Why can't we be Titans?
It wasn't long ago that our next opponent was jettisoning high priced veteran free agents like Steve McNair, Eddie George, and Samari Rolle in an effort to get out of salary cap hell and get young again. I remember watching a Titans game some years ago with Billy Volek at the helm and thinking that it might be a long time until they would be good again.
The Titans went from 12-4 and losing in the Divisional Round of the playoffs (to who else but the Patriots), to seasonal records of 5-11, 4-12, and 8-8, until last year where they went 10-6. This year they are off to a franchise best 5-0 start despite not playing with the 3rd overall pick in the '06 Draft. It seems they are a team that can overcome average QB play and a lack of star power at the skill positions by playing great defense and winning the battle in the trenches.
It doesn't hurt that they have the longest tenured Coach in the NFL who learned his trade from the Master himself, Bill Walsh. Jeff Fisher has stood the test of time and has outlasted many coordinators, quarterbacks, and a couple of GMs. He is highly respected in the NFL and by his players, and this fact no doubt helped them as they transitioned through some tough seasons. His philosophy of team first is a simple one. They are playing without their "Franchise Quarterback" without even skipping a beat. I think that there is much we can learn from the Titans.
For a team like Kansas City, who is trying their own tough transition back to respectability, the blueprint put forth by the Titan organization is a good one. I am sure that the losing seasons endured by the fan base seem much worse to them than they do to us. But they turned it back around in a relatively short time. This was no quick Rams-like turn around that we all would hope for, but this team is poised to be good for a long time because of Fisher's desire to play good young players(sound familiar?). They seem to be making good decisions for the most part (take away Pacman Jones and probably Vince Young) and they are a team that I admire for the hard road that they have traveled. They are built to win on the road, a must for a playoff team, and play the smash mouth brand of football that all Chiefs fans can respect.
Please note that they had to endure the trading, and/or dumping of big time Veterans in the rebuilding process. This did not go over well with the fans, but being popular should not be our goal. Our goal is to get better for the future. Even though "The Player" that we are currently looking at trading is a certain Hall of Famer, the heart of this team, and a fan favorite, I still think that this goes with what we are trying to do.
As for our rebuilding project, I truly think that what we have seen this year is our "bottoming out" period, and our ceiling is huge. We arguably had a better draft this year than the Titans did in any of those years, and they were no better than us at the quarterback position. I am sure that we can see many more changes this offseason. Look for us to be much more aggressive in Free Agency and next year's Draft class could be better than this one. I for one think that we have a bright future. Who's with me?
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Arrowhead Pride's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Arrowhead Pride writers or editors.
1 recs |
15
comments
Comments
I think the reason boils down to two names
Jeff Fisher
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Oct 12, 2008 9:50 PM CDT 0 recs
I respect him a lot.
Longevity in the NFL speaks volumes.
by TheQ on
Oct 12, 2008 9:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
exception that proves the rule
Al Davies
Blame my wife!
by sir eccles on
Oct 12, 2008 9:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Here's how it is...
Was Eddie George the greatest back of all time? Was McNair the greatest QB ever? Those were easy decisions to make. Trading Tony is admitting the Chiefs have not even a snowball’s chance in Hell of being a good team next year. That’s a sign my friend. How good will we be minus our only consistant offensive player? Bottoming out you say? I say the Chiefs haven’t even reached terminal velocity yet. Next season with no Gonalez will make us look back at the current 1-15 team as the good ol’ days. The bottom is coming fast, and the landing will hurt like Hell. The thing that worries me is how long the Chiefs will stay on the mat. If the Gonzalez trade goes through for a 3rd round pick I hope King Carl owns a Lamborghini he’d like to part ways with. I’ll trade him for a 2009 Kia straight up.
by fishbowl72 on Oct 12, 2008 11:42 PM CDT 0 recs
Trading Tony is kinda like doing a favor for a friend
You don’t always want to do it, but he is your friend. I agree it says a lot about how we think the rebuilding is going, but I don’t see us being worse than we have shown this year. We have put forth 3 really futile efforts out of 5 games. I also think that by trading TG, someone has to step up. Cottam has to be the man. More offense has to come from the WR corps. Young guys will be forced to quit standing in the shadows and make contributions. But all of this may be for not if he does not get traded. You never know.
by TheQ on
Oct 12, 2008 11:50 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Tony wants out, so let's let him go.
Oops, now LJ wants out. What’s that DJ, you want out too? Len Dawson, you want to call Bronco games? I guess Bill Grigsby will have to step up. He will have to be the man.
On the subject of futile efforts, how much offense will the Chiefs generate without Tony? Pissing in the wind is the best description.
by fishbowl72 on
Oct 13, 2008 12:38 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Completely Agree
If you think the offense is bad now, just wait and see what happens once the Chiefs don’t have Gonzalez to take heat off Bowe in the passing game. We’ve got nobody else in that receiving corps who is a threat right now and it’s not looking too promising for next year either. And forget about getting Losman or any other capable QB next season if we dump Gonzalez. Nobody’s going to want to come here and play for Herm Edwards’ offense once we’ve dumped our best receiving threat. We’ll be looking at another year of Huard-type backups.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 13, 2008 9:54 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Heck
We may even have Huard.
Trading Gonzalez just screams “bad idea” on almost all levels.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 13, 2008 9:55 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I am not even sure that
it will happen. I do honestly think he deserves the chance to not watch the twilight of his career from the back seat of a jalopy! (Now that is an old school word!) If he can ride in style, I won’t begrudge him that chance. I do agree that our offensive options would be slim if he left.
by TheQ on
Oct 13, 2008 10:37 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Like Clint Eastwood Said In "Unforgiven"
“Deserve’s got nothing to do with it.”
Tony’s a player under contract to the Chiefs and the Chiefs management owes it to the fans and the team not to trade him unless they get value in return. While it’s unfortunate if Tony doesn’t get a ring, he certainly won’t be the first player it happens to and that’s just the way things work out sometimes. And he’s not being maltreated by the team if they don’t trade him…he’s been given a very generous contract by the team for the services he provides and the fans give him constant appreciation as well. I can certainly understand how the losing would get to him, but this is not the worst possible place for him to be right now.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 13, 2008 10:44 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Another great movie!
I am not saying that we let him go without the right compensation. That is the pivotal part to the whole thing. If no one coughs up the right picks, etc, then we say “Sorry”, and we will see you at practice tomorrow. At 32, there is no better tight end in the league, and those teams know that. If they want him, they should cough up reasonable compensation for him.
by TheQ on
Oct 13, 2008 11:12 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Agreed
I just don’t think that anything we’ll get for Tony G on the trade market will be worth it. I could live with a 3rd round pick, but anyone we draft in the third round is going to be likely to provide what Tony can provide for the next three years. So, all things considered, I’d rather have Tony.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 13, 2008 6:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The argument against that
Is maybe that 3rd round pick can provide something Tony can’t for the next 8 years.
Maybe a guard in that spot with a low bust rate.
by primetime 07 on
Oct 13, 2008 6:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
1 -15 Team?
Funny, I though we still had 12 games to play. I didn’t realize that the league would keep us from playing and just automatically give us losses.
The probable loss of Tony is huge, but we still have a team. We still have players that want to win and are planning this very night to be pro bowlers a few years from now. Certain players make impacts on a team, but not one player wins or loses a game. If that was the case, we would have been winning already! We can still win a few, but everyone was told early on this season, not to expect much from the team as a whole. Our expectations must be in the abilities of the young players to step in and develop. Now is the time and opportunity for Cottom to make his history with the team. This year isn’t a disaster, it is the first building block.
We may end up 1 – 15, or even 5 – 11 this year, but it is all about building for the future from right now.
by TXChiefan on
Oct 13, 2008 11:14 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Adversity makes you stronger
Players better step up if Tony is here or not. Sometimes you never would have seen if those players could contribute if they didn’’t get the chance. Frankly, I am amazed at how our young corners are playing. I think Carr has Pro Bowl potential and Flowers ain’t have bad either. Surtain’s injury has actually helped us see the potential that Carr has sooner rather than later. I agree, Cottam will have big shoes to fill, but the guy is 6’7" for crying out loud!
by TheQ on
Oct 13, 2008 12:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs













