Report: Buffalo Bills Offer A 3rd Round Pick For Gonzalez

by primetime 07 on Oct 13, 2008 1:42 PM CDT in 2008 Campaign Comment 35 comments

Nothing is confirmed yet but Warpaint Illustrated is reporting (via the Buffalo Bills home page because I'm too cheap for a WPI subscription) that the Bills have offered a 3rd round pick for the services of Tony Gonzalez.

From the Bills homepage:

With NFC East rivals Philadelphia and the NY Giants in the running for Tony Gonzalez’s services via trade it could drive up the price for the perennial Pro Bowl tight end. WarpaintIllustrated.com, a team outfit under the Scout.com umbrella is reporting that the Bills have offered a third-round pick for Gonzalez.

Meanwhile they’re reporting that the Giants are willing to offer more than their original offer of a 6th round selection. If Philadelphia and the Giants start competing with one another naturally the asking price goes up, which could make things more difficult for a team like Buffalo if they are in fact a part of these trade talks, which has not been confirmed by One Bills Drive to this point.

The Chiefs have been historically slow in confirming these types of rumors to the media so don't expect much out of them.

If the Bills have indeed made an offer (again, nothing has been confirmed at this point) then it appears a deal with someone is inevitable. We had heard earlier that the Chiefs' asking price was a 3rd rounder but the Giants were stuck on a 6th rounder. So, if the Bills offer is legit, then the best case scenario is that we get a bidding war going.

Here is the link to the WPI article (but you need a password for access).

H/T to Brian at Buffalo Rumblings and AP commenter dkugler838 for the heads up.

0 recs | Comment 35 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

I don't think we'll get a better deal than this

My head says take it. My heart says, Tony must remain a Chief forever.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 13, 2008 1:52 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

So What Now...?

I agree we might not get a better deal than this but what is this going to do to our already non existent passing game/offense?

by Nelly on Oct 13, 2008 2:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

3rd round pick

Is prime for a guard in the draft.

We gotta accept that we are several years away from competing. This is a good deal (if it’s legit).

by primetime 07 on Oct 13, 2008 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Scenarios

Best-case scenario: force our QBs to look at other receivers and try to get them involved (no more TG safety net). Likely scenario: nothing. We couldn’t pass the ball before and this won’t change that too much. Now teams will make sure to double Bowe every play (which they were already doing) and lets them put an LB on the new TE (Cottam) instead of a DB. This means one more DB to cover the receivers we already weren’t throwing to. So, all-in-all, this wouldn’t significantly impact our passing, since it was already non-existent.

by Chiefs4Life on Oct 13, 2008 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

i know this is

different but if jason taylor is worth a 2nd rounder a player who pretty much said im onyl going toplay one more season. Why would Tony G. not be worth the same if not more, one of the best TE’s ever and still has 2-3 years left in him and is 2 or 3 years younger than taylor as well.

by DT58forever on Oct 13, 2008 2:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Jason Taylor

Is a bigger impact player than TG.

by primetime 07 on Oct 13, 2008 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

plus Washington was in a need of desperation when their starting DE's were lost to season ending injuries

by aPacificChief on Oct 13, 2008 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Maybe the Giants will up the ante

and give us that extra 2nd round pick they have

by Vince D on Oct 13, 2008 2:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

if anything..

They’ll give the existing second rounder because the extra one can turn into a 2010 first rounder if Vilma plays a certain number of snaps

by Hoyadestroya85 on Oct 13, 2008 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Vilma was a Jet, not Giant.

Am I missing someting?

by NJChiefsFan on Oct 13, 2008 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Jets And Giants Both Traded With New Orleans

But I don’t think those trades were tied together in a three way deal.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

The extra 2nd rounder they have is from Shockey

They got a 5th and a 2nd for him.

by Vince D on Oct 13, 2008 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

it's a long story...

the Jets trade was a third rounder that could conditionally move up to a second rounder if Vilma gets a certain number of snaps, if that was to happen they would not be able to fulfill their agreement to the giants therefore they would surrender their first rounder from 2010

by Hoyadestroya85 on Oct 13, 2008 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Wait...

I think you’re getting them mixed up or you’re leaving some information out. Vilma was traded from the Jets to the Saints. I don’t think the Giants were involved at all in the Vilma deal, and the Giants are who we’re discussing. The Giants also traded with the Saints this offseason (for Jeremy Shockey) so is that the trade you’re thinking of?

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

ok.. The jets traded Vilma to the saints for a fourth round pick, which could become a second round pick if Vilma plays 85 percent of the defensive snaps and they sign him to a contract extension..
If that were to happen, the saints would have no second round pick to give the giants for Shockey therefore they would have to give the Giants a first round pick in 2008

by Hoyadestroya85 on Oct 13, 2008 3:25 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

my bad for the repeat..

i copy pasted it on accident

by Hoyadestroya85 on Oct 13, 2008 3:26 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Gotcha

I see what you’re saying. Very convoluted. :)

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

It'll Be A Low Third-Rounder

I’m still inclined to say that we shouldn’t trade him for anything lower than a 2nd rounder. There’s no way we’ll get that but I think that’s what his value is to us as a player for the remainder of his contract.

Ah well, maybe the Giants will decide to do that bidding war and pony up a third rounder and Boss. Or maybe the Jets will get in on the action since the AFC East appears to be between them and the Bills.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 2:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

I thought it was third rounder?

You said third rounder would be fine yesterday, I thought? I may be confused, I’m just checking.

Ridiculous Upside: All the "Almost NBA" info you can handle!

by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 13, 2008 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Clarification

I won’t go apoplectic over a 3rd rounder but I don’t think we should do it because I don’t think we’ll get enough return for what we’d lose with Tony. I did kind of waver a little on it, though, so you’re not confused.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Like Most Other Fans

I don’t really want him to go either. And I think trading him will end up hurting us more than it helps us.

Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.

by UCrawford on Oct 13, 2008 3:21 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Umm we play the Bills this year. Anyone else realize that?

I think we’ll definitely give it to someone else if they also offer a 3rd.

by Vince D on Oct 13, 2008 2:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Can't wait to see

what they say about this on PTI tonight.

by NJChiefsFan on Oct 13, 2008 2:32 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

One thing for sure

We will know the results of all this by 4pm Tuesday.

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Oct 13, 2008 3:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

sigh.....What has become of the Chiefs that we had to get to this point?

by aPacificChief on Oct 13, 2008 3:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

Two Names

Carl Peterson

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Oct 13, 2008 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Add another Herm Edwards.

by Eric Allen on Oct 13, 2008 4:01 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Do you mean Two words....because thats one name :)

by aPacificChief on Oct 13, 2008 4:02 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

One persons name

Two names altogether

"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"

by Lanier63 on Oct 13, 2008 8:46 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Only I can make fun of Lanier

by AngryJesus on Oct 13, 2008 9:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Hahaha...got what you meant ;-)

by aPacificChief on Oct 14, 2008 2:40 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

Isn't a Hall of Honor

Part of the renovation?

Perhaps this is part of a move to cut renovation costs because at this rate we won’t have anyone remain a Chief long enough for them to be in the hall! We can build a closet of honor.

New field naming strategy…
Monsanto Field: Growing players for the rest of the NFL.

Sorry… I know it’s a business. But part of the business is the creation of a product that people can get to know and root for. Our product is becoming the equivalent of mystery meat. And I’m not complaining about getting younger. Just an inability to hang on to a few faces of the franshise. Herm wants players who will be “Chiefs.” At this rate, we’ll be running a childcare service and never have anything but a collection of Papooses.

Seriously,,,just sell jerseys with velcro strips where the name goes.

by sunny D on Oct 13, 2008 4:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs