The Kansas City Chiefs Lose to the San Diego Chargers in Typical Fashion
Chiefs lose their fifth home game of the season to the San Diego Chargers, 24 to 10. The Chiefs only managed ten points. Tony Gonzalez's 140 yard performance was overshadowed by four KC turnovers. The best you can say about this game was that we did not have our normal starting quarterback or normal starting running back in the game. The Chiefs starting left tackle, Damion McIntosh, went down in the fourth quarter with a knee injury, prompting backup Will Svitek to step in and get run over.
All in all, a pathetic performance by Kansas City. At best, I think we're looking at six wins this year.
My defensive player and offensive player of the game would be Jared Allen. Two sacks on defense and a diving catch in the end zone for Kansas City's only touchdown provided the few highlights of the game.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
well,
that's about the best silver lining i can come up with.
another disgusting performance at the end of the first half absolutely making my skin crawl. but a pretty good game from k-smith. that's all i can manage for now...sucks to have expectations reduced to nothing with several weeks of the season left.
Yea, Top 10 pick!
Brodie might get killed by our O-line the remainder of the season, if he comes back.
Huard will drag D-Bo across the middle and launch a high pass that gets his head knocked off.
And, we will run Kolby into the ground.
I am afraid to want to see these 3 young studs get ruined this year. Especially since Arrowhead has been defiled. I HAVE NEVER seen 1 Arrowhead drive as empty as it was today. Disgraceful!
Tony, Croyle, Kolby, D-Bo, DJ, Donnie, and the dominant Jared Allen are all we have to pin our future hopes on, and I don't want them to get destroyed by our coaches.
ARROWHEAD near EMPTY! I have nothing else to say.
The question is
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 4:46 PM CST reply actions
If Solari is around next year...
I think we have had only 2 of all of those plays called be successful this year. With the line of 3 years ago, those calls would have worked this season.
by DThomasReigns on Dec 2, 2007 7:05 PM CST up reply actions
Surprised?
Damon Huard is bad at playing quarterback.
LaDainain Tomlinson is very good.
Ty Law is old.
Our O-line sucks. Maybe drafting will help, maybe not.
Herm Edwards has enough reasons/excuses to get out of responsibility for this one.
Here's the list. Let's get it started.
Dolphins
Rams
Patriots (by way of Niners' first round pick, thanks, Goodell)
Jets
Falcons
Raiders/Chiefs (split record, split head-to-head, split division, if they hold on against the donks)
So..
QB (Brohm/Woodson/Brennan)
QB (Brohm/Woodson/Brennan)
McFadden (I hate you, Bellichek)
RB
QB
?
this draft
Following
This is the absolute best offensive 1st round class in years. And we're going to be taking either an offensive linemen that won't be quality for years, or a cornerback.
I know it's common sense. But still... such wasted potential.
We could trade LJ
I think Kolby is good, not LJ good, but young and Priest'ish enough to carry our run game with Boomer leading the way.
I would much rather have a 1st round LT/CB and another 1st rounder, instead of a 1st round LT/CB and "RocaAttitude" ruining the Offense.
by DThomasReigns on Dec 2, 2007 6:35 PM CST up reply actions
Blocking
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 7:27 PM CST up reply actions
Trade LJ
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 6:29 PM CST reply actions
Trade Up
You're not going to trade a couple of 5th round picks for a first rounder, but maybe we can move up a round or two to get a better quality player.
Its rare for the late round draft picks to make the team when there are only one per round. How many of the 8 or 9 late round picks the Chiefs got via trades and such would end up making the team if they dont trade up?
Lets cash some in and try to get a couple extra 3rd or 4th rounders where quality O-linemen for the future can still be found
by DJ @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 7:38 PM CST reply actions
Late round
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 7:42 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah
by Chris Thorman on Dec 2, 2007 7:48 PM CST up reply actions
True
You only get to keep so many guys anyway.
If we draft 10 guys on the second day, but only have room to keep 3 or 4, what does it hurt to try to trade up for a chance at better quality guys?
by DJ @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 10:31 PM CST up reply actions
You know
If we kept the pick, traded LJ, and packaged it with a pick, couldn't we theoretically get DMac AND Long? Wouldn't that be a pretty strong statement that we're committed to winning?
Those contracts would definitely
by Chris Thorman on Dec 2, 2007 8:28 PM CST up reply actions
Should we
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 8:33 PM CST up reply actions
Yet
Just sayin'.
by Ridiculous Matt on Dec 2, 2007 9:18 PM CST up reply actions
That Would Be
by Ridiculous Matt on Dec 2, 2007 9:26 PM CST up reply actions
Surely
by Eric @ Arrowhead Pride on Dec 2, 2007 9:56 PM CST up reply actions

by 























