Arrowhead Pride: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

What really is the problem on the Chiefs defense?

Nice first FanPost. To keep up with the Chiefs news today, we'll be posting lots of FanShots so keep an eye on that section. -Chris

I'd like to pose a question here and see your opinions on the subject. 

What really is the problem with the Kansas City Chiefs defense? 

There's been quite a bit of criticism directed towards Gunther Cunningham as of late.  Maybe this is warranted.  Maybe it's not.  I haven't been able to make a decision about Gun myself.  I love having him on the team, but this may just be a sentimental throwback notion that dreams of the glory days of our defense.  Is he still relevant in the modern day of the NFL?  I'm not sure, but consider this: 

Gun has shown in the past that he can run a successful defense.  He certainly did it in the 90's, but some of that success can be credited towards Marty and DT, among others.  Since he was rehired in 2005, Cunningham has been steadily improving the defense: 

2004 - 31st

2005 - 18th

2006 - 16th

2007 - 13th

So why is it so bad this year?  According to the trend so far I was expecting to break into the top 10 of the league.  Obviously that hasn't been the case.  Is it injuries?  Too many young players?  Lack of Jared Allen?  Lack of significant free agents? 

I have another theory:  Herm Edwards

We've all seen Herm's inability or unwillingness to change.  Last year's offense was arguably the worst in franchise history.  This year's started out much the same way.  Then look what happens - Herm finally backs off and lets Gailey do his job.  This offense is not Herm Edwards' offense at all.  But by abandoning his concrete notions of what a team should be they've actually made it work.  The team is actually moving the ball and scoring points now.  The offense (beyond all belief) is actually the side of the ball that has given the team an opportunity to win games at times. 

The defense seemed to do a serviceable job in 2006 and 2007.  Why the sudden change?  Who knows, but it does pose the question:  What exactly would happen if Herm backed off and let Gun run the defense like he did with Gailey?  We all know that the Cover 2 isn't Cunningham's choice of defense.  Therefore, he's being forced to run a scheme that goes against his style of coaching.  I can't see Herm ever turning away from it since he's known as a defensive coach and the Cover 2 is his baby.  But what if they did?  What if they threw his set-in-stone policies out the window and let the coordinator run the show? 

My guess:  major improvement.  So who's fault is this really?  Let's hear it guys. 

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.

4 recs  |  Comment 115 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well...

From what I see,

1) Zero Containment

Our ends have failed to do something taught in highschool, and arguably the easiest thing to do in football period. Force the run inside. Nothing worse than watching a runningback bounce it outside and take the rock another 5 yards before we tackle him.

2) Running Lanes Remain Open

Our linebackers seem to sit 3 yards deep in the runninglanes, not only giving up the 3 yards (obviously) , but ultimatly give the runningback room to actually make a move on a linebacker as opposed to going head on in a gap. This can be blamed on coaching as well because it too is such a simple part of football.

3)Zero Pressure on Passing Downs

Do I actually need to explain this? No.

And Finally,

4)Poor Tackling

Our linebackers miss more tackles than our rookie cornerbacks, not exactly a good thing. Broken tackles are a thing of highschool and Adrian Peterson, not an everydown fact of life like they have become for the Chiefs. Solving this problem alone would probably knock 100 yards off of the total offense.

This is just my take, their is most definetly more to it.

by Ben S on Nov 26, 2008 1:06 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

All Good Points

And I agree with all of your conclusions.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 7:42 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Excellent observations Ben - and all true

So is it our personnel or the scheme. I think it’s personnel. Hard to say what level of success this team would have if all were healthy (even with all the rookies on ’D’). But in the NFL injuries are not an acceptable excuse. So where does that leave this team ??

In need of a better GM or trainer ??

by HankerChief on Nov 27, 2008 3:51 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Defense

Gaping holes at RDE and MLB along with numerous injuries are a major culprit. The first several weeks of the season low TOP by offense wore a thin mediocre defense down. This house is not even half built.

by dklogue1 on Nov 26, 2008 2:11 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Overlooked...

…is that with the injuries the past few weeks the defense not only has been full of scrubs in various positions that can’t play as well as the regulars but also the defensive schemes and play calling has HAD to be more simple and “vanilla” so these new players know what theyre doing…which is debatable….

by woodman212 on Nov 26, 2008 3:46 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

New, young, injured

It takes time to jell on defense. On the defensive line, we have one rookie and two second-year players. At linebacker we have a first-year starter. In the defensive backfield we have two rookies and two third-year players. In addition, we have had injuries on the line (including Hali playing hurt all year) and among the linebackers. It is no surprise we have regressed on defense. Herm is NOT screwing up the defense. Gun is NOT a horrible coordinator. Losing Jared Allen definitely hurts, but does not explain a fall in defense from average to near the worst. We will be better next year. The defensive guys will have had more time playing and playing together. On the other hand, we will have two or three new starters. Thus, I see the year after next as when we really begin to shine.

by pleaseblock on Nov 26, 2008 6:58 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Actually

We’ve got a rookie. one second year player (McBride’s out for the year), a veteran (Edwards or Boone), and a third year player who was a 2006 first round draft pick.

The 3rd year player’s the worst one on the line, the second year player and the vet are non-factors, and the rookie’s playing the best (and he’s not close to playing like a Pro Bowler). The second year player on IR was also a non-factor before he got hurt. That, as Ben pointed out, can probably be taken as an indictment of the coaching staff since the defensive coordinator’s been here for four years now and the young players brought in haven’t improved a lick (and several have regressed).

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 7:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Boone

looked like a rookie on Sunday with 2 encroachment penalites in a row. Lack of discipline from a veteran on a young team is NOT what we need right now.

by dkugler838 on Nov 26, 2008 9:24 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Defensive problems

Why do our defensive line coach Tim Krumrie keeps getting a pass for coaching one of the worst units in football. He has done nothing to develope any of our draft picks since he’s been here. Year after year this man line has been the weak link of our defense, yet all you talking head continue to point fingers at everyone but him. No matter what linebacker we draft in the up coming draft, if do not get a good line coach to help them learn the pro game than our linebackers will always look average. Matter of fact the only defensive coach that should retain his job is David Gibbs our secondary coach. And don’t even get me started on the not so special special teams coach, what a joke.

vajazz24

by vajazz24 on Nov 26, 2008 9:09 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Missed tackles

I think the poor tackling is a result of overemphasizing stripping the ball. Once these guys figure out that the first guy to the ball has to take control of the runner and it is the assisting tackler’s job to go for the strip, the tackling and takeaways will improve. You can’t effectively wrap up if you are frantically slapping at the ball.

by Idahochief on Nov 26, 2008 9:26 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Injury, Scheme, Pride

One problem is the huge amount of injuries, I don’t think I have ever seen a team this injured in a season. We can’t even start the same guys two weeks in a row so the players do not trust the guy next to them to make the play, thus not keeping their assignment.

Tampa 2 – I have never liked this D, the weaknesses are too well documented and you need stellar players at certain positions to run it well. We need to do on D what we did on the O, that is we need to design a defense that plays to our best players strenghts. That is what Gun did his first trip here and was starting to do under Vermeil.

Pride – Edwards will not let Gun run something different because Herm is known for the Tampa 2 and it would look bad if he can’t get it running. Also, Allen was a Vermeil player Hali was an Edwards player; I think Edwards truely believed that Hali was just as good as Allen if he played on the QBs blind side. Herm just needs to check his pride and take some responsibilty for this failure.

by tevans96 on Nov 26, 2008 9:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great post

This is really the direction I was going here. I agree.

TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!

by TheScootness on Nov 26, 2008 2:12 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It is a mess no matter what angle you look at it from.

The coaches deserve the blame. How else can you explain it. Yeah we have had injuries but they cut a couple of players that could have helped on the defensive side. We improved the last couple of years and now we are worse than when Vermeil was here.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Nov 26, 2008 9:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The stats don't back up your conclusion

Our defense has been getting better consistently since 2004.

Last year we were 13th the year before that 16th.

This year we are horrible. Last year wasn’t that bad let’s look at what has changed.

Head coach? NO
D Coordinator? NO
players? YES
You can’t make the argument that Herm is the problem with the defense because as long as he has been here the d has been improving except for this year. Injuries and the loss of Jared Allen is the main problem.

I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.

by KCking on Nov 26, 2008 9:39 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree with you for the most part

One of the keys to the Tampa 2 is a powerful pass rush so that the QB doesn’t have time to read the zone. By losing the best pass rusher we had, one that made the other D-linemen better, we lost a key to this type of D. Without that and not being able to replace it this year no matter who we have sent out there we should have been looking at changing things up like the offense did to get the most out of the players we had.

We don’t have the talent needed for the D we run so it is the coaches’ job to put the players in position to be good. This is where I think Herm fails, he doesn’t seem willing to change due to situations he just keeps doing the same thing – this is also his weakness in gameday coaching and why we are so bad in the second half (he is not good at adjusting).

by tevans96 on Nov 26, 2008 9:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You Forgot About Gun's New Job

Linebackers coach…which means he’s now working two full-time jobs. Which means he now has half the time to dedicate to the defensive coordinator job.

Funny how the linebacking corps has also become a major weakness since Gunther took it over as well.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 10:18 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I never did understand this move

Last year I didn’t think our LBs were that bad but we threw Harris and the LB coach under the bus for some reason. This experiment with Gun has not worked and if he stays then he needs to find a LB coach he trusts to run that unit. It has not helped that every single one of our LBs has been injured this season.

by tevans96 on Nov 26, 2008 10:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What's Worse

Is that none of them have been effective when they’ve played.

Like I and several others have said before…if it’s one guy who’s a problem you can probably say it’s that individual or it’s bad luck. When it’s the entire linebacking corps that’s the problem, you should probably start asking what the hell the linebackers coach is doing.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 10:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark is trying to save money...lol

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Nov 26, 2008 11:06 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And Played Like Crap When They Were Healthy

Sorry, but injuries are a part of football and a couple of missed games for Derrick Johnson doesn’t explain why’s he’s on pace for the worst season of his career. Or why the linebackers coach decided that Pat Thomas was a good guy to have as our MLB. Or why our linebackers can’t execute basic tackles in the game.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 1:03 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The players have changed and it was the coaches who decided

To let PAT THOMAS who? to start over Napoleon Harris who had over 100 tackles and was the most consistant player on our defense. They are the ones who talk up Demorrio Williams all the way up to the start of the season and barely play him. It is the coaches who scheme and coach these players. So yes they should get the majority of the blame. Yeah we had injuries but they left the cupboard bare.

Vermeil gets the blame for the state the team was in when Herm got here. This is year three, it is time to blame the current staff.

Indecision is the key to flexibility

by cmpotter on Nov 26, 2008 10:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Another thing about Gunther that confuses me is that he was an extremely effective linebackers coach with Tennessee. They were consistently a top 5 run defense during Gun’s years as a coach there and were #1 his last year. Interestingly, in 2004, their run D plummeted.

Now, the fact that we’ve pumped so many people out of the draft toward defense in the last 7 years is disturbing. But if you want to point the finger somewhere, here are your options:

1. Insufficient talent – Carl Peterson
2. Insufficient coacing – Gunther Cunningham
3. Insufficient Scheme – Herm Edwards

I don’t necessarily believe the Cover 2 is flawed, but something needs to get settled. Either Herm needs to bring in a better Tampa 2 style coach or he needs to let Gunther design the defensive gameplan. Herm obviously gave Chan more freedom this year and it had very good results.

by ChiefsDude on Nov 26, 2008 9:45 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Cover 2

It’s not that the cover 2 is flawed, it’s that you have to have the right personnel to play it effectively. It requires ball-hawking corners, a solid front-four pass rush, and linebackers (especially MLB) that can stay disciplined in their assignments. We don’t have the personnel for that system. Our corners are young and show signs of playing at a high level, but still need to develop. Our front four is absolutely pathetic due to injuries,, poor coaching, poor development, etc. And our linebackers aren’t well suited for the cover 2. I’d say the only LB we have that is disciplined and smart enough to play cover 2 is Donnie, and he can’t stay healthy. DJ isn’t well suited to the cover 2, his mentality fits more with a man-coverage free-running style (similar to what D Thomas excelled at). The cover 2 isn’t bad, it just doesn’t fit us at this time.

by Chiefs4Life on Nov 26, 2008 9:54 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Players

Until we have the players to run it the Cover 2 will not be a good defense. We are missing the two biggest parts of the Tampa 2, a superior pass rush and a middle linebacker with great speed and range. Once we have that THEN run it if you want but until then our best players are in the secondary so we should be going man to man.

by tevans96 on Nov 26, 2008 9:57 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

so how long do we give Herm to get the players for the Cover 2 to be effective?

In the mean time, he doesn’t try a different scheme, ala Chan Gailey, to work with the personnel he has now?

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Nov 26, 2008 11:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's Why

I don’t think that it’s just about Herm.

Gailey couldn’t run Herm’s piece of crap offense with the players he had on hand, they were the worst in the NFL and Herm was willing to let him go with an offense that “everyone” said wouldn’t work in the NFL. When backed into a corner with no other options, Herm was willing to give someone else’s idea a shot even if it was a fairly radical one.

Question is…the Chiefs have possibly the worst defense in the NFL and yet Herm’s not willing to change like he was offensively. So is it then really a matter of Herm being inflexible? Or is it that Gunther doesn’t really have any ideas about how to improve the defense? After all, he ran off our leading tackler from last season. He took over the linebacking corps and the Chiefs signed a linebacker that he seemed high on only to see that guy riding the bench halfway through the season. If you want to blame Herm for that I think it’s fair…after all he is the head coach and he bears responsibility for the results produced by his assistants. But there’s been a lot that’s happened this year to indicate that Gunther’s very much a part of the problem.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 11:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Nov 26, 2008 11:55 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

DJ Is Right In One Thing

Not everything that goes wrong with the team on the field is because of Herm. He’s just the one at fault because it’s his coaching staff and he’s the one responsible for the lineups, the practices and saying yea or nay on the playcalls. So even if Gun’s fucking up the program it’s still Herm’s (and Carl’s) fault for either not reining him in or not getting rid of him.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 12:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Herm

I have been saying all along that if herm would let gun run his man to man, pressure heavy defense things would be alot different. I think herm has done a good job of gaining the respect of the players cause they all seem to love him, but i just think his philosophies are out of date, and if he would uncuff gun like he did chan our defense would improve immensely.

by InternetCreditOffers.com on Nov 26, 2008 9:54 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

i've said this all season

it’s like you read my mind. everyone has said something to the effect that the two biggest holes are at end and middle linebacker, undoubtedly the two most important positions in a cover 2 scheme. without a pass rush, the zone is just an umbrella, and dumpoffs and/or mistakes are common. the solution to no 4 man pass rush? gunther cunningham of the 1990s. BLITZ BLITZ BLITZ. i think we have two VERY talented young corners that we can trust enough in man coverage to send 5-7 guys on lots of passing downs. (the safeties are another issue)….but it has been said a million times, without a pass rush, any NFL quarterback will pick apart a defense. this is a timeless lesson, and it would take an aggressive defense to get that rush with out talent, and it has appeared herm just loves the cover 2 too much to let that happen.

Never giving up on your team is what makes you a good fan.

by kcisbetterthanstlateverything on Nov 26, 2008 9:59 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Let Gun Loose

Herm needs to let Gun have complete control of the defense! Look how the offense has evolved with Chan, why can’t the defense have the same autonomy? I say let the corners man-up and let loose the blitzkrieg every down if necessary, play some 3-4, anything different at this point would be appreciated…..We have NOTHING to loose!

by NoDoubt on Nov 26, 2008 10:36 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

and probably everything to gain

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Nov 26, 2008 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.

I have a HARD time believing that Gun doesn’t dicipline his players. I know Herm was the one who wanted to implement the Cover 2 Defense… But he’s not Tony Dungy and these aren’t the Bucs.
I like Gunther Cunningham. And it seems like EVERYONE is asking for his head… Well, I would rather see Herm go and allow Gun to have complete control over the D, and if he fails, THEN we can lynch the guy, but until then, I’m gonna stick to the “Fire Herm” Campaign before I jump aboard the “Kill Gun” bandwagon.

by ROC 27 on Nov 26, 2008 11:43 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Before he “Fire Gunther” train leaves the station, you eitherr have to

A: let him fall on his /own/ sword, by screwing up while running the D of his own choosing

or

B: Have a top-notch Cover-2 coach waiting in the wings to replace him, and acknowledge that Gun ain’t bad, he’s just not suited to the system & let him go.

I favor option A, myself.

But as long as we’re headhunting, the only proper way to go about it is in this order:
Peterson (this is year /what/ of his 5-year plan? Did he sleep through the part in history cass where the Communists’ 5-year plans never worked? Not to mention that he’s the only surviving piece left from the just-outta-reach years. QC’s on his 4th Head Coach, and gotten away clean from every one. I don’t know how much his management affected each particular shot, but he stands responsible for all of them collectively.)
Herm (since Peterson pressured him into trying to cobble the leavings of Vermeil’s aged team into enough of a winner to sell tickets, that set Herm’s program back, and we’re only now seeing it in full force. Herm should get one more year than than Queen Carl)
Gun (Unless you go Option B. Either let him run /his/ D, or blame the guy who’s forcing an incompatible system on Gun.)
Various coaches lower on the food chain, without as much pressure can stand or fall on their own merits.

KC need to have, at this point, a Special Teams Coordinator. Not just a coach there, a real Coodinator, with as much standing as the OC & DC, instead of treating ST as an afterthought as far as coaching goes, by treating the coach as they do the players when it comes to ST – tossing in whoever’s available & wouldn’t cut it in the “real” Coordinator’s slot. IMNSHO, anyway.

by Bleedingredandgold on Nov 28, 2008 4:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Good post, Scootness.

I agree to a certain extent that Gun needs to be allowed to run his scheme, but it seems like the players are also beginning to tune him out to a degree.

Here’s a question to follow yours:

Since Herm appears to have taken his influence out of the Offense, and if the Defense succeeds when he takes his influence out of it, why would Herm not be fired on the spot?

That would leave Herm to only be a motivator (questionable given the many flat and uninspired performances over the years) and a game manager (proven inability).

So, Herm, what exactly would you say you do here?

by DThomasReigns on Nov 26, 2008 12:50 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Did you get that memo?

I think you hit the nail right on the head. Beyond (maybe) helping with the draft, giving the players a few motivational speeches, and doing his damndest to confuse the media what is Herm really good for?

Thanks for the compliment and thanks to everyone for the responses.

I agree 100% with ROC 27’s comment above. I really believe that Gun could excel without Herm in the background screwing things up.

TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!

by TheScootness on Nov 26, 2008 2:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Based On What?

Seriously, what has Gunther done in the decade since he stopped working with Marty Schottenheimer to make the case that he’s a great (or even good) defensive coordinator?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Which Means What?

We were one of the worst defenses in the league when he got here in 2005. He’s been here the better part of four years and we’re still one of the worst defenses in the league (after picking primarily defensive players with our first-day draft picks and free agent signings). So what, exactly, has he cleaned up?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

He got here in 2004…so he’s been here the better part of five years. And our defense hasn’t been ranked in the top 10 in either yards or points in any of them. And now we’re competing again for worst defense in the NFL.

So what, exactly, has he fixed?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Well then who do you propose who would like to take on this job opportunity?

In our opinion we’re cutting down on some transaction costs of having a D-coordinator with a decent resume whose already married to the organization.

Scream for new blood all you want, but it’ll cost us and at the same time you want a new GM and head coach.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:33 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll Answer Your Question When You Answer Mine

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:35 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Quid Pro Quo And All That :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Asked and answered

2004 – 31st

2005 – 18th

2006 – 16th

2007 – 13th

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And Back To 31st or 32nd In One Year

Now what were the splits on those defenses (ranking of run v. pass)?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 11:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And To Answer Your Question

If Gunther were fired midseason I’d want the Chiefs to promote David Gibbs, our defensive backs coach and give him the rest of the season to prove himself. If it’s done after the season it would depend on who’s available.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 11:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You would prefer Greg Robinson?

This years undoubtedly a regression, but it’s also an incredibly young team that at least on paper has some potential future stars.

Just sayin’ we’d rather be one of the worst and youngest defenses than just one of the worst.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're Ducking My Question

What exactly has Cunningham fixed after five years on the job?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And Before You Answer, Consider

That we’ve selected eight defensive players with first-day draft picks during Gunther’s tenure.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:34 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Christ almighty, Dr. Z quotes the AP and it's scripture

Drafts a gamble and we all know it. That’s a pretty damning stat for the WHOLE ORGANIZATION, which Gunther’s definitely a part of, but jeez it’s getting pretty lame to take one season and blame it all on that.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

One season?

I think he’s talking about 5.

by Joel Thorman on Nov 26, 2008 2:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Improving Into What!?!

The Chiefs have been rebuilding the defense since Gunther came back five years ago and he’s never built a squad that ranked in the top 10 in either points or yards allowed…a defense that has now devolved into the worst defense in the NFL.

It doesn’t take five years to rebuild a defense when you devote that many draft picks and free agent signings to it.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:46 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

At Least

It doesn’t take five years if you’ve got a defensive coordinator who knows what he’s doing.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

So how did a complete incompetent put together the 13th ranked defense in league last year?

Just saying, if you look at what’s changed we’re not ready to put it all on Gunther without more info.

Also why hasn’t anyone asked Herm “what exactly the shit is up with this Tampa 2 system this year?”

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Because

The Chiefs have spent 71% of their first-day draft picks on free agents.

And because Gunther had someone else besides himself coaching the linebackers last year. Which he then screwed up by taking that job himself.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:53 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

Because the Chiefs have spent 71% of their first-day draft picks and free agent selections on defensive players.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:54 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Correction to my correction

Because the Chiefs have spent 71% of their first-day draft picks and most of their free agent selections on defensive players.

(Screw this…I’m getting some more caffeine. Long day). :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:55 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Let us take this in a different direction.

We submit that even if Dorsey grows into his ‘potential,’ Turk & Tank will never cut it as sufficiently beastly members of a Tampa 2 front three.

That said, Dorsey and Tank with McBride and a DE savior (yet unknown) could present a tenable front 4 in a future 4-3/nickel coverage scheme. Hali’s too fragile and step too slow, Boone’s never gonna cut it, so we need draft picks (preferably some big LBs).

Our problem with promoting Gibbs is that our defense’s problem already is that it’s basically one big pass coverage scheme with rookies as point men. Sure they’re doing well, HERM’S A GODDAMN FORMER CORNERBACK, THEY’D BETTER BE! Shottenheimer and Cunningham were former linebackers, what does that tell you?

Why was Buffalo thrilled to play us? We’re a 3-4 soft defense and they had two backs that can bang out short yardage like it’s their job.

Getting rid of Gunther and Krumrie may be necessary because they’re obsolete, but we don’t see their firings making us any tougher against the run.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Cunningham
Shottenheimer and Cunningham were former linebackers, what does that tell you?

It tells me that the job Gunther’s doing as linebacker coach is even more disappointing than I’d initially thought. Sorry, but the linebacking corps is playing like they were picked out of a parking lot right before game time. Gunther’s done an absolutely crap job with them.

We submit that even if Dorsey grows into his ‘potential,’ Turk & Tank will never cut it as sufficiently beastly members of a Tampa 2 front three.

Hali’s too fragile and step too slow

So in other words, three more of our “core” players on whom we expended first day draft picks (all drafted during Herm’s watch) can now be discounted as a useful part of the rebuilding effort?

So why, exactly, do you still think Herm, Carl, or Gunther should be trusted with continuing this rebuilding effort when they’ve apparently whiffed on so many of the players they’re supposed to be building around?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 3:39 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No, not at all
So in other words, three more of our "core" players on whom we expended first day draft picks (all drafted during Herm’s watch) can now be discounted as a useful part of the rebuilding effort?

We then precisely followed up with how we believe Turk & Tank could be utilized in this rebuilding effort.

Admittedly, Hali’s been possibly the biggest disappointment this year (even more than croyle in that DE stars have less of a 1 in a million quality). But calling him a bench player is a bit too harsh, he’s an adequate RDE but for whatever reasons he’s always got a nagging injury and can’t break through the hurry to sack barrier.

So why, exactly, do you still think Herm, Carl, or Gunther should be trusted with continuing this rebuilding effort when they’ve apparently whiffed on so many of the players they’re supposed to be building around?

Also, didn’t say that. First, their distinguishable entities, second, why didn’t you mention Bill Kuharich who would appear to be your grand nemesis?

Carl, we feel gets a bogus shake because while everyone gets up in arms over the past 20 years, he has put together some good teams, and not too mention seeing Joe Montana and Marcus Allen as Chiefs was pretty awesome.

Would we be sad to see Carl gone? Probably not.

Herm actually bothers us the most because he’s never actually achieved anything “great” as a coach before. To be fair, he’s still young and he gets a bad rap for talking like a crazy cliche riddled middle-aged black man (the Sancho Panza of the NFL if you will). But this season, the team’s current ‘image,’ this all falls at his feet and he’s not doing a lot to inspire anyone OUTSIDE the locker room, so that makes us wonder?

We’d be very angry if the Herm experiment flails around again next year. Are we stone cold convinced he’s a failure? Errr, not quite yet.

Gunther, we feel is still a question mark? Who is calling and doing what, the move from the box to the field, the lower tempo’d anger, we’re all very confused by this. We’d love to see a return to the bloody ‘em up smashmouth OLB’s from hell of the past, but is that even possible in the current scheme with the current personnel. If not it may be time for Gun to go despite his actual talent, can’t make a blunt instrument do a finesse job as it were.

So we still don’t know on Gun, but admittedly for nostalgia’s sake we’d like to see a successful change somewhere.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 4:08 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just To Be Clear...I'm Not Trying To Straw Man Your Positions

Wanted to say that before I continue.

Carl, we feel gets a bogus shake because while everyone gets up in arms over the past 20 years, he has put together some good teams, and not too mention seeing Joe Montana and Marcus Allen as Chiefs was pretty awesome.

Yeah, that was 15 years ago. What has he done since then? How many of those teams had any kind of serious shot at competing for a championship?

Marcus Allen and Joe Montana aren’t here any more and they didn’t win a championship when they were here, nor did they even get to a Super Bowl…which was the entire point of bringing them in. And Carl Peterson gets ripped because the answer to that question I asked is “none”. So he’s not getting an unfair shake at all…he’s being held accountable for his lack of results.

But calling him a bench player is a bit too harsh, he’s an adequate RDE but for whatever reasons he’s always got a nagging injury and can’t break through the hurry to sack barrier.

Adequate defensive ends are bench players. Adequate defensive ends who can’t stay healthy or get to the QB or play the run aren’t actually adequate and are lucky to be bench players.

Also, didn’t say that. First, their distinguishable entities, second, why didn’t you mention Bill Kuharich who would appear to be your grand nemesis?

Because Carl Peterson hired Bill Kuharich and because Carl Peterson is Bill Kuharich’s boss and because Carl Peterson’s hired every other person in the Chiefs front office because he’s had more or less complete control of this franchise for 19 years. I don’t rip that much on Kuharich because Bill Kuharich isn’t important enough to care about. Neither was Lynn Stiles. Neither are any of the other people in the front office except Carl Peterson. Because he’s the one responsible for the Chiefs falling apart because he built this team and hired everyone running it.

To be fair, he’s still young and he gets a bad rap for talking like a crazy cliche riddled middle-aged black man

He gets a bad rap because he’s been coaching for seven years and he doesn’t win that many games. Also because he’s a really terrible game manager and he never accepts responsibility for what happens with his team. The only time people get tired of cliches from the coach is when they’re being used to cover his ass when he doesn’t do what he’s supposed to.

We’d be very angry if the Herm experiment flails around again next year.

Got a mouse in your pocket? :)

Gunther, we feel is still a question mark?

He the defensive coordinator in charge of the worst defense in the NFL. He’s the linebackers coach in charge of a linebacking corps that’s falling apart. I don’t have any questions about Gunther Cunningham’s ability to lead…I don’t believe he has any. And I don’t care whether it’s because of Herm or not. Running the worst defense in the NFL means you don’t get the benefit of the doubt any more.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:30 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

"Got a mouse in your pocket? :)"

The PARADE has been utilizing the royal “we” for some months now.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 8:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Fair Enough

Figured that was the case. Sorry, couldn’t resist. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 9:10 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, but the linebacking corps is playing like they were picked out of a parking lot right before game time

Its because they were

by InternetCreditOffers.com on Nov 27, 2008 9:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Eight First Day Draft Picks On Defensive Players

Most of them are still our roster, few of them have shown any progression and we’ve got the worst overall defense in the NFL.

I’m not damning Cunningham for one season. I’m damning him because he hasn’t built a good defense in over a decade…since he quit working with Marty Schottenheimer. I’m saying that the man’s a fraud.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Actually, I'll Rephrase That

He’s a dinosaur, not a fraud.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Entirely possible

We’d wait and see though. Given your druthers and you could only chose one would you fire Herm or Gunther?

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Herm

Because I’m pretty sure the new coach would dump Gunther. Two birds with one stone and all that.

Although my druthers are that Peterson goes first out of all of them. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's been improving up until this year

Jared Allen became a dominant end that we got a high trade value for and this year he got dealt a bit of a personnel shit sandwich. Not to say that absolves him, but we’re not convinced it’s all him.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 2:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Improving Into What?

He’s been here five years and his defense hasn’t ranked in the top 10 in either points allowed or yardage in any of them. As head coach his defense didn’t rank in the top 10 in points allowed or yardage. All I see is that we’ve replaced one incompetent defensive coordinator with another.

And, to answer your question, if Cunningham were fired this season I’d want David Gibbs (our defensive back coach) to replace him for the remainder of the year.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 2:40 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

UC

You can see the progress that the Defense made… Gun MUST be doing SOMETHING right. Last year our Defense was the only thing keeping us in games… then we let go of Jared Allen, move Tamba Hali to RDE, bring in more rookies on Defense than you can count, have a musical chairs party with our LB’s, and have Herm breathing down his neck to press harder on the Cover 2…

Now if you ask ME, it’s gonna be hard to continue what he had going last season.

by ROC 27 on Nov 26, 2008 3:24 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And... take it easy, bro

Gun isnt getting fired this far into the season. Let’s get real now.

by ROC 27 on Nov 26, 2008 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just Because I Can't Fire Him

Doesn’t mean I’m going to keep quiet about how he needs to be fired. And he definitely needs to be fired.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 3:32 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What Progress?

After four years devoted to rebuilding the defense we were the 13th ranked defense. This season the team traded our leading pass rusher and dumped our leading tackler from last season and now we’re back to worst in the NFL. When the loss of two players (only one of whom needed to be let go) completely derails your defense, that’s not a sign that your defense was progressing…that’s a sign it’s going the wrong way.

And regarding Tamba Hali…I’m done accepting the excuse that his move to RDE was the reason he struggled. He’s been back on the left end now for awhile and he still sucks. He was decent his rookie year, he got a little worse his second year, and now he’s a complete non-entity. If eight games one the other side of the line wrecks him like that, then he’s just not that good. And if he has any talent, then Gunther and Krumrie don’t have a clue how to get it out of him because at this point he’s barely worth keeping around as a bench player.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Progress

Defined as:

n.
1.Movement, as toward a goal; advance.
2.Development or growth: students who show progress.
3.Steady improvement, as of a society or civilization: a believer in human progress. See synonyms at development.
4. A ceremonial journey made by a sovereign through his or her realm.

The last 4 years from year to year the Defense got better, showed development, improved – often known as progess. We didn’t make it to top 10 but we were just outside of it last year.

by tevans96 on Nov 26, 2008 3:52 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The Last Four Years Includes This Year

We’re now most of the way through the season. And we’ve gone right back to where we were under Greg Robinson after “rebuilding” the defense for the better part of five years. And outside of the secondary, few of the players we added are giving us any reason to think that they’ll be turning this defense into a powerhouse next year, or the year after that or the year after that. It’s just a cycle of rebuilding a bad defense to get to a level of mediocrity.

We didn’t make it to top 10 but we were just outside of it last year.

Yeah, and we almost made it to a Super Bowl in 1994. And we almost won a playoff game a few times over the last decade. And Herm almost won his division in New York. And Gunther almost built this defense into a good one before the bottom fell out and it became garbage again.

“Almost” is a term that losers (like Herm, Carl and Gunther) use a lot…usually to cover their ass when people call them out for continually falling short. I don’t accept it as a valid achievement. I have no idea why anyone else would accept it from this team, either.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:02 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Again...

If things didn’t change SO MUCH on Gun, then MAYBE we’d be a Top 10 Defense.

by ROC 27 on Nov 26, 2008 4:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe

And maybe if Gun isn’t able to handle change then maybe he’s exactly the wrong person to be put in charge of rebuilding a defense by bringing in young players.

Or maybe the reason things constantly change on Gun is because Gun keeps changing them (e.g. getting rid of Napoleon Harris, benching DeMorrio Williams, shifting Tamba Hali) as a way of making up excuses for why he only almost achieves all the things he said he was going to achieve.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:37 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

DeMorrio Williams broke his hand

It was really bothering us that you kept saying that, and we were like “really? he was looking pretty good earlier this season, what gives?”

Hali made the most sense to move, although he’s looking pretty insufficient.

If Tony Gonzalez is the best example of why we’re better off without Napoleon Harris, if a guy like Tony can show his kind of professionalism and a not half as talented Napoleon Harris not only under performs but whines, well we’re not going to criticize coaches for getting rid of him (maybe mgmt for not getting some sort of tax write off for him).

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 8:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

He Broke His Hand Three Months Ago..During Preseason

And he hasn’t been on the Chiefs final weekly injury report all season, so it’s not his hand.

If Tony Gonzalez is the best example of why we’re better off without Napoleon Harris, if a guy like Tony can show his kind of professionalism and a not half as talented Napoleon Harris not only under performs but whines, well we’re not going to criticize coaches for getting rid of him (maybe mgmt for not getting some sort of tax write off for him).

Tony Gonzalez requested a trade. Then he blasted management when he didn’t get it. He’s just choosing not to complain any more until the offseason because he can’t go anywhere until then.

As for Napoleon Harris, he led our team in tackles last year and the only reason I ever heard given for why he didn’t get played at all this year was that Gunther didn’t like him. And considering just how screwed up Gunther’s got the linebacking corps this year, I’d say the primary reason that Gunther didn’t like him was because Gunther is a moron who holds petty grudges that has nothing to do with performance.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 9:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And thats

with someone else’s defensive philosophy. To say he has never been successful is plum silly. He was very successful as the titans linebacker coach, and like many are saying has made progress until this year.

by InternetCreditOffers.com on Nov 27, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gunther's "Success" In Tennessee

In 2003, Gunther’s final season with the Titans, Tennessee was ranked 1st against the run and 30th against the pass (and 12th overall). So while giving up only 80 yards a game is impressive on the surface it’s not really that impressive when it’s because the league decided it was easier to pass you silly.

And the year before that…2nd against the run, 25th against the pass (10th overall). And the year before that (Gunther’s first year), the defense was ranked 25th overall. And the year before Gunther arrived in Tennessee? The Titans defense was ranked 1st.

And while I think it’s not realistic to blame the defensive woes in Tennessee on Gunther Cunningham (who, by the way, was not the defensive coordinator there) there’s no case to say that Gunther came in and had a lot of success. They were a great defense before he arrived and a middling defense for most of the time he was there. He was basically a tourist.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Rec'd

Succinct and eloquent post we couldn’t agree with more.

The jury’s still out in our mind on Gun as well. If you look at this in a holistic and personal way: the loss of Jared Allen (in hopes that Hali or Dorsey would put up marginally close to slightly inferior numbers) has really been debilitating; the whole Harris situation is embarrassing (why’d we take him in the first place, why couldn’t we manage to get a trade for him, why was he too unprofessional to do his job regardless of the team’s record?); and then we get this whole crop of unknowns at LB (Flowers & Carr seem to be working out why wasn’t anything done other than LJ this offseason?).

The basic problem seems to be “who’s calling the shots personnel and scheme wise?”

Honestly, if Dorsey dramatically improves (a big if), we fill the DE question (a big question), and we put the same effort into drafting LBs as we did drafting corners this year, this defense could dramatically improve. The biggest long-term looming problem is our lack of faith in this scheme and an identity.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 3:30 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Thank you

My real point here wasn’t exactly to defend Gun, it was to make a point that this may not be his fault. As we said, the jury is still out on him but I think it’s going a little too far to point the finger solely at him for the recent failings of this defense.

I have no doubt that if Gun was here during the Vermeil years the Chiefs could have cashed in on the big one. With that kind of firepower all they needed was a middle-of-the-road defense. Instead, the offense had to score 30 points a game to even give them a shot.

He started with absolutely nothing when Robinson left and he’s improved it every year since. Do we even have a defensive player left from ‘04? Yes, we’ve invested a lot of picks and FA’s in defense but we needed to! Does anyone remember how horrifically bad those defenses were? The only reason we won games was becuse of the massively overpowered offense. As I said, he was on pace to break into the top 10 this year until things broke down.

It’s just too easy for me to believe that he’s capable of putting together a great defense and that Herm is (more than) capable of throwing a monkey wrench into things like he did with the offense. I just think it would be entertaining to see Gun perform without the Edwards handcuffs. If he still tanks then can him. I’ll be right there calling for his head with the rest of you.

TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!

by TheScootness on Nov 26, 2008 3:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Makes sense to us.

This is going to be unpopular but we feel that even with Herm our defense could theoretically get turned around in a big way. Drop the strict “bend but don’t break” Tampa 2 (you can’t gang tackle until you can individually tackle), and cut this tricky coverage crap for run stuffing and pass rushing. Draft some fast as snot OLBs who can’t pass cover worth a damn but could left arm tackle the devil himself if they had to. Plug in a 4-4 every once in a while.

There seems to be a lost art in the NFL of putting the fear of God in quarterbacks.

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 26, 2008 8:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Quarterbacks Aren't Scared Of Defensive Ends That Can't Get To Them

And as Trent Edwards demonstrated last week, if we run a 4-4 against other teams the QB will just use all that time in the pocket to pick the defense apart or he’ll kill us with screen passes.

A defense where the linemen can’t get to the QB isn’t a defense that’s going to succeed just by going with man-to-man.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 9:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Also

People bitch about the defense only being 13th last year? I think that alone proves that Gun has what it takes.

How many three and outs by the offense last year? How many points per game did the offense average? What was their average time of possession? (I’m sure someone will look up these stats for me, I’m too lazy ;)

What about special teams? How many touchdowns did they produce? What was opponents’ average field position? How many missed field goals?

My point here is that the defense shouldered the weight of that inept team. They got no help whatsoever from the other two units. They held up their end of the bargain by allowing the team to be in almost every game.

8 of the 12 losses were by 10 points or less. 4 of those 8 were by 5 points or less. An offense and PK that could have put just 10 more points on the board would have left Kansas City at 12-4. But the main reason for winning would have been…you guessed it: Gunther Cunningham’s defense.

TOUCHDOWN! KAN-SAH-CITY!!!

by TheScootness on Nov 26, 2008 3:55 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah
People bitch about the defense only being 13th last year? I think that alone proves that Gun has what it takes.

Being ranked 13th after spending 71% percent of your first-day draft picks over the last eight years on defensive players is almost an impressive accomplishment from a guy who’s coaching for 27 years. That’s almost as impressive as Carl Peterson almost building a Super Bowl team a decade and a half ago.

It’s not 2007 any more. The defense is the worst in the NFL. The areas Gunther is personally responsible for are some of the biggest problem areas. Screw Gunther and the things he almost accomplished.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:07 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

As For The Rest
What about special teams? How many touchdowns did they produce? What was opponents’ average field position? How many missed field goals?

Fire Mike Priefer too as far as I’m concerned. Special teams has been a festering sore for long enough. Although Connor Barth and Colquitt have been okay so I’d like to keep them.

My point here is that the defense shouldered the weight of that inept team.

They’re the worst defense in the NFL. They aren’t shouldering a damned thing. And I want Herm, Carl, Gunther, Priefer and pretty much every other coach on this team (except Gailey) gone precisely because it’s been so inept (as you’ve stated) since those guys have been running things.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:11 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Would Have Been
But the main reason for winning would have been…you guessed it: Gunther Cunningham’s defense.

But the defense hasn’t won any games for us, has it?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:13 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

THATS What I'M saying...

Herm goes THEN if Gun can’t produce, then let him go too.

by ROC 27 on Nov 26, 2008 4:21 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

The biggest reason to not fire Gun during the season:

John Bunting.

Bunting would have a high probability of being named interim DC. The man who highly recommended the Chiefs draft Ryan Sims.

by DThomasReigns on Nov 26, 2008 4:36 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

What Does It Matter?

If the Chiefs are dumb enough to promote him then let him fail this year too…it’ll just increase the odds that much more that Carl and Herm get fired sooner rather than later.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:38 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I Didn't Make The Tampa 2 Argument

Others did as a way of letting Gunther off the hook. I don’t think Gunther’s got the ability to work outside the Tampa 2 either. After all, he was here for two years under Vermeil and Vermeil didn’t run the Tampa 2.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 4:42 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lack of the Pass Rush/Tamba Hali

I think that we can see that the former improvement, and dependancy, of our defense before, really was dependant on the dominating pass rushing presence of Jared Allen. I really don’t see Tamba Hali as being as bad as everyone else is saying. By no means is he a top-of-the-line defensive end, but I do think he is a very good complementary end. He worked very well in a system with a marquee pass rusher like Jared Allen who took the double teams on one side which allowed Tamba to work one-on-one on the other. If anything, I think that this offseason, we need to take a top-notch pass-rushing defensive end with our pick(Hello Orakpo!), to complement Hali, McBride, Tyler and most of all Dorsey. I honestly believe that our secondary is much better than it has shown this year, because opposing quarterbacks have had so much time to find receivers due to our pathetic pass rush. Hali had 9 and 8 sacks in his first two seasons with Jared Allen drawing(and successfully fending off) double teams on the other side. Basically, what I’m saying is, get a top-notch defensive end to complement Hali, and the defense comes together. We would have a great pass rush, a secondary that isn’t put under intense scrutiny from quarterbacks having way too much time to throw and can thus excel, making picks and breaking up passes, a run defense that is strong up the middle with Dorsey and a linebacking corps that can focus on effectively stuffing the run and stopping throws underneath.

A great end, either through Free Agency or the draft, is exactly what the Chiefs need to return to prominence in 2009.

by ArrowheadRed5658 on Nov 26, 2008 7:13 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Does anyone here remember last year's 13th ranked defense?

There are a TON of good points on this post, but a lot of people keep talking about the almighty 13th ranked D last year. That number was the biggest load of shite I’ve seen outside of Al Davis saying, well pretty much anything. That D was friggin horrible. The only reason that it was ranked 13th was because every team the Chiefs faced pulled out their starting QB’s in order to shove the ball up the gut of the D like a suppository. The fact that there are 7 NEW STARTERS a year later tell you how strong the best D that Gun/Herm/Carl ever put together should say everything. I have no problem with people defending Gun, but that stat is complete BS.

by mushin on Nov 26, 2008 7:38 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

That Defense Had Jared Allen And Napoleon Harris

Jared Allen got traded because Carl couldn’t get along with him. Napoleon Harris got dumped because Gunther couldn’t get along with him.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 26, 2008 9:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Jared was a beast that couldn't contain and Harris was an okay MLB

Oh really? Here are the other stats to go with the 13th overall defense:

Points allowed per game- 17.8 (ranked 28th)
Yds per game- 308.1 (ranked 13th)
Rush yards per game- 130.6 (ranked 28th)

Jarad was a beast when he could pin back his ears and go after the QB, but he never got the chance to. Teams ran all day long on KC last year. And that was partly Allen’s fault, since his contain capabilities lacked something to be desired. But even more so it was Edwards, Boone, Reed and Tyler who couldn’t stop an RB from getting to the second level. This accounted for Harris having so many tackles. He couldn’t help but bring some people down as they ran over him. He is a serviceable MLB that needs D-line help. See Minnesota.

The only stat that was good for the Chiefs D last year was their rank against passing offense:

pass yards per game: 188.6 (ranked 4th)

This is a crap stat. You can’t tell me that our shutdown corners of Law and Surtain had anything to do with that. It was caused by the fact that Jared could eat QB’s alive, and why pass when they can’t stop the run. The central problem last year was the D-line, and it is the issue again this year. That has to fall squarely on Kuharich and Gun. The LB’s aren’t good enough to handle the job without help up front. This includes “I have all the potential in the world but cant seem to turn the corner Derrick Johnson”.

The reason the D stepped back is because not only are they getting chewed up on the ground, now there is no pass rush to make teams thing twice about passing. You know who loves this D the most. The equipment manager for the other team. They haven’t had to wash a QB jersey all year.

What I want to hear is the Chief’s opponents sideline conversation. I imagine it sounds like this:

coach: “Okay, who wants to score a touchdown?”
Towel Boy: “Can I get in there coach?”
coach: “Let me see your endzone dance…”

Gun has got to go. Kuharich has to go. Herm probably has to go to. I like Herm as a man, but screw this. Give me a dickhead like Chucky or Parcells if it means this team starts winning. I’d swallow my vomit and support Shannahan if he could get this team to win. If you went to work and were at the bottom half of every conceivable category for 3 years and your company lost millions because of it, would you expect to be retained?

by mushin on Nov 26, 2008 10:59 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I Agree With Everything You've Said

Not sure if you were responding to my post, but my comment was meant to support a position similar to your own…the defense last year was smoke and mirrors and when you subtracted Allen and Harris (who wasn’t great but serviceable) from the equation it fell apart.

Outstanding argument you’ve made, by the way…very well put together. Seriously, I’m impressed.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 9:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

And

I apologize if you thought I was disagreeing with you before…I wasn’t. I was just tagging a comment on and I probably should have expanded on it.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 9:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No need to apologize

I’m just frustrated. I have a feeling my 4 year old son think I am a fan of the F#@&ING CHIEFS

by mushin on Nov 27, 2008 9:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Ditto

I got a lot less frustrated after I started going into every game accepting that the team will lose no matter how good they look in the early going because our head coach is a moron and our defensive coordinator hasn’t actually built a good defense in well over a decade (despite being given loads of support from the front office). After that I pretty much quit caring when the other team’s running backs ran through our defense like our players were a bunch of 12 year olds.

My irritation is with the prospect of having to watch another Herm and Carl constructed team next year. I wonder if that one will win four games?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 9:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My fear is a 6 win season

My biggest fear is that these guys start playing better with a year under their belts and the chiefs get decent pass rush. The offense can score enough to beat the lesser teams that make up this division. Hell, they could even make the playoffs and make some other non-AFC West team ecstatic.

Herm/Gun/Carl will just hang around like a fungus citing progress that had nothing to do with them. The thought of two more years of this garbage D gives me heartburn.

Of course it could be worse. We could be Lions fans. Holy 28-3 with 14:20 left in the 2nd qtr.

by mushin on Nov 27, 2008 12:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I Think You Can Rest Those Fears

The only thing that’s really improved with this team is the offense because Gailey implemented a new scheme and judging by Herm’s post game comments he hates this offense. So I have no doubt he’ll continue to screw things up for this team down the stretch because he distrusts the only part of his team that can actually win him games.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Nov 27, 2008 11:41 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

My theory is Clark Hunt. 33 Million under the salary cap!!!!!!!!!

by chiefs82 on Nov 27, 2008 9:40 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Eight exclamation marks!

You must be right!

Do you think he’s spending it all on Lamborghinis or Candy Corns?

by Official Arrowhead Pride Parade on Nov 27, 2008 2:50 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog!
Start posting about the Chiefs »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kool_aid_man_small
The Kool Aid Drinker’s Manifesto for the Chiefs
104_4223_small
Jamaal Charles, Lose Yourself!
Floyd1999_small
Joe Delaney ... a true Hero.
Duke_small
Better Know the Jacksonville Jaguars: Ask Big Cat Country
Phoenix_by_melen_small
Chiefs 3-4 Front 7 Grade Re-evaluation: Bye Week

Recent FanPosts

Small
half a season is better than no season at all
Football_small
Better Half
N41002407_31595918_1507_small
Let's Go Jamaal (and the rest of the Chiefs).
2220394594_small
Everyone Else is Talking About the Draft...
J_page_small
Photoshop Fun
Brodie_small
"PLAY LIKE A PARADEPION TODAY!!!" & Other Motivational Sign Ideas...
Small
Realistic Expectations?
Football_small
Game Time For Herm Guy
Kc-sd_game__mine__499_small
List of 2010 FAs. As of now anyways.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs Score on Opening Drive for the First Time All Season
Battle Red Blog
Open Game Day Thread: Houston v. Indianapolis: 2nd Quarter Thread
Dawgs By Nature
Week 9 Open Game Thread for Browns Fans

Managers

Arrowhead_pride_small Chris Thorman

Tg_small Joel Thorman

Editors

N505381175_257425_5488_small Matt Conner

Contributors

Ajax_small ChiefDJ

Small Jon Yoon