Reality!
The Chiefs are an ascending team!
Not what you thought you would read in the first line, was it? I can say this after the biggest lopsided lose in Chiefs history for one reason, and one reason only; Chan! Besides TO's today, the Chiefs offense continues to prove it is the only part of this team getting better.
The Chiefs are obviously a faltering team when it comes to defense, special teams, and head coaching. I will break all three down.
1) Defense - the defense, without injury, was making progress this season. In the first few games, the D was getting gashed against the run. A game or so before the rash of injuries, the Chiefs started to shut down the run. During injury, the D has been decent. Only the past few games has it been shown that the Chiefs need a few players (LB, DE, DE, SS). DE is and should be the #1 pick of the 2009 Kansas City Chiefs.
2) Special Teams - Because of player turnover, this section is awfully weak. How strong would the kick coverage be with players in the line up week in and week out? But recent weeks have shown that PR and KR continue to be a major problem for the Chiefs. Addition is needed in terms of a game breaking PR/KR.
3) Head Coach - It was sealed today. Not only did Herm fail to get his players prepared, he continues to show why he is a failure at game calling. Why, why in the 2nd half are you challenging a clear fumble by TT? If the game was close, which it was not, that would have cost the team a time out and the ability to challenge the rest of the game. Now I know in that position the Chiefs are down by a bunch, but it gains nothing by challenging.
Besides those three areas, the Chiefs are obviously better on offense (besides the TO's today - which happen to young teams).
Here is hoping Herm, Clark, and that GM guy get it right in the offseason. One or two more quality defensive draft picks and a FA or two and this team starts winning more then they lose.
Cheers
Chiefs fan in NY.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
0 recs |
13
comments
Comments
I agree
I’ll take 31 points anyday. The defense should have been able to hold the Bills to under 31 but couldn’t.
by Vince D on Nov 23, 2008 7:45 PM CST 0 recs
Sorry, But They're Not Ascending...Herm's Dragging Them Right Back Down
The offense is certainly looking better than it did at the beginning of the season. That’s because out of desperation the Chiefs finally built an offense that tailored itself to the abilities of the players they had rather than attempting to force the players to play an offense they weren’t capable of fitting. This is what the Chiefs should have done from the start, but didn’t. And why? Because Herm hates this kind of offense and will look for any excuse to go back to his old style, regardless of whether it works. Just look at his post-game comments:
You turn the ball over five times it doesn’t help you. That and the fouls gave them too much field position. I thought at times we moved the ball offensively. Defensively, I thought we did some things early but the turnovers got us.
Notice how he lays it all on the offense that scored him 31 points and lets the defense that gave up 34 points (without the turnovers) off the hook?
When it was close they kept coming at us offensively. We did some things offensively but the turnovers kill you. We didn’t play our game."
Again…he doesn’t look at a game like this and say “Man, our defense is really playing like shit. Maybe I’m doing something wrong here and maybe my philosophy is off.”. Nope, he looks at the game and takes from it that the only people out there doing their jobs (the offense) are somehow to blame because they didn’t play a perfect game. Never mind that the Chiefs couldn’t register a single sack against a mediocre offensive line, never mind that if the Bills hadn’t scored any points over turnovers the Chiefs still would have lost the game and that our offense under Herm’s “style” would never have kept us in the game…in his mind his defense is doing their job and it’s that goddamn kid Thigpen taking too many risks who’s sinking us. Defense good, offense bad, regardless of what actually happened on the field…that sums up perfectly why Herm’s such a miserable fuck-up as a head coach.
In fact, go through his post game comments and count how many knocks he made against his defense that gave up 34 non-turnover points versus how many times he harped on the offense. I counted nine times where he talked about turnovers and one where he indicated that the defense might not have done their job because Trent Edwards “got out of contain in the red zone”, after which he glossed over the complete lack of a viable pass rush.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Nov 23, 2008 9:50 PM CST 0 recs
they are ascending in the draft order arnt they?
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Nov 23, 2008 10:57 PM CST
up
0 recs
As we have proven, that isn't necessarily a good thing for the Chiefs. :)
by DThomasReigns on
Nov 23, 2008 11:02 PM CST
up
0 recs
We'll Spend It On A Defensive End
And he’ll either get hurt or never develop because if there’s one thing Tim Krumrie has demonstrated since he got here is that he knows jack shit about developing rookie linemen.
For the rest of the draft we’ll probably grab linebackers, safeties, cornerbacks, receivers…anything except an offensive lineman, which means another season of Sackintosh and Jones, after which Tyler Thigpen’s luck will finally run out behind that garbage line and he’ll get a serious injury that will completely throw his development off-track, the offense will fall apart as we go back to playing loser ball (Herm’s preferred offensive style), the Chiefs will probably win somewhere in the area of 3-4 games for 2009 and we’ll be looking for another young QB to throw behind the meat grinder because what the hell does Clark Hunt care anyway, he likes soccer better.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Nov 24, 2008 2:15 AM CST
up
0 recs
I Bottle It All Up Inside
You know…put on a happy face and lots of relentless optimism and all that to hide the pain so none of you will know just how down I am on the Chiefs right now. :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Nov 24, 2008 9:04 AM CST
up
0 recs
When you have no where to go but up
I guess by process of elimination you must be ascending
by KHAZAD on Nov 24, 2008 1:05 PM CST 0 recs
There is still
alot farther down to go. This could go on for years if changes aren’t made. How would that be ascending? Up is a long ways away.
have you seen my baseball?
by IISaiNtII on
Nov 24, 2008 1:18 PM CST
up
0 recs
Always Keep In Mind
That no matter how bad a situation might look, there’s always room for it to get worse.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Nov 24, 2008 1:47 PM CST
up
0 recs
As evidenced multiple times this year
First the Oakland game was the low point. Then it was Atlanta (first appearance of the 3rd QB). Then the Panthers, then the Titans (-58 point differential in 2 games). A string of competitiveness then this.
Actually…the Oakland game still sits pretty low for me.
by primetime 07 on
Nov 24, 2008 6:13 PM CST
up
0 recs
It Doesn't Get Worse
Than getting blown out by a team that dysfunctional at home. Even the Carolina game didn’t bother me that much because at least they were a decent team.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Nov 24, 2008 6:18 PM CST
up
0 recs













