Thoughts On The Chiefs' Core Players
From the FanPosts. Nice work UC. -Chris
Jeff Flanagan at the Star identified the players he'd say comprised the core of the Kansas City Chiefs and gave an assessment of their abilities or whether they were solid choices. I agree with him about who most of the core players are, but I'd disagree about his projections on a few:
OT Branden Albert: Yes, solid pick.
Agreed...I think that Albert's a big building block for this team and he's shown enough in his first season for us to be extremely optimistic about his potential in another year or two...assuming he gets to play in a real offense, of course.
K Connor Barth: Yes, should have made the team over Novak anyway. (Knowing kickers, I can see this one coming back to haunt me.)
It's no secret I think Barth is going to be good, but I hesitate to include a kicker among a team's "core" players. Kickers are probably the most replaceable members of any team and the difference between a good one or a bad one is pretty small. Part of the reason I think anyone would put this much value on a kicker for our team is mainly because Carl Peterson seems to have trouble figuring out good kickers from bad kickers...which is odd because with field goal kickers (unlike other positions) their contribution is defined almost entirely by their stats. Most of the ones Peterson whiffed on had bad stats before we got them.
WR Dwayne Bowe: Yes, has had his drops but he has talent. He can be a weapon. Just needs an adequate QB.
Agreed, he's got his rough spots in his game, but receivers are generally a three year project and he's well ahead of the developmental curve. He's a very solid building block for us.
CB: Brandon Carr: Yes, making a big leap and holding his own. Good size.
CB Brandon Flowers: Maybe. Size (5-9, 187) a concern.
S Jarrad Page: Yes. Plays hurt and plays hard and has a nose for the ball.
S Bernard Pollard: Yes. Cares about winning and losing.
I tend to be a bit skeptical of the high praise about our rookie cornerbacks...mainly because our rushing defense is so bad that there haven't been many times where other teams have needed to test our cornerbacks. In the one game where the other team had to rely on the pass (Denver), Jay Cutler threw for well over 300 yards and a lot of his mistakes were unforced. In the Tennessee game Kerry Collins only threw 18 times. And Carr and Flowers have one INT between them...so it's not like other teams are avoiding the pass because they're afraid of the picks. Jury's definitely out.
Our safeties, to my mind, have been good but I think a few other commenters have correctly noted that they still miss too many tackles and they still have problems in pass coverage. But I think Pollard and Page have shown consistent improvement since getting here and I question how much of the problems they've had are the failure of the defensive gameplan rather than individual failure on their part. I also agree that Pollard seems to be doing what he can to take a leadership role on this team and he's one of the few people employed by the Chiefs who publicly steps up and takes responsibility for what's happening out there. So I tend to think we're going in the right direction with our safeties. Good core players.
S DaJuan Morgan: No idea.
Except for this safety. He's made a couple of plays on special teams, but honestly I've got no clue why we drafted him over an offensive lineman because he's not better than Pollard or Page this year and he hasn't done anything to make me think he's going to become better than them in the future...or at least not better enough to take their starting jobs or to justify letting the o-line be neglected another year. Chalk it up to Herm's d-back fetish, I suppose.
RB: Jamaal Charles: Yes, we haven't even seen what he can do because of the team's poor offensive approach.
RB Dantrell Savage: Yes. Has tons to learn about the return game but he can be a weapon. Great kid.
RB Kolby Smith. Maybe. Not much vision and has trouble getting to the open holes.
FB Mike Cox: Yes. Tough kid
Meh...Charles might be good or might not. He hasn't done much to impress, although part of that is the terrible playcalling. And it doesn't help that McIntosh's crappy pass-blocking has left him one on one trying to block defensive ends on several occasions. Smith's non-descript, but he hasn't done anything to make me question having him out there. Savage is an improvement in the return game and I'm curious what he could do as a running back, but that doesn't appear to be in the cards this year. Mike Cox is probably the best addition to the backfield and he seems to find a way to make the most out of the plays that involve him...definitely a diamond in the rough. Too bad that he's not utilized more.
DE Tamba Hali: Questionable. Just not a factor without Jared Allen on the other side. Right now, just a guy.
DE Turk McBride: Questionable. Good motor but not a weapon. Might be better with 25 more pounds and at DT.
DT Tank Tyler: Maybe. Has made some improvement but like the rest of the defensive line, can get pushed around too easily.
DT Glenn Dorey: Yes. Not many flashes yet but DTs take time to develop. That's just a fact.
I think Turk's improved a bit...he hasn't gotten sacks this year, but he seems to be holding his own against the right tackles and he's made a few plays. He's started showing a mean streak that I'm taking a liking to as well...which is a welcome sight on a team getting stomped as badly as the Chiefs are. Tamba Hali has got me wondering how much of his problems come down to his knee or how much of his problems are that he's just not any good without Jared Allen taking pressure off of him. Maybe it's both.
Tank's starting, but he's starting on the worst rushing defense in the NFL. Take that for what it's worth. He's also getting pushed around and he's over 330, which makes me wonder just how much potential he's actually got. Maybe he'll get better maybe not...until then he's iffy as a building block. Some people are already throwing around the b-word about Dorsey and I think it's way too soon. Rookie linemen often struggle. If he's this bad in his third year I'll worry, but until then I think he's a good core player. Although I question just how much quality tutelage he's getting from our defensive line coach...considering he's in charge a line that has yet to register a single sack after six games and most of these guys have been playing for him for over a year.
LB Derrick Johnson. Yes. When they turn him loose, he produces.
A promising linebacker who seems to have regressed under Gunther's tutelage. I don't think he's as non-descript as this, which makes me think that maybe he's not the problem as much as Gunther is. I doubt he's going to develop into a perennial Pro Bowler, but I think he's a solid player who needs better coaching. And solid players are core players too.
LB Pat Thomas: Doubtful. Won job by default and hasn't made much of an impact.
If he's anything other than a reserve on this team next year, I'll be disappointed. Not a core player.
TE Brad Cottam: Maybe. Hasn't been involved much in offense.
WR Will Franklin: No idea.
Tough to gauge rookie receivers' abilities when the QB position is a vortex of suck. Jury's out on these two. Cottam seems to have more promise because he's at least staying healthy.
QB: Ingle Martin: Maybe. Hell, we may see him on Sunday and get a better opinion.
QB Tyler Thigpen: No idea. Has the athletic skills but must improve dramatically with decision-making and accuracy. A rough, rough project at best.
If these two are on our roster next season I'll be extremely upset. Thigpen's a guy with some athleticism who's unlikely to ever develop the accuracy necessary to be a legitimate NFL QB (either as starter or backup). Ingle Martin might have some ability but so far all we know is that Herm thinks he's worse than Thigpen (which isn't necessarily a disqualifier) and Tennessee was desperate for QB help and chose to go with Chris Simms instead. That doesn't give me any hope that he's someone to keep around as a project.
All in all, I'd say that we're not in the worst shape possible for next year if we can get a better coaching staff and front office to take over the youth movement. We've got talented players at left tackle, defensive tackle, outside linebacker, free and strong safety, wide receiver, and fullback. We've got promising prospects at wide receiver, running back, tight end and cornerback. So we're not devoid of talent...we just need a front office that can build on that talent with another good draft and a coaching staff that has a clue of how to get all that talent to play together. Unfortunately it appears that for now ownership's not ready to make the changes it really needs to get this team going in the right direction.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
3 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
Very good write up
I pretty much agree.
Its kinda sad the Dantrelle Savage is one of just a few young guys I am genuinely excited about – an undrafted running back. And at best I think he can be a good kickoff return man.
I have some hope for Albert, Flowers, Carr, DJ. D-Bowe is easily our best young player. The rest are pretty much “meh” to me and I’m not at all convinced they’ll be part of the “core” of this team.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 24, 2008 2:41 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I Think Dantrell Could End Up Making It At Running Back
He’s got that short, squat build that’s well-designed to handle punishment. I could see him breaking into the regular rotation and supplanting Kolby Smith if he doesn’t pan out. Although after kickers, running backs are probably the second-most easily replaced position on any team, so it’s tough to get excited because we found a running back as a UDFA. That’s not meant as a knock on Savage…just the way it is with that position.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 3:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 24, 2008 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed on being unsure
about the corners. It’s a tough position to evaluate in our current condition.
by Chris Thorman on Oct 24, 2008 2:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
That's The Thing About Pass Defenses
Plenty of bad teams have decent pass defenses because they can’t stop the run. So why air out the ball against someone when you don’t have to? I think Carr and Flowers are looking like they’ve got promise, but a lot of that is because teams aren’t throwing on them. Let’s see what happens when some teams decide to air it out.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 3:05 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree....
it seems to all lead back to the coaching staff…for instance…Dorsey has been keeping his head down on to many plays, causing him to be tossed to the grown like a rag doll….better coaching would tell him what he is doing wrong, and answer his question " why is my big ass getting tossed around" ….and a good QB would help a lot…at least then they wouldn’t have an excuse….put one of the top QB’s in the league on our team…and if we still suck….well…im not sure we will.
by sinellhell on Oct 24, 2008 3:08 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Dorsey
Yeah, I saw them talking about that on AFC Playbook on NFLN. I wonder if our D-line coach knows what’s up there. Who is our D-line coach anyway?
The more this goes on the more it looks like it’s not just Herm, it’s his entire staff that is lackluster.
by Ochophosphate on Oct 25, 2008 6:01 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tim Krumrie
So far the only thing that Krumrie’s really been noted for is a drill he ran on USC’s pro day where he slapped Sedrick Ellis around. Pete Carroll (who was a pretty good defensive coordinator in the pros and probably knows a thing or two about defensive line play) was so irritated with that drill that from what I understood he made Krumrie persona non grata at future USC Pro Days.
At the time I thought Carroll might have been overreacting, but now I wonder if Carroll might have recognized that Krumrie didn’t have any clue what he was doing and was pointlessly slapping around one of his players and he just wasn’t having any part of that.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 25, 2008 8:26 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I pretty much agree with nearly everything said here.
I really do not think our team is devoid of talent. In fact I think we have some really talented prospects who merely need to be coached and be in the right system to flourish. The thing that worries me the most about our team is the obvious lack of coaching ability, and the fact that the owner is totally disconnected from what is going on. We need to get this show on the road and start developing the talent we have. That cannot be done with Herm Edwards and crew. Currently Clark Hunt thinks the “rebuilding” is progressing right on schedule and is not inclined to pull the rug out from underneath Herm Edwards. What a joke.
by G.L. on Oct 24, 2008 3:40 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice post UC....was an informative & entertaining
Your arguments were both objective and balanced, with just a hint of bias. Pleasantly surprised that I agree about all the parts mentioned. Sounds about right on, on where we are at.
Most especially liked this part.
Tough to gauge rookie receivers’ abilities when the QB position is a vortex of suck.
They call the Oakland coliseum the black hole, some might reconsider moving that title to the Chiefs situation at the QB position under Dick Curl.
by aPacificChief on Oct 24, 2008 3:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
ya good post
i like
Herm Edwards - the new Art Shell.
by CBaller13 on Oct 24, 2008 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
There's Always Going To Be Bias
I’ll try to acknowledge both sides of any issue, but I’m still going to weigh in on which I think is right…that’s probably never going to change, but I’ll always be honest about the fact that I’m doing that. :)
Glad you enjoyed the post…and I agree with you about stealing the nickname from Oakland. :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is what I like about your posts
We always know your position on things! Nice write up. Good points here for sure. I agree with what you said about Turk. They guy seems to care more than most about the skid. Hopefully he can start to see some sack production from the effort he is giving.
by TheQ on Oct 24, 2008 4:19 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You'd Have To Hope That's The Case
If only because it would be extremely depressing to see our starting defensive end go through the entire season without a sack.
He’s one of the few guys who seems capable of getting any penetration, though, so if anyone can get one I figure he can.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 4:30 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Post
You hit on some key points. I wonder if we can build depth behind the positions that we have and still fill the huge voids as well.
I feel like I am in Bizarro world. I am surprised DJ hasn’t questioned your position sir since, it looks as if you have rose colored glasses and a half full jack and coke. :)
by KC FAN IN CA on Oct 24, 2008 4:42 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I Think Depth Is Important
And in the draft if the best player available would be a backup for us while the player we need would be a serious reach, I do agree that you go with the best player available. But Herm and Carl didn’t do that last year…they went with DaJuan Morgan, when there were several good o-line prospects who weren’t reaches at that position so among relatively equivalent talents they went backup over starter. And that’s just stupidity. I’d like our line a hell of a lot better with Jeremy Zuttah than I like our secondary with DaJuan Morgan on the bench (especially since, as I mentioned before) our secondary doesn’t get tested that much because the run D’s so bad.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree...
we should have taken Jeremy Zuttah. But, in respect to DaJuan, I think he was the best free safety prospect in the draft.
by chiefsfan1384 on Oct 26, 2008 1:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pollard
I’d like to see him get a look a LB. Seems like a natural fit for him. He tackles well but only covers so so. If moved to LB he’d instantly be one of the best cover LB’s and would have the opportunity to blow up some more ACLs.
by HIV 2 Elway on Oct 24, 2008 6:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I like you more today, UC
I agree with alot of this stuff here…good work…
by woodman212 on Oct 24, 2008 8:36 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Eh
Every once in awhile I write something for everyone :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 11:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you are still a jayhawker
Go to Wide World of Roto for all your fantasy news!
by JasonM on Oct 24, 2008 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Someone's Got To Protect The Rest Of The Country From Missouri :)
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 24, 2008 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
good stuff
I’m high on the cornerbacks mostly because I’ve seen flashes. The one thing you must expect from ANY young player is inconsistency. Albert…Dorsey…even Bowe have shown flashes of greatness and flashes of “whompff.” When Carr has been forced into one-on-one situations, he’s been been very, very good at times and bad at times. Hopefully, with time, he’ll eliminate the later and amplify the former.
I agree with pretty much all of the rest of your post. Morgan really hasn’t gotten much playing time. I think he probably does belong in the “I have no idea” category. The only reason I’d like to see him get more of a chance is because Pollard is just such a terrible form tackler. I can just picture him out there muttering to himself “shoot the plans, fry the eyes…I mean…hand the shits, eye to guys…dammit!”
Tyler is becoming more and more of a disappointment but, like you said, DTs usually take three years and Tank is still in his second. Same line of reasoning goes for Dorsey. Again, he’s young. Also, take into consideration that he was a one-gap guy in college.
I still think the vast majority of our problems, especially in the running game, stem from the linebacking corps. The line, in this system, is supposed to keep linemen of the backers and maintain the line of scrimmage. It’s not a glorious job and there aren’t really a lot of stats to go with it but they’re doing a fair job. However, when your linebackers can’t identify their gap, there’s nothing the linemen can do because the running back is already in the secondary before anyone even has a chance to make a tackle.
by Chief Running Bare on Oct 25, 2008 4:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Very good stuff
I like what you said. I also believe that the D hasn’t jelled as a unit. It looks like 11 individuals trying to do it by themsleves, instead of relying on each other to do their part, and succeed as a unit.
by TXChiefan on Oct 25, 2008 8:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Corners
UCrawford, here’s where I disagree with you on the corners. It’s not like our run defense has been consistently leaky. Most of the major leaks have come in the second half. You mentioned Cutler putting up almost 400 yards. What you didn’t mention was that Cutler got most of those yards in garbage time and was constantly flustered. They also flustered Jamarcus Russell. Point being: yes, our corners have given up some big plays against teams like Atlanta and Carolina, but they’ve mostly played terrific in spite of the fact that our defensive line is completely incapable of getting to the QB. I think our secondary has been terrific, but there’s nothing you can do when the front 7 in front of you doesn’t do their jobs.
As for Herm Edwards, I’ve made it no secret that I think it’s unfair to pin all the blame on him. He’s made some shaky decisions and there’s some decisions I’d leave out of his hands (i.e. quarterback), but the truth is that Carl Peterson destroyed this team through horrendous personnel decisions and left a bag of crap on Herm Edwards’ front porch. Herm hasn’t been great in turning that bag of crap into gold, but I blame Carl for leaving it in the first place. Jeff Fisher was equally bad coaching an equally inexperienced team in Tennessee a few years ago, so I think it’s unfair to blame a head coach for failures of their front office. Just my opinion.
by chiefzilla on Oct 26, 2008 8:53 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I agree with you to the extent that these corners can’t truly be judged when our run defense is so pathetic. I think they’ve looked good but at the same time, I want to see how they play on a complete defense.
Good thoughts.
by Joel Thorman on Oct 26, 2008 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















