Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ellenberger vs. Sanchez Heats Up, Hughes Talks Retirement

Positional Review: RB

# Name Pos Ht Wt Born Exp College Acquired
26 Michael Bennett RB 5-9 207 8/13/1978 7 Wisconsin T (NO)-06
31 Priest Holmes RB 5-9 213 10/7/1973 11 Texas UFA (BAL)-01
27 Larry Johnson RB 6-1 230 11/19/1979 5 Penn State D1-03
38 Marcus O'Keith RB 5-11 198 10/15/1983 R California CFA-07
39 Derrick Ross RB 5-10 226 12/29/1983 2 Tarleton State FA-06
21 Kolby Smith RB 5-11 219 12/15/1984 R Louisville D5a-07

In no particular order, we have the current crop of running backs that have stocked the Chiefs roster this summer. Before we delve into who goes where on the depth chart, I wanted to get one thing out of the way:

Priest Holmes is not coming back.

Do I know this for sure? No I do not. Do I hope that Priest could come back and play at a high level for the Chiefs? Of course. November 2005 will mark two years that Holmes has been out of football. As much as I admired Kyle Turley for attempting a comeback, its quite obvious from his attempt that "years" is entirely way too long to be removed from the game of football. I speculate that Holmes' prolonged stay in the IR has something to do with money but I'm not entirely sure. He's scheduled to earn $870,000 in 2007.

With or without Priest Holmes, the depth chart will still have Larry Johnson on the top of it. I think after that we have to throw a healthy Michael Bennett in at no. 2. After that, Marcus O'Keith will more than likely be on the practice squad at the no. 5 spot. The real question on the Chiefs RB depth chart is who will be no. 3, newly drafted Kolby Smith or NFL Europa (I hate that "a" on the end) MVP Derrick Ross?

The Chiefs have really taken a liking to Kolby Smith, who they just signed to a 3 year deal. But you can't deny Ross' "MVP" season either, whatever level it may have been accomplished at. Various people have mentioned that the Chiefs could be stock piling young RBs because they fear a holdout by Larry Johnson this summer. Another reason is because Michael Bennett has never been trusted by an NFL team to go the whole season. So the question of who the no. 3 guy should be is also a question of who can likely fill in at the no. 2 spot in 2007.

I previously mentioned that I figured Derrick Ross to be the no. 3 guy. After letting that thought digest and doing some more reading about Kolby Smith, I have to say that I am satisfied with either Ross or Smith at the no. 3 spot. I know. Its a cop out answer, right? I still haven't seen enough of these guys to say one way or the other.

I did enjoy this quote from Mike at Card Chronicle about Kolby Smith being drafted- "Smith caught everyone's attention as a sophomore with his dazzling runs during mop-up duty late in Louisville's many blowouts. Despite having a team loaded at running back with the likes of Eric Shelton, Lionel Gates and Michael Bush, coach Bobby Petrino said at the time that Smith was probably his most talented overall back."

If I had more knowledge of the level of competition at the NFL Europa level, I'd be more comfortable making a decision. Whoever the no. 3 RB for the Chiefs is, the battle will be fought in training camp in late July.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Marcus O'Keith?
Sorry, I don't understand why O'Keith would be #5 if Ross and Smith are both so back and forth for who's worth more? What do ya got on O'Keith?

BTW, speaking of Priest, even though I've given up hope of ever seeing him playing again, any word lately on his excuses?

-cw

by webby37 on Jun 25, 2007 9:33 AM CDT reply actions  

My point
is that O'Keith is going to be last this year. I have seen zip on O'Keith. He backed up Marshawn Lynch at Cal so his numbers and playing time are going to be deflated.

by Chris Thorman on Jun 25, 2007 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Welcome to the site
By the way. I haven't heard anything new on Priest Holmes, except for that article I read recently (that I can't find right now) about him sprinting through parking lots at Spurs games.

by Chris Thorman on Jun 25, 2007 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Priest
Priest is staying around and saying he is trying to comeback because he is then able to collect his bonus money and player salary. The Chiefs are nice enough to pay him this while they wait and see with Priest. To bad the media doesn't talk about that when they speak of Carl or the Hunts.

by Zach on Jun 25, 2007 12:52 PM CDT reply actions  

This running back post...
...was/is stellar. The site's looking really tight these days and your writing's clean and well-thought-out. Keep up the good work.

by bankmeister on Jun 25, 2007 2:06 PM CDT reply actions  

The more research
and commentary I read on Kolby Smith makes me think the Chiefs think he's a legit RB. Another guy overshadowed by his teammates.

by Chris Thorman on Jun 25, 2007 3:14 PM CDT reply actions  

As long as
we sign LJ to a long term extension we hopefully won't have to worry about back-up RBs.  LJ hasn't played as much in high school, college or the NFL as other big time backs have.  Hopefully this translates into more productive years in the league than these other guys.  LJ prides himself on proving people wrong and "running with a chip on his shoulder".  

by Joel Thorman on Jun 25, 2007 3:36 PM CDT reply actions  

in the nfl
you always need backup runningg backs. having one back carry the load is slowly becoming out of style, look at the final four teams last year. indianapolis (addai and rhodes) new england (maroney and dillon) new orleans (bush and mcalister) and chicago (benson and jones), they all split time. im not saying that LJ should split time, but i dont want him ever getting more than 380 carries or so. bennett should get 5-8 carries a game, same with smith/ross (most likely smith with ross on the practice squad again).

even though LJ is a stud, we still need all of the running backs we can get...

by rockchalk on Jun 25, 2007 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

mark my words
If for some crazy reason Carl decides to trade L.J. you will see the ghost of Priest Holmes return. Likeley to trade L.J.? Doubtful, but with Carl Peterson you can't rule anything out, even if L.J. is his "baby".
Steve Caskey

by swift347 on Jun 25, 2007 10:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Kansas City Chiefs blog! Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Calabaloo_small
Reviewing AP's Predictions For The Chiefs 2011 Season
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Crennelgatoradebathposterizedrough_small
Brian Daboll: Another Perspective
Dxmcc_copy_small
Why Drafting Robert Griffin Is Not Optional For The Kansas City Chiefs

Recent FanPosts

Dbs_oak_991_10_23_11_small
10 Bold Predictions For The Chiefs 2012-2013 Season
10452014-small_small
My Favorite Chiefs- Defense (1980's-Present Edition)
Small
Prospect Mockery. 02/15/2012
Small
Expectations for SB under Cassel/Orton
Winning_me_small
Chief Concern
Small
Trade Scenario with DT Glenn Dorsey
Nfl_u_okoye_200_small
Kansas City=Elite Defense?
Supernova1007_small
Triplettes
Dbs_oak_991_10_23_11_small
What Stanford Routt-Chiefs Visit Means
Small
What if.........

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

23247_617116905_1805_n_small Chris Thorman

Headshot_small Joel Thorman

Editors

Matt_ssv_pic_small_small Matt Conner

Stag_20silhouette_small stagdsp

288-chiefstexans0944_sp_8-15-09_jfs woodman212

Lips-rhps_small upamtn

Contributors

Small Jon Yoon

Kc_ny_small NJ Chiefs Fan

Phoenix_by_melen_small KaloPhoenix

N1358340181_30185582_5800_small Flowers24

Dirkness_small HisDirkness

Cassel_small Steve_in_RI