the Chiefs to the Super Bowl, but I know he’s a damn site better than you give him credit for looking for excuses (that sound ridiculous) to explain away his previous successes.

What successes? He’s never won his division, he’s never been to a Super Bowl, he’s got a losing record at both of his coaching jobs and his team is currently 2-10. Making up excuses would be what people who claim he’s a good coach are doing.

You are looking for perfection at a time where things are really ugly and cannot be otherwise because of the cards that have been dealt.

My expectations are in my signature block, and last I checked winning 6 games out of 16 wasn’t close to perfection. Things are ugly right now because Herm’s doing a crappy job. And Herm and Carl dealt their own cards…they’re not victims of fate, they’re victims of their own incompetence.

I honestly believe that your opinions are based solely on your dislike for Carl and Herm and that if it were a guy you liked

That’s because you can’t dispute any of my arguments with any objective evidence or accomplishments on Herm’s or Carl’s part so it’s more comforting to you to pretend that my arguments are invalid by labelling me a Herm Hater or Carl Hater, instead of being honest and admitting that at this point any improvement in this team is more wishful thinking than anything else. And I’d actually respect it if you admitted that your position was wishful thinking and that you’re merely hoping this team gets better.

If not and you want to flip managment every two years until they are a Super Bowl contender, you will never be happy ever because thats the biggest recipe for failure ever.

I’ve never taken that position, I’ve clearly explained my position on these threads about what I think are reasonable expectations from head coaches and GMs before (and how long they should be retained), and I’m pretty certain you’ve read them before.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 7:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is the most important thing to remember
You have no more proof that the Chiefs will not develop into a quality team under Herm and Carl than I have that they will.

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 3, 2008 7:48 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh thats something to remember

…then again someone once said “History will repeat itself, if we fail to learn from it”

I wonder what mgmt. has learned in coaching and building the Chiefs—-historically.

’nuff said

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 3, 2008 7:59 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's Why It's Called A Prediction

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 3, 2008 9:27 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can't always go on what Mort says.

He adds a lot of speculation to what he reports. I seriously doubt he knows anymore than anyone else reporting on the situation in KC.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Dec 2, 2008 12:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He Has Broken A Couple Of Stories That Have Turned Out To Be Duds

He breaks a lot that turn out to be true as well, but your point is taken.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the win over OAK did clinch his next season

What Carl is looking for is a ALMOST equivalent to a college coach on a pro level….

Yeah the team can loose a good number of games in the season as long as he wins the Rivalry/division games and is very competitive at least once every two years….. the exception is this year because of Herm’s " battle plan"….

He won’t let Herm go because like in all transitions it takes time for results…. This really is Herm’s first year with his “boys” … If next year the Chiefs aren’t 7-9, 8-8 …. Herm will most likely be let go to pursue other employment opps….

Sebo!!!

by bouzi on Dec 2, 2008 9:19 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tom Cable cinched

it for him with a foolish play, 4th and ten fake with a 260 pound kicker. If they had kicked the field goal, we would be talking about 1-11.

by Eric Allen on Dec 2, 2008 9:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree that the entire game resulted from the one call

The game must be looke at from the whole game. You are correct that this one call changed the course of the game, but in the end, we had more points due to the play of the whole team throughout the entire game. We held them to 13 and they held us to 20, but we won.

We could say the exact same thing and say we would be talking about 5-7, if you factor one or two individual plays in the close games we lost. I don’t mind winning by their mistakes, as long as we win.

by TXChiefan on Dec 3, 2008 10:59 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Glad to hear it

I am happy to see this. Maybe all the Herm haters can take a break for a while. Herm has flaws, but he is a good motivater and teacher, and that is what a young team undergoing an ambitious rebuilding project needs. I think there will be some changes at defensive coordinator and special teams coach, but I think herm will be her next year. Of course we went backwards, we are playing a bunch of kids. At the start of the year I was onboard with rebuilding and expected to win aropund 4 games. What I wanted to see was continued improvement throughout the year. I think we are there. Don’t be suprised when we win a couple more games before the end of the year. We are only 4-5 players from being a good team and I think they will address these in free agency and the early rounds of the draft.

Herm is here to stay and I for one am happy.

by saskwatch on Dec 1, 2008 8:15 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I've heard this before
Herm has flaws, but he is a good motivater and teacher, and that is what a young team undergoing an ambitious rebuilding project needs.

But the only draft class we can even begin to evaluate (2006) looks as if he’s failed horribly in teaching. I’ll judge him by the results on the field.

by primetime 07 on Dec 1, 2008 8:17 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

2007 Is Already Looking Worse Than 2006

In 2005 and 2006 at least we got two starters out of each class. The only player out of the 2007 draft class who’s looking like a starter is Dwayne Bowe. Turk McBride hasn’t demonstrated he’s anything more than a reserve at best (and not a great one), Tank Tyler’s been a non-factor. Kolby Smith is a backup running back who appears to have problems staying healthy.

Three starters in two years and a bunch of guys who are reserves on a terrible team. That’s a crap draft record. So much for Herm’s rep as a “teacher”.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 10:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am reaching my limit

I’ve followed this team since the early 70’s without one damn Super Bowl appearance in all that time, and stuff like this is just killing my hopes of EVER seeing one.

If the owner doesn’t care and doesn’t demand excellence from the organization, then why the hell should I?

If we luck out, in only 2 more years Herm will lead us to a 9-7 season and first round playoff loss, thereby earning a multi-year contract extension.

Followed by a few rebuilding seasons.

by Offense of the 70s on Dec 1, 2008 8:26 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The irony is

That what we are seeing now is what is necessary to CHANGE the fact we have gone decades without a Super Bowl.

They aren’t doing the Carl Peterson bandaid to get the team to 9-7 and a 1st round playoff loss method that they have been doing just to keep fans paying for season tickets. They had to tear the whole thing down and are building it up from scratch to be a team capable of winning a championship. The price you pay to do that is you’re going to have a couple bad years.

Two or three years down the road if we’re in the Super Bowl, nobody will give a crap about back to back bad seasons. It will all be worth it.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 1, 2008 11:18 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Except Of Course

For the fact that nothing’s really changed because the same guy who’s been running the team for the last 19 years is still running the team.

Honestly, DJ, I don’t know if you’re trolling or if you’re just completely clueless. You may think that somehow Carl and Herm have happened on some magic formula that’s suddenly transformed them from guys who haven’t come close to appearing in (much less winning) a Super Bowl in a combined 26 years, but anyone who’s paid any attention at all to the history of the NFL will pretty quickly realize that people with that track record of failure have never figured out how to win the big game and never really will. And none of the realists are buying that it’s happening now…so if you’re trying to win us over with the “you’ve just got to believe argument”, you can save your energy. I quit believing in magic when I was four.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:11 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At least he's not wearing rose colored glasses and drinking kool-aid

Being led by those that have never proven they can lead….who’s clueless? What’ll change? 19 years of bad decisions and then EUREKA…oops, Carl figured it out? lol…right

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 7:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True

But you can only listen to DJ chant make his unsubstantiated “We’re getting better, we’re getting better” mantra with his “Herm Hater, Herm Hater” followup for so long before you kind of get sick of him and feel like prodding him into actually backing up his comments with something.

So far we’re still waiting for DJ to show us any proof that this team’s on the right track.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 8:53 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I told you at the beginning of the year

If this team is a perennial playoff contender in another two years, you will have your proof the team is on the right track.

Can you prove that in two years it won’t be? If not, you are not making any better argument than I am.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:30 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And What Do You Expect To Happen For Those Next Two Years?

What are your benchmarks for determining if Herm and Carl are making progress towards those goals?

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 7:31 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

“Honestly, DJ, I don’t know if you’re trolling or if you’re just completely clueless.”

ad hominem

Pot calling the kettle black. What are your expectations of management to prove their effectiveness? Timeline please. I’ve stated mine ad nauseum.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Huh?

1) you misquoted me…the ‘ad hominem’ was in response to your phrase


At least he’s not wearing rose colored glasses and drinking kool-aid

2) I didn’t attack you, so I’m not sure where you get “Pot calling the kettle black”

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 2, 2008 9:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Actually, That Was My Phrase

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:27 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Forget :)

The “Honestly DJ” comment was mine. The thread’s become so convoluted we’re attributing arguments to the wrong people. :)

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 10:34 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True
that is the fallacy of false dilemma

Unfortunately, there really wasn’t any meat to his argument to discredit. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 8:50 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

DJ's neither.

Anymore than you are or many others here. He has an opinion that doesn’t match yours. It is as valid as yours. Supported by facts. Both of you lean opposite ways on what facts you give weight to.

DJ’s not saying “just believe.” He’s saying that Herm has had success as an NFL coach (true). He’s saying that over the last three years this team has been discarding older players and replacing them with (hopefully) better players and that this process is painful (true). He’s saying that this is a new direction for this team and is a direction taken because all else had failed (true). I feel pretty confident that if Herm fails DJ thinks he should go. Herm hasn’t failed. He might, but he hasn’t.

BTW DJ, let me know if I misrepresented anything.

Many here will be happy to point out all the bad things about Herm (real or imagined) to which, there will be fewer who care enough to point out the good (real or imagined). It’s fair to say no minds are being changed.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 8:51 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

He’s saying that Herm has had success as an NFL coach (true).

Really? What was that thing Parcell’s said?

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 8:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And I'm not only talking about this year

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 8:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The sad fact is that is not always true.

It sounds good, and the big tuna said it, but would you rather face a 10-6 surging team in the Super Bowl or a 16-0 tired team?

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:09 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You Mean The Pats Who Made It To The Super Bowl?

How many of Herm’s 10-6 teams made it to the Super Bowl?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But They Still Made It To A Super Bowl

How many of Herm’s teams have even gotten close?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:27 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The point is

you’re not always what your record says. You are also the team that shows up on Sunday (good or bad).

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In One Game That Might Be True

Because it’s a small sample size and upsets happen. Over a sample size of 16 games over 7 seasons, however, you are what your record says you are.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:40 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Not True
He’s saying that Herm has had success as an NFL coach (true).

Herm has not had success as a coach. He had a losing record as a head coach in New York. He had a losing record in the playoffs. He’s had a losing record here. If that’s DJ’s definition of success, then it can be applied to pretty much any coach who hasn’t lost every single game he’s coached in.

But that’s not DJ’s definition of success because he still blames Dick Vermeil for everything that happened with this team, despite the fact that Dick Vermeil’s had more success both here and everywhere else he’s been than Herm has. DJ sticks up for Herm because he’s here and he doesn’t want to hold anyone running the team accountable for their results. He rips on Vermeil because he’s gone so he’s a convenient scapegoat to fix blame to. This is a very consistent pattern with DJ’s arguments, and he’s never provided evidence to substantiate its validity.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 8:58 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Here's the difference in selecting facts.

You are using the total wins/ loss record, not years coached/ years in playoffs stats. Herm has had success. He has also had terrible seasons and that skews the winn/ loss totals.

Her has had bad luck with injuries (his last year in NY, last year with LJ, this year with everyone) and that has caused those terrible years. I am concerned that Herm might be a factor in that, but I don’t know. I’ll give it another year.

Coupled with the injuries in KC is the fact that we are rotating the roster. Both of those things should be finite things, just not ending this year.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Coaching Record
You are using the total wins/ loss record

Yes, because that’s the measure of what a coach is. When you’ve got seven years in and you’ve got a losing record over seven years you’re not that good of a coach, because you lose most of the time. You point to Herm getting to the playoffs…well so what if he made it to the playoffs some of the time? What did he do in the playoffs? How close was he to getting to a Super Bowl? How many times did he coach his team to win the division so they could get the first round bye and increase their chances of winning it all?

Her has had bad luck with injuries (his last year in NY, last year with LJ, this year with everyone) and that has caused those terrible years.

Almost every coach who’s ever done a bad job has got an excuse for why they did a bad job. They don’t really matter. Injuries are just a part of the game, good coaches work through them (see Belichick/New England/2008). Herm doesn’t. And when the “bad luck” persists over seven seasons, it’s not really bad luck…it’s something Herm’s doing systemically wrong.

Coupled with the injuries in KC is the fact that we are rotating the roster. Both of those things should be finite things, just not ending this year.

Herm’s teams in New York were injury-plagued, Herm’s teams in KC have been injury-plagued. That doesn’t sound like a one year phenomena.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:14 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thats pretty accurate NJ

I don’t think Herm is god. I agree with a lot of his philosophy and I think it can be a recipe for success.

I don’t think he gets a free pass forever though. He has been saying he thinks the Chiefs can be a serious contender in 2010, which looking at the holes on the roster seems like a reasonable goal to me. That also means that they need to be showing progress in 2009, the last year of his contract, to prove that he deserves a chance at 2010.

It just really irritates me people that take positions based on unreasoning hatred and then call ME unrealistic for hoping the guy running the team NOW knows what hes doing instead of praying the team fails miserably so we can start all over with a guy they like that may not be any better.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 2, 2008 6:36 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What have you done for me lately?

Or…ever? The man in charge hasn’t done anything in his tenure to indicate he can lead a team to a Super Bowl because….well, he hasn’t 20 years.

by primetime 07 on Dec 2, 2008 8:13 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And that's a LOOOONG lately, isn't it?

DJ…you see my sig. That’s my expectation and if they hit the goal (and I really hope they do), I’ll admit I was wrong. I’m man enough.

The word CONTENDER is absolute BS. It means nothing and can be argued and spun soooo many different ways. DJ…give us a specific goal that Herm has to hit.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 3, 2008 8:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What changes?

The decision makers are the same. They will continue to make the same kind of decisions they have always made. That’s not a change.

by Offense of the 70s on Dec 2, 2008 7:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Except they are making different decisions now.

If they were trying to build a team as they have over the last 19 years and expected different results that would be bad.

They are trying a new (to this organization) process to develop a team that can get to the playoffs on a regular basis and be competitive when they get there. It may work, it may not, but it is not the same failed process as before.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 7:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Different How?

Seriously, I’m not trying to rip on you by asking that, but different how? How, specifically are they different? Because all I’m seeing is an entrenched management that claims they’re going to build a better team through the draft but aren’t doing any better on their draft record than they’ve ever done and have built one of the worst teams in the NFL.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't feel ripped on.

Currently one of the worst. Let’s talk in two years.

That’s one of the points. We won’t know for a while if this has worked. There is certainly potential on the roster now. The offense is new and vastly imporved over last year. The D has gotten better every year with this year being the exception and I’m pretty confident youth and injuries might have played a small role in that.

We are playing our young players and getting them experience rather than have them sit behind declining veterans.

We are saving money that (hopefully) will be used on free agents to fill in spots where we miss on the draft.

I’m not saying this will work and I understand doubts based on past performance, but that is why I haven’t come to the conclusion that it is destined to fail.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:20 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just Food For Thought
We are saving money that (hopefully) will be used on free agents to fill in spots where we miss on the draft.

We spent money this year on DeMorrio Williams to solidify the linebacking corps and he’s currently spending much of his time on the bench. We didn’t get the free agents that Carl Peterson claimed he was trying to get (Josh Brown, Jeff Faine) despite having money to spend this year. What makes you think this will change because we’ll have money to spend next year? And what makes you think that Carl Peterson or Bill Kuharich will target the right free agents? Their record on free agent signings has been pretty bad.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:26 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You Can Demand More From Your Team

That’s what I’m trying to get at. You can be vocal about how you expect your team to improve and not settle for the status quo.

Does it mean that those changes will come about? No. But it means that you don’t have to pretend you’re happy when your team doesn’t even try to live up to expectations.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:42 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Peterson and Edwards have a track record

They both have had plenty of chances to deliver and have never done it. Peterson’s had 19 years on the job, which is three times beyond what most GMs get and has done nothing. Herm’s had 7 years as head coach and what has he done? Made it to the playoffs at 9-7 with Vermeil’s players and lost immediately while barely getting a first down, that’s pretty much his crowning achievement. Followed up by garbage.

Stop looking at these guys in a vacuum and compare them to other options around the league, and there’s no case for them. Are you seriously saying that there is no one else out there in the coaching ranks who could do a better job than Herman Edwards? No one in the GM ranks who could do a better job than Carl Peterson? Why? Their track records are there for all to see. They have had their chances, far more chances than most people ever get.

by Offense of the 70s on Dec 2, 2008 9:25 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exactly

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:26 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't want to defend Peterson

He’s been GM longer than I’ve been alive. Seriously.

But from what my Dad tells me the Chiefs were even worse off before he got here.

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:28 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

True

I never said I like Peterson and think he should stay.

But those who hate Herm just because he was hired by Peterson are dead wrong.

I host a talk show in South Bend and I cover the Colts. I talk to Tony Dungy at least once every two months. I trust Tony’s opinion and he says that Herm is a great coach and we need to give him a little more time.

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I do not see how he

is a great coach. He cannot manage the clock, makes piss poor in game adjustments, if any at all. He refuses to take personal responsibility for anthing that goes on, it is always on the players.

by Eric Allen on Dec 2, 2008 9:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And you'd expect him to say anything different? What kind of friend would he be if he did?

Seriously, Tony’s opinion doesn’t mean much in this regard. It doesn’t affect his team whether Herm is in KC or not. Sure he supports his friend, I would as well.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:33 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Tony Dungy's Not Going To Throw Herm Under The Bus

Because Tony Dungy is a class act and Herm’s his friend and you’ll almost never hear coaches do that anyway even if they’re not friends. It’s just professional courtesy. That doesn’t mean that Herm’s good at his job. And Truth is right, whether Herm’s good or bad in KC doesn’t affect Dungy so there’s no upside to him telling the truth if he did think Herm was doing a bad job.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Jobs that pay millions of dollars

shouldn’t be qualified by hopes and good intentions, rather by results. Nice Guy Herm hasn’t earned to continue to be our Head Coach. Unless there is a claus in his contract that says “no wins necessary” then we should move on. The only way I would keep him is if he wins out, and that is not completely impossible. The Rebuilding that we undertook was a good thing. Some of the decisions made during it were bad ones, such as not signing more experienced “short term” free agents to keep us somewhat competitive and keep us growing. We definitely have a feel like an expansion team, and it didn’t have to be that way. Look at what Miami has done in one year, and you can see the difference. They had a good draft (like us), but they signed quite a few low level free agents, and then lucked out by signing Pennington and his experienced QB play has been the difference. I think I would have been more patient with Herm if we had shown more progressive improvement, but we have been an absolute crap shoot week in and week out. There is no telling if Jekyll or Hyde we show up, and that has to be contributed to the coaching.

by TheQ on Dec 1, 2008 8:42 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We have won 15 games

in three years, and his job is secure, that is jacked up.

by Eric Allen on Dec 1, 2008 8:57 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's not good

That’s something that has followed Herm he doesn’t win games. 15 games in three years… Wow and the pats had 16 in 1 strange…

by NakedDave on Dec 1, 2008 9:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The Pats didn't go 16-0 in one season

The Patriots were a bad team for a LONG time before they became a good one.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 1, 2008 11:19 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And They Improved Once They Fired The People Who Ran The Team Into The Ground

See how that works?

The Chiefs have been a bad team for a long time. They’ll be a good team when Clark Hunt fires Carl Peterson and hires a real GM to run this team. Until then this “rebuild” is just smoke and mirrors set up to hide the fact that the team is bottoming out and is probably going to stay bottomed out as long as Carl and Herm are running it.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I watched Mort say that, as well. He is being fed.

Herm is not safe. Herm did not cinch his job.

Does anyone here seriously believe a week after the worst loss in Chiefs’ history, that Herm is safe because he beat the 3-7 Raiders?

They suck as badly as we do. If anyone thinks this was some triumphant victory proving Herm’s qualifications (Mort), they are deranged…..unless, of course, Clark is, too.

by DThomasReigns on Dec 1, 2008 10:42 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

God I Hope So

Otherwise I’m seriously done with this team. 20 years of futility is enough…I’m sure as hell not sticking with them if they think Herm’s 6 wins in two years is enough to merit two more years of job security.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 10:46 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In A Pathetic Game, No Less

Against a Raiders team run by a coach even more inept than Herm. If Lane Kiffin had been running that team, we’d have lost.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 10:50 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Great point

Didn’t even think about that factor. Bittersweet.

by KansasCityShuffle on Dec 1, 2008 11:50 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Herms not safe because he beat the Raiders

Herms job has NEVER been in danger. I keep telling you guys, and you think I’m just a homer.

Herm was commissioned by Clark to tear the team apart last off season with the knowledge that it would be ugly this year with the goal of building for the future.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 1, 2008 11:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We Don't Think You're A Homer Because You Don't Believe Herm Will Get Fired

We think you’re a homer because you’re happy about the idea that Herm won’t get fired because you, for some reason, think he’s a good coach and you’ve never provided us sufficient evidence to make us think you’ve got any good reason for believing that.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And Homer's Probably The Wrong Word

Since espousing unconditional support for Herm Edwards is not the same as supporting the team. Support for a coach should always be conditional based on the results he produces for the team…and Herm hasn’t produced a lot of good results for this team, in either wins or in developing his young players as he should.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Don't Have One

If you’ve got info, by all means please post it.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 1, 2008 10:52 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My experiences with WPI

Is that they don’t know jack most of the time.

They know people around the Chiefs organization, they aren’t sitting in Clarks office.

by ChiefDJ on Dec 1, 2008 11:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My experience with stuff like that

Is if it was actually legitimate news then they’d post it and get it out to as many people as possible with their author/site address attached to it. Does no good to have breaking news if there’s no one there to read it.

by primetime 07 on Dec 2, 2008 8:29 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Think That's Accurate

ESPN does it the same way with their Insider stuff. Real breaking news goes on the free site, speculation and analysis get paid for.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh...Mort's prettttttttttty accurate...lol

….I think Herm will do fine, he is cut from the Dungy mold…and that takes a little time, especially when the drafting has been so God-awful for years…let’s consider that people…Hell, maybe by then Dungy will be ready to come out of retirement and bail Herm out…

I think the Hunt’s love winning…it is pretty obvious to me really…

by woodman212 on Dec 2, 2008 12:09 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Herm

Well, t seems to me that there are just two points of view on the same thing.

Herm is safe because Clark Hunt let’s Carl Peterson call the shots.

Carl feels the need to stand by his decision and keep Herm around, come what may.

Now, if you’re a person who thinks Herm is “the guy” to rebuild and win, this is good news.

If you think Herm is not “the guy” to do it, then it is bad news.

while I personally fall in to the “bad news” camp, I have a hard time finding a good reason to bail out on my team.

I have been a Chiefs fan for about 20 years now. I don’t see that changing.

I can like some things that come about ( Tyler Thigpen is a pleasant surprise ) and I can not like things as they come about (hiring a guy that couldn’t coach his way out of a wet paper bag ) is something I just dread.

As a fan, I will let them know when I like something with the team and I will let them know when I don’t.

The reason we get so excited and so upset is because we allow ourselves to care so much about the team to begin with and that’s what makes us fans. We decided to care about this particular team ( “care” defined as we actually give a shit what goes on with the team )

There is personal and emotional investment on our part. That’s why we pay for overpriced tickets and shirts, etc… to show our support for our team, we care.

At this point, I don’t care what happens to Herm as long he’s NOT coaching at KC.

He is not a good fit for the Chiefs. Never was, never will be.

Big Bear

by bigbearomaha on Dec 2, 2008 8:40 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The problem is

…that I have yet to hear from the mangement supporters saying what their expectations are for them to consider Herm “a bust” or “a savior”. Give me a timeline….an expectation…something. Tell me what it’ll take for you to accept or change your stance/support?
Is 8-8 next year considered an improvement and reason to keep Herm? How about a playoff in 2 years? A superbowl in 3 years?
Do we give him a 10 year contract(like Gretz suggested)?

How long do we wait to become a Giants, Colts, Pitt., Pat. before we say this management is incompetent?

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 8:54 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm willing to give Herm next year.

I don’t know about win/ loss record next year, but we should either be in the playoffs or have just missed them.

Can’t have injuries like this year.

D has to be better (I’m giving the benifit of the doubt due to injuries this year).

Finish the year better than we started.

If those don’t happen Herm and Carl can go as far as I’m concerned.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:00 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Those Are Pretty Reasonable Expectations

Mine for this year was that they win as many or more games than they did last year. Even on a rebuilding team that’s not an unreasonable expectation given competent coaching and management (as Miami and Atlanta have demonstrated). But they couldn’t achieve even that meager accomplishment and that’s why I’m on the “Fire Herm and Carl” bandwagon.

And echoing Truth’s remarks, I’ve yet to hear the front office give us any sort of timeline or benchmarks for improvement. All I hear is vague remarks about needing to improve followed by the front office continually lowering the bar every time the team takes a big step backwards.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:05 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Getting a little ahead of yourself, aren't you?
Mine for this year was that they win as many or more games than they did last year.

and


But they couldn’t achieve even that meager accomplishment and that’s why I’m on the "Fire Herm and Carl" bandwagon.

If this is true, shouldn’t you remain “off the bandwagon” until we lose 3 more games?

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 2, 2008 9:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

+1

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nope

Because I don’t believe they’re going to win that total and they’ve been absolutely embarassed out there.

I’ll back off on Herm if he goes on a tear and wins the rest of his games. But my prediction is it’s not going to happen so oh well.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 3, 2008 9:29 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Thank you NJChief

That is EXACTLY the type of reply I respect. Give me some goals and realistic expectations. If it works (playoffs)…I’ll admit I was wrong.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What were your expectatons for this year?

I expected us to be bad. Maybe that’s why I’m not mad. Every realistic Chief’s fan didn’t expect all of our young players to be studs right away. That’s why I’m waiting till next year. next year they bettter be competitive or else I’ll join the Herm hating bandwagon

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:13 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What does "competitive" mean?

That’s a generic term and cannot be evaluated objectively. Is it 9-7? (which some consider a winning record although I can’t see it). Is it winning the AFC West? Is it playoff’s, SB?

Please explain. Give us a realistic goal that would convince you that mgmt. is on the right course.

Not being snide….I’m really trying to get a good feel for your thought process.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:17 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I understand

and I respect the way you comment. Makes me actually want to have a conversation with you.

Competitive to me means: Winning games, showing improvement throughout the season but willing to give a break when there are major setbacks. Such as, our 3rd string QB is starting, our franchise RB is having off the field issues… those may sound as excuses but the amount of injuries we have had this year isn’t normal.

I would be happy next year with a 9-7 record no less than 6-10 unless something really freaky is going on.

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:23 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

With our third string qb

we got away from the Herm playbook, actually running something to the players strength. These players were starting to laydown doing the same thing week in week out, the offense changed and enthusiasm has returned. Herm only wanted to adapt when there was nothing else, is that an example of someone should set for young players?

by Eric Allen on Dec 2, 2008 9:27 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

KCKing...9-7 is a realistic goal...thx that's the kind of response I was looking for.

Mind you, I’m not saying I agree….I’m saying that measurable goals such as 9-7 are specifics that I’d like to see more on this board instead of generic evaluations.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'd like to give more

but damn work is getting in the way.

by NJChiefsFan on Dec 2, 2008 9:38 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah I know

Finals are here and I’m need to study

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Dec 2, 2008 9:43 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I Expected Improvement From Our Year 2 and 3 Players

And saw very little of it. That was key to this team going in the right direction because that’s the core of our talent. All I’ve seen this year is DJ, Hali, Tyler, and McBride either stagnate or regress. Our “franchise QB” before the season flamed out in two games. Our current QB is only having success because the Chiefs had to completely scrap the offense that Herm has been drafting players to execute (which isn’t a bad thing, assuming that Herm will stick with this offense and not go back to the old one once he thinks he can get away with it).

Basically, I didn’t expect a lot of wins, but I expected the team to improve and it’s done poorly in all the areas management emphasized and is only succeeding in areas that management threw in out of desperation. That’s not progress…that’s treading water before you sink.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Basically, I didn’t expect a lot of wins, but I expected the team to improve and it’s done poorly in all the areas management emphasized and is only succeeding in areas that management threw in out of desperation.

Give me a measurable goal for next year. Don’t even look at the past seasons by Herm or Carl. Given the state of the team at this point and you are the owner of the team and are keeping both the GM and HC…what are you going to put on thier plan for next year? One goal that shows improvement….pick the highest on your list.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:39 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Measurable please...an undeniable goal that can't be disputed.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:40 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

After all these high draft picks

We should at least be 10-6 with a playoff berth.

by Eric Allen on Dec 2, 2008 9:41 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thx Eric...thats measurable

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:45 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

5-6 Wins

And no less than 4. That’s what I expected.

(By the way, Truth, I’m on your side here).

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 9:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We reevaluted our performance plan at work

There were sooooo many generic goals that could be misinterpreted. They did a great job in showing how MEASURABLE goals are written.

This board would be much easier if everyone put their MEASURABLE goal(s) in their signature line for this team. Lot less bantering. Personally, I expected a playoff berth for next year and this year I expected the team to AT LEAST go 8-8. Although that changed when Clark said he expected the team to compete for a playoff spot so that goal changed figuring he was the owner and had “inside knowledge” knowing what was goign on.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:55 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Personally, I expected a playoff berth for next year and this year I expected the team to AT LEAST go 8-8."

I think that was an unrealistic expectation for 2008…If we had a future hall of fame QB, the youngest team in the league could succeed (GB last season), but I would have been dumbfounded if we went 8-8 this season, given our instability at QB, our lack of an o-line, and our young secondary (which is one of the few components of the team which is actually exceeding my expectations)

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 2, 2008 10:06 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My 5-6 Win Expectation

Was formed before we found out just how rotten of a division the AFC West was. Now 8-8 doesn’t seem that unreasonable and 5-6 wins should be considered the cutoff for competence.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 10:21 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree

Re-read what Clarks expectations/goals were before the season started. His were larger then mine. He’s the owner, he’s in charge.

Realistic or not, that’s your opinion. Miami, Atlanta….what did you expect from them for this season? I think they far exceeded the expectation of the entire league. Especially Miami having gone 1-15 last year and Atlanta with a rookie QB. If they did it (overcame and had measurable accomplishments) then excusing the Chiefs doesn’t fly.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 10:30 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That comment was at PVC

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 10:30 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Just To Reiterate This Point

Miami and Atlanta (the only two teams who improved out of last year’s bottom five) did so after they fired the GM and head coach responsible for their terrible seasons.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 10:37 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I get it

…but excusing the Chiefs for anything on or off the field doesn’t fly in my book anymore. Plenty of teams have had injuries, suspended players…etc. It’s how you OVERCOME and come together to achieving a common goal of success that shows your merit.
Miami and Atlanta have done this in spades. Kudo’s to making the butt of jokes a complete turnaround. Detroit is next, however with their poor ownership I don’t think the changes will be made to make them successful. Decisions there are done waaay too late causing the team to be behind the times.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 10:41 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Detroit May Change

They fired the guy who put them in the tank and hired someone who looks like a good GM candidate to replace him. There’s not much Mayhew can do to fix things in-season, but pulling off that Roy Williams trade was a huge step. And Mayhew’s educational and training pedigree indicates he’ll be a much better candidate to run that front office than Millen was (not that many would be worse).

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 10:50 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

And if they pull a Miami next year I'll give that to them.

Miami wasn’t that much worse last year. It CAN be done.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 11:02 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Although

It all depends on who they hire full-time to run that front office. If it’s Mayhew (who I believe is just the interim GM) and they give him control, I like their chances of turning it around. If they run things as they have, though, I think they’re screwed.

Most of the problems with that franchise can really be traced back to the owner anyway…he’s a micromanager, he’s just sneakier about it than Al Davis is.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 11:07 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

ergo my comment about poor ownership

It’s interesting how you never get a team to win a SB without the head honcho making the right moves. It’s always those guys/gals that make the franchise competitive from the top-down.

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 11:10 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's Why They're The Ones Who Should Get The Blame

They’re the ones who dictate the tone of how the franchise is going to operate after all, and they’re the ones who have final say on the decisions their subordinates make.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 11:19 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also

they both started the season with competent QB’s…

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 2, 2008 12:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

But Don't You Remember?

We had a competent QB to run our team. He had the seal of approval of Herm, Carl, Clark, and Chan. He was the future, he was a first-day draft pick, he was going to lead our team to victory and be the cornerstone of the franchise for the next decade, which is why we didn’t draft anyone else this year.

So how’d that guy work out?

And why should I give the Chiefs a pass for not having a competent QB to start the season when they told us they had a competent QB? And how many games has this team won once we lucked out and found our competent QB?

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"which is why we didn’t draft anyone else this year"

wrong…we didn’t draft a QB, because each time our name was called, we drafted the BPA, and that happened to never be a QB.

by PVChiefsfan on Dec 2, 2008 3:40 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

BPA According To Herm And Carl's Assessment

I seriously doubt that DaJuan Morgan was so much better than Jeremy Zuttah that it merited us choosing a reserve safety over a guard good enough to start for a playoff team. Or that Kevin Robinson was so much better than Colt Brennan that we shouldn’t have considered him in the sixth round.

Best player available isn’t an absolute…it’s a mixture of both need and player ability. There were quality young QBs available when we were selecting players who projected out as reserves on our team. The Chiefs did not select any of them because they were adamant that Croyle was their franchise guy…not because one didn’t fall to us.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 4:06 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have to agree with that

it seems to be the way I remembered it

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 5:14 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's A Really Good Idea, Truth

I’ve changed mine to reflect that.

The Chiefs should win 5 to 6 games this year and no less than 4 for this season to be considered progress in any way.

by UCrawford on Dec 2, 2008 10:24 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Same here :)

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 10:47 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol...that is a story for another time.

I asked LJ to put it in there and he then got suspended. j/k

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:56 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I just wanna know

What has Herm done since he was here that he deserves the benefit of the doubt? The only stat that matters is win, losses, we have won 15 games in THREE years.

by Eric Allen on Dec 2, 2008 9:11 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Parcell's doesn't know what he's talking about ;-)

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 9:17 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Looks like McEnroe vs Conners again

“Hey are they serving refreshments at this match?”

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 11:14 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah $8 beers and a half cup of peanuts for $4...welcome to Arrowhead

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 11:30 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

4 bucks? That would be about 25 cents a peanut, kinda steep

“Welcome to Arrowhead home of the 25 cent peanut!” I hope when the team becomes competitive, they don’t raise the price of the peanuts anymore.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 1:12 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"It is what it is"

Nobody is forcign you to pay…‘course you can’t bring any food into the stadium either. Funny thing was that Hunt wouldn’t allow people to get water at WOF without paying for the cup about 15 years ago. They changed that when the city came down on them…it’s illegal for a business to not give water to someone asking for it.
Cheap bastards

Bill Parcell’s: "You are what your record says you are."

The Chiefs need to be playoff contenders in 2009 for me to consider improvement. Clark wanted it in 2008...I'll give them an additional year.

by THE_TRUTH on Dec 2, 2008 2:00 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I actually got to go to WOF back in the 70's

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Dec 2, 2008 2:10 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Chiefs_small
"Twas the Night Before Football"
P1_extra_bmm_1stcast_may08_small
"53"

Recent FanPosts

Img_1134_small
Steve McNair is dead at 36
Small
A look back (Herm years)
Small
the 53 Man Roster
Pict0200_small
BECAUSE I'M BORED LET'S PLAY GM FOR THE DAY
Kcchiefsd_small
Happy Independence Day!!!
Images2_small
A Rockin Chiefs Post
Images2_small
Pioli pulls the Trigger
Small
2009 AP Fantasy League(s)?
Chiefs_small
2009 Season
Heth_small
Cali girl going to Arrowhead....

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Editors

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris

Tg_small primetime 07

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Brodie_small Official Arrowhead Pride Parade

N505381175_257425_5488_small connerman

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports