Right here in the inner nucleus of Chiefs Kingdom are two shining examples of what happens when a football program sticks with a head coach, letting them implement and carry out their plan. What would happen if Missouri athletic director Mike Alden had fired Gary Pinkel after he finished 5-6 in his fourth season? Chase Daniel would probably be leading the Heisman race as a Texas Longhorn, the Tigers would have never graced the cover of Sports Illustrated, and they’d probably be unranked.
What if Kansas athletic director Lew Perkins had fired Mark Mangino after he finished 4-7 in his third season? There’d be no Orange Bowl victory, there’d be no Coach of the Year honors, and the buffet industry in Lawrence wouldn’t be in a relapse.
Sure, college football and professional football aren’t the same, but the NFL coaching carousel seems to be moving at a faster and faster pace than it used to. Take Jeff Fisher for example - he didn’t put together a winning season for the Titans/Oilers during his first five seasons, but the organization stuck with him, and he led them to a Super Bowl appearance in his sixth year.
about 1 month ago
ChiefDJ
50 comments
0 recs |
Comments
Another interesting fact in the article
Edwards is a proven head coach. The only active head coaches with more playoff appearances since 2001 are Indianapolis’ Tony Dungy and New England’s Bill Belichick. Edwards has 29 years of NFL experience, and 16 as a coach. He was in Kansas City during the glory years, when defense ruled the land and wins far outnumbered losses
by ChiefDJ on Oct 11, 2008 4:44 PM CDT 0 recs
Edwards also inherited a team built by Bill Parcells
That could explain why he had immediate opportunities at the playoffs… not so much on his coaching, because his best season at NY was 10-6. One of his playoff appearances was with a 9-7season, hardly convincing that he deserved a spot in the playoffs.
Don’t really care for Herm myself, but we started with him so I’m all for giving him a shot to finished what he started. The clock is ticking, he’s got 2 years left.
by aPacificChief on
Oct 12, 2008 2:57 AM CDT
up
0 recs
People always say that about it being a Parcells built team
But never bring up the fact that Parcells only took that team to the playoffs once and that was two years before Herm came along and took them to the playoffs 3 out of 4 years.
Yes, one of those playoff appearances was after a 9-7 season, then they went on to defeate Peyton Mannings Indianapolis Colts 41-0 before losing to the Raiders who would go on to the Super Bowl.
Fun facts:
- Jets are in the same division as the Patriots who won the Super Bowl 3 times in the five years Herm was there.
- Herms teams have been to the playoffs 4 times. Three of those four times, they were eliminated by teams that would go on to the Super Bowl.
I’m not as big a Herm lover as people think I am, but I don’t like seeing anyones record misrepresented as much as Herms is.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 12, 2008 2:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You give Herm more credit than he's due....
But never bring up the fact that Parcells only took that team to the playoffs once and that was two years before Herm came along and took them to the playoffs 3 out of 4 years.
When Bill Parcell took over the Head Coaching job at NY, the Jets they were 3-13 in ’95,and 1-15 in ’96. The first year with Bill, he took the Jets to a 9-7 record. During the offseason leading to the 1998 season he acquired Curtis Martin, and signed Testaverde and went to a 12-4 record. Keep also in mind that Patriots were just at the Superbowl in 1996, so the AFC east was still very competitive when Bill was at NY, but he still took the Jets to an AFC championship game.
When Bill left in 2000 from NY, the Jets had finished at 9-7.
Here’s Herms HC resume:
When Herm came on board as Head Coach in 2001, he took the veteran team (assembled by Parcells)to the playoffs, but was knocked out in the 1st round.
In 2002, Herm finishes the season with a 9-7 record, and makes it to the divisional round, but is knocked out.
In 2003, Herm finishes the season with a 6-10 record.
In 2004, Herm makes it again to the playoffs and is knocked out in the divisional round.
In 2005, Herm finishes the season with a 4-12 season. The Jets went full circle in just 9 years. Some said on this site that Herm is a team wrecker, and after going through this research I’m inclined to be more in agreement to that statement. The veterans and the rookie players that Herm so heavily relied on were assembled not by him, but by BILL PARCELLS. That is the reason why he enjoyed some level of success.
See what you made done…I’ve never really disliked Herm, but now it sounds as if I totally hate the guy. Because I don’t, and I’m still willing to give him the benefit of finishing what he’s started. Just had to make clear that Herm’s success was not based by his work to building the team.
by aPacificChief on
Oct 12, 2008 4:31 PM CDT
up
1 recs
You give him too little
When Herm came on board as Head Coach in 2001, he took the veteran team (assembled by Parcells)to the playoffs, but was knocked out in the 1st round.
A veteran team that went to the playoffs once under Parcells and didn’t make it back for two years before Edwards came. I’m not saying Herm is a better coach than Parcells by any stretch of the imagination, but in this case he got more out of those players.
In 2003, Herm finishes the season with a 6-10 record.
Yes, with 18 players on Injured Reserve including 11 starters and his starting and 2nd string QBs. Name me ANY team led by ANY coach that would be succesful in that situation.
In 2005, Herm finishes the season with a 4-12 season. The Jets went full circle in just 9 years. Some said on this site that Herm is a team wrecker, and after going through this research I’m inclined to be more in agreement to that statement. The veterans and the rookie players that Herm so heavily relied on were assembled not by him, but by BILL PARCELLS. That is the reason why he enjoyed some level of success.
Wrong.
Bill Parcells drafted those players, but those players looked to Herm as their leader and they didnt blame Herm for what happened the final season. I also don’t buy that he took them to the playoffs 3 of 4 years and then “wrecked” the team in one year. Players like Chad Pennington, Laverneus Coles, John Abraham and Curtis Marin all did very well under Herm.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 12, 2008 5:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm just glad you do the Pro-Herm research
Because I don’t have the energy for it.
I support Herm because of some unexplainable feeling I have about the guy. I also agree with his approach to how a football game is played. I wish he could execute the plan.
by AngryJesus on
Oct 12, 2008 9:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Injuries are one thing, but incompetent decisions is another.
A veteran team that went to the playoffs once under Parcells and didn’t make it back for two years before Edwards came. I’m not saying Herm is a better coach than Parcells by any stretch of the imagination, but in this case he got more out of those players.
Herm could get more out of his players than Bill Parcells? Are you freakin kidding me? That was quite humorous, who has the Super Bowl trophies? Bill also won the trohy with two different starting QB’s (Simms & Hostetler and almost won it with a third). Bill was also one game away from making it to the Super Bowl with a third team.
Furthermore he took over a team that was dreadful with records that were 3-13 & 1-15, and in a single year made them 9-7.
Wouldn’t you agree that it would be easier to win if you already have a team whose worst record to that point was 8-8?
Also, the reason that it took two years before the Jets could get back into the playoffs was more to circumstances (other than just injuries) than on poor coaching. The 1999 season, with the 8-8 was because of injury. In the 2000 season the owner (Hess) passed away, and left the future of Parcells with Jets uncertain, when Woody Johnson became the new owner he was ready to keep Bill as Head Coach, but Parcells stepped down and took on the role of Director of football operations. Al Groh become the Head Coach in 2000 and finished the season 9-7. After the 2000 season Parcells stepped away from the Jets and was replaced by Terry Bradway.
Name me ANY team led by ANY coach that would be succesful in that situation.
Yes I can, since were already on the subject………BILL PARCELLS! In that 8-8 (1999) season he lost Vinny Testaverde in the first game with an achilles heal injury. Rick Mirer took the team to a 4-6 record before being relieved by Ray Lucas (WHO?) and finished the season 4-2. Yet he finished 8-8 (some teams make it to wild card game with that), not bad considering that Herm had seasons that were 6-10 and 4-12. So Parcells in essence was only the Head Coach for 3 years.
Wrong.
Bill Parcells drafted those players, but those players looked to Herm as their leader and they didnt blame Herm for what happened the final season. I also don’t buy that he took them to the playoffs 3 of 4 years and then "wrecked" the team in one year. Players like Chad Pennington, Laverneus Coles, John Abraham and Curtis Marin all did very well under Herm.
Wrong? Of course they would consider him their leader, he was their Head Coach. What other options do you have? How do you know that they didn’t blame him? Did you talk to them individually? Herm didn’t wreck the team over just one year. He did it over 5 years. The team Parcells built was starting to slowly resemble their new Head Coach Herm Edwards.
Lets go further into how Herm contributed to wrecking this NY Jets team. He did not wreck the team single handedly, but he didn’t stop it from happening either. Remember the trade in 2005 for TE Doug Jolley, yup they gave the Raiders a 1st round pick for the guy who they eventually traded the next year to Tampa for a 6th rounder. Great move huh? Of all the 1st round picks that were selected while Herm was at NY, none remain. The only first round selections that are still on the team were from the Parcells era and Non-Edwards years. Strange don’t you think?
Lets ask another question, just for fun facts as you would put it. What led to the complete dismanteling of the NY Jets? That they would trade away a so called disgruntled John Abraham in 2006, or a Jonathan Vilma (who was rookie of the year in 2004) traded in 2008, and that three out of 5 of the O-Line was replaced with expensive free agents additions (problems kinda sounds familiar to our situation here at KC, except the expensive free agent additions part :). Maybe Mangini wants to remove all the traces of Herm Edwards time in NY, so that he he can accelerate the rebuilding process.
An old Ploy Sci professor once taught, that if a President (as in the President of USA) were to enjoy financial stability or success it can be attributed to the plans implemented by the previous President. In short, success or failure can rarely be attributed to the current Presidents policy (thats if he only serves 4 years w/o being re-elected to serve another term). But more often than not the current leader would be blamed for the mistakes of the previous leader whom he had just replaced.
I bring that example because you can use that as a model on what happened to the 2007 Jets who finished 4-12, and went into full renovation with the win now at all cost approach. And the 2007-2008 Chiefs after the Vermiel years. The only troubling part of those examples is Herm. He is now responsible of rebuilding something that Vermeil created, after he had created a similiar problem in NY. A task Mangini is now trying to fix.
If you don’t learn from your history you are destined to repeat it.
by aPacificChief on
Oct 13, 2008 8:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Edwards has 29 years of NFL experience, and 16 as a coach.
But only 8 years (including this year) of experience as a Head Coach.
by aPacificChief on
Oct 12, 2008 3:02 AM CDT
up
0 recs
I forsee a UCrawford reply coming
LOL…I just love this site!
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Oct 11, 2008 4:48 PM CDT 0 recs
I didn't write the article
But I figured he’d appreciate it. ;)
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 11, 2008 4:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
lol
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on
Oct 11, 2008 5:01 PM CDT
up
0 recs
good article
Ya, ucrawford definitely hates edwards and peterson and has an itchy trigger finger when it comes to firing them. Obviously if you look at his resume you will see he knows what he is doing. you can’t get your panties in a bunch three years in especially when the first year didn’t count cause he tried to work the the aging current team. I am going to leave ucrawford a little quote from a famous recording artist. “all we need is just a little patience” by Axel Rose…
by InternetCreditOffers.com on Oct 11, 2008 5:14 PM CDT 0 recs
Pretty sure we need to give Herm 14 years.
Actually a little longer. He’s clearly not as good of a coach as Cowher and it took him 14 years.
by NJChiefsFan on Oct 11, 2008 5:15 PM CDT 0 recs
Great post
But let’s give a little credit to UC. He’s just giving his opinion. I agree we ought to give Herm more time to implement his plan.
I strive to be the person my dog thinks I am.
by KCking on Oct 11, 2008 5:32 PM CDT 0 recs
I know
You can tell he is a die hard chiefs fan just by how mad he gets, i am just giving him a hard time
by InternetCreditOffers.com on
Oct 11, 2008 5:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I respect Crawford a lot
We butt heads a lot and sometimes we get pretty heated, but the fact that all of that are here are still this interested in the Chiefs in the darkest time in two decades tells that we all love the team.
We all see a light at the end of the tunnel, just the pessimists are absolutely conivinced its a freight train and want to run for their lives. :)
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 11, 2008 7:36 PM CDT
up
0 recs
This is true
I remember a couple years ago I was calling for Gary Pinkel’s head at Mizzou… I couldn’t wait for him to leave. I was so disappointed and angry when they resigned him to another contract. Now I’m happy that he’s still here.
by Vince D on Oct 11, 2008 5:50 PM CDT 0 recs
I'll Bite
Comparing college programs to the NFL is a crock of shit. You can’t do it. College is recruiting and NFL is evaluating talent and motivating players. Did anyone see a talented motivated team in Carolina besides the Panters? Herm cares more about being the guy who gives guys a chance than he does about winning. Also Herm had time in New York. TIme to evaluate talent and bring in his guys. What happened? He got ran out of town on a rail. The only team stupid enough to give him a job was us…and hell we gave up a draft pick too.
In college you can come up with a gimmick ie MIzzou’s offense and that will let you win if you get a system QB which is what Chase Daniel is…an extremely accurate system QB. It’s recruiting. Who knows where Pinkel would be if not for Chase and where Mangino would be if not for Reesing.
by ashleylat on Oct 11, 2008 6:02 PM CDT 0 recs
You miss the point
The point of the article was that organizations have benefited by not overreacting to bad seasons and sticking with coaches despite fan pressure.
There have been plenty of examples of that in the NFL.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 11, 2008 7:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
True
But there are also plenty of examples where coaches have had ample time and they haven’t got the job done but for arguments sake I’ll say that give him more time. How many years do you give him? 5 years? Herm got 5 in New York and drove that franchise down the crapper…oh wait they got better afer he left with a similar team.
I agree that one season doesn’t make the coach but in order to want him to say you have to be comfortable with the direction the team is going. I am okay with rebuilding but I don’t trust Herms ability to evaluate talent at all of the necessary positions. Can he find corners? Looks like it. Otherwise personally I don’t see it but maybe I’m wrong.
by ashleylat on
Oct 11, 2008 7:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Gary Pinkel
is also not sub.500 in his career.
Nice job completely glossing over the fact that he loses more games than he wins. DJ, if you’re going to frontpage something, make it something neutral, not more propaganda for the “SAVE HERMIE!” campaign.
Of which I’m still a member.
This is the week we’re going to turn it around! I can feel it!
Mizzou: Not desperately hanging on to a bygone winning tradition since 1900.
by Ridiculous Matt on Oct 11, 2008 6:08 PM CDT 0 recs
Chris never told me I had to post neutral articles
I didn’t write it, it was something I thought was interesting on another site. The writer made some very good points in my opinion.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 11, 2008 7:38 PM CDT
up
1 recs
Yeah
But that probably has more to do with playing young players, which result in a bad record. However, the team gains a lot of experience and they become better players. You know we are only one game behind the Chargers and tied with the Browns. It could be worse. We could be a team without any direction or more importantly upside. I always say its superbowl or bust. If we are not going to win the superbowl, then we should at least get high draft picks. We were always complaining in the 90s about mediocrity and drafting in the later part of each round. Before we were good in the 90s though we drafted two top 5 players in Derrick Thomas and Neil Smith. (remember?) Give him another draft and I’m sure we will be more open to some solid/young free agents come next offseason. O, and I think Herm could of made it to the superbowl had his kicker of made that blocked field goal in the playoffs against Pittsburgh.
by chiefsfan1384 on
Oct 11, 2008 7:51 PM CDT
up
0 recs
We can get all
the young talent you want, but if they are not coached up then what do you have? A team full of players that do not develop.
by Eric Allen on
Oct 11, 2008 8:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
What makes you think...
Gunther Cunningham, Chan Gaily, and Herm are such horrible coaches? Gunther has presided over a top 5 defense numerous times as a coach and Cowher said Gaily was one of the best offensive minds he has ever had in a coach. Herm doesn’t come across as good because you don’t like his press conferences. You think he is incompetent or doesn’t give a damn about the team. The fact of the matter is that it would be stupid to have a coaching change during a rebuilding period. Its like taking two steps back so you can take another two steps back. Cunningham and Gaily are the Xs and Os and Herm is the motivator. I think it will work out, YOU HAVE TO GIVE IT TIME!!! SUPERBOWLS ARE NOT WON OVER NIGHT!
by chiefsfan1384 on
Oct 12, 2008 2:50 AM CDT
up
0 recs
The problem with
the offense is Herm meddles in it, that is why the repeat of r2p2. Nothing has changed. I believe that if Chan, and Gun were left alone to run their areas of the team things may be different. I have no faith in Herm.
by Eric Allen on
Oct 12, 2008 8:41 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Firing Coaches
Personally, I’ve never been one to demand coaches at any level be fired within the first year or two of their job. I think that in college a coach deserves at least five years to do his job for evaluative purposes barring major NCAA infractions, scandals involving malfeasance on the part of the coaching staff (like with what happened with Baylor basketball a few years ago under Dave Bliss). Mangino had the team winning in his 4th season and competitive in almost every game his 5th season so I was glad to have him in the 6th season.
In pros because of how the NFL is set up (to encourage parity) the window is shorter. I think a coach deserves three or four years to demonstrate what he can do. The Belichick to Herm comparison is apt. Although being old enough to remember Belichick’s Cleveland stint I never recalled him being as questionable a decision maker as Herm in regards to lineups or playcalling…he played the best players he had and he managed the game well, he just had a very talent deficient team but he got the most he could out of them (including an 11-5 record his fourth year, which is better than any season Herm’s ever posted in his career). Then he got fired after his fifth season when age finally caught up with Earnest Byner, injuries wrecked every other running back on the roster and the rushing attack fell apart (plus, as I recall, he was clashing with management). I never had the impression of Belichick as a bad coach…I thought he was decent enough and a good game manager, but I didn’t find his firing too unfair at the time. I also thought he was a decent hire by New England when it was made (although I obviously had no clue that he’d be as good as he’s been). And of course by his second season in New England he’d taken a team from 5-11 to winning the Super Bowl and he’s never really looked back.
Herm, on the other hand, is a rather inept signal caller…has been for most of his career. I did think at the time he was let go that his firing might have been unfair as he’d had a couple of competitive years in there. Can’t say, though, that I really watched a lot of Jets football (or that of any team) since I was living overseas while Herm was coach there and the games didn’t come on until late (and I had to be up and on my way to work by 5:30 AM on Mondays). Once I got back to the States and watched the games, though, it became pretty obvious that he wasn’t a very good playcaller. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt through 2006 and 2007 though…pretty much until the point where he and Carl Peterson announced that an injury-prone Brodie Croyle was going to be the unquestioned starter at QB and no other QBs were brought in, despite a season in 2007 in which he couldn’t outperform his backup and a preseason in 2008 that looked a lot like his 2007 season. At that point I knew that Herm was also a pretty questionable evaluator of talent as well when your coach isn’t very good tactically and can’t identify the best players or biggest holes on his roster the team’s in serious trouble with that guy running things. And so far during the season he’s done nothing to disprove that. So I’m perfectly fine with calling for his head. He’s had seven full seasons as a head coach and all I see is a guy who can’t manage a game, who likes to look for diamonds in the rough, who isn’t that good at it outside of defensive backs, and who isn’t particularly focused on winning or losing football games. Pretty much what the New York press and the Jets fans I’ve come across have been saying about the guy for years…a team-killer.
Although I’m not as set on the team needing to fire Herm Edwards as I am on the team needing to fire Carl Peterson. Peterson has, by far, been the bigger problem here and I think Peterson needs to go first and the new GM should be allowed to decide what to do with Herm. If the new guy decides Herm should be given another year, fine…let Herm do his job with some actual pressure to keep his job (which Carl Peterson has never put on him, to Herm’s detriment). But somehow I doubt anyone’s going to come in to work on this team, look at what Herm’s achieved on the field and decide he’s part of the solution here.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on Oct 11, 2008 9:59 PM CDT 0 recs
Right...
those NY fans are a pretty objective bunch. All NY fans do is bitch and moan. They almost fired Cofflin the year before he won the superbowl. And Herm doesn’t even coordinate his offenses so I don’t see the point there. The signal calling really isn’t the problem this year, its the damn signal caller. You know what the difference between Belichick in Cleveland and New England is? Tom “lighting in a bottle 6th rounder” Brady. Give him one more offseason. You know way even Carl will survive if we suck nuts again next season.
by chiefsfan1384 on
Oct 12, 2008 3:00 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Actually
I don’t know that. I honestly believe that if the Chiefs don’t show a lot of improvement this year, Peterson’s gone. Because the owner’s stated explicitly that he won’t accept a team this year that’s not competitive and out of it by mid-season. And I’m willing to take the guy at his word because so far he’s given us no reason not to.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 12, 2008 9:06 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Interesting points being made about giving Herm his "three" years
and see where the team is at. But why did the same GM only give Gun two years with two .500 seasons?
"But what do I know, I’m like an empty room with a large ECHO"
by Lanier63 on Oct 11, 2008 10:16 PM CDT 0 recs
Because
He had an opportunity to get Vermeil.
by primetime 07 on
Oct 11, 2008 10:17 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Exactly
Vermeil had just won a Super Bowl two years before and wanted to coach again. Peterson seized the opportunity. Was nothing personal against Gun, but Gun really isn’t cut to be a head coach.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 11, 2008 10:32 PM CDT
up
0 recs
And Barry Switzer won one Super Bowl
Does that put him on the same field as Bill Cowher?
by primetime 07 on
Oct 11, 2008 11:37 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Switzer had a loaded team.
That was carry over much like 06.
by Eric Allen on Oct 11, 2008 11:47 PM CDT 0 recs
Firing coaches
I’ll show my age. I remember the coaching carousel that was the KC chiefs in the late 70’s and 80’s Paul Wiggin anyone? The greatness that was Frank “crash” Ganz. Those choices were CRAPTACULAR. The biggest mess though was not being patient and letting Marv Levy got to Buffalo and take his team to the superbowl numerous times!
Beware the coach carousel! Herm may not be a great tactician but, to me he is a straight up guy and is doing what he thinks is right. Lets be realistic this team is another solid draft away from filling some huge holes MLB,WR, TWO Olinemen and a pass rushing RDE. DELAYED GRATIFICATION revel in it because it is all we have til 2010 IMO
by dklogue1 on Oct 12, 2008 1:42 AM CDT 0 recs
Our biggest need
is o-line. Watch we will go defense first, then pick up lineman late in the draft. This year was an exception, because we had two first round picks.
by Eric Allen on
Oct 12, 2008 8:45 AM CDT
up
0 recs
When Herm came, defense was the biggest need
But its a myth that Herm only looks to the defense early in the draft.
2006:
1st round – Hali DE
2nd round – Pollard S
3rd round – Croyle QB
2007:
1st round – Bowe WR
2nd round – McBride DE
3rd round – Tyler DT
2008:
1st round – Dorsey DT
1st round – Albert LT
2nd round – Flowers CB
3rd round – Charles RB
3rd round – Cottam TE
3rd round – Morgan S
In the first three rounds, thats 7 defensive players and 5 offensive players. Considering the defense was in very poor shape when he arrived, I don’t think thats a crazy imbalance.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 12, 2008 2:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Unfortunately
Our defense is actually in worse shape now with “Herm’s” guys than they were in Vermeil’s last year before all those high draft picks.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 12, 2008 3:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Young players take time to devleop
You admit that every once in a while until you think its a good reason to jab at Herm.
by ChiefDJ on
Oct 12, 2008 6:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The real problem
I am going to post something that might make me really unpopular but I have thought about this for some time. If there are no real changes this year and Peterson is still here I think the Hunt family should sell the team to someone who is interested in running it as a real winning sports investment. They are too tied to Carl Peterson and they will never make any changes in this situation. I saw an interview with who I guess was the appointed Hunt family president and he was praising Carl Peterson as if he could do no wrong. Everybody thought highly of Lamar Hunt but Carl Peterson was his ‘blind’ spot and this has to come to an end so the Kansas City fans can have the team they deserve and get rid of non-performers in the management and coaching jobs as needed.
by 2blueyes on Oct 12, 2008 11:59 PM CDT 0 recs
Interview
Do you have a link for it? I’d be interested in checking it out.
Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting something evil.
by UCrawford on
Oct 13, 2008 7:22 AM CDT
up
0 recs
House cleaning (Carl, Herm, LJ,.....)
We just need to get rid of Carl, Herm, LJ, and those pathetic QB’s. Carl is slow to react. Edwards is an idiot. Croyle has no ball control unlike Huard and who the hell is that 3rd stringer? And LJ can’t make changes when needed. Up the middle, right into a pile of people. He’s too short and has no sense of direction. We have some good young prospects but we need some “good” veterans to show them how it’s done. It’s increasingly more difficult to watch. I got through part of the thrid quarter last game before I turned it off.
by Dead_b4_SB on Oct 13, 2008 2:53 AM CDT 0 recs












